Question Time AU

Question Time

Senate

Tuesday 18 August 2026 · 10 questions

Summarised by AI in reported speech, not a transcript. Read the official Hansard · OpenAustralia

At a glance

Main topics

Superannuation System Strength and Reforms, Veterans Allied Health Services Cap, Gambling Reform, National Youth Parliament and Youth Economic Security, Freedom of Information Transparency, Artificial Intelligence Taxation and Sovereignty, Veterans Allied Health Services and Choice, Remote Jobs and Economic Development Program, Aged Care Assessment Algorithm, Wage Growth and Cost of Living

Topics (select to filter)

Questions and answers

Superannuation

Background

The question sought to highlight the government's actions to strengthen the superannuation system for current and future workers.

Question

The senator asked the minister to outline the purpose of superannuation, its benefits for working Australians, and how the government is strengthening the system. She specifically inquired about the impact of the requirement for employers to pay superannuation simultaneously with wages, and asked what threats exist to the system.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Katy Gallagher

The minister stated that the government has increased the superannuation guarantee to 12 per cent and implemented payday super to close loopholes where workers missed out on contributions. She noted that approximately 1.3 million Australians, including 750,000 women and 550,000 young people, will benefit from an enhanced low-income super tax offset, providing up to $810 annually and a potential retirement benefit of $15,000. The minister explained that payday super prevents an average 35-year-old from losing approximately $32,000 in retirement savings due to delayed payments. She identified opposition parties and One Nation as threats to the system, citing their proposals to freeze the guarantee or allow early access.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q3 Matthew Canavan LNP QLD 2:12 pm

Veterans

Background

Veterans had met with the Minister for Veterans' Affairs to protest a new $5,000 annual cap on allied health services, alleging the minister was dismissive during the meeting.

Question

The senator asked whether the Prime Minister would meet with veterans to listen to their concerns about the $5,000 allied health threshold. He cited reports that the Veterans' Affairs minister had been dismissive and that four veteran suicides were linked to distress over the policy. He asked if the government was considering scrapping the cap.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister acknowledged Vietnam Veterans' Day and stated that the Prime Minister regularly engages with veteran groups. She clarified that the $5,000 threshold is not a hard limit if there is a clinical need, ensuring veterans continue to receive necessary care. She noted that the Prime Minister's office has been briefed on the issues raised by the veteran delegation. The minister did not confirm whether the cap would be scrapped, stating only that the government's position would be considered carefully.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q4 Sarah Hanson-Young Greens SA 2:18 pm

Gambling

Background

The question referenced Peta Murphy, a prominent advocate for gambling reform.

Question

The senator asked the minister what Peta Murphy would say regarding the government's approach to gambling reform.

Answer from Penny Wong (Minister representing the Prime Minister)

The minister did not provide a substantive answer to the question, as the transcript indicates the exchange ended without a recorded response or with an interjection not captured in the provided text segments for a full answer.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

National Youth Parliament

Background

150 young Australians were attending the first National Youth Parliament in Canberra, raising concerns about cost of living, housing, and financial security.

Question

The senator asked how the government is listening to young Australians and addressing their concerns about economic security. She asked for an update on government actions to support youth and what obstacles remain to their economic future.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Jess Walsh

The minister highlighted government actions including five consecutive minimum wage rises, protections for gig economy workers, and the criminalization of wage theft. She noted tax cuts and housing reforms designed to help young people buy homes. The minister also mentioned a 20 per cent reduction in HECS debt and free TAFE access. She identified opposition parties and One Nation as the primary obstacles, citing their opposition to wage increases, free TAFE, and housing support.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Freedom of Information

Background

The rate of FOI requests granted full access had dropped to 25 per cent, with independent reviews finding many blackouts unjustified.

Question

The senator asked what mandatory training requirements exist for FOI decision-makers to ensure they understand the FOI Act. She asked how much taxpayer money was spent defending FOI refusals that were later overturned by independent authorities.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Don Farrell

The minister rejected the premise that the government lacks transparency, citing upcoming electoral law reforms requiring donor disclosure within seven days. He stated he was not aware of specific training requirements for FOI officials but offered to investigate and provide a formal response. He emphasized the need to modernize the FOI system to prevent abuse by vexatious requesters and protect public servants, rather than providing the specific financial figures requested.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 4 points of order raised

Artificial Intelligence

Background

The Assistant Minister for Science had given a speech on AI economic benefits without mentioning tax contributions from multinational tech companies.

Question

The senator asked if Australia was doomed to repeat mining boom mistakes by failing to capture tax benefits from AI investments. He asked if the government would mandate sovereign Australian capability in procurement to ensure local companies benefit from the AI value chain.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Tim Ayres

The minister stated that all firms investing in Australia must pay their fair share of tax, noting Australia's leadership in OECD multinational tax discussions. He emphasized the government's focus on legislating AI standards for data centres to ensure they support the national electricity grid and economic resilience. He affirmed the goal of capturing as much AI training investment and technology stack development as possible within Australia, from critical minerals to chip manufacturing.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 1 point of order raised

Q8 Tyron Whitten One Nation WA 2:39 pm

Veterans

Background

One Nation criticized the $5,000 allied health cap, arguing it disproportionately affects remote veterans and that assessments are funneled through a sole supplier.

Question

The senator asked why the government refuses to help veterans suffering under the $5,000 allied health cap. He asked if the government would commit to allowing veterans to choose their own assessors rather than using preferred suppliers.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Jenny McAllister

The minister acknowledged Vietnam Veterans' Day and highlighted a significant increase in allied health provider fees, the largest in 20 years, responding to Royal Commission recommendations. She clarified that the $5,000 threshold reduces the need for veterans to return to a GP for referrals every 12 visits. Regarding assessor choice, she stated that DVA already prefers reports from a veteran's usual treating doctor, with independent exams only required when necessary due to complexity or lack of access.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Indigenous Employment

Background

The government had fulfilled its pledge to generate 3,000 positions in isolated areas and revealed intentions to double that figure.

Question

The senator asked for an update on the Remote Jobs and Economic Development program. She asked for feedback from individuals working in these jobs and what obstacles stand in the way of further economic development in remote communities.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Malarndirri McCarthy

The minister confirmed the delivery of 3,000 jobs and the commitment to create 6,000 by the end of the decade. She shared positive testimonials from workers in the Tiwi Islands and Wurrumiyanga regarding financial stability and job satisfaction. She identified the opposition's criticism of the program's ambition as an obstacle, contrasting the government's delivery with the previous coalition's failure to meet its own targets.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Aged Care

Background

A 96-year-old woman with serious health needs was denied additional funding by the government's assessment algorithm, a decision criticized by experts as flawed.

Question

The senator asked how the government could justify the algorithm's decision to deny additional support to a deteriorating 96-year-old. He asked if the government believed this was the best outcome and why it rejected a bill allowing human override of the algorithm.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister stated that the specific case has been referred to the department for review. She highlighted two improvements to the assessment system: a rapid review of prioritization and a legislated review process for changing care levels. She noted an additional $3.7 billion investment in aged care in the budget. She did not directly answer whether the specific outcome was correct, instead emphasizing the government's commitment to dignity and the ongoing refinement of the system.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Wages and Salaries

Background

The question sought to highlight government actions supporting wage rises and cost-of-living relief for workers.

Question

The senator asked how the government is backing wage rises to support workers. He asked for details on other measures to help Australians keep more of their earnings and what obstacles stand in the way.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Murray Watt

The minister cited strong wage growth, including a 4.75 per cent increase in the national minimum wage affecting 2.7 million workers. He highlighted tax cuts, cheaper medicines, and housing funding as additional supports. He identified the opposition and One Nation as obstacles, accusing them of opposing wage increases, penalty rates, and superannuation contributions. He characterized the opposition's agenda as determined to cut wages and cost-of-living relief.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Other debates this day (16)

Aged Care General Debate Answers to Questions Take Note Debate Broadcasting Services Amendment (Register of Media Interests) Bill 2026; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Broadcasting Services Amendment (Register of Media Interests) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Crimes Amendment (Prohibiting Shackling During Childbirth) Bill 2026; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Crimes Amendment (Prohibiting Shackling During Childbirth) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Crimes Amendment (Prohibiting the Strip Searching of Children) Bill 2026; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Crimes Amendment (Prohibiting the Strip Searching of Children) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Freedom of Information Take Note Debate Gambling Take Note Debate National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; In Committee Bill Debate National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate · listed Privatisation Matter of Public Importance Taxation Matter of Public Importance Veterans Take Note Debate National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Bill Debate

Divisions on this day (20)

1. Rearrangement Passed 28–16 2. Rearrangement Passed 28–16 3. National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; Second Reading Passed 36–24 4. National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; Second Reading Not passed 11–32 5. National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; Second Reading Not passed 11–30 6. National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; Second Reading Passed 32–10 7. Aged Care Passed 34–23 8. Select Committee on Corruption in the Construction Industry; Appointment Not passed 24–31 9. Animal Welfare; Order for the Production of Documents Not passed 11–24 10. Cheaper Home Batteries Program; Order for the Production of Documents Not passed 23–32 11. Renewable Energy, Climate Change; Order for the Production of Documents Not passed 24–32 12. Privatisation Not passed 9–22 13. National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Passed 28–12 14. National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Not passed 12–30 15. National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Passed 37–3 16. National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Passed 30–12 17. National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Not passed 12–30 18. National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Passed 29–12 19. National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Not passed 12–29 20. National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Passed 30–12