Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025; Second Reading

Senate · Thursday 14 May 2026

Continued from Tuesday 3 March 2026.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned the permanent extension and expansion of ASIO's compulsory questioning powers, including safeguards and oversight mechanisms. Senator Kovacic supported the bill's substance but insisted on retaining a three-year sunset clause to ensure parliamentary review, a position the government accepted. Senator Pocock opposed the bill, arguing that compulsory questioning powers, particularly regarding minors and legal representation, were excessive and unnecessary, citing advice from ASIO and the Department of Home Affairs against their retention.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

Kovacic argued that ASIO's compulsory questioning powers were essential for addressing complex national security threats, including espionage and sabotage. The coalition supported the expansion of questioning matters and strengthened oversight provisions but opposed making the powers permanent without review. Kovacic stated that the opposition would support the bill only if a three-year sunset clause was retained to ensure periodic parliamentary scrutiny. The government agreed to this amendment, which Kovacic described as balancing security needs with accountability.