Commonwealth Entities Legislation Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading

Continued the debate

Roberts argued that the bill would entrench politicisation within the public service by granting ministers broad discretionary power over senior officials without sufficient transparency. Roberts contended that the legislation lacked specific performance criteria, relying instead on vague ministerial directions that could be used to threaten department heads. Roberts highlighted concerns that the bill allowed for paid suspensions of up to 12 months based solely on the minister's assertion of departmental best interests. Roberts concluded that the legislation undermined accountability and transparency, characterising the drafting as sloppy and insufficient for effective governance.

Government response

Green stated that the government introduced the bill to ensure integrity, honesty, and accountability among statutory office holders. Green explained that the legislation enables the removal of officials who breach the APS Code of Conduct or engage in discrimination, bullying, harassment, or corruption. Green emphasised that the amendments are designed to hold office holders accountable for performance and conduct without fettering their regulatory independence. Green asserted that these standards align with community expectations and reflect the government's commitment to making the Commonwealth a model employer.