Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading

Senate · Thursday 10 September 2026

Continued from Monday 7 September 2026.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Senate debated the Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026, with three senators moving amendments to address specific concerns before the bill's second reading. Malcolm Roberts and Sean Bell moved amendments to refer parts of the bill regarding health data privacy and international trademark agreements to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee. David Pocock moved an amendment calling for measurable regulatory reduction targets and stronger accountability mechanisms. All three amendments were defeated in divisions, after which the bill was read a second time.

Outcome

The amendments were defeated and the bill was read a second time.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

Roberts moved an amendment noting that Part 2 of Schedule 3 would permit the disclosure of personal health information to third parties without individual consent. Roberts argued that the legislation lacked dedicated checks and balances to ensure data confidentiality and privacy. Roberts also highlighted the absence of data integrity reporting and mechanisms for individuals to remedy incorrect data matches. Roberts proposed referring this section to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee for inquiry by 12 October 2026.

Votes during this debate

Division 16: Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading Not passed 23–32 Division 17: Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading Not passed 4–34 Division 18: Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading Not passed 4–34 Division 19: Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading Not passed 6–32