Question Time AU

Take Note Debate

National Anti-Corruption Commission

Senate · Thursday 5 February 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senator Shoebridge moved a motion to take note of the Attorney-General's answer regarding the National Anti-Corruption Commissioner. He argued that recent correspondence revealed serious undisclosed conflicts of interest by Commissioner Brereton, contradicting previous government assurances of confidence. Shoebridge detailed how the Attorney-General had instructed the commissioner to avoid decision-making in conflicted matters, citing the robodebt referral as a key example. The Senate agreed to the motion without further debate.

Outcome

The question was agreed to.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Shoebridge argued that correspondence between the Attorney-General and Commissioner Brereton exposed significant failures to disclose conflicts of interest. Shoebridge stated that the government's previous public support for the commissioner was misleading given the private concerns raised in an October letter. Shoebridge highlighted the Attorney-General's instruction that the commissioner must withdraw from decision-making when conflicts arise, contrasting this with Brereton's involvement in the robodebt referral despite known affiliations. Shoebridge criticised the commissioner's subsequent response as self-justifying and lacking transparency regarding his roles in the Defence Force.