Michaelia Cash
Liberal Party Senator for WA
Currently sitting
Photo: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from Washington D.C, United States, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Seat and party history (1)
- Liberal Party - WA (Senate) - 1 Jul 2008 to present
- Seat and party records: OpenAustralia member data.
Contact
Office: (08) 9226 2000
44 Outram Street, West Perth WA 6005
Office details: Parliament of Australia, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Contact details on aph.gov.au Profile on OpenAustraliaThese counts cover what is on this site only. They do not measure electorate work or committee work.
Compared with other members
Michaelia Cash compared with all 76 sitting senators.
Questions asked in Question Time
Higher than 91% of senators- This member
- 22
- Average
- 10.4
- Median
- 10
Debates spoken in
Higher than 91% of senators- This member
- 85
- Average
- 44.8
- Median
- 40
Votes cast
Lower than 95% of senators- This member
- 216
- Average
- 743.0
- Median
- 730
Share of divisions voted in
Lower than 97% of senators- This member
- 19%
- Average
- 69%
- Median
- 69%
Read these with care
- The median is the middle member: half did more, half did less. It is less affected by a few very active members than the average.
- Ministers answer questions rather than ask them, and the presiding officers rarely vote, so their patterns differ.
- Government backbenchers are often given arranged "Dorothy Dixer" questions, which raises their question counts.
- Votes only record ayes and noes, so a missed vote cannot be told apart from a pair (an agreed absence).
- Counts cover only what is on this site, and do not measure electorate or committee work. New members have less history.
Question Time
Question from Michaelia Cash
The senator asked why the Prime Minister continued to oppose legislation to restore common sense to the Sex Discrimination Act and safeguard the rights of biological women and girls in female-only spaces. In supplementary questions, she asked why the Prime Minister did not care about the privacy and safety of women in these spaces and why women should trust a Prime Minister who repeatedly refused to support sex-based rights.
Background: The High Court refused special leave in the Tickle v Giggle case, upholding a ruling against a women-only networking app.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister emphasised respect and dignity for all people, citing former Senator Marise Payne's call for sensitivity. She highlighted the government's focus on women's equality, including the National Plan to End Violence against Women and Girls and efforts to address the gender pay gap. She challenged the opposition to condemn comments regarding consent in marriage and to support development assistance for girls' education and rights in developing countries.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The senator asked whether the Prime Minister agreed with Mr Kelty's assessment that Australians cannot pay their bills because real wages are declining while interest rates rise. She further asked if the Prime Minister agreed with Mr Kelty's criticism of the Treasurer's focus on wage share rather than real wage growth, and his analysis that falling property prices do not equate to improved affordability.
Background: Former ACTU head Bill Kelty criticized the government's economic management, stating that real wages are falling and housing affordability is worsening due to rising interest rates.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister acknowledged the pressure on households from global shocks, including the pandemic, conflicts in Europe and the Middle East, and energy market disruptions. She highlighted government actions such as free doctor visits, cheaper medicines, support for first-home buyers, and free TAFE. Regarding wages, she noted that annual wage growth had exceeded three per cent for 16 consecutive quarters, unemployment was at a half-century low, and 1.3 million jobs had been created. She emphasized that the national minimum wage had increased by more than $12,000 annually, a rise of over 30 per cent, and that pay rises were delivered for early educators and aged care workers. On housing, she stated the government was implementing tax cuts and ensuring fair conditions for investors and first-home buyers to ensure equity.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The senator asked why the government had not reversed cuts to veterans' health services despite the protest. She cited the disappointment expressed by fourth-generation soldier Andy Cullen, who felt betrayed by the government's approach and was discouraging his son from joining the Australian Defence Force.
Background: Australian military veterans protested outside Parliament House by laying down their medals in response to government changes to veterans' health services.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister expressed respect for veterans and noted that Minister Keogh had started talks after publishing a consultation paper. She stated that the $5,000 threshold for health services would not apply to those on special rate disability pension, totally and permanently incapacitated pension, or those determined to be catastrophically injured. The minister highlighted a $169.7 million investment in allied health provider fees, the largest in over a decade, responding to Royal Commission recommendation 71. She also criticized the opposition for not addressing a backlog of 42,000 veteran compensation claims during their time in government.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The senator asked whether the Prime Minister retained confidence in Minister Keogh given that veterans described his conduct as disrespectful and indicated they had lost trust in him after he initially refused to meet with them.
Background: Veterans expressed dissatisfaction following a meeting with Minister Matt Keogh, citing dismissive conduct and a lack of trust in his leadership regarding the $5,000 allied health threshold and previous policy reversals.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister confirmed the Prime Minister had confidence in Minister Keogh. She noted that the minister had acknowledged his error in not meeting the veterans initially. She reiterated that veterans with clinical needs would retain access to allied health services above the $5,000 threshold. She highlighted government investments in the Department of Veterans' Affairs to address a backlog of approximately 42,000 compensation claims.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The member asked whether the innovative business classification would apply at the time of founding, share issuance, investment, or only upon the realization of a capital gain. She sought clarification on how founders and investors could assess risk given the timing of eligibility.
Background: Uncertainty remained regarding when the innovative business carve-out would apply in the capital gains tax reform process.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister reiterated that the government had lifted the turnover threshold to $10 million for small business capital gains tax concessions, covering 98 per cent of active businesses. She stated that the Treasurer was engaging in consultation regarding innovative startup arrangements, with a consultation paper released on 18 June. The minister advised that the government would proceed with consultations in good faith and introduce amendments as necessary, but did not specify the exact timing of eligibility assessment for innovative startups.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The member asked how many times the Prime Minister had promised not to change negative gearing, capital gains tax, or family trust taxes before the last election.
Background: The question focused on the Prime Minister's previous election promises regarding negative gearing, capital gains tax, and family trusts.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister acknowledged the policy change, stating it was necessary to address intergenerational inequity and help young Australians enter the housing market. She argued that the status quo was failing young people and that the budget papers demonstrated worsening inequity. Regarding trusts, she noted that 82 per cent had no underlying business operations, justifying the need for equitable tax arrangements while excluding farming and testamentary trusts.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The senator asked whether the leaked government documents indicated an intention to break election promises by introducing higher taxes on Australians. She followed up by asking why the government was preparing excuses for breaking the promise that changes to negative gearing were off the table. A final supplementary asked how many election promises would be broken in the upcoming budget.
Background: The Prime Minister had previously stated that no new tax policies would be implemented beyond those taken to the election, but leaked documents suggested the government intended to use all available levers to address housing issues.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that the budget would reflect Australian values of fairness and opportunity, particularly for young people seeking housing and jobs. She argued that the opposition had consistently opposed government efforts to increase housing supply and ensure fuel security. In response to the supplementary questions, she reiterated that the government prioritizes giving young people a fair go and criticized the opposition for lacking vision and aligning with One Nation.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The senator asked whether the Prime Minister's mixed messages regarding holiday travel and fuel conservation created confusion for the public. She requested clarification on the specific actions the government expected Australians to take during the crisis.
Background: The Prime Minister previously encouraged Australians to enjoy Easter holidays, but subsequently announced a national address regarding fuel conservation amid a global energy shock.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that the government was responding to an unprecedented shock to global energy markets caused by conflict in the Middle East. She outlined that the Prime Minister would address the nation to explain measures taken to shore up supply, including releasing 20 per cent of fuel reserves and changing fuel standards. The minister criticized the opposition for attempting to create doubt about the government's fuel plan, referencing leaked talking points that allegedly instructed opposition members to sow fear.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The member asked whether the Prime Minister would guarantee that fuel would reach empty pumps before Good Friday, given the reliance of regional areas and tourism operators on available fuel supplies during the peak travel period.
Background: With the Easter long weekend approaching, concerns were raised about fuel availability for regional communities and travellers, with reports of over 870 service stations running dry or missing fuel types.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister reported that National Cabinet had convened to address fuel supply and chain issues stemming from the Middle East conflict. A National Fuel Security Plan was adopted to coordinate responses across governments, currently operating at level 2 to keep Australia moving, with capacity to escalate to levels 3 and 4 if necessary. The minister emphasised that responsibilities span Commonwealth, state, and territory governments, as well as industry partners, with a commitment to working together to maintain economic activity.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The member asked whether the minister would apologise for previously characterising concerns about fuel shortages as extremist rhetoric, given that six shipments had been cancelled and consumers were facing high prices.
Background: The member referenced previous government statements dismissing fuel shortage warnings as scaremongering, contrasting them with recent cancelled shipments and rising prices.
Answer from Tim Ayres
The minister rejected the premise, accusing the opposition of hyperpartisan behaviour. He highlighted government actions including implementing minimum stockholding obligations, empowering the ACCC against price gouging, and appointing a coordinator-general to manage supply.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The member asked whether the Prime Minister believed that holding services to commemorate the death of the Iranian leader was beneficial for social cohesion in Australia.
Background: Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in military strikes, and some Australian mosques held services mourning his death.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that the government does not mourn the passing of Ayatollah Khamenei, citing his regime's responsibility for sponsoring terrorism and attacks on Australian soil. In response to supplementary questions asking if the government would condemn the services or raise concerns with religious groups, she reiterated that the government does not mourn the ayatollah and stated that the government seeks to strengthen social cohesion.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The member asked whether the Prime Minister would apologise for his previous statement regarding inflation, given that evidence now showed inflation was increasing again under the government's policies.
Background: The Prime Minister previously stated that inflation had turned the corner, but recent data indicated a rise in inflation and prices.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that while inflation was higher than desired, it remained significantly lower than the 6.1 per cent rate inherited from the previous government. She highlighted that the government's priority was easing cost-of-living pressures through measures such as cheaper medicines, bulk-billing incentives, student debt relief, and tax cuts. The minister noted that the opposition had voted against these cost-of-living measures. In response to supplementary questions, she affirmed agreement with the Prime Minister's assessment, citing a growing economy, record low unemployment, and wage growth. She listed specific supports including energy bill relief, childcare subsidies, and rent assistance increases.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The member asked whether the Prime Minister would apologise to Jewish Australians for the government's failure to take firm action against antisemitism despite repeated warnings following the October 2023 events.
Background: The question referenced public statements by Sheina Gutnick, daughter of a Bondi attack victim, accusing the government of failing to act on warnings about rising antisemitism since October 2023.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister expressed condolences to victims and described the attack as an evil, ISIS-inspired act of antisemitic violence. She stated that the Prime Minister had publicly expressed sorrow for the grief experienced by the Jewish community and the nation. The minister emphasised that the government's responsibility was to act to prevent future attacks, noting that the government was prioritising the drafting of legislation to address the issue. She argued that national unity and action were more important than further words.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The senator asked whether individuals associated with ISIS were returning to Australia or had returned in recent months, citing community concern over the group's history of violence and genocide.
Background: The Prime Minister previously denied reports of ISIS brides returning to Australia, while the acting NSW Police Force chief stated state and federal agencies were finalising operations regarding the return of Islamic State operatives.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated that security agencies were monitoring the unstable situation in Syria to prepare for any potential returns. He confirmed that the government was not providing assistance or repatriating individuals from Syrian IDP camps. In response to supplementary questions, he reiterated that no taxpayer funds were being spent on the return of these individuals and that the government was not facilitating their repatriation.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The member asked if the government was aware of how many ISIS-associated individuals intended to return and whether the Prime Minister supported their return despite their terrorist links.
Background: Reports suggested individuals associated with ISIS were returning to Australia from Syria, with some having committed serious crimes.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated the government was aware of media reporting but confirmed it was not providing assistance or repatriating this cohort. In response to supplementary questions about guarantees regarding terrorist acts and monitoring, she reiterated that the government was not repatriating the group and that security agencies' advice was always taken to keep Australians safe.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The member asked whether the government would categorically rule out recognising a Palestinian state while Hamas retains exclusive control of the Gaza Strip. She cited international condemnation of Hamas and noted that former minister Ed Husic had suggested recognition was timely.
Background: The questioner referenced Hamas's control of Gaza, the October 2023 attacks, and ongoing hostage situations to challenge the government's stance on diplomatic recognition.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister reiterated the government's condemnation of Hamas as a terrorist organisation dedicated to Israel's destruction. She stated that international consensus, including from Arab nations, requires a reformed Palestinian Authority and the demilitarisation of Hamas before recognition can occur. She argued that addressing the issue of a Palestinian state is essential for long-term peace and security, aligning with positions taken by the United Kingdom and France. The minister criticised the opposition for not supporting a ceasefire, which she claimed is supported by the international community and President Trump.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The senator asked whether the Prime Minister or his office had directed the minister to alter his previous statement regarding discussions with the US President about the beef import ban.
Background: Senator Farrell had previously claimed President Trump raised the beef import ban with the Prime Minister, a statement the Prime Minister denied, leading to a retraction by the minister.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated he had made a mistake, clarifying that President Trump mentioned US beef exports in a speech rather than in discussions with the Prime Minister. He confirmed he had apologised to the Prime Minister and corrected the record with journalists. In response to supplementary questions, he reiterated that he owned up to the error immediately and affirmed that the Prime Minister always tells the truth, dismissing further inquiries as unnecessary.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The senator asked whether the government would rule out introducing new or increased taxes on individuals or businesses during the current term. She followed up by asking for confirmation that negative gearing arrangements would remain unchanged and that Western Australia would continue to receive at least 75 cents in the dollar for GST funding.
Background: The first question of the 48th Parliament sought confirmation on the government's tax stance.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that the government's economic plan focuses on Australians earning and keeping more of their income. She noted that while the government has not changed its tax policy, some members are open to discussing capital gains tax reforms. Regarding negative gearing, she confirmed no changes to tax policy but highlighted the government's detailed housing supply and demand measures. On GST, she referred to the Prime Minister's previous statements confirming the funding arrangement for Western Australia.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The member asked if the Prime Minister believed a small future tax cut would help families facing significant price increases. She cited specific percentage rises in various cost-of-living categories.
Background: Senator Cash questioned the Minister representing the Prime Minister on the effectiveness of tax cuts given rising prices for food, housing, and energy.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister criticized the opposition for consistently voting against cost-of-living relief, including energy bill rebates and previous tax cuts. She stated that inflation was decreasing and real wages were growing. She argued that the opposition's nuclear proposal would require cuts to essential services.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The member asked whether the Prime Minister believed the victims of harassment and violence deserved a more substantial response than a brief comment. She questioned if the government had further actions to address the impact on the construction industry.
Background: The Prime Minister previously described allegations of violence against women by CFMEU members, revealed in a 60 Minutes report, as 'appalling'.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that the allegations were sickening and affirmed the government's commitment to safe workplaces. She noted that Minister Watt had referred matters to the Victorian Deputy Premier for WorkSafe action and that allegations of violence were referred to the Australian Federal Police. The minister argued that the opposition's proposal to deregister the CFMEU would return control to John Setka, whom she described as a criminal element. She asserted that the government stands against violence against women and that deregistration would allow criminal elements to regain control without regulation.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The member asked what actions the Prime Minister had taken to guarantee the safety of Jewish and Israeli patients across Australia following these specific threats made by healthcare workers.
Background: Footage emerged of two nurses at Bankstown Hospital making antisemitic death threats against Israeli patients, including references to sending them to hell and refusing treatment.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister condemned the footage as vile and stated that antisemitism has no place in Australia or its health system. She confirmed that New South Wales authorities had stood down the individuals and referred them to police for criminal investigation. Regarding the supplementary question, she noted that the Prime Minister regularly engages with states and territories on antisemitism but did not confirm a specific National Cabinet call. She added that the matter was being handled through appropriate procedures, including referral to the Health Care Complaints Commission, which feeds into the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The member asked whether the government would acknowledge that its international actions against Israel were fueling the crisis of antisemitism in Australia.
Background: The question followed statements by Israeli officials linking the rise in antisemitism in Australia to the government's stance on Israel, including an attack on a Melbourne synagogue.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that Australia's position in the United Nations reflected international concern and aligned with countries such as Canada, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Japan, and Korea. She argued that conflating government concerns about the humanitarian situation in Gaza with antisemitism was unhelpful, noting that the government advocated for a ceasefire and peace for both Israelis and Palestinians. She condemned the rise in antisemitism as unacceptable and rejected hate acts, including slogans outside the Sydney Opera House. In response to supplementary questions regarding specific attacks and UN motions, she reiterated that the government consistently condemned Hamas and called for hostage releases, dismissing the suggestion that it supported one-sided motions as misinformation. She noted that the opposition leader had opposed a ceasefire supported by US presidents.
Other Parliamentary Activity
-
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare Without Caps) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 17 September 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as shadow minister
-
Denman, Ms Kay Janet
Senate · Monday 14 September 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Statute Update Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 10 September 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Answers to Questions
Senate · Thursday 10 September 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Superannuation
Senate · Wednesday 9 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Fair Work Amendment (Disqualified Officers) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 9 September 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as shadow minister
-
Australian Senate
Senate · Wednesday 9 September 2026 · General Debate
Opened this debate
-
Tobacco Control
Senate · Monday 7 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 7 September 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as shadow minister
-
Veterans
Senate · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 2) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as shadow minister
-
Prime Minister
Senate · Monday 17 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026; In Committee
Senate · Monday 17 August 2026 · In Committee
Responded as shadow minister
-
Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026; In Committee
Senate · Thursday 13 August 2026 · In Committee
Responded as shadow minister
-
Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026; In Committee
Senate · Wednesday 12 August 2026 · In Committee
Opened this debate
-
Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 11 August 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Taxation
Senate · Tuesday 11 August 2026 · General Debate
Opened this debate
-
Taxation
Senate · Tuesday 11 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Grocery Prices
Senate · Thursday 2 July 2026 · General Debate
Responded as shadow minister
-
Aged Care Amendment (Restoring Human Override for Aged Care Needs Assessments) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 2 July 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Sex Discrimination Amendment (Restoring Common Sense and Recognising Biological Sex) Bill 2026; First Reading
Senate · Wednesday 1 July 2026 · First Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Treasurer, Minister Representing the Treasurer; Censure
Senate · Monday 29 June 2026 · General Debate
Opened this debate
-
Crossin, Ms Patricia Margaret (Trish), AM
Senate · Wednesday 24 June 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Private Health Insurance
Senate · Tuesday 12 May 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Morris, Hon. Peter Frederick, OAM
Senate · Tuesday 12 May 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Kumanjayi Little Baby
Senate · Tuesday 12 May 2026 · General Debate
Responded as shadow minister
-
Copyright Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Fuel Security
Senate · Monday 30 March 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Fuel
Senate · Monday 30 March 2026 · General Debate
Opened this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 26 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Defence Amendment (Parliamentary Approval of Overseas Service) Bill 2020; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 25 March 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as shadow minister
-
Commonwealth Entities Legislation Amendment Bill 2026; In Committee
Senate · Tuesday 24 March 2026 · In Committee
Opened this debate
-
Commonwealth Entities Legislation Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 23 March 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Royal Commissions Legislation Amendment (Protections for Providing Information) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 12 March 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion
Senate · Thursday 12 March 2026 · General Debate
Opened this debate
-
Criminal Code Amendment (Keeping Australia Safe) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 11 March 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as shadow minister
-
Boswell, Hon. Ronald (Ron) Leslie Doyle, AO
Senate · Tuesday 3 March 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Closing the Gap
Senate · Monday 2 March 2026 · Ministerial Statement
Responded as shadow minister
-
Middle East
Senate · Monday 2 March 2026 · General Debate
Opened this debate
-
Law and Justice Legislation Amendment (New South Wales Local Court) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 2 March 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as shadow minister
-
Hanson, Senator Pauline Lee; Censure
Senate · Monday 2 March 2026 · General Debate
Responded as shadow minister
-
Commonwealth Parole Board Bill 2025, Commonwealth Parole Board (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 2 March 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Defence Amendment (Parliamentary Joint Committee on Defence) Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 5 February 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide
Senate · Wednesday 4 February 2026 · General Debate
Responded as shadow minister
-
Allen, Dr Katrina Jane (Katie)
Senate · Wednesday 4 February 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
International Relations: Australia and Israel
Senate · Tuesday 3 February 2026 · General Debate
Responded as shadow minister
-
Bolkus, Hon. Nick
Senate · Tuesday 3 February 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Administrative Review Tribunal and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 3 February 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism (Criminal and Migration Laws) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 20 January 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as shadow minister
-
Bondi Beach: Attack
Senate · Monday 19 January 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
- Votes recorded
- 216
- Aye votes (52.8%)
- 114
- No votes (47.2%)
- 102
Showing the latest 50 votes.
-
Middle East
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Australian Federal Police; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Trade Unions; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Consideration of Legislation
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Cybersafety Legislation; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Executive Remuneration; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 17, Noes 26 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Waste Management and Recycling; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Environment and Communications References Committee; Reference
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Red Lines Package Omnibus Bill 2026; First Reading
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 39, Noes 14 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Artificial Intelligence
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Carbon Farming Initiative--Improved Forest Management in Multiple-use Public ...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 27, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Senate Estimates: Questions on Notice; Order for the Production of Documents
9 Sep 2026 · Ayes 37, Noes 22 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Climate Change
7 Sep 2026 · Ayes 11, Noes 27 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Veterans
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
COVID-19: Vaccination; Order for the Production of Documents
13 Aug 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Health Technology Assessment Review Implementation Advisory Group; Order for ...
13 Aug 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Prime Minister; Order for the Production of Documents
13 Aug 2026 · Ayes 36, Noes 24 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026; Second Read
12 Aug 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Taxation
11 Aug 2026 · Ayes 24, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
National Security
11 Aug 2026 · Ayes 24, Noes 35 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
National Security
11 Aug 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 24 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Taxation
11 Aug 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 37 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Aged Care Amendment (Restoring Human Override for Aged Care Needs Assessments...
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Aged Care Amendment (Restoring Human Override for Aged Care Needs Assessments...
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Cost of Living
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Sex Discrimination Amendment (Restoring Common Sense and Recognising Biologic...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 30 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Consideration of Legislation
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Consideration of Legislation
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Consideration of Legislation
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 11 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 27, Noes 11 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 11 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 11 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Consideration by Estimates Committees
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 11 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Consideration of Legislation
29 Jun 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Treasurer, Minister Representing the Treasurer; Censure
29 Jun 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Treasurer, Minister Representing the Treasurer; Censure
29 Jun 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Treasurer, Minister Representing the Treasurer; Censure
29 Jun 2026 · Ayes 24, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Treasurer, Minister Representing the Treasurer; Censure
29 Jun 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 25 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Rearrangement
25 Jun 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
25 Jun 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 25 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026, Income Tax Rates Amendm...
25 Jun 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 25 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026, Income Tax Rates Amendm...
25 Jun 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026, Income Tax Rates Amendm...
25 Jun 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026, Income Tax Rates Amendm...
25 Jun 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026, Income Tax Rates Amendm...
25 Jun 2026 · Ayes 24, Noes 35 · Failed
VOTED AYE
About this page
This page tracks Michaelia Cash's parliamentary activity: questions asked and answered in Question Time, debates spoken in, and votes in divisions. Summaries are in reported speech, not transcripts; each one links to the official record.