Question Time AU

Question Time

Senate

Monday 29 June 2026 · 12 questions

Summarised by AI in reported speech, not a transcript. Read the official Hansard · OpenAustralia

At a glance

Main topics

Capital Gains Tax and Minimum Tax, Tax Cuts and Cost of Living, Construction Industry Corruption, Gambling Advertising Regulations, Early Childhood Education Pay Rise, KPMG Contracts and Ethics, Small Business Tax Impact, Productivity and Tax Policy, Tax Bracket Indexation, SMSF Property Loans

Topics (select to filter)

Questions and answers

Q1 Claire Chandler Liberal TAS 2:00 pm

Budget

Background

The Prime Minister stated that recent capital gains tax reforms returned the system to pre-1999 arrangements. Senator Chandler questioned whether a 30 per cent minimum tax existed before 1999 or exists under the current legislation.

Question

The senator asked whether a 30 per cent minimum tax was in place before 1999 and if it currently applies under the government's tax laws. She followed up by asking about the existence of income averaging before 1999 and its current status. Finally, she inquired how many taxpayers earning less than $45,000 would be affected by the minimum tax.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Katy Gallagher

The minister stated that the reforms restored concession arrangements indexed for inflation rather than the previous 50 per cent discount. She noted that the legislation passed last week aimed to balance tax on wages and assets and assist first-home buyers. Regarding income averaging, she explained it was removed in 1999 for integrity reasons following a business tax review. She cited Treasury analysis indicating capital gains are predominantly realised by high-income earners. She confirmed that tax cuts for low-income earners, including those under $45,000, commence on 1 July.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 2 points of order raised

Taxation

Background

The government is delivering its fifth round of tax cuts, with the average worker expected to keep up to $2,800 annually. Senator Ghosh asked for an outline of these cuts and their impact on the cost of living.

Question

The senator asked the minister to outline the benefits of the upcoming tax cuts for working Australians and how they assist with cost-of-living pressures. He subsequently asked how these cuts complement other relief measures such as wage increases and parental leave extensions. He also asked why the government continues to deliver tax cuts and when remaining legislative cuts will be implemented.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Katy Gallagher

The minister confirmed that tax cuts commence on 1 July, lowering the 16 per cent rate to 15 per cent for those earning under $45,000, with a further reduction to 14 per cent from 1 July 2027. She highlighted the Working Australians Tax Offset of up to $250 annually and a $1,000 instant deduction from 2026-27. She noted that the national minimum wage will rise by six per cent and modern award wages by 4.75 per cent. Paid parental leave will extend to 26 weeks, and social security payments will be indexed for 2.6 million Australians. She stated these measures are funded by reforms to negative gearing and capital gains tax.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Victoria's Big Build

Background

Media reports indicated that labour hire firms linked to Victoria's Big Build continued paying criminal figure Mick Gatto for site access. Senator Hume asked what steps the government has taken to determine if these companies worked on Commonwealth-funded projects.

Question

The senator asked whether any companies receiving Commonwealth-funded contracts were required to make payments to organised crime figures to access worksites. She followed up by asking why Mick Gatto continues to profit from taxpayer-funded projects despite the appointment of a CFMEU administrator.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister stated the government does not tolerate corruption or criminality in the construction industry. She noted that the Minister for Infrastructure had written to states regarding these issues and that she would seek further information on specific contracts. She clarified that the conduct suggested would be illegal. She added that Mr Gatto is facing charges as a result of actions taken by the administrator appointed by the government. She confirmed that federal funding agreements now include strong governance and accountability mechanisms.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q4 Sarah Hanson-Young Greens SA 2:15 pm

Gambling Advertising

Background

Current rules ban gambling ads on streaming services during live sport between 5 am and 8 pm. Proposed changes would remove this ban. Senator Hanson-Young asked how the government claims to be taking strong action when this creates a regulatory loophole.

Question

The senator asked why the government is allowing gambling ads to be shown more easily on streaming services than currently permitted. She followed up by asking why the government is letting the online gambling industry off the hook. Finally, she asked if the government would ban all gambling advertising on public broadcasters.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Don Farrell

The minister rejected the claim that the government was not doing enough, pointing to more than $110 million allocated for gambling harm reduction in the budget. He outlined $112 million over five years for consumer protections, including $39 million for financial counselling and $28.7 million to enhance BetStop. He asserted that the government had delivered the most significant gambling advertising reform in Australian history. He did not pledge to ban ads on public broadcasters, restating the scope of the current reforms.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Early Childhood Education and Care

Background

The government secured a 15 per cent wage increase for early childhood educators. Senator Darmanin asked what difference this pay rise is making for educators and families.

Question

The senator asked about the impact of the 15 per cent pay rise on educators and families. She followed up by asking why a stable workforce is important for quality early learning and how the government's approach supports families. Finally, she asked what is at stake if Australia does not support a trained early learning workforce.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Jess Walsh

The minister stated that the pay rise, combined with minimum wage increases, will make a typical full-time educator $255 a week better off. She noted that job vacancies in the sector have fallen by almost a third and staffing waivers by 40 per cent since the announcement. She explained that a stable workforce ensures children have consistent educators, which fosters safety and readiness to learn. She warned that without this support, quality would suffer, harming children and parents who rely on the system.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q6 Barbara Pocock Greens SA 2:28 pm

KPMG Australia

Background

KPMG has faced allegations of unethical behaviour, including lying to parliament and mistreating whistleblowers. Senator Pocock asked if KPMG should continue to be contracted for $1.3 million to provide ethics training to public sector leaders.

Question

The senator asked whether KPMG should retain its ethics training contract given its ethical failures. She followed up by asking if Peter de Cure, the TPB chair and former KPMG partner, should recuse himself from investigating KPMG due to a conflict of interest. Finally, she asked if the government would commit to structural reforms to regulate big four firms like corporations.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Katy Gallagher

The minister stated that existing contracts were entered into prior to the current concerns and that there is no evidence of unethical behaviour in current government contracts. She noted that ministers cannot cancel contracts as it would be unlawful. She confirmed a pause on new KPMG contracts until a review led by Dr Ian Watt is completed. Regarding the TPB chair, she stated she expected the board to manage any conflicts of interest appropriately. She noted that the Assistant Treasurer is releasing a discussion paper on regulating these firms.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 1 point of order raised

Q7 Jacinta Nampijinpa Price Country Liberal Party NT 2:33 pm
Tax

Taxation

Background

The Treasurer admitted that some small businesses would be worse off under Labor's tax changes. Senator Price asked which small businesses deserve to pay more tax.

Question

The senator asked which small businesses the government believes should pay more tax. She followed up by asking how many small businesses would be disadvantaged by the capital gains tax changes. Finally, she asked what other hidden tax increases are in the package.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister highlighted benefits for small business, including a permanent $20,000 instant asset write-off, a two-year loss carryback, and an increase in the active asset reduction CGT concession threshold from $2 million to $10 million. She said that 98 per cent of active businesses would qualify for concessional treatment. She did not provide a specific number of businesses that would be worse off, instead noting that the government had consulted with small business and introduced support measures. She criticised the opposition for voting against tax cuts for 13 million Australians.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q8 Sean Bell One Nation NSW 2:38 pm

Budget

Background

Senator Bell claimed Labor's tax agenda punishes investment and productivity. He asked if the budget is designed to fuel spending by taxing innovation.

Question

The senator asked if the government's budget is designed to tax innovation and aspiration to fund spending. He followed up by asking where capital will go if the government makes investment in businesses and shares less attractive. Finally, he asked the minister to name a single productive industry that will not be taxed higher.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Katy Gallagher

The minister rejected the claim, stating the government has done more for productivity than any recent administration. She explained that tax reforms aim to create neutral tax settings so investment decisions are based on productivity rather than tax concessions. She noted that $3.8 billion is invested in business through R&D incentives and venture capital arrangements. She stated that the reforms ensure wage earners are not taxed more than asset owners, creating a fairer system across all industries.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 1 point of order raised

Q9 Malcolm Roberts One Nation QLD 2:44 pm

Income Tax

Background

Senator Roberts moved an amendment for tax bracket indexation to prevent bracket creep. He asked why the government would not support this and if it was happy to see workers pay more tax.

Question

The senator asked why the government would not support indexation of tax brackets to prevent bracket creep. He followed up by asking if the government accepts that cutting taxes is the only way to restore worker incomes. Finally, he asked why the government has increased tax take and raised the fuel excise.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Katy Gallagher

The minister stated the government is cutting taxes five times in three ways, including the instant tax deduction and Working Australians Tax Offset. She noted that real wages have grown for the first time in a decade since the government took office. Regarding the fuel excise, she explained that the temporary halving was extended at a lower level to help households adjust as petrol prices fell. She emphasised that the government continues to roll out cost-of-living help, including Medicare investments and cheaper medicines.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q10 Dean Smith Liberal WA 2:51 pm

Budget

Background

The government said approximately 4,000 self-managed superannuation fund property loans were written off each year. Senator Smith queried whether a regulatory impact statement had been prepared prior to altering this sector.

Question

The senator asked if the government undertook a regulatory impact analysis before changing rules on SMSF property loans. He followed up by asking if the government verified its figures with lenders. Finally, he suggested the confusion arose from writing policy to satisfy the Greens rather than industry experts.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister stated she would take advice on the regulatory impact statement. She cited Treasury advice indicating that less than 10 per cent of SMSFs have such arrangements and that they account for under one per cent of all residential property lending. She noted that transitional arrangements are in place. She referenced the Murray inquiry and the Council of Financial Regulators, which identified limited recourse borrowing as a significant risk to retirement savings, particularly for low-balance funds.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Vanuatu-Australia Nakamal Agreement

Background

The Prime Minister and Vanuatu's Prime Minister signed the Vanuatu-Australia Nakamal Agreement. Senator Cox asked what the treaty means for Australia and how it secures Australia's place in the region.

Question

The senator asked for an explanation of the Nakamal Agreement's significance for Australia and regional security. She followed up by asking how strengthening Pacific relationships makes Australians safer. Finally, she asked what has helped Australia engage constructively and what threats exist to this approach.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister described the treaty as transformative, strengthening security and development partnerships. She noted it confirms Australia as Vanuatu's primary policing partner and ensures Vanuatu will not allow foreign military bases or infrastructure. She stated that strong regional relationships enhance Australia's security in a contested world. She attributed success to mutual respect and listening to Pacific priorities, contrasting this with previous government neglect. She listed other agreements like the Pukpuk alliance and Falepili union as evidence of restored standing.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q12 Richard Colbeck Liberal TAS 3:00 pm

Tasmania: Foreign Investment

Background

Senator Colbeck wrote to the Treasurer expressing concern about the Clean Energy Finance Corporation subsidising the purchase of Rushy Lagoon farm by a foreign investment company. He noted Tas Farmers had received no response.

Question

The senator asked why Tas Farmers had not received a response to his letters regarding the Rushy Lagoon farm purchase. He followed up by asking when the government would respond to concerns about the deal. Finally, he asked why the government would not reject the deal.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Katy Gallagher

The minister stated she was not aware of the specific issue or the status of the response. She undertook to take the matter on notice, consult the Treasurer's office, and return to the senator directly with further information. She repeated this commitment in response to subsequent questions.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Other debates this day (19)

Answers to Questions Take Note Debate Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2026-2027, Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2026-2027, Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 1) 2026-2027; Limitation of Debate Bill Debate · listed Budget Take Note Debate Fuel Matter of Public Importance Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate KPMG Australia Take Note Debate Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Secrecy Provisions Amendment (Sunsetting Provision) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Secrecy Provisions Amendment (Sunsetting Provision) Bill 2026; Third Reading Bill Debate · listed Taxation Matter of Public Importance Treasurer, Minister Representing the Treasurer; Censure General Debate Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Bill Debate · listed Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Reporting System Reform) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Bill Debate · listed Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Reporting System Reform) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Treasury Laws Amendment (Fuel Excise Relief No. 2) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Bill Debate · listed Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No. 1) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Bill Debate · listed Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No. 1) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate

Divisions on this day (26)

1. Treasurer, Minister Representing the Treasurer; Censure Passed 32–25 2. Treasurer, Minister Representing the Treasurer; Censure Not passed 24–33 3. Treasurer, Minister Representing the Treasurer; Censure Passed 33–21 4. Treasurer, Minister Representing the Treasurer; Censure Not passed 22–33 5. Consideration of Legislation Not passed 25–32 6. Consideration of Legislation Passed 32–25 7. Consideration of Legislation Not passed 25–32 8. Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Not passed 11–34 9. Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Not passed 25–32 10. Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Passed 36–10 11. Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Not passed 11–34 12. Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Passed 36–5 13. Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Reporting System Reform) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Passed 33–24 14. Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Reporting System Reform) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Passed 33–24 15. Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Reporting System Reform) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Not passed 5–37 16. Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Reporting System Reform) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Passed 33–24 17. Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No. 1) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Passed 32–25 18. Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No. 1) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Passed 32–24 19. Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No. 1) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Passed 32–24 20. Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No. 1) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Not passed 24–32 21. Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No. 1) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Passed 31–25 22. Treasury Laws Amendment (Fuel Excise Relief No. 2) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Not passed 5–38 23. Treasury Laws Amendment (Fuel Excise Relief No. 2) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Not passed 11–31 24. Treasury Laws Amendment (Fuel Excise Relief No. 2) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Not passed 11–32 25. Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2026-2027, Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2026-2027, Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 1) 2026-2027; Limitation of Debate Not passed 10–33 26. Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2026-2027, Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2026-2027, Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 1) 2026-2027; Limitation of Debate Not passed 5–38