Question Time AU

General Debate

Grocery Prices

Senate · Thursday 2 July 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Senate debated a motion noting that grocery prices have risen because of climate targets, power bills, overseas property holdings, and red tape. Opposition and One Nation senators argued that government energy policies have driven up electricity costs, which in turn increased food prices and reduced productivity, while also citing high inflation and housing costs. Labor senators countered that opposition parties consistently voted against measures designed to lower costs, such as tax cuts and wage protections, and accused them of supporting corporate interests over workers. The debate highlighted deep divisions over the causes of the cost-of-living crisis and the effectiveness of government interventions.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Hanson moved the motion, attributing skyrocketing grocery prices to net-zero policies, high energy costs, foreign corporate land ownership, and excessive regulation on farmers. Hanson cited Salvation Army and OzHarvest reports indicating widespread food insecurity, with many Australians skipping meals or eating expired food. Hanson argued that renewable energy targets have caused electricity prices to rise by over 200 per cent since 2001, leading to blackouts and high household bills. Hanson claimed that Australia is de-industrialising and losing manufacturing jobs due to high energy costs, while exporting coal and gas that could provide cheaper domestic power. Hanson concluded that the government's reliance on renewables and international agreements is driving families into poverty.

Opposition response

Cash stated that Australians are paying significantly more for insurance, electricity, gas, rent, education, and food under the Labor government. Cash noted that interest rates have increased 15 times, leaving mortgage holders approximately $29,000 worse off annually, which has forced some employed Australians to live in their cars. Cash argued that the government failed to control spending and inflation, leading to higher taxes and a need for many Australians to work multiple jobs. Cash proposed a coalition plan including a tax-back guarantee to prevent inflation from pushing taxpayers into higher brackets and linking migration numbers to housing construction to address affordability.