Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Public and Educational Lending Rights (Better Income for Authors) Bill 2026, Public and Educational Lending Rights (Better Income for Authors) Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions Bill 2026; Second Reading

Senate · Thursday 14 May 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Senate debated legislation to consolidate the Public Lending Right and Educational Lending Right schemes into a single legislative framework. The government argued the bills modernise support for creators by including digital formats and ensuring fair compensation. The opposition supported the administrative reforms but clarified that the legislation does not increase funding or change payment calculations. The bills were passed after second reading.

Outcome

The bills were read a second time.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Green moved the second reading of the bills, stating they consolidate lending rights schemes into a contemporary framework to support Australian creators. Green highlighted that the legislation ensures authors are compensated when their works are borrowed from public and educational libraries, including digital formats like e-books and audiobooks. Green noted that in the 2024-25 financial year, over 17,000 payments totalling $28.16 million were made to eligible creators. Green argued the reforms align with the National Cultural Policy, Revive, and provide certainty for claimants through a unified advisory committee.

Opposition response

McDonald stated the coalition supports the bills as sensible administrative reforms that bring educational lending rights into legislation for the first time. McDonald clarified that the legislation does not increase the total funding pool, which remains capped at approximately $28 million, nor does it alter payment calculations. McDonald noted that while the governance changes provide certainty, they do not address the broader financial pressures facing authors or increase compensation amounts. McDonald emphasised that the coalition has supported these schemes for decades and called for continued dialogue on adequate funding for the creative sector.