Question Time AU

Question Time

Senate

Thursday 5 February 2026 · 8 questions

Summarised by AI in reported speech, not a transcript. Read the official Hansard · OpenAustralia

At a glance

Main topics

Fiscal Policy and Government Spending, Cost of Living and Economic Performance, Defence Estate Reform, National Anti-Corruption Commission Integrity, Climate Change and Fossil Fuel Exploration, Net Zero Fund and Interest Rates, Capacity Investment Scheme Costs, Aged Care Wait Times

Topics (select to filter)

Questions and answers

Q1 James Paterson Liberal VIC 2:00 pm

Fiscal Policy

Background

Senator Paterson challenged Senator Gallagher regarding her previous claim that the Howard government was the highest-spending administration, noting that recent government expenditure stood at 26.2 per cent of GDP.

Question

The member asked for the basis of the minister's assertion that the Howard government had the highest spending levels. He subsequently asked if she could name a financial year where Howard-era spending exceeded current levels, and questioned why she and other ministers had made such fundamental errors regarding published statistics.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Katy Gallagher

The minister corrected the record, stating she had mistakenly referred to the Howard government instead of the Morrison government. She clarified that the Morrison government was the highest-spending, while the Howard government was the highest-taxing. She maintained that the current administration manages the budget responsibly by containing spending growth and finding savings to pay down inherited debt, despite pressures from defence, health, and aged care sectors.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Cost of Living

Background

Senator Walker asked the Minister representing the Prime Minister to outline the government's achievements in delivering cost-of-living relief, healthcare, housing, and energy support.

Question

The member asked what specific measures the government was delivering to help Australians get ahead, including details on wages, unemployment, housing, and healthcare. She also inquired about actions taken to address climate change while managing cost-of-living pressures, and asked what obstacles stood in the way of government delivery.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister highlighted record low unemployment, 1.2 million jobs created, and the smallest gender pay gap. She cited a landmark agreement in South Australia to release 17,000 new dwellings, with 7,000 for first-home buyers, and $2 billion in additional public hospital funding. She noted that over 200,000 cheaper home batteries had been installed since 1 July, with South Australia leading in per capita installations. The minister attributed delays in delivery to opposition from the Liberals, Nationals, and One Nation.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Defence Properties

Background

Senator Chandler cited RSL Tasmania president John Hardy's criticism that the sale of Tasmanian defence assets was a catastrophic strategic error and a withdrawal of defence presence.

Question

The member asked if the minister agreed with the assessment that the defence asset sales fundamentally altered Tasmania's role in national defence. She further asked how the government could claim to strengthen defence readiness while selling facilities used by 300 reservists and 450 cadets in Tasmania, and whether there would be a net reduction in defence jobs or training opportunities in the state.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister disagreed with the criticism, stating that the reform was necessary because many properties were not fit for purpose and were costly to maintain. She confirmed that all personnel, including reservists, would be transitioned to alternative sites. The minister assured that Tasmania would retain a strong defence presence, including the consolidation of training depots in Burnie and Devonport into a new multiuser depot, building on investments in the Launceston cadet depot and Anglesea Barracks.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

National Anti-Corruption Commission

Background

Senator Shoebridge highlighted conflicting statements regarding whether Commissioner Brereton had resigned as Assistant Inspector-General of the ADF before taking up his NACC role, citing letters and committee answers.

Question

The member enquired whether Commissioner Brereton had stepped down from his role as assistant IGADF, and if that was the case, what the timing and circumstances were. He then questioned whether the government retained confidence in Brereton, citing his failure to disclose moonlighting activities, and urged the minister to dismiss him because of eroding public trust.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Don Farrell

The minister initially stated he could not answer directly as he was not the responsible minister and would consult with the Attorney-General. In response to the supplementary question regarding confidence, the minister answered affirmatively. He rejected the proposition that Brereton should be removed, stating that the government had appointed him and he continued to do his work, having clarified he was not involved in other activities.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Climate Change

Background

Senator Whish-Wilson questioned the decision to open 25,000 square kilometres of ocean in the Otway Basin for oil and gas exploration amidst extreme weather events linked to climate change.

Question

The member asked if it was acceptable to grant ocean access to oil and gas companies during a climate emergency. He further asked how the government planned to transition off fossil fuels to protect future generations while continuing to open new exploration areas, and addressed concerns about toxic algal blooms linked to warming oceans.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Tim Ayres

The minister argued that the Greens' approach would wreck international climate negotiations and harm Australian industry. He stated that 52 per cent of Australia's oceans are already protected and the government is working towards protecting 30 per cent highly. He maintained that gas exports are necessary for lower emissions and sustainable industry, and that releasing new acreage helps address energy needs. The minister highlighted government investments in transforming the electricity system and supporting industries to move to lower-cost electricity.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 1 point of order raised

Renewable Energy

Background

Senator Canavan criticized the government for slashing interest rates for large companies borrowing from the Net Zero Fund, arguing it contradicts the fund's mandate and burdens taxpayers.

Question

The member asked why the government was providing interest rate cuts to billion-dollar companies investing in renewables while families faced higher home loan costs. He also questioned the funding of lower interest rates for electric vehicles made in Korea and asked for the total cost of the net zero agenda and its impact on interest rates.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister stated that driving decarbonisation and scaling up domestic manufacturing in renewable technologies was necessary for economic activity and jobs. She argued that leveraging private sector investment was essential for Australia to participate in global supply chains in a transitioning economy. Regarding electric vehicles, she noted that Australia no longer manufactures cars, a situation resulting from previous government policies, and that the current approach was about economic logic rather than ideology.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 2 points of order raised

Capacity Investment Scheme

Background

Senator Hanson asked for the total cost of the Capacity Investment Scheme in the 2025-26 budget, noting it was listed as 'not for publication' in budget papers.

Question

The member asked for the specific total cost of the Capacity Investment Scheme to taxpayers, questioning why the figure was kept secret. She pressed for clarification on whether the cost was within quantified contingent liabilities and demanded transparency regarding the financial burden of the renewable energy strategy.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Katy Gallagher

The minister stated she did not have the budget papers with her but confirmed the costs were accounted for in contingent liabilities and the statement of risks. She offered to provide the figures later, noting that some information was commercially sensitive. She highlighted that 23 agreements had been executed, representing seven gigawatts of capacity, with negotiations ongoing for 33 projects, aiming to deliver a minimum of 40 gigawatts of fresh renewable and clean dispatchable power by 2030.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 1 point of order raised

Q10 Anne Ruston Liberal SA 2:59 pm

Aged Care

Background

Senator Ruston cited cases of older Australians waiting months for aged care placements, including one man stuck in hospital for 47 days, and another facing a 10-12 month wait for home care.

Question

The member asked if the government would take responsibility for the aged care crisis leaving thousands stranded in hospitals. She further asked if the minister accepted that excessive wait times caused by rationing care were causing distress and pressure on hospitals, and agreed that more needed to be done to move patients out of hospitals.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Jenny McAllister

The minister acknowledged the longstanding issues in the aged care system and stated the government was rebuilding it from the ground up. She confirmed that urgent cases were being prioritised and that wait times were expected to decrease. She attributed the crisis to neglect during the previous government's tenure and stated that the current administration was working swiftly to address the backlog through new legislation, resourcing, and workforce support.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Other debates this day (18)

Administrative Review Tribunal and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; In Committee Bill Debate Administrative Review Tribunal and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; Third Reading Bill Debate · listed Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025; Report from Committee Bill Debate Competition and Consumer Amendment (Make Price Gouging Illegal) Bill 2024; Second Reading Bill Debate Copyright Amendment Bill 2026, Corporations (Review Fees) Amendment (Technical Amendments) Bill 2025; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Copyright Amendment Bill 2026, Corporations (Review Fees) Amendment (Technical Amendments) Bill 2025; Second Reading Bill Debate Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Bill 2025; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Bill 2025; Second Reading Bill Debate Cost of Living General Debate Defence Amendment (Parliamentary Joint Committee on Defence) Bill 2025; In Committee Bill Debate Defence Amendment (Parliamentary Joint Committee on Defence) Bill 2025; Second Reading Bill Debate Excise Tariff Amendment (Draught Beer) Bill 2025, Customs Tariff Amendment (Draught Beer) Bill 2025; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Excise Tariff Amendment (Draught Beer) Bill 2025, Customs Tariff Amendment (Draught Beer) Bill 2025; Second Reading Bill Debate Fiscal Policy, Defence Properties Take Note Debate Health Legislation Amendment (Prescribing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 2025, Translating and Interpreting Services Bill 2025; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Health Legislation Amendment (Prescribing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 2025, Translating and Interpreting Services Bill 2025; Second Reading Bill Debate Iran General Debate National Anti-Corruption Commission Take Note Debate

Divisions on this day (12)

1. Competition and Consumer Amendment (Make Price Gouging Illegal) Bill 2024; Second Reading Not passed 12–29 2. Administrative Review Tribunal and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; In Committee Not passed 12–32 3. Administrative Review Tribunal and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; Third Reading Passed 32–11 4. Selection of Bills Committee; Report Not passed 19–29 5. Selection of Bills Committee; Report Passed 27–19 6. Selection of Bills Committee; Report Not passed 18–27 7. Selection of Bills Committee; Report Passed 36–9 8. Environment and Communications References Committee; Reference Not passed 18–28 9. Finance and Public Administration Legislation Committee; Reference Not passed 20–29 10. Defence Amendment (Parliamentary Joint Committee on Defence) Bill 2025; Second Reading Passed 31–10 11. Defence Amendment (Parliamentary Joint Committee on Defence) Bill 2025; In Committee Not passed 12–26 12. Defence Amendment (Parliamentary Joint Committee on Defence) Bill 2025; In Committee Not passed 13–28