Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) Bill 2025, Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025; In Committee

Opened the debate

Faruqi highlighted that the government had agreed to several Greens amendments aimed at increasing the independence of the Australian Tertiary Education Commission and ensuring commissioners possessed research expertise. Faruqi noted the inclusion of an amendment recognising the public mission of higher education and academic freedom. However, Faruqi criticised the government for refusing to include student contributions within the commission's remit, arguing this prevented a full assessment of degree costs. Faruqi questioned why the government would not allow the commission to advise on replacing previous fee hike policies.

Government response

Walsh acknowledged the work done by the Greens and the acceptance of certain amendments. Walsh stated that the government had already implemented recommendations to reduce student contributions and reform repayment arrangements, including a twenty per cent debt cut. Walsh explained that the interim commission was currently working to determine the actual expenses of education as a necessary first step. Walsh emphasised that the government was implementing the Universities Accord recommendations progressively.

Opposition response

O'Sullivan argued that the bill failed to mention key concepts such as teaching, learning, research, quality, or efficiency. O'Sullivan claimed the legislation was not fit for purpose and did not address the national interest or student experience. O'Sullivan encouraged the Senate to support an opposition amendment, although it was subject to the guillotine.