Malcolm Roberts
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party Senator for QLD
Currently sitting
Photo: Joshua Ryan, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons
Seat and party history (2)
- Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party - QLD (Senate) - 1 Jul 2019 to present
- Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party - QLD (Senate) - 1 Jul 2016 to 27 Oct 2017
- Seat and party records: OpenAustralia member data.
Contact
Office: (07) 3221 9099
Commonwealth Parliament Offices Suite 2, Level 36 Waterfront Place, 1 Eagle Street, Brisbane QLD 4000
Office details: Parliament of Australia, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Contact details on aph.gov.au Profile on OpenAustraliaThese counts cover what is on this site only. They do not measure electorate work or committee work.
Compared with other members
Malcolm Roberts compared with all 76 sitting senators.
Questions asked in Question Time
Higher than 91% of senators- This member
- 22
- Average
- 10.4
- Median
- 10
Debates spoken in
Higher than 96% of senators- This member
- 115
- Average
- 44.8
- Median
- 40
Votes cast
Higher than 63% of senators- This member
- 910
- Average
- 743.0
- Median
- 730
Share of divisions voted in
Higher than 59% of senators- This member
- 81%
- Average
- 69%
- Median
- 69%
Read these with care
- The median is the middle member: half did more, half did less. It is less affected by a few very active members than the average.
- Ministers answer questions rather than ask them, and the presiding officers rarely vote, so their patterns differ.
- Government backbenchers are often given arranged "Dorothy Dixer" questions, which raises their question counts.
- Votes only record ayes and noes, so a missed vote cannot be told apart from a pair (an agreed absence).
- Counts cover only what is on this site, and do not measure electorate or committee work. New members have less history.
Question Time
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The senator asked why people could not find enough work under the government, citing rising underutilization. He followed up by asking if the government had failed to keep its promise of a paid job for everyone who wants one, given that unemployment had risen to 4.5 per cent, up from 3.4 per cent. He also asked why the government maintained high immigration levels when it allegedly took work from Australians.
Background: ABS data showed underutilization increased from 1.35 million in June 2022 to 1.68 million in July 2026.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister stated that unemployment was at historically low levels, though she misspoke by saying 412 per cent before correcting the context. She highlighted that 1.3 million jobs had been created, with three out of five being full-time and five out of six in the private sector. She noted that the participation rate had risen from 66.3 per cent to 66.9 per cent, near record highs, and that the gender pay gap was at a record low. She argued that the labour market was resilient despite global uncertainty. Regarding migration, she stated that Australia had always relied on overseas workers to supplement the domestic workforce and that One Nation's policy would damage businesses and services.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The member asked how the Treasurer's claim could be true if the private sector's share of jobs had fallen. He later asked what the government was doing to reverse the fall in labor market productivity and where the plan was to address economic issues like inflation and debt.
Background: The Treasurer stated that since 2022, the private sector had generated six of every seven new jobs, although figures indicated a drop in that sector's portion of the workforce.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister defended the Treasurer's comments, noting that 1.3 million jobs had been created since May 2022, including growth in the care economy. She listed 15 areas of productivity improvement from the budget, including investment, innovation, and regulatory reform. She argued that employment, participation rates, and real wage growth were up, contradicting the member's portrayal of the economy.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The senator asked why the government brought in many new arrivals when there was insufficient work for 1.68 million underutilised Australians. He claimed mass immigration was creating a labor glut that pulled down real wages.
Background: The underutilisation rate of workers increased from 1.35 million in June 2022 to 1.68 million in June 2026. The wage price index showed a 1.5 per cent decline in real wages since the government took power.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister stated that over a million jobs had been created and unemployment remained low, with participation rates at record highs. She noted that net overseas migration had fallen by roughly 45 per cent from the post-COVID high. The minister defended jobs in the non-market economy, such as health, aged care, and education, as legitimate and valuable. She criticized One Nation for opposing wage increases and argued that the government supported better wages and conditions for workers.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The senator asked the minister to undertake to work with the NAIF to progress the GAIN proposal urgently, citing its potential to add $100 billion to GDP and create 40,000 jobs.
Background: The Great Australian Infrastructure Network (GAIN) proposal for a transcontinental railway has been with the Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility (NAIF) for over two months.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister explained that large-scale proposals require rigorous due diligence and cannot be processed quickly, citing historical examples of infrastructure delays. He confirmed the NAIF operates independently to assess projects against its mandate. He committed to making personal inquiries into the status of the proposal and reporting back to the senator.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The member asked if energy companies were profiteering or if the government was hiding the real cost of electricity, and whether Australians were deceived about the benefits of rooftop solar.
Background: The member cited increases in daily connection fees for solar customers, rising from 26 cents to $1.46 a day, and falling feed-in tariffs.
Answer from Tim Ayres
The minister accused the previous energy minister of concealing price rises. He stated that the government had provided three free hours of solar power for 455,000 Australians with home batteries, resulting in zero electricity costs for those households. He argued that these benefits primarily aided people in outer suburbs and regions. In supplementary answers, he claimed that One Nation opposed solar electricity and that the previous government had wrecked the electricity system and fuel refineries, causing energy insecurity.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The senator asked why the government would not support indexation of tax brackets to prevent bracket creep. He followed up by asking if the government accepts that cutting taxes is the only way to restore worker incomes. Finally, he asked why the government has increased tax take and raised the fuel excise.
Background: Senator Roberts moved an amendment for tax bracket indexation to prevent bracket creep. He asked why the government would not support this and if it was happy to see workers pay more tax.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister stated the government is cutting taxes five times in three ways, including the instant tax deduction and Working Australians Tax Offset. She noted that real wages have grown for the first time in a decade since the government took office. Regarding the fuel excise, she explained that the temporary halving was extended at a lower level to help households adjust as petrol prices fell. She emphasised that the government continues to roll out cost-of-living help, including Medicare investments and cheaper medicines.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The senator asked for the total cost of the Snowy Hydro 2.0 scheme, including construction, capital costs, maintenance, transmission lines, and renewable energy installations. He sought a comprehensive figure for the project's lifetime cost.
Background: An Australian National Audit Office report highlighted shortcomings in the management of the Snowy Hydro 2.0 project.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister stated that the project cost had been reset to approximately $12 billion after the government inherited it, as the initial $2 billion estimate lacked proper scoping and geological surveys. She noted that the Snowy board was undertaking a cost reassessment due to the government in late July. She emphasised that the project was more than half built and crucial for energy grid security. In response to supplementary questions, she refused to cancel the project, citing its importance for energy stability. She noted that the ANAO report found project management partially effective and that Snowy Hydro had accepted most recommendations. She argued that the market was not investing in new coal-fired power stations, whereas renewables were delivering cheaper and more reliable energy.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The member asked how 301,000 new permanent arrivals would impact GDP per hours worked. He questioned whether the low proportion of skilled migrants would cause productivity to continue falling.
Background: Data indicated a slight fall in productivity measures, and One Nation linked this to migration levels.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister stated that productivity growth had been slow for decades and that the budget included measures to drive improvements, such as regulatory reform and infrastructure investment. She noted that Treasury had revised productivity assumptions downward based on evidence. The minister rejected the link between migration and low productivity, emphasizing the value of migrant contributions and stating that net overseas migration had decreased by 45 per cent. She highlighted that the government was addressing productivity challenges through various economic reforms.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The senator asked why the government was not offering refugee status to Christians persecuted in Nigeria and South Africa, alleging the program favored Muslim countries. He asked if the government would reduce Islamic refugee intake to balance it with Christian and Alawite refugees from Syria.
Background: The member claimed the government was excluding Christian refugees from Nigeria and South Africa.
Answer from Murray Watt
The minister rejected the premise that the government discriminated based on religion, stating that all applications were assessed on merit and character. He criticized the senator's rhetoric as divisive and reminiscent of comments by Pauline Hanson. He affirmed that the government did not have blanket rules excluding people from any faith and that security risks were assessed individually.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The member asked whether the Prime Minister's security arrangements indicated he believed the mosque was unsafe, and whether the government would arrest individuals associated with banned groups who acted violently.
Background: The member questioned the safety of the mosque visit given the large security detail and the recent banning of Hizb ut-Tahrir.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that politicians do not arrest people, citing separation of powers. She noted that One Nation had voted against the legislation banning Hizb ut-Tahrir, thereby hindering the government's ability to act against such groups.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The member asked how the government justified setting minimum stockholding obligations at 24 days, below international standards. He followed up by asking why additional supply was not secured before the Lytton refinery closed for maintenance, and questioned the government's plan given Australia's limited tanker capacity.
Background: The member criticized the government's fuel reserve obligations, claiming they were lower than International Energy Agency guidelines, and raised concerns about an upcoming refinery maintenance shutdown.
Answer from Tim Ayres
The minister attributed energy insecurity to the closure of four oil refineries under the previous government. He stated that current fuel reserves were at their highest level in 15 years. Regarding the Lytton shutdown, he noted that such maintenance occurs periodically and declined to provide specific details on supply arrangements, instead criticizing the opposition's past energy policies.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The member asked why the government had ignored reports on insufficient fuel reserves and failed to protect industries from fuel shocks.
Background: Inquiries had noted insufficient fuel reserves, and current stockpiles were reported to be low.
Answer from Tim Ayres
The minister stated that Australia holds minimum stockholding obligations of 150 per cent for petrol, 134 per cent for jet fuel, and 116 per cent for diesel, with reserves held in domestic infrastructure. He criticised the previous government's energy strategy and highlighted current efforts to secure the electricity system and promote electric vehicles. In response to supplementary questions about refining capacity and specific commitments to new reserves or refineries, he noted that fuel stocks are at their highest level in 15 years and pointed to the national gas reservation scheme and other measures to shore up supply. He also criticised the opposition for campaigning against electric vehicles.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The member asked why the humanitarian visa program appeared to favour Islamic refugees over Christian refugees, citing the religious demographics of the top source countries. He followed up by noting that no visas had been issued to Nigeria, despite UN guidance protecting Nigerian Christians, and asked if the government was cherry-picking UN guidance to exclude Christians.
Background: The question referenced data showing that the top five countries for humanitarian visas were Afghanistan, Syria, Myanmar, Iraq, and Malaysia, with four having Islam as the dominant religion.
Answer from Murray Watt
The minister stated that the government supported a non-discriminatory immigration policy and did not rule people out based on faith, race, or country of origin. He argued that the common feature of the listed countries was that they were war-torn and that people were fleeing for safety reasons. He denied that the government was cherry-picking UN guidance or excluding Christians, and he predicted that the opposition would eventually adopt similar restrictive immigration policies.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The member asked what threats the government had levied against China for increasing coal use. He argued that Australia was sacrificing living standards to satisfy foreign dictates while China expanded coal capacity.
Background: The member contrasted Australia's climate actions with China's continued coal expansion, questioning the government's stance.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that Australia's climate commitments were driven by economic imperatives and global trends, not foreign dictates. She noted that 24 out of 28 coal-fired power stations had announced closures under the previous coalition due to lack of investment. She emphasized that capital markets were moving towards renewable energy and that the transition was necessary for Australia's prosperity.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The senator asked for the specific countries of origin for the majority of humanitarian visa grants during the specified period. He subsequently inquired about the total number of visas issued and the specific counts for Nigerian Christians and South African farmers. He further questioned why the government's program allegedly favored Islamic cultures over Christians, claiming the latter were being excluded despite facing persecution.
Background: The senator sought data on the top five countries of origin for refugees granted humanitarian visas in the 2024-25 financial year or 2024 calendar year.
Answer from Murray Watt
The minister stated he did not have the detailed statistics available and would provide the information on notice. Regarding the supplementary questions on specific groups and policy bias, he reiterated that he would return with facts. He challenged the premise of the question, asserting that Australia maintained a non-discriminatory immigration policy supported by previous governments, including the Liberal Party, and confirmed this approach would continue under Labor.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The member questioned the failure of the Commonwealth prosecutor to bring charges in light of Comcare's findings. He sought the disclosure of the prosecutor's rationale to offer closure to victims' families.
Background: A Comcare investigation alleged serious workplace health and safety breaches by the Department of Defence regarding the fatal Taipan helicopter crash.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated that Comcare had provided its findings to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions. He noted that independent investigations by the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force and the Queensland coroner were ongoing. He deemed it inappropriate to comment further while these investigations were proceeding.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The senator asked why the roundtable considered forcing homeowners to take in renters and whether the government would rule out such ideas, as well as death taxes on family homes.
Background: Rumors circulated about proposals to force homeowners to take in renters or impose death taxes on family homes.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister stated she did not attend sessions where such specific proposals were raised and that the government had no intention to alter the tax treatment of owner-occupied homes. She clarified that tax reforms would focus on standard deductions and income tax reductions as promised at the election. She emphasized that the roundtable discussions were high-level and did not result in outcomes matching the senator's concerns.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The senator asked if the government would cancel the visas of 23,000 students who purchased qualifications in breach of visa conditions.
Background: The Australian Skills Quality Authority cancelled qualifications for over 4,200 students after their provider was deregistered for running a cash-for-diplomas scheme.
Answer from Murray Watt
The minister stated that the government had reformed compliance measures to remove fraudulent providers. He confirmed that qualifications were cancelled where students paid for them without training. He noted that there was little evidence that these students were employed in the occupations for which they held fraudulent qualifications. The minister affirmed that action was being taken against both students and providers.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The member asked where the new international students would sleep, implying a housing shortage.
Background: ABS data showed a record number of new foreign students arrived in Australia in February.
Answer from Murray Watt
The minister stated that the government has built more housing in three years than the previous coalition did in ten. He noted that the opposition voted against legislation to cap international student numbers. He argued that migration levels are falling compared to when the coalition was in government, citing a 30 per cent drop in student visa applications. He also mentioned that the Housing Australia Future Fund was blocked by the opposition for months.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The senator asked about the cost of behind-the-meter power usage excluded from net zero cost estimates. He also claimed AEMO was instructed to assume net zero as a forced assumption and questioned why electricity prices remain high despite renewable investment.
Background: Disputes arose over the cost of the net zero transition, with AEMO estimating $122 billion and Frontier Economics estimating over $650 billion.
Answer from Jenny McAllister
The minister stated the government relies on expert advice from AEMO, which identifies renewables firmed by batteries and gas as the cheapest path to 2050. She dismissed One Nation's energy policy as lacking detail and contrasted it with the opposition's nuclear proposal. She attributed high wholesale energy prices to the previous government's mismanagement, noting prices were $286 per megawatt hour when Labor took office. She clarified that consumer bills reflect average prices, not spot prices, and stated renewables remain the cheapest form of new generation.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The member asked if Indian degrees were given equal merit to Australian degrees and whether the government would verify the legitimacy of qualifications, particularly in health and engineering.
Background: The member raised concerns about the mutual recognition of qualifications between India and Australia and alleged issues with degree authenticity.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated she would seek further advice on mutual recognition schemes and noted that consumer safety remained paramount. She clarified that while mutual recognition agreements exist, specific professions often have separate registration requirements to ensure practitioners have the necessary qualifications. Regarding the balance of domestic and international students, she noted that the government had announced caps on international student numbers to maintain education quality. She emphasized that international education was an important export industry that contributed to the economy, but the government aimed to gradually lower international student enrolments.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The senator inquired about the overall expense of shifting to net zero. He then requested details on specific taxpayer expenditure within the forward estimates. He further asked the minister to present the complete cost, covering forward estimates, on the initial day of the March sitting.
Background: The senator inquired about the overall expense of shifting to net zero and the sum allocated in forward estimates.
Answer from Murray Watt
The minister stated that the transition cost was approximately $120 billion to $130 billion, citing the Australian Energy Market Operator's integrated system plan which estimated a net present value of $122 billion. He noted that he did not have a figure specifically for the forward estimates. He contrasted this with the opposition's nuclear plan, which he claimed would cost $600 billion and increase power prices by $1,200 per household per year. He dismissed the higher figures cited by the senator as lacking credible assumptions.
Other Parliamentary Activity
-
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare Without Caps) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 17 September 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Defence Force Discipline Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 1) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 17 September 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Manufacturing Industry
Senate · Wednesday 16 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Amendment (No Jab No Pay Repeal) Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 16 September 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Economy
Senate · Tuesday 15 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Water
Senate · Monday 14 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Major Sporting Events (Indicia and Images) Protection Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 14 September 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 10 September 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide
Senate · Wednesday 9 September 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 8 September 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Employment
Senate · Tuesday 8 September 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Defence Properties
Senate · Tuesday 8 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Tobacco Control
Senate · Monday 7 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 7 September 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
-
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 20 August 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Veterans: Women's Health
Senate · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility
Senate · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Privatisation
Senate · Tuesday 18 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; In Committee
Senate · Tuesday 18 August 2026 · In Committee
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026, Cash Distribution Framework (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 17 August 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Extended Producer Responsibility Scheme for Packaging (No Time to Waste) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 13 August 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
National Security
Senate · Tuesday 11 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Energy
Senate · Thursday 2 July 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Coal Mining Industry (Long Service Leave) Legislation Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 2 July 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Taxation
Senate · Wednesday 1 July 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Health Legislation Amendment (Prescribing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 2025; In Committee
Senate · Wednesday 1 July 2026 · In Committee
Opened this debate
-
Health Legislation Amendment (Prescribing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 30 June 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 29 June 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
-
Fuel
Senate · Monday 29 June 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Tackling the Gender Super Gap) Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 24 June 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Snowy 2.0
Senate · Tuesday 23 June 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026, Income Tax Rates Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 22 June 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Competition and Consumer Amendment (Responding to Exceptional Circumstances) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 14 May 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Budget
Senate · Wednesday 13 May 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
-
Private Health Insurance
Senate · Tuesday 12 May 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Criminal Code Amendment (Keeping Australia Safe) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 1 April 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Fuel Excise Relief) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026; In Committee
Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · In Committee
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Copyright Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Biodiversity
Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · Take Note Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) Bill 2025, Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025; In Committee
Senate · Monday 30 March 2026 · In Committee
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
-
Fair Work Amendment (Fairer Fuel) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 30 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Appropriation Bill (No. 3) 2025-2026, Appropriation Bill (No. 4) 2025-2026, Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 2) 2025-2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 26 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
National Commission for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children and Young People Bill 2026, National Commission for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children and Young People (Transitional Provisions) Bill 2026; In Committee
Senate · Wednesday 25 March 2026 · In Committee
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Appropriation Bill (No. 3) 2025-2026, Appropriation Bill (No. 4) 2025-2026, Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 2) 2025-2026; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 25 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Cost of Living
Senate · Tuesday 24 March 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Commonwealth Entities Legislation Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 24 March 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Supporting Choice in Superannuation and Other Measures) Bill 2025; In Committee
Senate · Monday 23 March 2026 · In Committee
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Supporting Choice in Superannuation and Other Measures) Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 11 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Fuel Security
Senate · Tuesday 10 March 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
- Votes recorded
- 910
- Aye votes (64.8%)
- 590
- No votes (35.2%)
- 320
Showing the latest 50 votes.
-
Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026; Second Read
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Defence Force Discipline Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 30, Noes 24 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Corruption in the Construction Industry Select Committee; Appointment
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee; Reference
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Environment and Communications References Committee; Reference
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare With...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare With...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Migration
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 19, Noes 30 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Manufacturing Industry
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 20, Noes 27 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Personal Information and Privacy; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 30, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Maritime Industry; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 16, Noes 23 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Climate Change; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 16, Noes 23 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Census; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 30 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
North to East Australia Pipeline; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 18, Noes 25 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Artificial Intelligence Joint Select Committee; Appointment
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 17, Noes 25 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Artificial Intelligence Joint Select Committee; Appointment
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 17, Noes 26 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Improved Native Forest Management; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 27, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Middle East
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED NO -
A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Amendment (No Jab No Pay Repeal) Bill 20...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 6, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Economy
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Australian Federal Police; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Trade Unions; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Consideration of Legislation
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Cybersafety Legislation; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Executive Remuneration; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 17, Noes 26 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Waste Management and Recycling; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Environment and Communications References Committee; Reference
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Red Lines Package Omnibus Bill 2026; First Reading
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 39, Noes 14 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Artificial Intelligence
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account)...
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 36 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Water
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 16, Noes 24 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Cost of Living
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Digital Seller Underperformance Policy; Order for the Production of Documents
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 18 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Health Care; Order for the Production of Documents
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 28 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Intergenerational Trust Fund for the People of the Republic of Nauru; Order f...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account)...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 24, Noes 35 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; In Committee
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; In Committee
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 22 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Consideration of Legislation
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 19, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 6, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 4, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 4, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Strengthening Accountability for Tax Adviser Miscond...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 4 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Defence Properties; Order for the Production of Documents
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 36, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 36 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Housing; Order for the Production of Documents
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 37, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED AYE
About this page
This page tracks Malcolm Roberts's parliamentary activity: questions asked and answered in Question Time, debates spoken in, and votes in divisions. Summaries are in reported speech, not transcripts; each one links to the official record.