Question Time AU

Matter of Public Importance

Housing

Senate · Tuesday 2 September 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a motion by Senator Tyrrell arguing that government actions to address housing shortages were insufficient. Senator Tyrrell proposed using standardised building plans to accelerate supply, while opposition and crossbench members criticised the government's migration policies and the effectiveness of the Housing Australia Future Fund. Government senators defended their record, highlighting the five per cent deposit scheme and the Homes for Australia plan. The Greens argued that tax concessions for investors needed to be addressed to achieve genuine affordability.

Outcome

The motion was debated as a Matter of Public Importance; no vote was taken.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Senator Tyrrell argued that the housing affordability crisis required a supply-side solution rather than demand-side subsidies. Senator Tyrrell proposed that the government hire architects to create free, low-cost floor plans using off-the-shelf components to streamline council approvals. Senator Tyrrell suggested that if ten per cent of the government's target of 1.2 million homes used these designs, it would deliver 24,000 homes at a cost of $480 million annually. Senator Tyrrell contended that creating a separate sector for affordable housing would avoid competing with the private market and reduce construction costs through economies of scale.

Opposition response

Senator Nampijinpa Price linked the housing crisis to high migration levels and government regulation. Senator Nampijinpa Price argued that record migration had increased demand for homes, driving up rents and prices, while the government's policies had failed to boost supply. Senator Nampijinpa Price claimed that the Housing Australia Future Fund had not resulted in any new homes being built during the government's first term. Senator Nampijinpa Price also asserted that increased regulations and energy policies had raised construction costs and contributed to building company failures.