Larissa Waters
Australian Greens Senator for QLD
Currently sitting
Photo: The Australian Greens, CC BY-SA 2.5 au, via Wikimedia Commons
Seat and party history (2)
- Australian Greens - QLD (Senate) - 6 Sep 2018 to present
- Australian Greens - QLD (Senate) - 1 Jul 2011 to 18 Jul 2017
- Seat and party records: OpenAustralia member data.
Contact
Office: (07) 3367 0566
Level 2, 251 Given Terrace, Paddington QLD 4064
Office details: Parliament of Australia, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Contact details on aph.gov.au Profile on OpenAustraliaThese counts cover what is on this site only. They do not measure electorate work or committee work.
Compared with other members
Larissa Waters compared with all 76 sitting senators.
Questions asked in Question Time
Higher than 96% of senators- This member
- 26
- Average
- 10.4
- Median
- 10
Debates spoken in
Higher than 86% of senators- This member
- 68
- Average
- 44.8
- Median
- 40
Votes cast
Higher than 88% of senators- This member
- 1079
- Average
- 743.0
- Median
- 730
Share of divisions voted in
Higher than 86% of senators- This member
- 96%
- Average
- 69%
- Median
- 69%
Read these with care
- The median is the middle member: half did more, half did less. It is less affected by a few very active members than the average.
- Ministers answer questions rather than ask them, and the presiding officers rarely vote, so their patterns differ.
- Government backbenchers are often given arranged "Dorothy Dixer" questions, which raises their question counts.
- Votes only record ayes and noes, so a missed vote cannot be told apart from a pair (an agreed absence).
- Counts cover only what is on this site, and do not measure electorate or committee work. New members have less history.
Question Time
Question from Larissa Waters
The senator asked why the government was adopting strict enforcement measures similar to US ICE squads and why it was not working with the Greens to prioritize family reunion and humanitarian obligations.
Background: The Immigration Minister announced plans to return to Abbott-era policies, including new detention centers and compliance officers to enforce visa conditions.
Answer from Murray Watt
The minister dismissed the comparison to ICE as predictable political maneuvering. He stated that the government's policy ensures those without valid visas do not remain in Australia, noting that previous changes diverted resources to criminal deportations rather than visa overstayers. In response to supplementary questions about bridging visas, he argued that some visa holders abuse the system by hopping between visas, undermining public confidence. He rejected the suggestion that the government's policy was influenced by One Nation, citing significant differences in migration numbers, and emphasized maintaining social harmony and a sustainable migration system.
Question from Larissa Waters
The senator asked why the government was prioritizing gas corporations over Australians and climate safety by proposing a weak gas reservation instead of a substantial export tax. She asked if the government planned to deal with the Coalition to benefit gas corporations rather than introducing a tax that would raise $17 billion annually and lower energy prices. She also asked if the minister acknowledged that gas export taxes were fundamentally broken.
Background: The government proposed a 20 per cent gas reservation instead of a 25 per cent gas export tax, with potential carve-outs for corporations.
Answer from Tim Ayres
The minister described the gas reservation plan as the most significant reform in Australian gas history, designed to ensure sovereign resilience, industrial competitiveness, and lower prices for households and industry. He argued that the reservation would secure sufficient gas for Australian manufacturing and heavy industry, supporting blue-collar jobs. He characterized the gas tax as merely a revenue measure, whereas the reservation was a structural reform to ensure future competitiveness. He stated that the reform placed a heavy obligation on gas producers in the national interest and would be brought to parliament.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked when the government would act on recommendations to improve justice system responses to sexual assault, including trauma-informed training and access to independent lawyers. She also asked if a new review of consent education would implement expert recommendations for clearer language around sex and consent for young people.
Background: The Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commissioner's annual report highlighted system failures, and the government had received Law Reform Commission recommendations for 18 months.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister stated that the government is undertaking a whole-of-government effort, including consulting on the second action plan for the National Plan to End Violence against Women and Children. She noted that Minister Rowland has been implementing recommendations through the Standing Council of Attorneys-General. Regarding the consent education review, she said the government is keen to see outcomes that ensure support is relevant and useful for young people, which will feed into the second action plan. She highlighted that over $4 billion has been invested in women's safety and the national legal access partnership.
Question from Larissa Waters
The senator asked how approving fossil fuel projects was consistent with the government's commitment to a safe climate. She referenced the Prime Minister's comments on the Nepal glacier collapse disaster and the approval of the Beetaloo gas fracking project amidst warnings of a super El Nino.
Background: The government approved an extension to a coal mine in Queensland on the same day the UN warned that global warming might exceed 1.12 degrees. The senator noted 37 coal and gas projects had been approved since May 2022.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister acknowledged the seriousness of climate change and the El Nino event. She criticized the Greens for voting with Tony Abbott and others against climate action in the past. The minister stated that 146 renewable energy projects had been approved as of 7 September 2026. Regarding the Saraji mine, she clarified it was not a new mine and was covered by the safeguard mechanism with a baseline declining to zero by 2050. She emphasized the government's commitment to transitioning the economy to lower emissions through thoughtful policy.
Question from Larissa Waters
The senator asked how the minister could support weak gambling reforms that protect corporate profits rather than delivering evidence-based policy. She also questioned the government's decision to work with the Liberals on NDIS cuts affecting 241,000 people.
Background: The question addressed reports of a deal between Labor and the Liberals to pass gambling reforms that did not fully implement the Murphy report recommendations, and allegations of NDIS cuts.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that the government's focus is on protecting Australians and that negotiation with the opposition is necessary to pass legislation in the Senate. She listed specific measures in the reforms, including bans on gambling advertising during live sports, radio ads during school hours, and stadium and jersey advertising. Regarding the NDIS, she argued that the government's changes are necessary to ensure the scheme's long-term sustainability. She rejected the characterisation of the government's actions as favouring corporations, stating that the government is motivated by delivering real change for Australians facing cost-of-living pressures.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked why the government continued to subsidize fossil fuel industries with the Fuel Tax Credit scheme despite calls for its elimination. She later asked why mining handouts were prioritized over NDIS cuts and how the scheme aligned with climate targets.
Background: The member criticized the government for providing billions in fuel tax credits to mining corporations while cutting NDIS support.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister stated that the government had not changed its view on the diesel fuel tax credit scheme, which had operated for a long time. She argued that the government was focused on delivering a transformation to a renewable energy future, reducing reliance on fossil fuels, and investing in storage and batteries. Regarding the NDIS, she stated that changes were necessary to slow the growth of the scheme, which had risen from $13 billion to over $50 billion annually and was projected to exceed $70 billion, making it unsustainable without intervention.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked if the minister would commit to properly assessing the climate impacts of the Browse gas project on the Great Barrier Reef, citing evidence that emissions would contribute to coral bleaching. She questioned whether the government would protect the reef or approve more fossil fuel projects.
Background: Woodside's proposed Browse gas project was under assessment, with critics citing its potential to release 1.6 billion tonnes of carbon pollution and harm the Great Barrier Reef.
Answer from Murray Watt
The minister stated that the project was currently under assessment under the EPBC Act and Western Australian law, with a final decision pending regulatory advice. He noted that it would be inappropriate to comment further before a decision was made. He emphasised that the government assesses projects on their merits and has approved over 140 renewable energy projects. He also mentioned that the government was presenting evidence to the World Heritage Committee to demonstrate the reef is well-managed.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked whether the government accepted that rising support for One Nation was due to Labor's lack of a serious plan to address the cost of living. She highlighted disparities in wealth and the limited immediate relief for welfare recipients.
Background: Criticism was directed at the government for perceived inadequate support for low-income earners and renters in the budget.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister rejected the premise, stating that the government had delivered measures including urgent care clinics, energy price relief, and wage increases for various sectors. She invited the Greens to support the proposed tax changes and criticized their approach as divisive. The minister emphasized that the government was committed to addressing cost-of-living challenges and urged the Greens to focus on opposing conservative policies rather than attacking the government.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked if the Prime Minister believed the ACTU did not understand its own proposal for a gas export tax. She further asked why the government rejected taxing gas giants to fund services like housing and health, instead choosing to cut funding for 160,000 families on the NDIS. The member also questioned why the budget cut $4 billion from climate programs while maintaining $47 billion for fossil fuel subsidies.
Background: The Prime Minister had dismissed the ACTU's proposal for a 25 per cent gas export tax as a slogan, despite the ACTU estimating it would raise $17.1 billion in 2023-24.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that the government did not need a lecture on the trade union movement and defended the gas reservation policy as superior to a tax. She argued that the reservation ensured producers supplied Australia first, delivering lower and more stable prices and protecting manufacturing jobs. The minister described the current situation as the worst global energy crisis in history, justifying decisions to ensure access to diesel, jet fuel, petrol, and fertiliser. She declined to engage with the premise that the government was keeping the gas industry happy, instead focusing on the necessity of managing the energy shock.
Question from Larissa Waters
The senator asked why the government had not insisted that suppliers immediately lower prices to pass on the excise cut or introduced stronger anti-price-gouging laws. She questioned the delay in relief reaching consumers.
Background: Fuel prices had risen significantly since the start of the conflict, and the government had announced a halving of the fuel excise.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister explained that the excise cut would flow through to prices as contracted supplies were purchased, which might take some time. She stated that the ACCC was monitoring prices to ensure reductions were realized at the pump. In response to supplementary questions about direct cost-of-living relief and AUKUS, she emphasized targeted assistance for businesses and households, noting that the budget would reflect current economic circumstances. She firmly rejected the suggestion that the government would withdraw from AUKUS.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked why the government was refusing to fund states to introduce free public transport to reduce urban fuel demand and assist regional fuel security.
Background: Victoria and Tasmania announced plans for free public transport to reduce fuel demand, while New South Wales cited cost barriers. No federal funding announcement was made at National Cabinet.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister welcomed state initiatives for lower-cost public transport, noting that reduced urban fuel usage helps address regional distribution challenges. She outlined the government's substantial package, including fuel excise reductions and heavy vehicle charge changes, as the primary response to high prices. The minister also criticised the Greens for not condemning Iran's actions in the conflict.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked whether the government was prepared to implement a levy on gas exports of no less than 25 per cent to address windfall profits during the Middle East conflict.
Background: The member referenced polling showing public support for taxing gas exports and the Greens' legislative numbers.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated the government's immediate priority was fuel security rather than tax changes. She noted previous reforms to the petroleum resources rent tax and emphasised the need to secure supply amidst global instability.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked whether Australia was at war. She also questioned when and how the US requested Australia's deployment, accusing the government of bowing to US demands, and asked why there was a double standard in protecting Australians in the Gulf versus those in Lebanon.
Background: Australia deployed military assets to the Gulf region amid escalating conflict.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister clarified that Australia was engaged in collective self-defence to protect civilians and Australians in Gulf nations under attack by Iran, not taking offensive action against Iran. She stated the deployment was in response to a written request from the United Arab Emirates to help defend against missile and drone attacks. She rejected the accusation of bowing to US demands, asserting that actions were taken in Australia's national interest to protect civilians in locations where Australians were present.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked if the deployment was requested by the US administration and how the decision was made. She further questioned how weapons could be used solely for defensive purposes and why Iranian visa holders were being excluded while resources were committed to the conflict.
Background: The member questioned the government's decision to deploy missiles, aircraft, and personnel to the Gulf, alleging it aligned with US and Israeli interests in an illegal war.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister asserted that the deployment was defensive, responding to requests from Gulf countries to protect civilians and infrastructure, including Australians. She emphasized that Australia was not taking offensive action against Iran. Regarding the visa restrictions, she deferred to the Minister for Immigration, stating that the government's view on the Iranian regime was clear. She criticized the Greens' narrative as inconsistent with the facts.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked what the government would do to stop corporations from profiteering off the war and why the government would not increase the tax rate on gas exports to 25 per cent or higher.
Background: The member raised concerns about gas companies profiteering from the Middle East conflict and criticized the Petroleum Resources Rent Tax (PRRT) as being easily gamed by the industry.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that her primary focus was on the safety of Australians in the Middle East. She characterized Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism and emphasized the importance of international humanitarian law. Regarding the supplementary question on taxation, the minister raised a point of order, arguing it was outside her portfolio, but noted that the oil and gas sector paid nearly $12 billion in levies during 2023-24. She referred questions on price gouging to the Minister representing the Treasurer, noting the Treasurer had worked with the ACCC on this issue.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked whether the government would explicitly denounce the Israeli airstrike on an elementary school in Iran that caused more than 100 child fatalities.
Background: Reports emerged of civilian casualties, including children, from Israeli bombing in Iran.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that the government mourns the loss of civilian life and continues to call for the observance of international humanitarian law. She declined to issue a specific condemnation of the strike, maintaining that the government's position is principled and consistent. In response to supplementary questions regarding the legality of the strikes and the use of Australian bases, she affirmed that Australia did not participate in the strikes and that the issue of compliance with international law is for the US and Israel to outline. She also noted that other countries in the region were being attacked by Iran.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked if the government would cut tax handouts for property investors to help renters and first-home buyers. She followed up by asking when the government would scrap the capital gains tax discount, noting its disproportionate benefit to the wealthy. Finally, she asked if the government would cut fuel tax credits for mining companies to fund cost-of-living relief.
Background: The member asked whether the government would use the upcoming budget to cut tax concessions for property investors, citing record credit growth and inflation concerns.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister stated that the government's tax policies on housing had not changed and that the focus remained on increasing supply through initiatives like the Housing Australia Future Fund. She noted that tax reform work was underway, including instant deductions, superannuation changes, and tax cuts, but confirmed that positions on housing tax and fuel tax credits remained unchanged. She emphasized that the government was delivering on election commitments rather than introducing new tax cuts for investors.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked how the minister could justify approving the enlargement of a thermal coal mine in Queensland and considering further oil and gas drilling off the Great Ocean Road given the worsening climate crisis.
Background: The question highlighted recent extreme weather events across Australia, including cyclones, floods, and bushfires, attributing them to climate change driven by fossil fuels.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister referred the question to the Minister for the Environment and Water for detailed EPBC approval information. She stated that the government was committed to a responsible economic transition, acknowledging the historical reliance on fossil fuels. The minister argued that building export industries and skills for lower carbon goods was necessary for a responsible transition. She noted that the government had approved 130 new renewable energy projects since 2022, including solar farms, wind farms, and batteries, and emphasised that the energy transition would take many years.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked when the government would increase funding for frontline family and domestic support services, specialist sexual violence services, and prevention work.
Background: The member highlighted that 43 women had been killed by family violence that year and that demand for services was outstripping funding.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister stated the government had invested over $4 billion in programs to end gender-based violence and $3.9 billion in legal services. She outlined a multi-faceted approach including housing policy, economic equality measures, and women's health packages. Regarding the funding mapping framework, she indicated that strategic coordination of investments was ongoing and would be discussed at an upcoming women's ministerial meeting.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked if the government's continued support for coal and gas exports was the reason for withdrawing the COP bid. She further asked when the government would outline a roadmap to transition away from fossil fuels, noting Australia's signing of the Belem declaration. Finally, she questioned why the Prime Minister had undermined his climate minister by withdrawing the bid despite reports of a strong position.
Background: The question addressed the Prime Minister's decision to withdraw Australia's bid to host the next UN Climate Change Conference (COP), citing Australia's continued approval of coal and gas projects.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister denied that fossil fuel addiction was the reason for withdrawing the bid, stating that the decision was made in close consultation with Pacific leaders to ensure their voices were amplified. She explained that the withdrawal was necessary to break an impasse under UNFCCC rules that would have delayed the election of the COP president. She highlighted achievements such as securing a pre-COP in the Pacific and pledges for the Pacific Resilience Facility. Regarding the fossil fuel roadmap, she stated that the Australian position had not changed and that the transition required policy delivery rather than symbolic gestures, while dismissing accusations as inconsistent.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked whether the government was genuinely committed to hosting the climate conference or if mining industry interests were influencing the bid, and whether the proposed fast-tracking of fossil fuel projects had jeopardized the bid.
Background: The question raised concerns about the likelihood of Australia hosting COP31, noting unresolved arrangements with Turkey and the Prime Minister's absence from COP30.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister denied that mining companies had influenced the bid, stating she had never discussed the conference with resource companies. She emphasized the government's engagement with Pacific leaders to elevate their voices and noted support from international partners. The minister asserted that the EPBC Act reforms had not been raised in international forums and argued that the government sought both stronger environmental protections and faster business decisions.
Question from Larissa Waters
The senator asked why the minister refused to exclude expediting coal and gas developments under new environmental laws. She cited concerns that reforms undermined climate progress and denied the government power to limit pollution from major fossil fuel projects.
Background: The Climate Council criticized proposed environmental reforms for failing to address climate pollution and potentially fast-tracking fossil fuel projects.
Answer from Murray Watt
The minister defended the reforms as delivering real environmental gains, including national environmental standards and requirements to mitigate harm. He stated that the laws provided ways to fast-track projects, particularly housing and renewables, while maintaining strong environmental protections. He refused to rule out fast-tracking fossil fuels, arguing that both the Greens and Coalition should support the reforms.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked when responsible ministers were informed of the leak and why no federal action had been taken to repair the tanks. She cited FOI documents showing knowledge by the Clean Energy Regulator, CSIRO, and NOPSEMA.
Background: Reports revealed that Santos's Darwin LNG facility had been leaking methane for 19 years, with federal agencies aware but taking no action.
Answer from Tim Ayres
The minister stated that the matter is primarily for the Northern Territory EPA, though the Resources Minister had asked his department to review the reports. He noted the tank is not currently in operation and has an approved safety case. He clarified that NOPSEMA has no jurisdiction over the Darwin LNG facility and that the tank's licence was due for renewal on 18 September.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked whether the federal 2035 climate pollution target would be lower than the 71 per cent reduction achievable by state and territory targets, which would represent a step backward. She also asked if the government would incorporate commitments on fossil fuel subsidies, exports, or new mines into its nationally determined contribution.
Background: State and territory targets combined could achieve a 66 to 71 per cent reduction in emissions. Pacific leaders were advocating for strong science-based targets and commitments on fossil fuels.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that the government was committed to ambitious climate action and transitioning to a net zero economy to ensure economic prosperity. She noted that more ambitious targets for 2035 were necessary to reach 2050 goals and that the government would set a responsible target based on advice from the climate authority. Regarding fossil fuels, the minister highlighted the government's engagement with Pacific leaders, citing the Tuvalu mobility pathway as an example of addressing climate impacts, but did not explicitly commit to banning new coal or gas mines.
Question from Larissa Waters
The senator asked the minister to cancel the conditional approval for Woodside's gas plant extension, citing its carbon emissions. She followed up by linking the approval to climate-driven marine heatwaves and toxic algal blooms, and asked what actions were being taken to redirect fossil fuel subsidies toward environmental protection.
Background: The senator questioned the approval of a gas project extension on the Burrup Peninsula.
Answer from Murray Watt
The minister explained that the approval was subject to strict conditions focused on protecting 50,000-year-old Indigenous rock art from air emissions, rather than being a decision on climate change. He noted that the project must reduce emissions by five per cent annually and reach net zero by 2050 under the safeguard mechanism. Regarding the algal bloom, he confirmed $14 million in federal support for South Australia's response. He emphasized the government's record on renewable energy investment and its commitment to net zero by 2050.
Question from Larissa Waters
The member asked whether the government would tax big corporations to fund the inclusion of dental care in Medicare for all Australians.
Background: The Greens advocated for including adult dental care in Medicare, citing high costs and corporate tax avoidance.
Answer from Malarndirri McCarthy
The minister referred tax policy questions to the Minister for Health and Aged Care but highlighted the government's investment of $6.1 billion to strengthen Medicare, including two large rebate increases and the opening of 87 urgent care clinics. She noted that the government was developing a new national oral health plan with states and territories. In response to supplementary questions, she stated that the government was providing $215.6 million over two years to state and territory governments for public dental services for adults, as these services are a state responsibility. She also highlighted the Child Dental Benefits Schedule, which had delivered $3.1 billion in benefits to 3.5 million children, and support for private dental services through health insurance rebates.
Other Parliamentary Activity
-
Water
Senate · Monday 14 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission
Senate · Wednesday 9 September 2026 · Ministerial Statement
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence
Senate · Wednesday 9 September 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Climate Change
Senate · Monday 7 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026, National Self-exclusion Register (Cost Recovery Levy) Amendment Bill 2026, Interactive Gambling (Cost Recovery Levy) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Privatisation
Senate · Tuesday 18 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Aged Care
Senate · Tuesday 18 August 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 17 August 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Gas Industry: Taxation
Senate · Wednesday 12 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Gambling
Senate · Tuesday 11 August 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Defence Procurement
Senate · Tuesday 30 June 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Gas Industry
Senate · Thursday 25 June 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026
Senate · Monday 22 June 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Cost of Living
Senate · Monday 22 June 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Kumanjayi Little Baby
Senate · Tuesday 12 May 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Translating and Interpreting Services Bill 2025; Limitation of Debate
Senate · Wednesday 1 April 2026 · Limitation of Debate
Contributed to this debate
-
Budget: Fuel
Senate · Wednesday 1 April 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Fuel Excise Relief) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
-
Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
-
Public Transport
Senate · Monday 30 March 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 26 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
National Commission for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children and Young People Bill 2026, National Commission for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children and Young People (Transitional Provisions) Bill 2026; In Committee
Senate · Wednesday 25 March 2026 · In Committee
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Defence Amendment (Parliamentary Approval of Overseas Service) Bill 2020; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 25 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Transport Infrastructure
Senate · Tuesday 24 March 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
National Commission for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children and Young People Bill 2026, National Commission for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children and Young People (Transitional Provisions) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 23 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
-
Gas Industry: Taxation, Middle East
Senate · Monday 23 March 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Migration Amendment (2026 Measures No. 1) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 12 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Middle East
Senate · Tuesday 10 March 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Fuel
Senate · Thursday 5 March 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Fossil Fuel Industry
Senate · Wednesday 4 March 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Closing the Gap
Senate · Monday 2 March 2026 · Ministerial Statement
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Middle East
Senate · Monday 2 March 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Taxation
Senate · Wednesday 4 February 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Perth: Attack
Senate · Tuesday 3 February 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Housing
Senate · Tuesday 3 February 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism (Firearms and Customs Laws) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 20 January 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Bondi Beach: Attack
Senate · Monday 19 January 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025, National Environmental Protection Agency Bill 2025, Environment Information Australia Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Customs Charges Imposition) Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Excise Charges Imposition) Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Restoration Charge Imposition) Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 27 November 2025 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Discrimination
Senate · Tuesday 25 November 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Housing
Senate · Monday 24 November 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Higher Education Support Amendment (End Dirty University Partnerships) Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 6 November 2025 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Fair Work Amendment (Baby Priya's) Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 3 November 2025 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Racial Discrimination Act 1975: 50th Anniversary
Senate · Thursday 30 October 2025 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
-
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Board of Management Functions) Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 28 October 2025 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Gas Industry
Senate · Thursday 4 September 2025 · General Debate
Opened this debate
-
Gas Industry
Senate · Monday 1 September 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Members of Parliament (Staff) Amendment (Providing Certainty and Improving Integrity) Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 28 August 2025 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Bill 2025; In Committee
Senate · Thursday 28 August 2025 · In Committee
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 26 August 2025 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water
Senate · Tuesday 26 August 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
- Votes recorded
- 1079
- Aye votes (57.1%)
- 616
- No votes (42.9%)
- 463
Showing the latest 50 votes.
-
Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026; Second Read
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026; Second Read
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 13, Noes 23 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026; Second Read
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 13, Noes 23 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Defence Force Discipline Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 30, Noes 24 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Corruption in the Construction Industry Select Committee; Appointment
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee; Reference
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Environment and Communications References Committee; Reference
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Selection of Bills Committee; Report
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 28 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare With...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare With...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Migration
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 19, Noes 30 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Manufacturing Industry
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 20, Noes 27 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Personal Information and Privacy; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 30, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Maritime Industry; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 16, Noes 23 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Climate Change; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 16, Noes 23 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Census; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 30 · Failed
VOTED NO -
ASECA Judicial Seminar; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 28 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Middle East; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 13, Noes 27 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
North to East Australia Pipeline; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 18, Noes 25 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Artificial Intelligence Joint Select Committee; Appointment
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 17, Noes 25 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Artificial Intelligence Joint Select Committee; Appointment
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 17, Noes 26 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Improved Native Forest Management; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 27, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Middle East
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Amendment (No Jab No Pay Repeal) Bill 20...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 6, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Economy
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Australian Federal Police; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Trade Unions; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Consideration of Legislation
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Cybersafety Legislation; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Executive Remuneration; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 17, Noes 26 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Waste Management and Recycling; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Environment and Communications References Committee; Reference
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Red Lines Package Omnibus Bill 2026; First Reading
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 39, Noes 14 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Artificial Intelligence
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account)...
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 36 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Water
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 16, Noes 24 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Cost of Living
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Digital Seller Underperformance Policy; Order for the Production of Documents
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 18 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Health Care; Order for the Production of Documents
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 28 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Intergenerational Trust Fund for the People of the Republic of Nauru; Order f...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account)...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 24, Noes 35 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account)...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 25 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Major Sporting Events (Indicia and Images) Protection Amendment Bill 2026; Th...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 18 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Major Sporting Events (Indicia and Images) Protection Amendment Bill 2026; Se...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 18 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; In Committee
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; In Committee
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 22 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Consideration of Legislation
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 19, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED NO
About this page
This page tracks Larissa Waters's parliamentary activity: questions asked and answered in Question Time, debates spoken in, and votes in divisions. Summaries are in reported speech, not transcripts; each one links to the official record.