Question Time AU

Take Note Debate

Migration

Senate · Monday 14 September 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senator Tyron Whitten moved a motion to take note of the Minister for Finance's answer regarding migration and productivity. Whitten argued that mass immigration was suppressing productivity through capital shallowing, citing Reserve Bank of Australia findings and comparisons with Canada and New Zealand. He outlined One Nation's policy to reduce low-productivity visas while maintaining regional labour programs. The Senate agreed to the question.

Outcome

The question was agreed to.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Whitten argued that the government's migration settings were harming productivity and living standards. Whitten cited the Reserve Bank of Australia's identification of capital shallowing as a factor suppressing productivity due to investment not keeping pace with new labour. Whitten noted that Canada and New Zealand had reduced mass immigration and seen productivity recover. Whitten stated that One Nation's policy would slash low-productivity visas and remove overstayers, aiming for negative net migration initially. However, he clarified that programs supporting rural communities, such as working holiday-makers and the PALM scheme, would be maintained.