Question Time AU

Question Time

Senate

Monday 14 September 2026 · 11 questions

Summarised by AI in reported speech, not a transcript. Read the official Hansard · OpenAustralia

At a glance

Main topics

Cost of Living and Wages, Cybersafety and Digital Duty of Care, Productivity Growth, Gas Export Tax and Reservation, Global Economy and AAA Rating, AI Data Centres and Regulation, Housing Loans and Rent, Migration and Productivity, Labour Market and Underutilisation, Private Health Insurance Rebate for Seniors

Topics (select to filter)

Questions and answers

Cost of Living

Background

Former ACTU head Bill Kelty criticized the government's economic management, stating that real wages are falling and housing affordability is worsening due to rising interest rates.

Question

The senator asked whether the Prime Minister agreed with Mr Kelty's assessment that Australians cannot pay their bills because real wages are declining while interest rates rise. She further asked if the Prime Minister agreed with Mr Kelty's criticism of the Treasurer's focus on wage share rather than real wage growth, and his analysis that falling property prices do not equate to improved affordability.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister acknowledged the pressure on households from global shocks, including the pandemic, conflicts in Europe and the Middle East, and energy market disruptions. She highlighted government actions such as free doctor visits, cheaper medicines, support for first-home buyers, and free TAFE. Regarding wages, she noted that annual wage growth had exceeded three per cent for 16 consecutive quarters, unemployment was at a half-century low, and 1.3 million jobs had been created. She emphasized that the national minimum wage had increased by more than $12,000 annually, a rise of over 30 per cent, and that pay rises were delivered for early educators and aged care workers. On housing, she stated the government was implementing tax cuts and ensuring fair conditions for investors and first-home buyers to ensure equity.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Cybersafety

Background

The government announced a digital duty of care to safeguard youth against online social media risks and provide adults with greater internet choice.

Question

The senator asked how the digital duty of care would make the internet safer for children and why basic online safety standards were important. He also asked about responses from community groups and faith-based organizations, and whether there were any risks to the government's plan.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister explained that tech companies would have a legally enforceable duty to prevent harm, protecting children from harmful content and features across all online services. She noted that users would gain choice over their feeds, including the ability to opt out of algorithms. She cited examples of online harms, such as AI-generated nude images of children, chatbots promoting disordered eating, and grooming on platforms like Roblox. She stated that community groups, including Equality Australia and the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, welcomed the duty of care and wanted parliament to go further. She emphasized that the government was consulting on the standards to ensure they were robust and would work with parliament to implement them.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q3 Jane Hume Liberal VIC 2:12 pm

Productivity

Background

The Business Council of Australia reported that labour productivity had declined by an average of 0.1 per cent annually under the government, predicting the 2020s would be the worst decade for productivity growth since 1960.

Question

The senator asked what rate of productivity growth the government was assuming across the forward estimates. She followed up by asking if the government agreed with the BCA's calculation that average productivity growth would only be 0.2 per cent annually even if Treasury's 1.2 per cent assumption was met. Finally, she asked what Treasury currently estimated average labour productivity growth to be for the 2020s, and what rate would be needed to make up the lost productivity.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister acknowledged productivity as a long-standing challenge for governments of both persuasions since the Hawke-Keating era. She noted that productivity had fallen for seven quarters before the pandemic. She stated that the budget included 15 productivity reforms aimed at attracting investment and cutting regulatory costs by $10.2 billion annually. These measures included reducing red tape, building a single national market, modernizing energy markets, and unlocking data and AI opportunities. She confirmed that the long-run assumption for productivity growth was 1.2 per cent, which had been revised down in the first term based on Treasury advice. She did not provide a specific figure for the rate required to make up for lost productivity, instead focusing on the government's reform agenda.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Energy

Background

The government proposed a 20 per cent gas reservation instead of a 25 per cent gas export tax, with potential carve-outs for corporations.

Question

The senator asked why the government was prioritizing gas corporations over Australians and climate safety by proposing a weak gas reservation instead of a substantial export tax. She asked if the government planned to deal with the Coalition to benefit gas corporations rather than introducing a tax that would raise $17 billion annually and lower energy prices. She also asked if the minister acknowledged that gas export taxes were fundamentally broken.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Tim Ayres

The minister described the gas reservation plan as the most significant reform in Australian gas history, designed to ensure sovereign resilience, industrial competitiveness, and lower prices for households and industry. He argued that the reservation would secure sufficient gas for Australian manufacturing and heavy industry, supporting blue-collar jobs. He characterized the gas tax as merely a revenue measure, whereas the reservation was a structural reform to ensure future competitiveness. He stated that the reform placed a heavy obligation on gas producers in the national interest and would be brought to parliament.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Economy

Background

The IMF downgraded global growth and upgraded inflation due to the war in the Middle East, impacting Australian households.

Question

The senator asked for an update on global economic conditions and their impact on Australia. She also asked why retaining the AAA credit rating was important and how the government balanced spending with cost-of-living relief. Finally, she asked about the government's approach to supporting Australians while growing the economy.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Katy Gallagher

The minister reported that the IMF downgraded global growth to 3.1 per cent and revised up inflation to 4.4 per cent, driven by energy prices and supply chain disruptions from the Middle East conflict. She stated that the Australian economy had grown 0.4 per cent over the June quarter and 2.1 per cent over the year, matching or exceeding other advanced economies. She highlighted strong employment growth, low debt-to-GDP ratios, and historically low unemployment at 4.5 per cent. Regarding the AAA rating, she noted that Standard and Poor's reaffirmed it, endorsing the government's tax and saving reforms and modest debt levels. She emphasized that responsible budget management, including returning revenue windfalls to the budget, was key to maintaining fiscal discipline while delivering targeted relief such as cheaper medicines and tax cuts.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Data Centres

Background

New York and Texas imposed moratoriums on AI data centres, and tech CEOs called for regulation due to catastrophic risks.

Question

The senator asked when the government would introduce a moratorium on new AI data centres or ensure forthcoming AI legislation applied retrospectively to protect Australians. She pressed for a commitment to retrospective laws or a moratorium, citing concerns that corporations were rushing projects before guardrails were in place.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister stated that AI had enormous potential benefits and risks, requiring agreed guidelines for deployment. She confirmed that the government would legislate Australian standards for AI, ensuring large data centres met minimum requirements for energy, water, and location. She emphasized the need to keep Australians safe while spreading the benefits of the technology. She did not commit to a moratorium or retrospective legislation, instead focusing on the development of standards and guardrails to ensure safe rollout.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q7 Andrew Bragg Liberal NSW 2:36 pm

Housing

Background

NAB reported that loans to owner-occupiers were down 15 per cent since the budget.

Question

The senator asked if the government was aware that its taxes were reducing home loans and homeownership opportunities. He followed up by asking if the minister stood by the claim that rents would rise by only $2 a week, given projections of $200-a-week rises in Sydney. He also asked who benefited from the $77 billion in new housing taxes.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister countered that loan approvals had risen by 8.9 per cent compared with the previous year, reaching their peak since 2021, while commencements grew by 15.2 per cent. She stated that more first-home buyers were entering the market under the government, with over 490,000 accessing it and 260,000 using a five per cent deposit. Regarding rents, she affirmed that Treasury modelling indicated weekly increases of less than $2, noting transitional arrangements for negative gearing. She did not directly answer who benefited from the taxes, instead focusing on the increase in supply and first-home buyer activity.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 1 point of order raised

Q8 Tyron Whitten One Nation WA 2:41 pm

Migration

Background

Reserve Bank analysis suggested lack of capital deepening held back productivity, and One Nation blamed high immigration for capital shallowing.

Question

The senator asked if the government accepted that high immigration caused capital shallowing and was a material cause of the productivity slump. He followed up by citing Canada's experience with cutting immigration to boost per capita growth, and asked if the government supported One Nation's plan to reduce net overseas migration to negative for three years and then cap it at 130,000.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Katy Gallagher

The minister rejected the claim that migration caused productivity issues, stating that productivity challenges were common across advanced economies. She noted that the government had cut net overseas migration by roughly 45 per cent from the post-COVID peak. She emphasized that the budget included 15 measures to drive productivity, including approvals reform and technology adoption. She stated that the government would not support One Nation's plan, citing feedback from business groups, farmers, and healthcare providers that such a policy would have a detrimental impact on economic growth and essential services.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Economy

Background

ABS data showed underutilization increased from 1.35 million in June 2022 to 1.68 million in July 2026.

Question

The senator asked why people could not find enough work under the government, citing rising underutilization. He followed up by asking if the government had failed to keep its promise of a paid job for everyone who wants one, given that unemployment had risen to 4.5 per cent, up from 3.4 per cent. He also asked why the government maintained high immigration levels when it allegedly took work from Australians.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Katy Gallagher

The minister stated that unemployment was at historically low levels, though she misspoke by saying 412 per cent before correcting the context. She highlighted that 1.3 million jobs had been created, with three out of five being full-time and five out of six in the private sector. She noted that the participation rate had risen from 66.3 per cent to 66.9 per cent, near record highs, and that the gender pay gap was at a record low. She argued that the labour market was resilient despite global uncertainty. Regarding migration, she stated that Australia had always relied on overseas workers to supplement the domestic workforce and that One Nation's policy would damage businesses and services.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Private Health Insurance

Background

The government intended to reduce the extra private health insurance rebate for senior Australians to finance aged care.

Question

The senator asked if it was compassionate to expect pensioners to sacrifice holidays and meals to pay for the policy, given that $1.6 billion of the $3 billion savings came from pensioners. She also asked if the minister was aware that the Health Minister had previously directed elderly Australians to use the rebate for cochlear implant replacements before announcing the cut. Finally, she asked if the government accepted that officials called the policy the 'least worst option'.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Jenny McAllister

The minister stated that the government's priority was directing tax dollars to aged care services, which required bringing older Australians' private health insurance rebate back to the same rate as everyone else's. She acknowledged the decision was difficult and unwelcome but necessary to fund aged care beds and packages. She criticized the Coalition for having no costed aged care policies. Regarding cochlear implants, she noted that implants were funded through public hospitals, and processor upgrades were available through the NDIS and Veterans' Affairs. She confirmed that over-65s would still receive up to 24 per cent subsidy on premiums, the same as the rest of the population, based on income rather than age.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 1 point of order raised

Early Childhood Education and Care

Background

The government signed the final Building Early Education Fund agreement with the Northern Territory.

Question

The senator asked what the milestone of signing agreements with all states and territories meant for children and families, and how the fund would help access quality early education. She also asked how the investment would make a practical difference and if there were any obstacles to addressing infrastructure challenges.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Jess Walsh

The minister stated that the fund was investing $1 billion to build and expand early education centres in disadvantaged areas. The final agreement with the Northern Territory included $8.7 million for a new 60-place centre in Karama and another in Tennant Creek. Across Australia, 42 projects were delivering more than 2,500 additional places, with two-thirds in regional and rural communities. Many centres were co-located with schools to facilitate smooth transitions for children and convenience for parents. She criticized the Coalition for cutting disadvantaged children off from childcare and One Nation for opposing qualified educators and pay rises.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Other debates this day (23)

Artificial Intelligence General Debate Cost of Living Matter of Public Importance Criminal Code Amendment (National Sport Integrity Offences) Bill 2026; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Criminal Code Amendment (National Sport Integrity Offences) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Customs Amendment (Safeguard Inquiries) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Customs Amendment (Safeguard Inquiries) Bill 2026; Third Reading Bill Debate · listed Denman, Ms Kay Janet Condolence · listed Energy Take Note Debate Environment and Other Legislation Amendment (Fast Tracking Coal, Gas and Oil Projects) Bill 2026; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Environment and Other Legislation Amendment (Fast Tracking Coal, Gas and Oil Projects) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Major Sporting Events (Indicia and Images) Protection Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Major Sporting Events (Indicia and Images) Protection Amendment Bill 2026; Third Reading Bill Debate · listed Migration Take Note Debate Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; In Committee Bill Debate Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Third Reading Bill Debate · listed Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes No. 2) Bill 2026, Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2026; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes No. 2) Bill 2026, Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) (Extending Support and Strengthening Safety) Bill 2026; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) (Extending Support and Strengthening Safety) Bill 2026; In Committee Bill Debate Water Matter of Public Importance Answers to Questions Take Note Debate Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) (Extending Support and Strengthening Safety) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate

Divisions on this day (15)

1. Artificial Intelligence Not passed 14–24 2. Consideration of Legislation Not passed 19–33 3. Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; In Committee Passed 31–22 4. Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; In Committee Not passed 21–32 5. Major Sporting Events (Indicia and Images) Protection Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading Passed 31–18 6. Major Sporting Events (Indicia and Images) Protection Amendment Bill 2026; Third Reading Passed 31–18 7. Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) (Extending Support and Strengthening Safety) Bill 2026; Second Reading Not passed 12–25 8. Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account) (Extending Support and Strengthening Safety) Bill 2026; Second Reading Not passed 24–35 9. Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference Passed 35–19 10. Intergenerational Trust Fund for the People of the Republic of Nauru; Order for the Production of Documents Passed 35–19 11. Health Care; Order for the Production of Documents Not passed 23–28 12. Digital Seller Underperformance Policy; Order for the Production of Documents Passed 32–18 13. Cost of Living Not passed 22–32 14. Water Not passed 16–24 15. Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference Not passed 25–31