Question Time AU

Question Time

Senate

Thursday 14 May 2026 · 10 questions

Summarised by AI in reported speech, not a transcript. Read the official Hansard · OpenAustralia

At a glance

Main topics

Housing Australia Future Fund performance, Women's Budget Statement priorities, Budget impact on young Australians' wealth building, Gas export tax and energy policy, Budget measures for young Australians, Aged care waitlists and Support at Home packages, Net zero policy and energy prices, Foreign ownership of housing and compliance, Inheritance tax and family home tax, Wages growth and worker outcomes

Topics (select to filter)

Questions and answers

Q1 Andrew Bragg Liberal NSW 2:00 pm

Housing

Background

The member cited Treasury portfolio budget statements indicating zero homes built under the Housing Australia Future Fund in 2025-26 and asked if the target of 30,000 homes was at risk.

Question

The member asked the minister to confirm that government budget papers showed no new homes had been built under the Housing Australia Future Fund in 2025-26. He further inquired whether the target of 30,000 new homes under the fund was listed as at risk in those same documents.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister stated that nearly 660,000 homes had been built nationwide since Labor took office, with over 6,000 completed using Commonwealth investment and 23,000 in planning or construction. She noted that new home starts had risen by 26 per cent compared to the previous year. The minister highlighted the $47 billion Homes for Australia plan, which includes the HAFF, and criticized the opposition for opposing the fund and intending to abolish it. She argued that the government was committed to building more social and affordable housing, whereas the opposition believed the government had no role in ensuring adequate housing supply.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 2 points of order raised

Women's Budget Statement

Background

The government delivered its fifth Women's Budget Statement, highlighting gender equality as central to the economic agenda.

Question

The member asked the minister to outline the priorities in the current Women's Budget Statement and explain how measures to improve gender outcomes would make a practical difference for Australian women. She also asked how the budget built on previous reforms to lock in lasting progress.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Katy Gallagher

The minister stated that the budget included $182.6 million for child support reforms to reduce weaponisation and protect women from financial abuse. She noted continued investment in the National Plan to End Violence against Women and Children, including the Our Ways--Strong Ways First Nations safety plan, bringing total investment to over $4.4 billion since 2022. Regarding economic security, she explained that a woman earning $81,000 could be nearly $3,000 better off annually from 2027-28 due to the Working Australians Tax Offset and Instant Tax Deduction Benefit. The minister also highlighted investments in aged care, Medicare, mental health, reproductive health, and menopause services, noting that women had saved over $647 million on medicines since January 2023.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q3 James Paterson Liberal VIC 2:14 pm

Budget

Background

The member cited quotes from young Australians claiming government tax hikes would hinder their ability to save for housing deposits and build wealth through shares.

Question

The member asked how the government could claim its budget measures promoted intergenerational equity when young Australians were being punished by tax hikes that delayed their ability to save for deposits. He further asked why the government was closing wealth-building opportunities for young people, such as share investments, that the Prime Minister had previously benefited from.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister stated that the budget aimed to uphold the 'great Australian contract' by ensuring future generations could fulfil the dream of homeownership. She explained that tax changes would increase housing supply and bring more owner-occupiers into the market, while noting that negative gearing remained available for new builds. The minister claimed the budget would help 75,000 Australians achieve homeownership and argued that under a Liberal government, young people would face higher taxes. She asserted that the government was aligning the treatment of income from labour with income from assets to ensure fairness, while providing additional tax cuts to working Australians.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Taxation: Gas Industry

Background

The Prime Minister had dismissed the ACTU's proposal for a 25 per cent gas export tax as a slogan, despite the ACTU estimating it would raise $17.1 billion in 2023-24.

Question

The member asked if the Prime Minister believed the ACTU did not understand its own proposal for a gas export tax. She further asked why the government rejected taxing gas giants to fund services like housing and health, instead choosing to cut funding for 160,000 families on the NDIS. The member also questioned why the budget cut $4 billion from climate programs while maintaining $47 billion for fossil fuel subsidies.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister stated that the government did not need a lecture on the trade union movement and defended the gas reservation policy as superior to a tax. She argued that the reservation ensured producers supplied Australia first, delivering lower and more stable prices and protecting manufacturing jobs. The minister described the current situation as the worst global energy crisis in history, justifying decisions to ensure access to diesel, jet fuel, petrol, and fertiliser. She declined to engage with the premise that the government was keeping the gas industry happy, instead focusing on the necessity of managing the energy shock.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 1 point of order raised

Budget

Background

The member asked how the government was listening to young people and building a fairer future for them, particularly regarding housing and cost of living.

Question

The member asked the minister to update the Senate on how the government was addressing young Australians' concerns about housing affordability and cost of living. She specifically asked how the budget helped young people earn more and keep more of their income.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Jess Walsh

The minister stated that the budget took responsible action to help young Australians enter the housing market through increased supply and tax reforms that levelled the playing field for first home buyers. She noted that tax benefits for investing in new builds remained available. Regarding wages, she highlighted the rollout of legislated tax cuts, including a $1,000 instant tax deduction and the Working Australians Tax Offset. The minister pointed out that the national minimum wage had increased by more than $9,000 a year since Labor took office, allowing young workers to keep more of what they earned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 1 point of order raised

Q6 David Pocock Ind ACT 2:37 pm

Aged Care

Background

The member asked for current figures on people waiting for Support at Home packages and assessments, noting that over 200,000 older Australians were waiting for care.

Question

The member asked how many people were currently waiting for a Support at Home package and how many were waiting for an assessment. He further asked how many new Support at Home packages were funded in the budget, given the large number of Australians waiting for care.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Jenny McAllister

The minister stated that as at 31 December, 94,963 people were waiting for a Support at Home place and 103,527 were waiting for an assessment. She explained that the government had invested over $4.3 billion in the new Support at Home program. In response to the supplementary, she confirmed that the budget would deliver an additional 32,000 Support at Home places in 2026-27, bringing the total to more than 420,000 places. She also noted that the budget included $3.7 billion for more aged-care beds and better care, including 5,000 additional beds annually.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Energy

Background

The member claimed electricity prices had risen by 40 per cent and that the budget contained no promise to lower energy costs, suggesting the government had abandoned its net zero agenda.

Question

The member asked why the government was continuing with net zero policies when it would not promise to lower energy prices, citing a 40 per cent rise in electricity costs. He further asked why the government spent $18 billion on net zero if it was not reducing the cost of living, and why mining investment growth was slumping to zero by 2027-28.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister stated that the budget addressed energy security in the context of the largest global energy market shock in history. She argued that the previous government had allowed coal-fired power stations to exit the system without a plan for replacement supply, causing price and supply issues. The minister claimed that 24 of 28 ageing coal plants announced closures while the Coalition was in government. She defended the government's energy rebates and argued that the opposition's ideological position on energy sources had contributed to the current crisis.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Housing

Background

The member cited freedom of information documents suggesting only one in five foreign purchasers submitted mandatory disclosure returns, implying widespread non-compliance.

Question

The member asked how the public could trust government statements on foreign ownership levels when 80 per cent of foreign owners allegedly failed to comply with disclosure laws. She further asked why the government did not require proof of citizenship for all real estate sales and when it would force foreigners to sell existing homes.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Katy Gallagher

The minister stated that the budget prolonged the prohibition on overseas acquisitions of established residences until 2029. She noted that foreign buyer levels had dropped to 0.5 per cent of buyers after the ban started in 2025, compared to a peak of 1.8 per cent under the previous government. Regarding compliance, she referred to the Register of Foreign Ownership of Australian Assets and the ATO's role in monitoring acquisitions. The minister explained that the government supported investment in new housing construction to drive supply, which is why foreigners could still purchase new builds.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 1 point of order raised

Q10 Anne Ruston Liberal SA 3:01 pm

Budget

Background

The member asked for unequivocal assurances that the government would not introduce taxes on inheritance or the family home.

Question

The member asked the minister to assure the public that the government would not introduce a tax on inheritance or oppose new taxes on the family home. She further asked why the public should believe the government's word given changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister confirmed that the government was not introducing and did not intend to introduce taxes on inheritance or the family home. She stated that the opposition was contesting issues not in the budget because they could not contest the budget itself. In response to the question about credibility regarding negative gearing, the minister argued that the opposition had previously promised higher taxes and more debt, and criticized them for lacking a clear policy identity.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Budget

Background

The member asked how the budget would deliver better outcomes for workers, citing ABS data showing wages growth above three per cent.

Question

The member asked the minister to outline how the budget would deliver better outcomes for workers, particularly regarding wages growth. He further asked how the government was helping younger workers earn more and why parliamentary support for these measures was important.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Murray Watt

The minister stated that the budget included a $250 Working Australians Tax Offset for 13.3 million workers, representing the most meaningful increase to the tax-free threshold in over a decade. He noted that the government would advocate for a real wage increase for minimum award wage earners, benefiting 2.7 million workers. The minister highlighted that the minimum wage had increased by more than $9,000 per year since Labor took office. Regarding young workers, he pointed to the removal of lower pay scales for those aged 18 to 20 in some sectors, allowing tens of thousands to earn adult wages.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Other debates this day (21)

Aged Care Take Note Debate Answers to Questions Take Note Debate Australia-Indonesia Treaty on Common Security Ministerial Statement Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025; Second Reading Bill Debate Budget General Debate Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Banning Dirty Donations) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Competition and Consumer Amendment (Responding to Exceptional Circumstances) Bill 2026; In Committee Bill Debate Competition and Consumer Amendment (Responding to Exceptional Circumstances) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Bill Debate Competition and Consumer Amendment (Responding to Exceptional Circumstances) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Customs Legislation Amendment (False Trade Marks Infringement Notices) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Customs Legislation Amendment (False Trade Marks Infringement Notices) Bill 2026; Third Reading Bill Debate · listed Export Control Amendment (Clarifying Obligations Relating to Registered Establishments) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Export Control Amendment (Clarifying Obligations Relating to Registered Establishments) Bill 2026; Third Reading Bill Debate · listed Housing Take Note Debate Public and Educational Lending Rights (Better Income for Authors) Bill 2026, Public and Educational Lending Rights (Better Income for Authors) Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Public and Educational Lending Rights (Better Income for Authors) Bill 2026, Public and Educational Lending Rights (Better Income for Authors) Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions Bill 2026; Third Reading Bill Debate · listed Public and Educational Lending Rights (Better Income for Authors) Bill 2026, Public and Educational Lending Rights (Better Income for Authors) Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions Bill 2026; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Taxation: Gas Industry Take Note Debate Treasury Laws Amendment (The Survivors Law) Bill 2026; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Treasury Laws Amendment (The Survivors Law) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Treasury Laws Amendment (The Survivors Law) Bill 2026; Third Reading Bill Debate · listed

Divisions on this day (11)

1. Consideration of Legislation Passed 31–25 2. Competition and Consumer Amendment (Responding to Exceptional Circumstances) Bill 2026; Second Reading Not passed 27–34 3. Competition and Consumer Amendment (Responding to Exceptional Circumstances) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Not passed 27–34 4. Competition and Consumer Amendment (Responding to Exceptional Circumstances) Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate Passed 34–27 5. Selection of Bills Committee; Report Not passed 15–26 6. Selection of Bills Committee; Report Passed 34–26 7. Directions to Committees Not passed 7–35 8. Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee Not passed 7–36 9. Consideration by Estimates Committees Not passed 26–32 10. Economics References Committee; Reference Not passed 22–31 11. Economics References Committee; Reference Not passed 23–30