Question Time AU

Question Time

Senate

Thursday 6 February 2025 · 11 questions

Summarised by AI in reported speech, not a transcript. Read the official Hansard · OpenAustralia

At a glance

Main topics

Antisemitism database and National Cabinet briefing, Cost of living and economic performance, Cost of living increases, US President Trump's Gaza proposals, Critical minerals processing and production tax credits, Salmon industry and nature-positive laws, Agricultural costs and food prices, Cost of net zero transition, Australia's stance on Gaza and US tariffs, Environmental Defenders Office funding

Topics (select to filter)

Questions and answers

Antisemitism

Background

National Cabinet agreed on 21 January to establish a national database to record antisemitic crimes and incidents.

Question

The senator asked whether the database had been established and, if so, how many incidents it had recorded. He followed up by asking if the minister was unaware of the database's status despite the recent National Cabinet meeting. He also asked whether the National Cabinet was briefed on an incident involving a caravan at Dural, suggesting only the New South Wales Premier was aware.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister stated she did not have the specific information on the database to hand but would seek it. She emphasised the government's focus on combating the rise in antisemitism through legislative measures, including hate crime and antidoxxing laws, and financial support for the Jewish community. Regarding the supplementary questions, she reiterated that she would obtain the information and noted that the Dural incident was subject to an ongoing investigation. She criticised the opposition for focusing on political advantage rather than national security.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 2 points of order raised

Cost of Living

Background

The government highlighted low unemployment, falling inflation, rising wages, and the creation of 1.1 million jobs.

Question

The senator asked how the government achieved these economic objectives and assisted Australians. She followed up by asking how the government supported women in the workforce, noting record participation and a low gender pay gap. She also asked how the government's approach improved the economic outlook compared to the previous administration.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Katy Gallagher

The minister attributed the improvements to government policies that reduced inflation, increased wages, and created jobs, contrasting this with the previous government's record of rising inflation and stagnating wages. She listed measures including tax cuts, Medicare investments, early education and care support, and HECS debt relief. Regarding women, she cited extended paid parental leave, superannuation on parental leave, and investments in female-dominated sectors like aged care and early education, noting that 500,000 of the new jobs went to women. She contrasted the government's plan with the opposition's proposed cuts and nuclear energy policy.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q3 Anne Ruston Liberal SA 2:12 pm

Cost of Living

Background

The senator cited increases in living costs, including food, housing, and insurance, under the current government.

Question

The senator asked when the Prime Minister would admit to failing to control costs and why he claimed Australians were better off. She followed up by asking for an apology regarding extra mortgage interest payments due to rate rises. She also asked why the Prime Minister would not admit to breaking promises on energy costs and nuclear policy.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister rejected the premise, stating that inflation was high and living standards were declining when the government took office. She highlighted that inflation has since fallen, wages are growing, and unemployment is at a 50-year low. She criticised the opposition for opposing cost-of-living relief measures and for proposing $350 billion in cuts and a $600 billion nuclear program. She argued that the opposition's policies would lead to higher power prices and cuts to essential services.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q4 Mehreen Faruqi Greens NSW 2:19 pm

United States of America

Background

US President Donald Trump proposed the occupation of Gaza and the displacement of Palestinians.

Question

The senator asked the minister to condemn Trump's proposal, which she described as ethnic cleansing and illegal, and to confirm Australia would not support such actions. She followed up by asking for a clear statement that Australia would not support the actions or involve troops. She also asked the minister to condemn the Opposition Leader for praising Trump.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister stated that the Prime Minister had consistently backed a two-state outcome reached in line with international law. She explained that the government does not immediately react to every report, noting that regional countries are in dialogue with the United States. She reiterated the bipartisan commitment to a two-state outcome as the path to self-determination for Palestinians and security for Israel. She referred to her previous answers regarding the condemnation of Trump and the Opposition Leader.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Economy

Background

The government plans to process critical minerals in Australia rather than exporting them for refinement.

Question

The senator asked how the government was creating secure jobs in the resources industry through local processing. He followed up by asking how production tax credits would create jobs and who supported them. He also asked why the credits were important for Western Australia and what was preventing their implementation.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Don Farrell

The minister stated that production tax credits would ensure critical minerals are processed locally, maximising value and creating jobs, particularly in Western Australia. He noted that industry groups, including the Association of Mining and Exploration Companies and the Minerals Council of Australia, supported the credits. He claimed that the Liberal and National parties were standing in the way of implementation, turning their backs on the resources sector and Western Australia.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q6 Tammy Tyrrell Ind TAS 2:28 pm

Fishing Industry

Background

The government withdrew nature-positive bills from the Notice Paper, and salmon farms at Macquarie Harbour faced uncertainty.

Question

The senator asked when workers in the West Coast community could expect clarity on the salmon industry. She followed up by asking if the Prime Minister's consideration of legislation to prevent reviews of past approvals was a personal opinion or party policy. She also asked why the government delayed decisions and pursued nature-positive bills if they were friends of the industry.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Murray Watt

The minister stated that the government was not proceeding with the nature-positive laws this term because neither the Greens nor the Coalition agreed to a sensible conclusion. He affirmed strong government support for the salmon industry, citing funding for oxygenation trials and a captive breeding program for the maugean skate. He noted that the Prime Minister supported the workers and that Minister Plibersek was making a decision taking legal processes into account. He argued that the nature-positive laws were intended to provide certainty and speed up approvals, not harm the industry.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q7 Perin Davey Nationals NSW 2:35 pm

Agriculture Industry

Background

Farm performance reports indicated rising costs for dairy and sheep/beef farmers, and food prices had increased.

Question

The senator asked why the government was making it harder for farmers to supply food and when the Prime Minister would admit farmers were not better off. She followed up by citing higher electricity prices, insurance costs, and trucking taxes. She also asked for an apology regarding the loss of competitive edge for farmers.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister highlighted the government's work to secure export markets, including China, as vital for the agricultural sector. She addressed energy costs by noting the government's energy rebates for households and small businesses, which the opposition had voted against. She criticised the opposition's nuclear policy as guaranteeing higher prices. She stated that a strong agricultural sector requires access to global markets and that the government was working to ensure energy price stability.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q8 Malcolm Roberts One Nation QLD 2:42 pm

Renewable Energy

Background

The senator inquired about the overall expense of shifting to net zero and the sum allocated in forward estimates.

Question

The senator inquired about the overall expense of shifting to net zero. He then requested details on specific taxpayer expenditure within the forward estimates. He further asked the minister to present the complete cost, covering forward estimates, on the initial day of the March sitting.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Murray Watt

The minister stated that the transition cost was approximately $120 billion to $130 billion, citing the Australian Energy Market Operator's integrated system plan which estimated a net present value of $122 billion. He noted that he did not have a figure specifically for the forward estimates. He contrasted this with the opposition's nuclear plan, which he claimed would cost $600 billion and increase power prices by $1,200 per household per year. He dismissed the higher figures cited by the senator as lacking credible assumptions.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

United States of America

Background

The senator referenced Trump's Gaza proposals and the government's silence.

Question

The senator asked when Australian values allowed for the actions in Gaza. She followed up by asking how the government could support a two-state solution while refusing to recognise Palestine. She also asked if the government's silence was due to fear of US tariffs.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister reiterated the government's support for a two-state solution achieved in accordance with international law. She outlined conditions for recognition, including that a future Palestinian state must not threaten Israel's security, Hamas must have no role in governance, hostages must be released, and issues like Jerusalem and territory must be defined through negotiations. She stated that the government had taken a principled and consistent position throughout the conflict.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 1 point of order raised

Environmental Defenders Office

Background

The Environmental Defenders Office faced legal costs after failing to halt the Santos Barossa Gas Project and reported financial uncertainty.

Question

The senator asked if it was acceptable to use taxpayer money to pay for penalties incurred by the EDO. He followed up by asking if the government would cease funding the organisation given its financial peril and alleged job destruction. He also asked why the government would not stop funding the 'discredited activist outfit'.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister stated that all Commonwealth funding agreements require funds to be spent for their allocated purpose and are subject to compliance. She noted that the matter was before the court and she could not comment further. Regarding the supplementary questions, she referred to her original answer and noted that a departmental review of allegations regarding the EDO's conduct was available on the department's website.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q11 Glenn Sterle ALP WA 2:55 pm

Energy

Background

The Australian Energy Market Operator said that renewable energy provided the cheapest method for supplying electricity.

Question

The senator asked how the government was helping to put downward pressure on energy bills and how the clean energy plan was helping Australians. He followed up by asking why the renewables plan was the best way to reduce bills. He also asked what the biggest barriers to cheaper power were.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Murray Watt

The minister stated that the government was focused on cost-of-living relief, including direct energy bill relief and investments in renewables, gas, and batteries. He argued that renewables were the cheapest form of energy, citing the Energy Market Operator. He identified the opposition's nuclear policy as the biggest barrier to cheaper power, claiming it would cost $600 billion and increase bills by $1,200 per household per year. He criticised the opposition for not disclosing what cuts would fund the nuclear program.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Other debates this day (17)

Answers to Questions Take Note Debate Commission of Inquiry into Antisemitism at Australian Universities Bill 2024 (No. 2); Second Reading Bill Debate Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024; In Committee Bill Debate Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024; Second Reading Bill Debate Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024; Third Reading Bill Debate · listed Defence Service Homes Amendment (Insurance) Bill 2025; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Defence Service Homes Amendment (Insurance) Bill 2025; Second Reading Bill Debate Free TAFE Bill 2024; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Free TAFE Bill 2024; Second Reading Bill Debate Future Made in Australia (Production Tax Credits and Other Measures) Bill 2024; Second Reading Bill Debate Hodges, Hon. John Charles Condolence · listed Navigation Amendment Bill 2024; Second Reading Bill Debate · listed Navigation Amendment Bill 2024; Third Reading Bill Debate · listed Parliament General Debate Tambling, Hon. Grant Ernest John, AM Condolence · listed United States of America Take Note Debate

Divisions on this day (17)

1. Commission of Inquiry into Antisemitism at Australian Universities Bill 2024 (No. 2); Second Reading Not passed 31–33 2. Selection of Bills Committee; Report Not passed 18–23 3. Selection of Bills Committee; Report Not passed 14–29 4. Selection of Bills Committee; Report Passed 29–14 5. Local Content Broadcasting; Order for the Production of Documents Passed 43–18 6. Migration: Transitory People; Order for the Production of Documents Not passed 19–28 7. Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee; Reference Not passed 17–29 8. Environment and Communications References Committee; Reference Not passed 19–29 9. Environment and Communications References Committee; Reference Not passed 19–43 10. Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024; In Committee Not passed 16–26 11. Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024; In Committee Passed 25–18 12. Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024; In Committee Not passed 18–26 13. Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024; In Committee Passed 28–16 14. Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024; In Committee Not passed 16–26 15. Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024; In Committee Passed 28–16 16. Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024; In Committee Not passed 16–28 17. Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024; Third Reading Passed 41–6