Tyron Whitten
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party Senator for WA
Currently sitting
Photo: SIX News Australia, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Seat and party history (1)
- Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party - WA (Senate) - 3 May 2025 to present
- Seat and party records: OpenAustralia member data.
Contact
Office: (08) 9477 5411
Suite C, 117 Great Eastern Highway, Rivervale WA 6103
Office details: Parliament of Australia, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Contact details on aph.gov.au Profile on OpenAustraliaThese counts cover what is on this site only. They do not measure electorate work or committee work.
Compared with other members
Tyron Whitten compared with all 76 sitting senators.
Questions asked in Question Time
Higher than 82% of senators- This member
- 17
- Average
- 10.4
- Median
- 10
Debates spoken in
Higher than 64% of senators- This member
- 47
- Average
- 44.8
- Median
- 40
Votes cast
Higher than 59% of senators- This member
- 863
- Average
- 743.0
- Median
- 730
Share of divisions voted in
Higher than 74% of senators- This member
- 87%
- Average
- 69%
- Median
- 69%
Read these with care
- The median is the middle member: half did more, half did less. It is less affected by a few very active members than the average.
- Ministers answer questions rather than ask them, and the presiding officers rarely vote, so their patterns differ.
- Government backbenchers are often given arranged "Dorothy Dixer" questions, which raises their question counts.
- Votes only record ayes and noes, so a missed vote cannot be told apart from a pair (an agreed absence).
- Counts cover only what is on this site, and do not measure electorate or committee work. New members have less history.
Question Time
Question from Tyron Whitten
The senator asked why the government insisted on a higher immigration rate than other developed nations and how it reconciled its stance with Canada's economic performance under negative migration.
Background: One Nation argued that Australia's targeted migration rate of 0.8 per cent is too high compared to the developed world average of 0.37 per cent.
Answer from Murray Watt
The minister cited Bureau of Statistics data showing a 47 per cent reduction in net overseas migration due to government reforms. He argued that while numbers need to be sustainable, drastic cuts would crush the economy and remove essential workers from hospitals, aged care, and agriculture. In response to supplementary questions, he noted that Canada experienced a recession after cutting migration, contrasting this with Australia's need to balance migration with economic stability. He dismissed One Nation's policies as reckless and aligned with US political trends.
Question from Tyron Whitten
The senator asked if the government accepted that high immigration caused capital shallowing and was a material cause of the productivity slump. He followed up by citing Canada's experience with cutting immigration to boost per capita growth, and asked if the government supported One Nation's plan to reduce net overseas migration to negative for three years and then cap it at 130,000.
Background: Reserve Bank analysis suggested lack of capital deepening held back productivity, and One Nation blamed high immigration for capital shallowing.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister rejected the claim that migration caused productivity issues, stating that productivity challenges were common across advanced economies. She noted that the government had cut net overseas migration by roughly 45 per cent from the post-COVID peak. She emphasized that the budget included 15 measures to drive productivity, including approvals reform and technology adoption. She stated that the government would not support One Nation's plan, citing feedback from business groups, farmers, and healthcare providers that such a policy would have a detrimental impact on economic growth and essential services.
Question from Tyron Whitten
The senator asked how many cases involving child sex offenders the Home Affairs Minister had intervened in to prevent visa retention. He followed up by asking about specific actions taken regarding a Federal Court decision overturning a cancellation and whether the government would strengthen ministerial directives to the tribunal.
Background: Reports indicated that the Administrative Appeals Tribunal had set aside visa cancellations for individuals with serious criminal records.
Answer from Murray Watt
The minister stated he did not have precise numbers but confirmed that the government takes strong action to cancel visas for serious offenders. He explained that when the tribunal sets aside a cancellation, the matter returns to the minister for reconsideration, and in many cases, the visa is cancelled again. Regarding the specific Federal Court case, he confirmed it was being examined and that appropriate action would be taken. He noted that the government had already strengthened ministerial directions to the tribunal in its first term and reminded the senator that One Nation had previously voted against legislation to deport hate preachers.
Question from Tyron Whitten
The senator asked why the government refuses to help veterans suffering under the $5,000 allied health cap. He asked if the government would commit to allowing veterans to choose their own assessors rather than using preferred suppliers.
Background: One Nation criticized the $5,000 allied health cap, arguing it disproportionately affects remote veterans and that assessments are funneled through a sole supplier.
Answer from Jenny McAllister
The minister acknowledged Vietnam Veterans' Day and highlighted a significant increase in allied health provider fees, the largest in 20 years, responding to Royal Commission recommendations. She clarified that the $5,000 threshold reduces the need for veterans to return to a GP for referrals every 12 visits. Regarding assessor choice, she stated that DVA already prefers reports from a veteran's usual treating doctor, with independent exams only required when necessary due to complexity or lack of access.
Question from Tyron Whitten
The member asked how many times Labor had provided concessions to the Greens to pass legislation, despite pre-election promises not to negotiate with them. He asked if the government had entered a coalition in substance with the Greens and if it would stop making deals with them.
Background: The Prime Minister had previously ruled out a coalition with the Greens, but the government had negotiated with them to pass legislation.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that the government would not enter a minority government with the Greens but had to negotiate to pass legislation, including tax cuts for 13 million Australians. She defended the negotiations as necessary to deliver for working people. She criticised One Nation for voting against cost-of-living measures and tax cuts, alleging they worked with the coalition to block Labor's agenda. She quoted One Nation's leader as saying she was not anti-coalition.
Question from Tyron Whitten
The senator inquired about the aggregate potential cost of residential mortgage failures within the 5% deposit initiative. Additional queries questioned why the government was implementing measures that would eliminate rental housing stock and increase inflation, and when it would resolve the housing emergency by reducing large-scale migration.
Background: Concerns were raised about default rates under the five per cent deposit scheme and the potential impact of abolishing negative gearing on rental supply.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that figures on contingent liabilities would be updated in the budget. She criticized One Nation for voting against the Help to Buy Bill and the Housing Australia Future Fund Bill, arguing their voting record did not demonstrate care for young home buyers. In response to supplementary questions, she asserted that the government was focused on increasing housing supply and enabling home ownership, while criticizing One Nation for consistently opposing government housing policies.
Question from Tyron Whitten
The member asked whether the government had the power to ration fuel if the crisis worsened and whether it could guarantee supplies would not run out.
Background: The member claimed Australia's fuel storage levels were below international requirements and questioned government preparedness.
Answer from Tim Ayres
The minister did not directly address rationing powers but guaranteed that domestic reserves were being used to address undersupply issues. He contrasted current domestic storage with previous government practices of storing reserves overseas.
Question from Tyron Whitten
The member asked why the government overruled judicial decisions to grant Equality Australia DGR status. He questioned the legislative process used to bypass administrative rejections.
Background: Equality Australia was rejected for DGR status by the ACNC, AAT, and Federal Court due to being considered a lobbyist group. The government introduced legislation to grant it status.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister explained that there are two avenues for DGR status: administrative approval and legislative inclusion. She stated that the government believed Equality Australia performed important work for the LGBTIQ+ community, including advocacy and support. She confirmed that the legislation was currently before the Senate for debate and vote.
Question from Tyron Whitten
The member asked whether the government accepts that immigration levels significantly impact house and rental prices.
Background: Questions were raised about the impact of immigration levels on housing prices and rental costs.
Answer from Tim Ayres
The minister stated that net overseas migration had declined by more than 40 per cent from its post-COVID peak in 2022-23. He highlighted the government's commitment to building 55,000 social and affordable homes and 100,000 homes for first-home buyers. In response to supplementary questions citing reports on immigration cuts and housing demand, he criticised One Nation for voting against housing bills and stated that the government is managing migration in the national interest while building homes. He argued that the opposition parties are undermining these efforts.
Question from Tyron Whitten
The senator asked if the government accepted that its housing policies, particularly the five per cent deposit scheme, were putting young people at risk of mortgage stress and driving up prices.
Background: Critics argued the five per cent deposit scheme increased mortgage stress risks amid inflation concerns and APRA's introduction of debt-to-income limits.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister rejected the claims, citing Treasury modelling and bank CEO statements that the scheme was not driving prices. She highlighted that construction cost inflation had fallen to 2.1 per cent and that over 520,000 new homes had been built. She emphasised that lending rules remained unchanged and that the scheme helped buyers save on mortgage insurance without increasing borrowing capacity.
Question from Tyron Whitten
The member asked whether the government accepted responsibility for poor economic indicators, including rising inflation and housing costs, and whether its policies were driving young Australians into mortgage stress.
Background: The question cited RBA data showing inflation at the top of the target band and predicted negative wage growth.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister rejected the characterization of the economic data, stating that inflation had halved since the government took office and that unemployment was at historic lows. She highlighted the creation of 1.1 million jobs and record female labor participation. Regarding housing, the minister denied that government policies were causing stress, arguing instead that the focus was on increasing supply to address intergenerational inequities.
Question from Tyron Whitten
The senator asked if the government was considering mandatory methane-reducing additives for livestock, similar to Denmark. He raised concerns about consumer right-to-know regarding food contents and potential health risks to cattle.
Background: Denmark introduced mandates for Bovaer 10 to reduce methane in dairy, raising questions about similar measures in Australia and food labeling.
Answer from Malarndirri McCarthy
The minister stated that the government was not introducing mandates but was supporting the introduction of methane-reducing additives. She declined to answer specific questions about labeling rights and health risks, stating she had answered the questions and would take further examples on notice.
Question from Tyron Whitten
The senator asked what percentage of global CO2 emissions Australia was responsible for, suggesting it was one per cent. He followed up by asking for the percentage of emissions attributable to China, the USA, and India, and whether their emissions had increased or decreased over five years. Finally, he asked why Australia should cripple its economy for climate action when major polluters do not care and Australia's contribution is minimal.
Background: Australia's small share of global CO2 emissions compared to major emitters like China, the USA, and India.
Answer from Tim Ayres
The minister stated that Australia's onshore scope 1 and 2 emissions were between one and two per cent, but noted that Australia is a high per capita emitter. He argued that it was in Australia's national interest to engage in international frameworks because the country has much to lose from climate failure, particularly for farmers and coastal communities. He did not provide specific figures for the emissions of China, the USA, or India, but emphasised the need for international cooperation and legally binding frameworks. He asserted that increased carbon emissions cause temperature rises and that industries must engage with this reality.
Question from Tyron Whitten
The senator asked whether the government had been in discussions with NSW police over repatriation and if the government would consider sending ISIS brides to Nauru instead of allowing them into the community.
Background: The deputy police commissioner of NSW stated that state and federal agencies were working on the return of ISIS brides, contradicting government denials.
Answer from Murray Watt
The minister stated that comments made by NSW police were a matter for them. He repeatedly affirmed that the Australian government was not providing assistance to the cohort. He declined to comment on costs, timelines, or locations for potential returns, maintaining that no assistance was being provided.
Question from Tyron Whitten
The member asked if the government accepted that record immigration was outpacing investment and driving declining productivity. He followed up by asking why the government denied a correlation between immigration and poor productivity, and what the government would say to Australians struggling with housing costs.
Background: The member asked if the government accepted that record immigration was driving declining productivity rates and outpacing investment.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister stated that productivity challenges are multifaceted and have existed for decades, comparable to issues in other economies, and are not linked to migration numbers. She noted that the worst decade for productivity was under the previous coalition government. She emphasized that the government is working on skills, training, and infrastructure to improve productivity without changing net overseas migration, and rejected attempts to pit groups against each other.
Question from Tyron Whitten
The senator asked for data on permanent resident visas and the total non-citizen population, and why the government had not stopped mass migration to address housing affordability.
Background: Senator Whitten asked about permanent resident visas and the total number of non-citizens in Australia, linking migration to the housing crisis.
Answer from Murray Watt
The minister stated he did not have the specific visa data to hand but would seek it. He highlighted that net overseas migration had fallen by 37 per cent to 341,000 in the year to December 2024, down from a peak of 538,000. Regarding housing, he criticized One Nation senators for previously voting against housing supply legislation and encouraged the new senator to support future housing bills.
Question from Tyron Whitten
The senator asked why the government was crushing livestock industries by lifting restrictions on US beef imports and banning live exports, and what other rural industries were targeted.
Background: The senator claimed the government was harming beef and sheep industries through import decisions and live export bans.
Answer from Malarndirri McCarthy
The minister rejected the premise that the government was harming agriculture, stating it supports farmers. She reiterated that biosecurity is not compromised and that Australian beef exports have grown significantly, with record-breaking values. She dismissed the question's assertions as incorrect.
Other Parliamentary Activity
-
Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 17 September 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Migration
Senate · Thursday 17 September 2026 · Take Note Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 16 September 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Migration
Senate · Wednesday 16 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Amendment (No Jab No Pay Repeal) Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 16 September 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Migration
Senate · Monday 14 September 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Protecting Australians from Foreign Terrorist Fighters Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 10 September 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide
Senate · Wednesday 9 September 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 9 September 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Fair Work Amendment (Disqualified Officers) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 9 September 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Veterans: Health Care
Senate · Tuesday 8 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
National Security
Senate · Thursday 20 August 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Veterans
Senate · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Veterans
Senate · Tuesday 18 August 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Taxation
Senate · Tuesday 18 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Grocery Prices
Senate · Thursday 2 July 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Cost of Living
Senate · Wednesday 1 July 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Competition and Consumer Amendment (Unfair Trading Practices) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 1 July 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
-
Fuel
Senate · Monday 29 June 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Australian Greens
Senate · Thursday 25 June 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Gas Industry: Taxation
Senate · Monday 22 June 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Competition and Consumer Amendment (Responding to Exceptional Circumstances) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 14 May 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Housing
Senate · Tuesday 12 May 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Fuel Excise Relief) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
-
Taxation
Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Fuel Security
Senate · Monday 30 March 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 26 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Sovereign Capability
Senate · Tuesday 24 March 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Supporting Choice in Superannuation and Other Measures) Bill 2025; In Committee
Senate · Wednesday 11 March 2026 · In Committee
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Criminal Code Amendment (Keeping Australia Safe) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 11 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Online Safety Act 2021
Senate · Wednesday 4 March 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Competition and Consumer Amendment (Make Price Gouging Illegal) Bill 2024; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 5 February 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism (Criminal and Migration Laws) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 20 January 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Bondi Beach: Attack
Senate · Monday 19 January 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Plebiscite (Future Migration Level) Bill 2018; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 26 November 2025 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Housing
Senate · Wednesday 26 November 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Housing
Senate · Monday 24 November 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Payday Superannuation) Bill 2025, Superannuation Guarantee Charge Amendment Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 3 November 2025 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Economy
Senate · Monday 3 November 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Australian National Flag
Senate · Wednesday 3 September 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Housing
Senate · Tuesday 2 September 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Cost of Living
Senate · Monday 1 September 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Cost of Living
Senate · Monday 25 August 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Whitten, Senator Tyron
Senate · Tuesday 29 July 2025 · First Speech
Contributed to this debate
-
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
Senate · Tuesday 29 July 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Trade with the United States of America: Beef Industry
Senate · Monday 28 July 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
- Votes recorded
- 863
- Aye votes (66.9%)
- 577
- No votes (33.1%)
- 286
Showing the latest 50 votes.
-
Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026; Second Read
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Defence Force Discipline Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 30, Noes 24 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Corruption in the Construction Industry Select Committee; Appointment
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee; Reference
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Environment and Communications References Committee; Reference
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare With...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare With...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Migration
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 19, Noes 30 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Manufacturing Industry
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 20, Noes 27 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Personal Information and Privacy; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 30, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Maritime Industry; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 16, Noes 23 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Climate Change; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 16, Noes 23 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Census; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 30 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
North to East Australia Pipeline; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 18, Noes 25 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Artificial Intelligence Joint Select Committee; Appointment
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 17, Noes 25 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Artificial Intelligence Joint Select Committee; Appointment
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 17, Noes 26 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Improved Native Forest Management; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 27, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Middle East
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED NO -
A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Amendment (No Jab No Pay Repeal) Bill 20...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 6, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Economy
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Australian Federal Police; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Trade Unions; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Consideration of Legislation
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Cybersafety Legislation; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Executive Remuneration; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 17, Noes 26 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Waste Management and Recycling; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Environment and Communications References Committee; Reference
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Red Lines Package Omnibus Bill 2026; First Reading
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 39, Noes 14 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Artificial Intelligence
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account)...
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 36 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Water
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 16, Noes 24 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Cost of Living
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Digital Seller Underperformance Policy; Order for the Production of Documents
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 18 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Health Care; Order for the Production of Documents
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 28 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Intergenerational Trust Fund for the People of the Republic of Nauru; Order f...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account)...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 24, Noes 35 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; In Committee
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; In Committee
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 22 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Consideration of Legislation
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 19, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Carbon Farming Initiative--Improved Forest Management in Multiple-use Public ...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 27, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 6, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 4, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 4, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED AYE
About this page
This page tracks Tyron Whitten's parliamentary activity: questions asked and answered in Question Time, debates spoken in, and votes in divisions. Summaries are in reported speech, not transcripts; each one links to the official record.