Andrew Bragg
Liberal Party Senator for NSW
Currently sitting
Photo: David Foote (AUSPIC), CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Seat and party history (1)
- Liberal Party - NSW (Senate) - 1 Jul 2019 to present
- Seat and party records: OpenAustralia member data.
Contact
Office: (02) 9159 9320
Shop 1, 392 Oxford Street, Paddington NSW 2021
Office details: Parliament of Australia, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Contact details on aph.gov.au Profile on OpenAustraliaThese counts cover what is on this site only. They do not measure electorate work or committee work.
Compared with other members
Andrew Bragg compared with all 76 sitting senators.
Questions asked in Question Time
Higher than 91% of senators- This member
- 22
- Average
- 10.4
- Median
- 10
Debates spoken in
Higher than 64% of senators- This member
- 47
- Average
- 44.8
- Median
- 40
Votes cast
Lower than 78% of senators- This member
- 544
- Average
- 743.0
- Median
- 730
Share of divisions voted in
Lower than 79% of senators- This member
- 48%
- Average
- 69%
- Median
- 69%
Read these with care
- The median is the middle member: half did more, half did less. It is less affected by a few very active members than the average.
- Ministers answer questions rather than ask them, and the presiding officers rarely vote, so their patterns differ.
- Government backbenchers are often given arranged "Dorothy Dixer" questions, which raises their question counts.
- Votes only record ayes and noes, so a missed vote cannot be told apart from a pair (an agreed absence).
- Counts cover only what is on this site, and do not measure electorate or committee work. New members have less history.
Question Time
Question from Andrew Bragg
The senator asked if the government was aware that its taxes were reducing home loans and homeownership opportunities. He followed up by asking if the minister stood by the claim that rents would rise by only $2 a week, given projections of $200-a-week rises in Sydney. He also asked who benefited from the $77 billion in new housing taxes.
Background: NAB reported that loans to owner-occupiers were down 15 per cent since the budget.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister countered that loan approvals had risen by 8.9 per cent compared with the previous year, reaching their peak since 2021, while commencements grew by 15.2 per cent. She stated that more first-home buyers were entering the market under the government, with over 490,000 accessing it and 260,000 using a five per cent deposit. Regarding rents, she affirmed that Treasury modelling indicated weekly increases of less than $2, noting transitional arrangements for negative gearing. She did not directly answer who benefited from the taxes, instead focusing on the increase in supply and first-home buyer activity.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The senator asked why the Prime Minister was persisting with tax policies that allegedly worsened the housing shortage. He cited claims that tax changes made new projects harder to finance and presell, leading to fewer homes being built and higher rents.
Background: The Property Council claimed that Labor's housing taxes had reduced buyer confidence and caused new housing supply to drop significantly.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister defended the government's focus on increasing supply through a $47 billion Homes for Australia plan. She stated that tax arrangements were changed to favor first-home buyers over investors. The minister cited data showing building approvals were 8.9 per cent higher than the previous year and commencements were 15.2 per cent higher, the highest levels since 2021. She rejected the premise that tax changes were causing a decline in construction, attributing improvements in approvals and commencements to government interventions.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The member asked to confirm if Australia completed 198,000 houses annually under the Coalition compared to 170,000 under Labor. He later asked if completions had fallen to a decade low and if this constituted successful policy.
Background: The member compared housing completion figures under the former Coalition government with those under the current Labor government.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that over 660,000 homes had been built since Labor was elected, with new home starts up 26 per cent and approvals rising for three consecutive years. She highlighted that more than 40,000 first-home buyers in New South Wales had entered the market through the five per cent deposit scheme. The minister argued that the government had invested in housing supply and tax changes to level the playing field, contrasting this with the opposition's reliance on the private market and opposition to tax reforms.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The member asked if the government wanted less private investment in the housing market. He cited industry claims that self-managed super funds (SMSFs) accounted for as much as 30 per cent of advance sales in apartment projects and asked why the government was driving that investment out of the market.
Background: The government had passed legislation limiting negative gearing to new builds, which the opposition argued would reduce private investment in housing.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that the government wanted more housing supply and had invested $47 billion in the Australian Housing Plan. She noted that less than 10 per cent of SMSFs had limited recourse borrowing arrangements for residential property, and these arrangements accounted for less than one per cent of total residential borrowing. She explained that the ban on these arrangements was to protect superannuation savings, not to stop people from purchasing homes. She emphasised that the legislation would help 75,000 more first home buyers.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The senator asked whether the government would expand the ban on super funds buying houses to include APRA-regulated institutional and union-backed funds. He questioned why individuals faced punitive treatment while institutions retained tax advantages.
Background: The government had reached an agreement with the Greens regarding tax package provisions.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister clarified that the agreement supported banning future borrowing by self-managed superannuation funds for residential property, noting that less than 10 per cent of such funds had these arrangements. She cited the 2014 Murray inquiry and Council of Financial Regulators reports regarding risks to retirement savings. She accused the opposition of defending the status quo and voting against tax cuts.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The member asked whether there would be 35,000 fewer homes built due to tax hikes and if rents would rise as projected. He sought clarification on the definition of new builds in the tax legislation.
Background: Criticism was directed at the government for alleged negative impacts of tax policy on housing supply and rents.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that budget papers indicated an increase in housing supply over the decade, with 75,000 additional first home buyers supported. She noted that negative gearing would remain available for new builds, which could choose between CPI indexation or a 50 per cent capital gains discount. The minister highlighted that over 660,000 homes had been built since the government took office and that new home starts were up 26 per cent. She stated that legislation defining new builds would be introduced later in the year following consultation.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The member asked the minister to confirm that government budget papers showed no new homes had been built under the Housing Australia Future Fund in 2025-26. He further inquired whether the target of 30,000 new homes under the fund was listed as at risk in those same documents.
Background: The member cited Treasury portfolio budget statements indicating zero homes built under the Housing Australia Future Fund in 2025-26 and asked if the target of 30,000 homes was at risk.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that nearly 660,000 homes had been built nationwide since Labor took office, with over 6,000 completed using Commonwealth investment and 23,000 in planning or construction. She noted that new home starts had risen by 26 per cent compared to the previous year. The minister highlighted the $47 billion Homes for Australia plan, which includes the HAFF, and criticized the opposition for opposing the fund and intending to abolish it. She argued that the government was committed to building more social and affordable housing, whereas the opposition believed the government had no role in ensuring adequate housing supply.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The member asked how building fewer houses would help younger people. He further questioned why the Prime Minister was cutting off negative gearing opportunities and requested a guarantee that tax changes would result in more homes.
Background: The question claimed the government's tax changes would reduce housing supply by 35,000 dwellings.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister denied the claim, stating the policies would result in 35,000 more houses than otherwise. She highlighted that the Local Infrastructure Fund would support up to 65,000 homes and tax changes would enable 75,000 additional owner-occupiers over the decade. The minister emphasized that negative gearing remained available for new builds and that the changes aimed to address the divergence between housing prices and incomes.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The senator asked how new high taxes on houses would build more houses and address the housing crisis. Supplementary questions asked if the housing tax was a cash grab and why the government was attacking investment needed to build more houses when it was short of its own supply targets.
Background: Leaked documents suggested the government intended to use tax levers to meet housing targets, despite previous admissions that higher taxes would not increase supply.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that details would be available in the budget, but emphasized that the government was committed to fairness and aspiration. She criticized the opposition for opposing housing supply measures and argued that the federal government had a role in facilitating home ownership. She asserted that the opposition did not believe the government should have a role in housing supply, contrasting this with the government's proactive approach.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The member asked whether the minister would stand by the Treasurer's claim that public demand was retreating, given that official data contradicted this assertion. He questioned if the government would admit the error, noting that the claim had been used to justify interest rate rises that impacted mortgage holders.
Background: The Treasurer had previously attributed economic pressure to retreating public demand, but recent national accounts showed public demand growing more than twice as fast as private demand in the December quarter.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister stated that, over the year, private demand expanded more rapidly than public demand, citing contributions of 2.3 for private demand and 0.7 for public demand to annual growth. She affirmed the Treasurer's position was correct and contrasted the government's fiscal management with the opposition's election platform, which she claimed would have resulted in deeper deficits, higher debt, and higher taxes.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The member asked for the exact count of social and affordable homes that have been fully constructed and are ready for occupancy due to federal support. He followed up by asking how many additional completed dwellings would result from the increase in Housing Australia's borrowing cap from $26 billion to $44 billion, and by what date. Finally, he asked whether the government conceded failure on housing given population growth and construction trends.
Background: The member sought specific data on the number of dwellings completed under Commonwealth housing programs since the current government took office, distinguishing completed homes from those merely funded or in the pipeline.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that five thousand social and affordable homes had been completed through Commonwealth programs, with a further 25,000 in construction or planning, including over 18,000 via the Housing Australia Future Fund. She noted that 21,000 more homes would be commissioned this year. Regarding the borrowing cap, she declined to provide specific projections, stating such details would be addressed in estimates. She rejected the premise of government failure, asserting that the opposition consistently opposed housing supply measures and did not believe government should play a role in increasing supply.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The member asked why the government would not release secret Treasury documents regarding the impact of the home guarantee scheme on housing prices.
Background: The member alleged the government was hiding Treasury modelling that suggested the expanded home guarantee scheme would increase house prices.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that Treasury advice indicated the impact on house prices would be minor, approximately half a per cent over six years, and that other factors like interest rates and supply were more significant. She challenged the opposition to explain the abandonment of their own super-for-housing policy and emphasised the government's focus on increasing housing supply and investing in social and affordable housing to address affordability.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The senator asked why the government believed it was beneficial to reduce the affordability of entry and middle-level houses for first home buyers. He cited Treasury advice and RBA warnings that the scheme would increase house prices and repayments.
Background: Data from Cotality showed an acceleration in home value growth, particularly in entry and middle markets, following the expansion of the five per cent deposit scheme.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister rejected the premise that the scheme made housing less affordable, stating that lending rules and serviceability requirements remained unchanged. She argued that Treasury guidance suggested the effect on property values would be small. She highlighted that the deposit scheme was part of a broader strategy including increasing housing supply, training tradespeople, and kickstarting construction, noting that building approvals and commencements had risen.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The member asked if the HAFF was still acquiring and converting homes, citing previous figures of 340 homes. He sought clarification on whether the fund was building new houses or buying existing ones.
Background: The member questioned the number of homes built versus acquired by the Housing Australia Future Fund (HAFF).
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that more than 5,000 homes had been completed through Commonwealth programs since the government took office. She attributed delays in HAFF progress to opposition and Greens blocking of housing supply. She listed specific HAFF projects in various electorates, including Penrith, South Grafton, and Southport.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The member asked whether the 2,000 homes cited by the housing minister as completed by the Housing Australia Future Fund were constructed or purchased. He followed up by asking if the fund was buying homes in competition with private buyers, arguing this would worsen the housing crisis.
Background: The member sought clarification on whether 2,000 homes attributed to the Housing Australia Future Fund were newly built or existing properties acquired by the government.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that over 500,000 homes have been built nationwide since the government took office, with more than 4,000 completed using Commonwealth investment and 28,000 in planning or construction. She attributed delays to the opposition's stance on the fund and noted that the coalition had built only 373 social and affordable homes in their previous decade. Regarding the supplementary, she argued that opposing supply increases was illogical and listed specific HAFF projects in New South Wales, including 580 homes in Merrylands and Regents Park, 144 in Maroubra, 221 in Macquarie Park and Lane Cove, 16 in Coonabarabran, and 10 in Casino and South Grafton.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The senator asked for the specific number of houses completed by the HAFF, following a previous promise to report back. He pressed for a direct answer after the minister provided figures for homes in planning and construction.
Background: The senator had previously asked about the number of houses completed by the Housing Australia Future Fund (HAFF).
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that over 28,000 social and affordable homes were in planning and construction, with 18,000 through the HAFF and National Housing Accord Facility. When pressed for the number of completed homes, she stated she did not have the specific figure in front of her but argued that the opposition's policy would result in zero homes being built. She highlighted that the opposition had sought to disallow 80,000 homes.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The senator asked why the government decided to allow children of billionaires to use taxpayer dollars for their first homes under the expanded Home Guarantee Scheme, and queried the contingent liability for taxpayers.
Background: The Prime Minister announced an expansion of the Home Guarantee Scheme, removing caps and means tests.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister dismissed the notion that billionaires would utilise the scheme, stating it is designed for first-home buyers. She argued that the opposition stands in the way of housing supply, which is key to affordability. Regarding liability, she noted that the scheme saves first-home buyers approximately $1.5 billion in mortgage insurance over 12 months. She cited a default rate below 0.003 per cent and highlighted that only five guarantees had been paid out over seven years, despite nearly 160,000 guarantees issued.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The senator asked why the government was adopting a policy it had previously criticized during the election campaign, specifically regarding the freezing of the National Construction Code.
Background: The government decided to pause the National Construction Code, a move similar to previous Coalition policy.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that the government was focused on delivering policies to increase housing supply, including the construction code announcement. She contrasted this with the Opposition's election pledge to abolish the Housing Australia Future Fund and block supply measures. The minister argued that Australians had rejected the Opposition's stance on housing supply.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The member asked for the current number of houses built by the HAFF. He also noted that only $223 million of the required $500 million had been debited by 31 March 2025, asking if the remaining $277 million was spent between April and June.
Background: The questioner referenced a previous instance where the minister did not know how many houses the HAFF had built.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister said that 18,000 dwellings were being planned or built via the HAFF and National Housing Accord. She criticised the opposition for opposing the fund and blocking 5,000 homes from proceeding during the caretaker period. She did not give a specific number for houses finished to date nor confirm spending of the remaining $277 million, instead focusing on the opposition's historical stance against the fund.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The senator asked if the government would intervene to stop CFMEU expansion in NSW, given its administration status and alleged impact on construction costs.
Background: The CFMEU announced expansion in NSW, with the senator linking this to increased construction costs and housing shortages.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated she was not aware of the specific NSW expansion details but would seek information. She reaffirmed the government's stance that organised crime has no place in unions and that the CFMEU is in administration to stamp out corruption. She rejected the proposition that the administration had failed, noting officials had been terminated. She also argued that housing shortages are driven by lack of supply, which the government is addressing.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The senator asked if the government would meet its target of building 1.2 million new homes, citing Treasury advice that the target would not be met. He also asked for the number of homes completed under the Housing Australia Future Fund.
Background: The senator questioned the feasibility of the government's housing construction target.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister affirmed the ambitious nature of the target and stated the government was committed to meeting it through supply-side measures and assistance for first-home buyers. She criticized the opposition for blocking housing legislation in the previous term. Regarding the Housing Australia Future Fund, she noted she did not have current operational data but highlighted that the opposition had previously blocked the fund's establishment.
Question from Andrew Bragg
The member asked if the government understood the definition of insanity given the lack of new housing construction. He challenged the minister on the effectiveness of current housing policies.
Background: Senator Bragg questioned the Minister representing the Treasurer on the government's housing record, claiming no new houses had been built.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister rejected the claim, stating that thousands of houses were under construction with $33 billion in funding. She accused the opposition of voting against and delaying housing measures. She defended the 1.2 million homes target and criticized the opposition's policy of allowing superannuation access for housing deposits.
Other Parliamentary Activity
-
Migration
Senate · Wednesday 16 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Cost of Living
Senate · Monday 14 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Housing
Senate · Wednesday 9 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Housing Australia Amendment (Transparency and Reporting) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Housing Australia Amendment (Transparency and Reporting) Bill 2026; First Reading
Senate · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · First Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Taxation
Senate · Tuesday 18 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Taxation
Senate · Tuesday 11 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Data Centres
Senate · Tuesday 30 June 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Taxation
Senate · Monday 29 June 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026, Income Tax Rates Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026; In Committee
Senate · Thursday 25 June 2026 · In Committee
Responded as shadow minister · Position: oppose
-
Housing
Senate · Wednesday 24 June 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026, Income Tax Rates Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 23 June 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Taxation
Senate · Tuesday 23 June 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Budget
Senate · Monday 22 June 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Budget
Senate · Wednesday 13 May 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Budget
Senate · Tuesday 12 May 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Fuel
Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as shadow minister
-
Housing Australia Amendment (Accountability) Bill 2025; Third Reading
Senate · Thursday 26 March 2026 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Appropriation Bill (No. 3) 2025-2026, Appropriation Bill (No. 4) 2025-2026, Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 2) 2025-2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 26 March 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Cost of Living
Senate · Tuesday 24 March 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Fuel
Senate · Monday 23 March 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Economy
Senate · Wednesday 4 March 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Allen, Dr Katrina Jane (Katie)
Senate · Wednesday 4 February 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Housing
Senate · Tuesday 3 February 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Bondi Beach: Attack
Senate · Monday 19 January 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Housing
Senate · Wednesday 26 November 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
-
Discrimination
Senate · Tuesday 25 November 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Housing
Senate · Monday 24 November 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Housing
Senate · Wednesday 5 November 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Housing
Senate · Tuesday 4 November 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Economy
Senate · Monday 3 November 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Housing Australia Amendment (Accountability) Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 30 October 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Commonwealth Workplace Protection Orders Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 29 October 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Energy
Senate · Wednesday 3 September 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Housing
Senate · Wednesday 27 August 2025 · Ministerial Statement
Responded as shadow minister
-
Taxation
Senate · Tuesday 26 August 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Economic Reform Roundtable
Senate · Monday 25 August 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Defence Housing Australia Amendment Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 25 August 2025 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Customs Amendment (Australia-United Arab Emirates Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement Implementation) Bill 2025, Customs Tariff Amendment (Australia-United Arab Emirates Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement Implementation) Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 31 July 2025 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
Senate · Tuesday 29 July 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Housing Investment Probity Bill 2024; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 24 July 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Budget
Senate · Wednesday 26 March 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Reconsiderations) Bill 2025; Reference to Committee
Senate · Tuesday 25 March 2025 · Reference to Committee
Contributed to this debate
-
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
Senate · Tuesday 25 March 2025 · Take Note Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Cost of Living
Senate · Monday 10 February 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Future Made in Australia (Production Tax Credits and Other Measures) Bill 2024; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 5 February 2025 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
- Votes recorded
- 544
- Aye votes (70.4%)
- 383
- No votes (29.6%)
- 161
Showing the latest 50 votes.
-
Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026; Second Read
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Defence Force Discipline Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 30, Noes 24 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Corruption in the Construction Industry Select Committee; Appointment
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee; Reference
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Environment and Communications References Committee; Reference
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Migration
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 19, Noes 30 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Manufacturing Industry
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 20, Noes 27 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Personal Information and Privacy; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 30, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Census; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 30 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Improved Native Forest Management; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 27, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Middle East
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Economy
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account)...
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 36 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Cost of Living
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Digital Seller Underperformance Policy; Order for the Production of Documents
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 18 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Health Care; Order for the Production of Documents
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 28 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Intergenerational Trust Fund for the People of the Republic of Nauru; Order f...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account)...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 24, Noes 35 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Major Sporting Events (Indicia and Images) Protection Amendment Bill 2026; Th...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 18 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Major Sporting Events (Indicia and Images) Protection Amendment Bill 2026; Se...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 18 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; In Committee
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; In Committee
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 22 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Consideration of Legislation
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 19, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Carbon Farming Initiative--Improved Forest Management in Multiple-use Public ...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 27, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Defence Properties; Order for the Production of Documents
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 36, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 36 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Housing; Order for the Production of Documents
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 37, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 20, Noes 30 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 23 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Protecting Australians from Foreign Terrorist Fighters Bill 2026; Second Read
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Superannuation
9 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Taxation; Order for the Production of Documents
9 Sep 2026 · Ayes 27, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Senate Estimates: Questions on Notice; Order for the Production of Documents
9 Sep 2026 · Ayes 37, Noes 22 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
9 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 35 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
9 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 22 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
8 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Veterans: Health Care
8 Sep 2026 · Ayes 36, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Housing; Order for the Production of Documents
8 Sep 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Cheaper Home Batteries Program, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet,...
8 Sep 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE
About this page
This page tracks Andrew Bragg's parliamentary activity: questions asked and answered in Question Time, debates spoken in, and votes in divisions. Summaries are in reported speech, not transcripts; each one links to the official record.