Question Time AU

Matter of Public Importance

Cost of Living

Senate · Wednesday 1 July 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senator Sean Bell moved a matter of public importance arguing that the Labor government had failed to address rising costs for essentials like food, fuel, and power. Opposition and crossbench members criticised the government's economic management, citing specific price increases and the impact on households and small businesses. Government senators defended their record, highlighting tax cuts, wage increases, and healthcare investments, while accusing One Nation of opposing relief measures. The Greens argued that the crisis was driven by corporate profiteering and that One Nation served billionaire interests. The motion was passed by the Senate.

Outcome

The motion was passed by the Senate with a division of 21 to 19.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Bell argued that the government's tax and spend policies were driving inflation and making families poorer. Bell cited specific price rises, including a 21 per cent increase in electricity and a 5.5 per cent rise in insurance, alongside rising rents and mortgage pressures. Bell claimed that pensioners and small businesses were being squeezed by these costs and that the government was prioritising global agendas over Australian households. Bell called for an end to net zero policies, which were described as driving up power prices, and urged the government to put national interests first.

Opposition response

O'Sullivan argued that everyday Australians were struggling with rising costs despite government claims of economic improvement. O'Sullivan cited ABS data showing increases in meat, dairy, and clothing prices, as well as a 21.1 per cent rise in electricity prices. O'Sullivan highlighted that childcare costs had risen by 27 per cent since the government took office, contradicting promises of cheaper care. O'Sullivan stated that real wages were not keeping pace with living costs, leaving families unable to make ends meet.

Votes during this debate

Division 17: Cost of Living Passed 21–19