Question Time AU

General Debate

Kumanjayi Little Baby

Senate · Tuesday 12 May 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Senate debated a condolence motion concerning the tragic death of five-year-old Kumanjayi Little Baby in Alice Springs. Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price moved an amendment to the government's motion, arguing that the original text failed to adequately address systemic failures, community dysfunction, and the need for accountability in child protection and service delivery. The government, led by Minister Malarndirri McCarthy, declined to support the amendment, stating the motion was developed in partnership with the child's family who requested a focus on mourning rather than political action. The debate highlighted deep divisions between those calling for immediate systemic reform and accountability, and those urging respect for the family's wish to avoid politicising the tragedy during the period of sorry business. The amendment was ultimately defeated by a vote of 26 to 36.

Outcome

The amendment was defeated by a division of 26 votes to 36.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

McCarthy moved a motion mourning the death of Kumanjayi Little Baby and extending sympathies to her family and communities in Alice Springs, Kalkarindji, and across Australia. The motion recognised the death as a consequence of ongoing community dysfunction and commended the volunteers and emergency services involved in the search. It called on federal and territory governments to take immediate action to address family violence, inadequate policing, and child protection failures in remote communities. McCarthy emphasised that the motion was developed in partnership with the Warlpiri and Gurindji families, who requested that the child's life not be used for political reasons. McCarthy highlighted the nationwide vigils and the collective grief felt by Australians, urging the Senate to honour the family's request for respect and space to mourn.

Government response

McCarthy stated that the government would not support the amendment moved by Senator Price. McCarthy explained that the condolence motion had been crafted in close consultation with the child's family, including Mr Robin Japanangka Granites, and other community leaders. The government prioritised respecting the family's explicit wish for the moment to be one of mourning and sorry business, rather than a platform for political debate or systemic critique. McCarthy affirmed that while difficult conversations about systemic issues would occur in the future, the immediate priority was to support the grieving community and honour the child's memory without adding to their burden.

Opposition response

Cash supported the amendment moved by Senator Price, arguing that the original motion was insufficient given the systemic failures that contributed to the child's death. Cash contended that offering condolences without demanding accountability for the billions of dollars spent on Indigenous programs was inadequate. Cash emphasised that the death of a five-year-old child, despite known warning signs, demonstrated a profound failure of the current system. Cash called for honesty about the conditions in remote communities and urged the parliament to move beyond symbolic gestures to ensure that such tragedies are not repeated.

Votes during this debate

Division 1: Kumanjayi Little Baby Not passed 26–36