Question Time AU

Take Note Debate

Answers to Questions

Senate · Monday 14 September 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senators debated the government's economic management, focusing on real wage growth, productivity trends, and housing supply. Opposition senators argued that real wages were falling and productivity was declining due to government policies, while also criticising changes to private health insurance subsidies for pensioners. Government senators defended their record, citing consecutive quarters of real wage growth, workplace reforms, and tax cuts. The debate concluded with the motion being agreed to.

Outcome

Question agreed to.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Cadell argued that the government was ignoring the reality of falling real wages, noting that while nominal pay packets might increase, purchasing power for groceries, healthcare, and rent was declining. Cadell cited budget paper No. 1 to claim that 35,000 fewer homes were being built and criticised the Housing Australia Future Fund for lacking transparency on construction numbers. Cadell asserted that labour productivity was deteriorating due to excessive red tape and policies that disadvantaged small businesses and industry super funds. Cadell referenced former ACTU secretary Bill Kelty to support the claim that the government was misleading the public about economic conditions.