Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026; Second Reading

Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Senate debated the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026, which grants Export Finance Australia new powers to secure fuel and critical minerals supplies amid global disruptions caused by conflict in the Middle East. Government senators argued the legislation was essential for national security and economic resilience, while opposition and independent senators criticised the government's prior handling of energy policy and raised concerns about the breadth of executive powers. The Greens moved amendments to sunset the powers and restrict their use, but the bill passed its second reading.

Outcome

The bill was read a second time.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Green moved the second reading, stating the bill establishes a Strategic Reserve to secure fuel, critical minerals, and other goods vital for the economy. Green explained that Export Finance Australia would receive new financial tools, including insurance and loans, to underwrite fuel purchases and stockpile materials like antimony and rare earth elements. Green argued this action shields Australians from supply chain disruptions and market volatility resulting from geopolitical events. Green emphasised that the government is acting proactively to manage fuel security and support the $1.2 billion Critical Minerals Strategic Reserve.

Government response

Wong described the bill as a measure of economic resilience and sovereignty, noting that Export Finance Australia would help secure critical supplies during the Middle East conflict. Wong highlighted that the legislation empowers the agency to use a broader financial toolkit, including guarantees and loans, to support businesses purchasing strategic materials. Wong stated that the government is using all tools of statecraft to build resilience and diversify relationships in the region. Wong urged the Senate to support the legislation to ensure Australia remains prepared for future disruptions.

Opposition response

Bragg argued that Australia was underprepared for the crisis due to restrictive environmental laws that delayed energy project approvals. Bragg claimed the government had failed to utilise domestic fossil fuel resources, leaving the country dependent on imports despite having significant reserves. Bragg criticised the lack of progress on bilateral deals with states and territories to streamline approvals. Bragg asserted that a mix of energy sources, including fossil fuels and renewables, was necessary for security and that the current regulatory framework hindered production.