James Paterson
Liberal Party Senator for VIC
Currently sitting
Photo: Alison Newman, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Seat and party history (1)
- Liberal Party - VIC (Senate) - 9 Mar 2016 to present
- Seat and party records: OpenAustralia member data.
Contact
Office: (03) 9690 2201
Ground floor, 63 York Street, South Melbourne VIC 3205
Office details: Parliament of Australia, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Contact details on aph.gov.au Profile on OpenAustraliaThese counts cover what is on this site only. They do not measure electorate work or committee work.
Compared with other members
James Paterson compared with all 76 sitting senators.
Questions asked in Question Time
Higher than 89% of senators- This member
- 21
- Average
- 10.4
- Median
- 10
Debates spoken in
Lower than 92% of senators- This member
- 18
- Average
- 44.8
- Median
- 40
Votes cast
Lower than 80% of senators- This member
- 534
- Average
- 743.0
- Median
- 730
Share of divisions voted in
Lower than 82% of senators- This member
- 48%
- Average
- 69%
- Median
- 69%
Read these with care
- The median is the middle member: half did more, half did less. It is less affected by a few very active members than the average.
- Ministers answer questions rather than ask them, and the presiding officers rarely vote, so their patterns differ.
- Government backbenchers are often given arranged "Dorothy Dixer" questions, which raises their question counts.
- Votes only record ayes and noes, so a missed vote cannot be told apart from a pair (an agreed absence).
- Counts cover only what is on this site, and do not measure electorate or committee work. New members have less history.
Question Time
Question from James Paterson
The member asked whether the Prime Minister or his office raised the commitment to fund the Marrickville golf club with the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet before the project list was provided to the infrastructure department. He sought to establish who authorized the list and whether the Prime Minister was a decision-maker in the grant process.
Background: Senate estimates showed that the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet provided the roster of exclusive initiatives for the Major and Local Community Infrastructure Program. The inquiry centred on the Prime Minister's part in approving the $6 million payment to the Marrickville golf club.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister confirmed the commitment was raised prior to the list being provided, as it was a public election commitment. She stated that the Prime Minister was not the decision-maker, as the grant was delivered through standard departmental processes and Commonwealth grant guidelines. She argued that the commitments were authorized by the Australian people through the election and that the same process would have been used by the coalition if they had won.
Question from James Paterson
The senator asked whether the minister knew how the media obtained the sensitive diplomatic correspondence. He sought an explanation for the breach of confidentiality.
Background: Media reports indicated that the Japanese government was surprised by the leak of confidential correspondence regarding the Prime Minister's comments on the melon gift.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated she did not know what specific correspondence was being referred to. She reiterated that the Japanese Prime Minister is a friend of Australia and that the Prime Minister was committed to ensuring her comfort during her visit. She accused the opposition of spreading misinformation and confecting a diplomatic issue. She urged bipartisan support for the relationship with Japan, describing it as historically important.
Question from James Paterson
The member asked when the Prime Minister first became aware that the legislation included provisions described as a widows tax. He further inquired what actions were taken to prevent the parliament from legislating these measures and why caucus members were compelled to vote for them, asking if other defects remained undisclosed.
Background: The opposition raised concerns regarding the government's tax legislation, specifically referring to it as a 'widows tax' and questioning the Prime Minister's awareness and actions regarding this provision.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that the Treasurer had confirmed on Insiders on Sunday that the government would address the issue through grandfathering arrangements. She noted that multiple tranches of legislation were planned to resolve matters including startup exemptions and testamentary trusts. The minister argued that the opposition no longer opposed the core policy, acknowledging that the previous housing market status quo was unsustainable and disadvantaged first home buyers. She emphasized that the Labor caucus voted proudly for tax cuts for working people and fairer tax arrangements, contrasting this with the opposition's lack of clear direction.
Question from James Paterson
The senator asked the minister to explain the distinction between a small business and an innovative business under the proposed tax framework. He sought clarification on how the government differentiates these categories for tax purposes.
Background: The government released a consultation paper on tax arrangements for innovative startups, proposing distinct capital gains tax rules for small businesses versus innovative businesses.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that amendments would allow 98 per cent of active small businesses to access concessional capital gains tax treatment. She noted that page six of the consultation paper outlines business activity requirements for innovative small businesses, including innovation, commercialisation, scalability, and growth potential. She argued that the opposition was opposing consultation with the startup sector despite claiming to support small business. In response to supplementary questions, she indicated that some terms were drawn from existing legislation and policies, and she criticised the opposition for complaining about consultation while blocking tax reforms.
Question from James Paterson
The member asked how the government could claim its budget measures promoted intergenerational equity when young Australians were being punished by tax hikes that delayed their ability to save for deposits. He further asked why the government was closing wealth-building opportunities for young people, such as share investments, that the Prime Minister had previously benefited from.
Background: The member cited quotes from young Australians claiming government tax hikes would hinder their ability to save for housing deposits and build wealth through shares.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that the budget aimed to uphold the 'great Australian contract' by ensuring future generations could fulfil the dream of homeownership. She explained that tax changes would increase housing supply and bring more owner-occupiers into the market, while noting that negative gearing remained available for new builds. The minister claimed the budget would help 75,000 Australians achieve homeownership and argued that under a Liberal government, young people would face higher taxes. She asserted that the government was aligning the treatment of income from labour with income from assets to ensure fairness, while providing additional tax cuts to working Australians.
Question from James Paterson
The senator asked if the Prime Minister was correct that Bunnings had run out of jerry cans, citing a Bunnings spokesman who denied this. He asked how it was responsible to spread misinformation and add to anxiety.
Background: The Prime Minister had stated that Bunnings had run out of jerry cans.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated she was not across Bunnings' inventory but emphasized the seriousness of the global energy shock caused by the Middle East conflict. She criticized the opposition for focusing on inventory rather than the broader economic and policy challenges. She listed government actions, including releasing fuel reserves and using Export Finance Australia, as evidence of serious management of the crisis.
Question from James Paterson
The member asked what plans the government had to secure urea supplies for farmers and ensure food production was not threatened.
Background: The member raised concerns about looming fertiliser shortages affecting agricultural production due to the Middle East conflict.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister observed that Australia obtained 65 per cent of its fertiliser-grade urea from the Middle East and that costs were unstable. She said most supplies for the next season were already in Australia or at sea, and that resuming local urea manufacturing in Western Australia was an immediate goal.
Question from James Paterson
The member asked whether the Foreign Minister had any discretion under current law to refuse passports. He cited specific sections of the Australian Passports Act regarding emergency documents and security grounds, asking how many passports had been refused or cancelled under Section 14 during the minister's tenure.
Background: The opposition questioned the Foreign Minister's previous statements regarding the discretionary powers of the government to refuse passports to citizens returning from conflict zones.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister clarified that she can refuse or cancel passports on security grounds if a competent authority requests it. She stated that no such request had been made regarding the group of individuals in question. She declined to provide specific numbers or details regarding other matters, citing the need to protect classified security advice and offering a confidential briefing to the senator instead.
Question from James Paterson
The member asked when the government first learned of Dr Rifi's involvement in facilitating passports for the group and how they became aware of it.
Background: Media reports suggested Dr Jamal Rifi, a friend of the Home Affairs Minister, was involved in facilitating passports for ISIS associates.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that Minister Burke had publicly indicated he had no knowledge of Mr Rifi's actions or whereabouts beyond media reports, and that Mr Rifi had not spoken to him about the issue since June of the previous year. In response to supplementary questions about the authorisation of individuals handing over passports and assurances given to Dr Rifi, she stated that individual actions are a matter for those individuals and that she was not aware of any assurances given to Dr Rifi, referring questions about discussions to Minister Burke.
Question from James Paterson
The member asked for the basis of the minister's assertion that the Howard government had the highest spending levels. He subsequently asked if she could name a financial year where Howard-era spending exceeded current levels, and questioned why she and other ministers had made such fundamental errors regarding published statistics.
Background: Senator Paterson challenged Senator Gallagher regarding her previous claim that the Howard government was the highest-spending administration, noting that recent government expenditure stood at 26.2 per cent of GDP.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister corrected the record, stating she had mistakenly referred to the Howard government instead of the Morrison government. She clarified that the Morrison government was the highest-spending, while the Howard government was the highest-taxing. She maintained that the current administration manages the budget responsibly by containing spending growth and finding savings to pay down inherited debt, despite pressures from defence, health, and aged care sectors.
Question from James Paterson
The member asked how much the rate rise would increase monthly repayments for an average mortgage of $600,000.
Background: The Reserve Bank increased interest rates by 25 basis points.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister declined to give individual financial advice, stating it depended on mortgage terms. She attributed the rate rise to private demand growing faster than expected, not government spending. In response to supplementary questions citing economists' concerns about fiscal policy, she highlighted that the budget had improved by $233 billion and that public demand's contribution to GDP growth had eased. She noted debt was $188 billion lower than forecast and that average real annual spending growth was restrained to 1.7 per cent.
Question from James Paterson
The member asked when household power bills would decrease under the government's net zero strategy, given the recent price increases.
Background: The member cited claims that renewables are the cheapest energy source, contrasting this with a reported 40 per cent rise in power prices since the current government took office.
Answer from Tim Ayres
The minister stated that electricity prices had risen by 91 per cent during the previous government's tenure. He argued that the current administration is addressing the infrastructure gaps left by prior policy inaction, including the closure of coal-fired stations without replacement. He asserted that a mix of renewables, storage, gas, and hydro provides the lowest generation costs and that prices would be lower under the government's orderly transition model compared to the opposition's approach.
Question from James Paterson
The member asked whether the government accepted responsibility for rising inflation and the Reserve Bank of Australia's decision to maintain high cash rates, citing claims that government spending was outpacing economic growth.
Background: The question referenced comments by economist Warren Hogan suggesting that structural increases in government recurrent spending were a key factor preventing interest rates from falling sufficiently to curb inflation.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister stated that the government had carefully calibrated spending to avoid complicating the central bank's task, noting that much of the expenditure was demand-driven, such as indexed pensions and disability support. She highlighted that the government had delivered two budget surpluses, reduced debt by $188 billion, and cut interest costs by $60 billion. The minister argued that investments in Medicare, education, and early childhood care were essential for the country's future, contrasting this with the previous government's deficits.
Question from James Paterson
The member asked what the government said to homeowners facing high interest rates due to inflation from government spending. He cited RBA forecasts of higher underlying inflation and asked if the government admitted its spending put the economy at risk.
Background: The Reserve Bank kept the cash rate at 3.6 per cent. The member linked this to government spending and inflation.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister disagreed with the opposition's characterization, stating that inflation was lower than when the government took office and that real wages were growing. She noted that interest rates had been cut three times and unemployment was low. She attributed the opposition's concerns to a desire to cut social services and cost-of-living measures, rather than accepting responsibility for economic outcomes.
Question from James Paterson
The senator asked whether the government agreed that rapid price increases indicated flawed energy policy settings. He referenced comments by former Treasury secretary Ken Henry suggesting that permanent rebates signal incorrect policy directions.
Background: Recent Consumer Price Index figures indicated a significant annual rise in electricity costs, prompting scrutiny of government policy settings.
Answer from Bridget McKenzie
The minister rejected the premise, attributing current issues to a decade of policy delay under the previous government which failed to manage the transition from coal-fired power. She highlighted new investments in renewable energy and support measures for households, including energy bill rebates, Medicare, childcare, and housing assistance. She stated that the government was increasing grid capacity and supporting the transition to cheaper renewable energy sources.
Question from James Paterson
The member asked whether the government agreed that high inflation was a material miss that would hurt mortgage payers. He questioned the government's spending policies.
Background: Inflation rose to 3.2 per cent, raising concerns about the government's spending policies and their impact on mortgage payers.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister disagreed with the characterization, stating that inflation was down and real wages were growing. She highlighted falling interest rates and low unemployment. She accused the opposition of wanting to cut Medicare and pensions.
Question from James Paterson
The senator asked whether the Prime Minister or the Treasurer was correct regarding the implementation of new tax policies beyond those taken to the election.
Background: Conflicting statements were made by the Prime Minister and Treasurer regarding future tax changes.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister affirmed that the government was implementing the tax policies taken to the last election, specifically standard deductions and income tax reductions. She reminded the Opposition that they had campaigned on raising taxes. She stated that the government considered revenue and spending through the annual budget process and would continue to deliver on costed commitments made before the election.
Question from James Paterson
The senator asked whether the member for Deakin misled constituents or if the government would abandon the proposed tax on unrealised superannuation gains.
Background: Member Matt Gregg previously stated that taxing unrealised gains on superannuation was not Labor policy, raising questions about consistency.
Answer from Katy Gallagher
The minister confirmed that the policy on high-balance super accounts remained unchanged and was taken to the election. She noted that the proposal affects approximately half a per cent of people with balances over $3 million. The government intends to pass the legislation through the parliament in the current term. The minister dismissed concerns from stakeholders as part of a campaign against the policy.
Question from James Paterson
The senator asked whether the database had been established and, if so, how many incidents it had recorded. He followed up by asking if the minister was unaware of the database's status despite the recent National Cabinet meeting. He also asked whether the National Cabinet was briefed on an incident involving a caravan at Dural, suggesting only the New South Wales Premier was aware.
Background: National Cabinet agreed on 21 January to establish a national database to record antisemitic crimes and incidents.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated she did not have the specific information on the database to hand but would seek it. She emphasised the government's focus on combating the rise in antisemitism through legislative measures, including hate crime and antidoxxing laws, and financial support for the Jewish community. Regarding the supplementary questions, she reiterated that she would obtain the information and noted that the Dural incident was subject to an ongoing investigation. She criticised the opposition for focusing on political advantage rather than national security.
Question from James Paterson
The member asked why the Prime Minister was willing to discuss briefings regarding the Adass Israel Synagogue firebombing but not the Dural incident, given the consistency of his previous statements.
Background: The Prime Minister previously declined to discuss National Security Committee meetings regarding a planned terror attack in Sydney, citing an ongoing investigation. Media reports indicated he had discussed similar briefings in the past.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister refused to comment on operational national security matters. She cited New South Wales police warnings that publishing information compromised the investigation. She accused the opposition of playing political games with an ongoing investigation and noted the Leader of the Opposition had not even requested a briefing.
Question from James Paterson
The member asked when the Prime Minister was first briefed on the discovery of the explosive-laden caravan.
Background: A caravan containing explosives allegedly intended to target Sydney's Jewish community was discovered in Dural, New South Wales.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister declined to provide a specific date, stating that the government does not comment on operational matters regarding national security to avoid undermining police investigations. She emphasized that the priority was ensuring those responsible faced the full force of the law and that the community should show solidarity with the Jewish community. In response to supplementary questions, she reiterated that the government takes advice from national security agencies rather than political commentators and dismissed the opposition's focus on the timing of briefings as playing politics with a serious investigation.
Other Parliamentary Activity
-
Defence Force Discipline Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 1) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 17 September 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2026; In Committee
Senate · Thursday 10 September 2026 · In Committee
Responded as shadow minister
-
Muddle, Warrant Officer Class 2 Lachlan
Senate · Tuesday 12 May 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Middle East
Senate · Tuesday 10 March 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Middle East
Senate · Tuesday 3 March 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Australian Defence Force
Senate · Tuesday 3 March 2026 · General Debate
Responded as shadow minister
-
Middle East
Senate · Monday 2 March 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Administrative Review Tribunal and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; In Committee
Senate · Thursday 5 February 2026 · In Committee
Responded as shadow minister
-
Cost of Living
Senate · Tuesday 3 February 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Bondi Beach: Attack
Senate · Monday 19 January 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Payday Superannuation) Bill 2025, Superannuation Guarantee Charge Amendment Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 3 November 2025 · Second Reading
Responded as shadow minister
-
Questions Without Notice
Senate · Thursday 30 October 2025 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Pacific Banking Guarantee Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 28 August 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
Senate · Tuesday 25 March 2025 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Andrews, Hon. Kevin James, AM
Senate · Tuesday 11 February 2025 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 6 February 2025 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
National Security
Senate · Wednesday 5 February 2025 · General Debate
Responded as shadow minister
-
Antisemitism
Senate · Tuesday 4 February 2025 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
- Votes recorded
- 534
- Aye votes (65.5%)
- 350
- No votes (34.5%)
- 184
Showing the latest 50 votes.
-
Corruption in the Construction Industry Select Committee; Appointment
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee; Reference
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare With...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare With...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account)...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 24, Noes 35 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Major Sporting Events (Indicia and Images) Protection Amendment Bill 2026; Th...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 18 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Major Sporting Events (Indicia and Images) Protection Amendment Bill 2026; Se...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 18 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; In Committee
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; In Committee
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 22 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Consideration of Legislation
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 19, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Defence Properties; Order for the Production of Documents
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 36, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 36 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Housing; Order for the Production of Documents
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 37, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 13, Noes 26 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 20, Noes 30 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 23 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Protecting Australians from Foreign Terrorist Fighters Bill 2026; Second Read
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
8 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Defence Properties
8 Sep 2026 · Ayes 39, Noes 23 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Veterans: Health Care
8 Sep 2026 · Ayes 36, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026, Cash Distribution Framework (Consequen...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 26 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026; Limitation ...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 35 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
News Journalism Payments Bill 2026, News Journalism Payments (Consequential A...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 35 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Capacity Investment Scheme, Cheaper Home Batteries Program, Rewiring the Nati...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Climate Change; Order for the Production of Documents
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Selection of Bills Committee; Report
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 38, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Selection of Bills Committee; Report
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 26 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Selection of Bills Committee; Report
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026, National Self-exc...
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 39 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026, National Self-exc...
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 39, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Veterans
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Renewable Energy, Climate Change; Order for the Production of Documents
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 24, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Cheaper Home Batteries Program; Order for the Production of Documents
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Select Committee on Corruption in the Construction Industry; Appointment
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 24, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 36, Noes 24 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
17 Aug 2026 · Ayes 27, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Personal Information and Privacy; Order for the Production of Documents
17 Aug 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 23 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Taxation; Order for the Production of Documents
17 Aug 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Consideration of Legislation
13 Aug 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Consideration of Legislation
13 Aug 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 26 · Passed
VOTED NO
About this page
This page tracks James Paterson's parliamentary activity: questions asked and answered in Question Time, debates spoken in, and votes in divisions. Summaries are in reported speech, not transcripts; each one links to the official record.