Question Time AU

Matter of Public Importance

Economy

Senate · Tuesday 15 September 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senator Jessica Collins moved a matter of public importance arguing that the government was deceiving Australians about the economy while real wages fell and housing became unaffordable. Labor senators countered that wage growth had improved significantly since they took office and that the opposition had a history of suppressing wages. Other speakers highlighted specific issues such as negative equity for first-home buyers, job losses in the private sector, and the need for productivity reforms. The debate concluded with the motion passing by a vote of 31 to 20.

Outcome

The motion was passed by a vote of 31 to 20.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Collins argued that the government was misleading the public about economic conditions while real wages declined and housing affordability worsened. Collins cited data showing rents had risen by 24.8 per cent while wage growth was only 16.1 per cent, resulting in a real pay cut for workers. Collins claimed that property tax changes in the budget would reduce GDP by $1 billion and stunt construction. Collins highlighted that those purchasing their first home via the five per cent deposit scheme were increasingly facing negative equity. Collins proposed coalition policies including capping migration, investing $5 billion in infrastructure, and indexing tax thresholds to inflation.

Opposition response

Smith argued that the government was in crisis and that former union leader Bill Kelty had correctly identified the Treasurer's approach as insulting to voters. Smith claimed that record migration and failed housing supply increases had left young Australians in negative equity, particularly in Western Australia. Smith stated that the coalition would link migration levels to housing construction capacity and prioritise Australian citizens in welfare systems. Smith argued that the government had profited from bracket creep while families struggled with rising costs for groceries, electricity, and insurance.

Votes during this debate

Division 11: Economy Passed 31–20