Don Farrell
Australian Labor Party Senator for SA
Currently sitting
Photo: Australian Government, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Photograph taken by David Foote of AUSPIC, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Seat and party history (2)
- Australian Labor Party - SA (Senate) - 1 Jul 2016 to present
- Australian Labor Party - SA (Senate) - 1 Jul 2008 to 30 Jun 2014
- Seat and party records: OpenAustralia member data.
Contact
Office: (08) 8231 8400
Level 5, 19 Gilles Street, Adelaide SA 5000
Office details: Parliament of Australia, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Contact details on aph.gov.au Profile on OpenAustraliaThese counts cover what is on this site only. They do not measure electorate work or committee work.
Compared with other members
Don Farrell compared with all 76 sitting senators.
Questions asked in Question Time
Lower than 82% of senators- This member
- 1
- Average
- 10.4
- Median
- 10
Debates spoken in
Lower than 95% of senators- This member
- 12
- Average
- 44.8
- Median
- 40
Votes cast
Lower than 92% of senators- This member
- 346
- Average
- 743.0
- Median
- 730
Share of divisions voted in
Lower than 95% of senators- This member
- 31%
- Average
- 69%
- Median
- 69%
Read these with care
- The median is the middle member: half did more, half did less. It is less affected by a few very active members than the average.
- Ministers answer questions rather than ask them, and the presiding officers rarely vote, so their patterns differ.
- Government backbenchers are often given arranged "Dorothy Dixer" questions, which raises their question counts.
- Votes only record ayes and noes, so a missed vote cannot be told apart from a pair (an agreed absence).
- Counts cover only what is on this site, and do not measure electorate or committee work. New members have less history.
Question Time
Question from Don Farrell
The member asked how financing Indian renewable projects met the purpose of Export Finance Australia, given the lack of Australian products or jobs involved.
Background: The member defended the role of Export Finance Australia in securing fuel supplies and building regional relationships, particularly with India.
Answer from Matthew Canavan
The minister stated that the investment was made through Export Finance Australia's commercial account, meaning there was no cost or exposure to Australian taxpayers. He argued that EFA supports infrastructure development in the region that benefits Australia by strengthening partnerships and granting access to new markets. He rejected the characterization of the question as xenophobic and emphasized that EFA helps Australian businesses trade and invest overseas.
Question from Jonathon Duniam
The senator asked why net overseas migration soared to over 500,000 in 2022-23 and why the government is only now acting on issues of 'permanent temporariness' identified in 2023.
Background: The Immigration Minister announced plans to reduce immigration numbers, contrasting with previous statements from 2022 that migration needed to rise.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister explained that the high migration figures resulted from processing a backlog of one million visa applications accumulated during the pandemic. He stated that migration numbers have since decreased by 47 per cent. In response to supplementary questions, he acknowledged the issue of permanent temporariness but did not provide specific figures on visa hopping, stating it was not his portfolio and he would seek an accurate answer from the relevant minister.
Question from Raff Ciccone
The senator asked how the deal would deliver for Australian farmers, producers, miners, and exporters, and whether there were any risks to the agreement.
Background: The Prime Minister announced a landmark free-trade agreement with the European Union in March.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister described the agreement as a once-in-a-generation deal with a $30 trillion market. He stated it would remove tariffs on agricultural products and create new access for beef and sheep meat through tariff-rate quotas, benefiting regional jobs and supply chains. In response to supplementary questions, he warned that blocking the agreement would deny producers access to the EU market and put jobs at risk, criticizing those who oppose it as prioritizing populism over policy.
Question from Maria Kovacic
The senator asked if the Prime Minister opportunistically raised the rent on his property nine days after announcing the funding, and if he disclosed his ownership to the minister who signed off on the funding.
Background: The Prime Minister announced $6 million in funding for the Marrickville Golf Club, where he was an honorary member, shortly before raising the rent on his adjacent investment property.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister initially stated the question did not deserve an answer. In response to supplementary questions, he said he did not know if the Prime Minister had disclosed his ownership but would ask him. He defended the funding as an election promise honored by the government and deflected by criticizing the opposition for not answering questions about sports rorts during their time in office.
Question from Deborah O'Neill
The senator asked how the government has strengthened laws to hold social media companies accountable and what the next steps are for keeping children safe. In supplementary questions, she asked how the digital duty of care protects children from antisemitic content and AI-generated nude images.
Background: The government's social media minimum age law has removed millions of accounts and inspired international follow-up.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated the government doubled fines for breaches to $109.2 million and strengthened the eSafety Commissioner's investigative powers, including the ability to summon executives. He confirmed the government is legislating a digital duty of care to prevent harms before they occur. He noted that this obligation would compel technology firms to assess how algorithms boost extremist content and would enable the eSafety Commissioner to serve removal orders on applications producing fake nude material.
Question from David Pocock
The senator asked whether the government had consulted on an opt-out option for copyright material used in AI training and if it was considering a statutory data training authorisation model.
Background: Reports indicated OpenAI would not invest in domestic AI training if copyright laws were not watered down, raising concerns about rights holder protections.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated that the government was interested in maximizing AI benefits while protecting Australian creatives and media. He confirmed that the government sought to attract frontier AI investment while setting terms that included control and payment for copyright owners regarding the use of their material. The minister affirmed that strong protections for Australian artists and media would remain a core part of the government's approach to artificial intelligence.
Question from Pauline Hanson
The member sought confirmation that parliamentary staff could opt to receive 3.4 per cent of their pay as salary rather than superannuation contributions. She challenged the inconsistency of permitting this flexibility for political staff while opposing comparable arrangements for other Australians.
Background: The question focused on clause 29 of the enterprise agreement, which allows parliamentary staff to choose between a 3.4 per cent super contribution or extra salary. This was contrasted with the Treasurer's rejection of similar measures for the general public.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister confirmed the arrangement existed from the previous coalition government's enterprise bargaining agreements in 2017. He stated that the current government had increased the super guarantee to 12 per cent. He criticized One Nation for opposing wage rises and superannuation increases while suddenly championing workers' rights. He defended the compulsory superannuation system as a world-leading achievement.
Question from Michelle Ananda-Rajah
The member asked how the government would provide further protection from harmful content and features on digital platforms while giving Australians more choice over what they see online. She specifically inquired about protections for children on chatbots, gaming platforms, and messaging apps.
Background: The government released draft legislation for a digital duty of care to protect children from harmful online content.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated that over five million accounts of people under 16 had been removed or deactivated under existing laws. He explained that the draft digital duty of care legislation, released for consultation, would require platforms to protect under-18s from harmful content and design features with negative behavioral impacts. The legislation would also introduce an Australian-first 'my feed, my way' initiative, requiring platforms to notify users and offer choices over their default feeds and algorithms.
Question from Varun Ghosh
The senator asked the minister to outline how the government was leading the world in protecting children online. He sought details on the tools provided to the eSafety Commissioner and the risks associated with the current approach.
Background: The government was promoting its leadership in online safety, particularly regarding the social media minimum-age law and powers for the eSafety Commissioner.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated that over 20 countries were looking to Australia's lead on social media minimum-age laws. He noted that laws introduced in June strengthened the eSafety Commissioner's investigative powers and doubled fines for noncompliance to over $109 million. The Commissioner could request more information from social media and age-verification companies. The minister argued that delaying social media access for under-16s allowed them to build resilience and digital literacy, and called on other parties to pass the strengthening legislation.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The senator asked the minister to undertake to work with the NAIF to progress the GAIN proposal urgently, citing its potential to add $100 billion to GDP and create 40,000 jobs.
Background: The Great Australian Infrastructure Network (GAIN) proposal for a transcontinental railway has been with the Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility (NAIF) for over two months.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister explained that large-scale proposals require rigorous due diligence and cannot be processed quickly, citing historical examples of infrastructure delays. He confirmed the NAIF operates independently to assess projects against its mandate. He committed to making personal inquiries into the status of the proposal and reporting back to the senator.
Question from Jacqui Lambie
The senator asked what mandatory training requirements exist for FOI decision-makers to ensure they understand the FOI Act. She asked how much taxpayer money was spent defending FOI refusals that were later overturned by independent authorities.
Background: The rate of FOI requests granted full access had dropped to 25 per cent, with independent reviews finding many blackouts unjustified.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister rejected the premise that the government lacks transparency, citing upcoming electoral law reforms requiring donor disclosure within seven days. He stated he was not aware of specific training requirements for FOI officials but offered to investigate and provide a formal response. He emphasized the need to modernize the FOI system to prevent abuse by vexatious requesters and protect public servants, rather than providing the specific financial figures requested.
Question from Helen Polley
The member asked how the government is working with industry and international partners to build sovereign critical minerals capabilities and secure supply chains.
Background: Australia holds significant deposits of critical minerals essential for clean energy and advanced manufacturing.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister highlighted the US investment of over half a billion dollars in the Sunrise Energy Metals scandium project near Dubbo, which will create about 100 construction and 60 ongoing jobs. He mentioned the production tax credit starting July 2027 and the Critical Minerals Strategic Reserve, which enabled a final investment decision for the Arafura Rare Earths project. He emphasized collaboration with trusted partners to diversify global supply.
Question from Ellie Whiteaker
The member asked what real change the new market access delivered for farmers, producers, and exporters, specifically for Western Australia and Queensland.
Background: The member referenced the landmark trade deal with the European Union, aimed at removing tariff barriers for Australian exporters.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister estimated the agreement would be worth $10 billion in its first year, effectively doubling the number of Australian free trade agreements. He stated that tariffs on seafood, dairy, rice, nuts, honey, olive oil, fruit, and vegetables would be eliminated or reduced. Critical mineral tariffs would be cut to zero. For Western Australia, he highlighted benefits for minerals, wheat, barley, beef, and sheepmeat. For Queensland, he noted tariff eliminations on wheat, copper, seafood, and vegetables. He warned that protectionist arguments posed a risk to these benefits.
Question from David Pocock
The member asked how the government could support 'same job, same pay' while allowing Carnival Cruise Line workers to be paid significantly less in Australian waters due to an exemption. He further asked why the government granted this exemption and whether it would commit to not renewing it to ensure award rates are paid.
Background: The senator met with former Carnival Cruise crew members who said they received $2.50 hourly, significantly under Australian minimum wage rates, because of a ministerial exemption from the coastal trading act.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated that the government supported 'same job, same pay' and that the Maritime Labour Convention 2006 provided standards for seafarer welfare. He noted that the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) enforced these standards with a zero-tolerance approach to breaches, including wage issues. However, he clarified that he was not the minister in charge of these specific issues and would convey the question to Minister King for a prompt response. He repeated this position for the supplementary questions, stating he was not familiar with the specific exemption details but would seek a response from Minister King.
Question from Sarah Hanson-Young
The senator asked why the government is allowing gambling ads to be shown more easily on streaming services than currently permitted. She followed up by asking why the government is letting the online gambling industry off the hook. Finally, she asked if the government would ban all gambling advertising on public broadcasters.
Background: Current rules ban gambling ads on streaming services during live sport between 5 am and 8 pm. Proposed changes would remove this ban. Senator Hanson-Young asked how the government claims to be taking strong action when this creates a regulatory loophole.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister rejected the claim that the government was not doing enough, pointing to more than $110 million allocated for gambling harm reduction in the budget. He outlined $112 million over five years for consumer protections, including $39 million for financial counselling and $28.7 million to enhance BetStop. He asserted that the government had delivered the most significant gambling advertising reform in Australian history. He did not pledge to ban ads on public broadcasters, restating the scope of the current reforms.
Question from Lidia Thorpe
The senator asked if the government accepted that upholding international agreements was a federal responsibility. Supplementary questions asked what the government was doing to stop the jailing of Indigenous children, given that these matters were often handed to states, and why the government signed agreements if it was unwilling to implement them.
Background: A UN committee had highlighted the treatment of children in Australian prisons, which the senator argued violated international commitments.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister confirmed that upholding international agreements was a federal responsibility. He stated that the government was committed to reducing First Nations incarceration rates through community-led solutions. He highlighted record funding for justice reinvestment, including $69 million for national initiatives and $3.9 billion through the National Access to Justice Partnership, with $800 million specifically for frontline legal assistance for First Nations people.
Question from Raff Ciccone
The senator asked how the new fuel security powers would help secure fuel supplies and keep the economy moving. He sought details on how these measures would shield Australians from the impacts of the Middle East conflict.
Background: The Prime Minister announced new fuel security powers to address global supply shocks.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister explained that Export Finance Australia would be given financial tools, including insurance and loans, to support companies in securing additional fuel shipments. He stated that this support would target additional supplies beyond commercial contracts to ensure wider availability. He also mentioned that strategic reserves would secure supplies of critical minerals and other goods impacted by the conflict.
Question from Raff Ciccone
The senator asked how the fuel security and excise announcements were helping to keep Australians on the road and supporting tourism businesses. He also asked about support for businesses facing supply chain issues and actions to diversify trade.
Background: The government announced fuel excise relief and security measures.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated that halving the fuel excise and reducing road user charges would lower costs for families and tourism operators. He highlighted the Trade Diversification Network, established under the $50 million Accessing New Markets Initiative, which included 40 peak bodies. He noted that Austrade was providing market support and connecting exporters with alternative markets and logistics providers to mitigate reliance on the Gulf region.
Question from Sarah Hanson-Young
The member asked why the government was failing to legislate a digital duty of care to protect Australians from harmful social media algorithms, despite a commitment made 18 months prior. She referenced the US court ruling against tech giants.
Background: A US jury found Meta and Google liable for designing addictive social media platforms, raising questions about the delay in implementing a digital duty of care in Australia.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister claimed the government had taken world-leading action in this space, citing early leadership from the South Australian Premier. He stated that the government was not afraid of US political pressure. He dismissed the suggestion that the government was delaying action to avoid upsetting Donald Trump, answering 'no' to that specific implication. He emphasised that the government was protecting ordinary Australians, particularly young people.
Question from Deborah O'Neill
The member asked what benefits the new free trade agreement with the European Union would deliver for Australia and Australian workers, highlighting the EU's status as the second-largest economy with a GDP of approximately $31 trillion.
Background: The Albanese government announced a free trade agreement with the European Union, concluding eight years of negotiations.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister described the agreement as a historic achievement that opened access to 27 countries and 450 million consumers. He stated that lower tariffs on EU imports would provide relief to consumers, while the deal supported farmers, miners, manufacturers, and winemakers. In response to supplements, he detailed specific benefits including tariff removals on dairy and rice, 700 per cent more beef access, and savings of nearly $37 million for wine producers. He also noted benefits for critical minerals, cheaper auto parts and machinery for consumers, and commitments to climate change obligations and labour rights.
Question from Tammy Tyrrell
The member asked what actions the government was taking to increase community trust and transparency, specifically questioning the reintroduction of FOI exemptions and fees.
Background: Data from the Mapping Social Cohesion report indicated that trust in government had fallen to 33 per cent in 2024, down from 44 per cent in 2021.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister listed several measures to build trust, including establishing the National Anti-Corruption Commission, strengthening the ministerial code of conduct, and protecting whistleblowers. He argued that the FOI system was being reformed to prevent abuse, citing a former senator who had commercialized FOI requests. He stated that the government was focused on cost-of-living issues and pointed to the release of the Liberals' report as an example of transparency.
Question from David Shoebridge
The member enquired whether Commissioner Brereton had stepped down from his role as assistant IGADF, and if that was the case, what the timing and circumstances were. He then questioned whether the government retained confidence in Brereton, citing his failure to disclose moonlighting activities, and urged the minister to dismiss him because of eroding public trust.
Background: Senator Shoebridge highlighted conflicting statements regarding whether Commissioner Brereton had resigned as Assistant Inspector-General of the ADF before taking up his NACC role, citing letters and committee answers.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister initially stated he could not answer directly as he was not the responsible minister and would consult with the Attorney-General. In response to the supplementary question regarding confidence, the minister answered affirmatively. He rejected the proposition that Brereton should be removed, stating that the government had appointed him and he continued to do his work, having clarified he was not involved in other activities.
Question from David Pocock
The senator asked when the government would introduce legislation to ban gambling advertising over three years, as recommended by the Murphy report.
Background: The Murphy report recommended a phased ban on gambling advertising, but no legislation had been introduced despite other bills passing.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister highlighted existing harm reduction measures, including the BetStop self-exclusion registry and the ban on credit card use for online wagering. He stated that the government was engaging with stakeholders, including broadcasters and sporting codes, to develop further solutions. He did not provide a specific date for introducing advertising ban legislation, emphasising ongoing consultation.
Question from Lisa Darmanin
The senator asked how the government's social media laws would protect children and where families could find information.
Background: Statistics show seven out of 10 children have witnessed online harm, and new social media laws are set to begin on 10 December.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister explained that delaying social media access until age 16 would allow children three more years to develop real-world connections. He noted that resources were available on the eSafety website, which had seen a 1,000 per cent increase in visitors. In response to supplementary questions, he highlighted that the reforms were welcomed at the UN General Assembly and that other countries like Malaysia and Denmark were implementing similar bans for under-16s or under-15s.
Question from Sarah Henderson
The member asked if the Minister for Trade was consulted before signing the declaration and whether economic modelling was conducted on its impact on coal and gas exports.
Background: The government signed the Belem declaration on transitioning away from fossil fuels.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated that climate issues fell under the purview of the Minister for Climate Change and Energy. He rejected the premise that the declaration ended fossil fuel exports, emphasizing the continued role of gas as a transition fuel. He noted that Australia would continue to honor contractual obligations for gas exports, particularly to Japan.
Question from Anne Ruston
The member asked whether the government intended to punish senators for voting to strengthen parliamentary accountability by stripping opposition committee deputy chair positions. She requested that the Prime Minister rule out such vindictive threats immediately.
Background: The Senate extended question time to increase scrutiny of the government, prompting reports of potential retaliatory actions against opposition committee roles.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated he was unaware of the reports and denied being vindictive. He urged the coalition to demonstrate maturity and common sense in governing the chamber. He emphasized that the government answers questions honestly and directly, suggesting the opposition should act responsibly to regain public trust.
Question from Lisa Darmanin
The member asked about the significance of the 50th anniversary of the Racial Discrimination Act, which was introduced by the Labor government in 1975. She sought to highlight the act's role as Australia's first Commonwealth antidiscrimination legislation.
Background: The 50th anniversary of the commencement of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 was approaching, marking a significant milestone in Australian antidiscrimination law.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister described the act as a historic step that made racial discrimination unlawful for the first time. He noted it created rights not previously existing in common law and provided a template for state and territory laws. He highlighted the act's role in promoting respect and cooperation across society.
Question from Bridget McKenzie
The member asked whether the government respected the resolutions and decisions of the Senate, particularly regarding the release of a document promised two years prior. She questioned the government's commitment to transparency and parliamentary convention.
Background: The Senate voted to extend question time after the government failed to release a document promised by Senator Gallagher, raising concerns about executive accountability.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister confirmed that Senator Gallagher would release the report at the appropriate time. He argued that the government takes time to ensure policy correctness and transparency. He rejected suggestions of heavy-handed tactics, claiming the government is cooperative with parliament.
Question from Lidia Thorpe
The member asked why the government had not endorsed or responded to the National Anti-Racism Framework a year after its release. She questioned the government's progress on the 63 recommendations.
Background: The government had not responded to the National Anti-Racism Framework handed down by the Race Discrimination Commissioner the previous November.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated he was not the Attorney-General but would consult with her and seek a response. He rejected the suggestion that the government was ignoring the report, emphasizing its commitment to tackling racial discrimination. He promised to forward the question for a formal response.
Question from Maria Kovacic
The member asked how the Prime Minister could have confidence in the CFMEU administrator given the secret transfer of the slush fund. She questioned the government's oversight of the union.
Background: Concerns were raised about the CFMEU slush fund and the government's confidence in the union administrator.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister affirmed the Prime Minister's confidence in Minister Rishworth. He stated the government was taking action against the CFMEU and that Minister Rishworth was capable of dealing with corruption. He did not directly address the administrator's knowledge of the transfer.
Question from Leah Blyth
The member asked for the government's view on the incident and whether China was still considered a friend. She questioned how Australia was ensuring the safety of its personnel.
Background: A Chinese fighter jet released flares near an Australian surveillance aircraft, raising concerns about regional security.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated that the government prioritized the protection of military personnel. He confirmed that the Prime Minister had raised the issue with Chinese officials. He highlighted investment in submarine construction in South Australia.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The senator asked whether individuals associated with ISIS were returning to Australia or had returned in recent months, citing community concern over the group's history of violence and genocide.
Background: The Prime Minister previously denied reports of ISIS brides returning to Australia, while the acting NSW Police Force chief stated state and federal agencies were finalising operations regarding the return of Islamic State operatives.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated that security agencies were monitoring the unstable situation in Syria to prepare for any potential returns. He confirmed that the government was not providing assistance or repatriating individuals from Syrian IDP camps. In response to supplementary questions, he reiterated that no taxpayer funds were being spent on the return of these individuals and that the government was not facilitating their repatriation.
Question from Charlotte Walker
The member asked how the government was tackling abusive technologies and protecting the community from stalking, nudity, and deepfake apps.
Background: The government was implementing social media minimum age limits and addressing online harms like deepfakes and stalking.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated the government was taking a proactive approach to protect vulnerable Australians from deepfake and stalking apps, which had doubled in use over 18 months. He noted that one in every classroom had a victim of deepfake abuse. The government would work with industry to develop reforms alongside the digital duty of care, complementing existing laws prohibiting stalking and non-consensual explicit material distribution. He emphasized the commitment to restricting access to these apps to give parents peace of mind.
Question from Malcolm Roberts
The member questioned the failure of the Commonwealth prosecutor to bring charges in light of Comcare's findings. He sought the disclosure of the prosecutor's rationale to offer closure to victims' families.
Background: A Comcare investigation alleged serious workplace health and safety breaches by the Department of Defence regarding the fatal Taipan helicopter crash.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated that Comcare had provided its findings to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions. He noted that independent investigations by the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force and the Queensland coroner were ongoing. He deemed it inappropriate to comment further while these investigations were proceeding.
Question from Carol Brown
The member asked about government actions to open new export opportunities and create jobs. She subsequently inquired about the benefits of the UAE trade agreement for businesses and consumers, and the government's approach to mitigating the impact of US tariffs.
Background: The member asked about government efforts to open new export opportunities and create jobs, specifically regarding the UAE trade agreement and US tariffs.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister highlighted that one in four Australian jobs relates to trade and that export jobs pay nine per cent more on average. He stated that the UAE agreement, passed into law on 31 July, would allow over 99 per cent of Australian products to enter tariff-free, saving households and businesses about $40 million annually. Regarding US tariffs, he noted that two-way investment reached $2.9 trillion in 2024 and that the government had introduced a $50 million program to assist impacted industries and completed five new business missions to secure markets.
Question from Tammy Tyrrell
The senator asked why the government continued to exclude families with twins from the multiple birth allowance, noting that twin births cost five times as much as single births. She also challenged the minister on a previous statement that a council had met 'multiple times' when it had only met twice, and asked if support should be based on the number of children born.
Background: Families with twins face higher costs but are excluded from the multiple birth allowance, which is reserved for triplets or more.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated that he was not the responsible minister but would take the issue up with the Minister for Social Services to provide a proper response. Regarding the previous statement, he defended his use of the word 'multiple' by stating that two is more than one and therefore constitutes a multiple, asserting that his previous answer was correct.
Question from Michaelia Cash
The senator asked whether the Prime Minister or his office had directed the minister to alter his previous statement regarding discussions with the US President about the beef import ban.
Background: Senator Farrell had previously claimed President Trump raised the beef import ban with the Prime Minister, a statement the Prime Minister denied, leading to a retraction by the minister.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated he had made a mistake, clarifying that President Trump mentioned US beef exports in a speech rather than in discussions with the Prime Minister. He confirmed he had apologised to the Prime Minister and corrected the record with journalists. In response to supplementary questions, he reiterated that he owned up to the error immediately and affirmed that the Prime Minister always tells the truth, dismissing further inquiries as unnecessary.
Question from Jacqui Lambie
The member asked what specific measures the government would take to protect the Liberty Bell Bay smelter and its 260 workers from being sold off.
Background: GFG Alliance's Liberty Bell Bay smelter faces financial uncertainty after granting security to White Oak Global Advisors.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister expressed support for the industry, citing the government's intervention in the Whyalla Steelworks as an example of protecting jobs. He stated that funding provided so far was for Whyalla but would consult with Minister Husic regarding any requests from Tasmania. He expressed confidence that the Whyalla Steelworks would remain a going concern and that maintenance issues under GFG would be addressed.
Question from Louise Pratt
The senator asked how the government is creating secure, well-paid manufacturing jobs to strengthen the economy and deliver a future made in Australia, particularly in Western Australia.
Background: The government is promoting its plan to build Australia's industrial future and create secure jobs.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated the National Reconstruction Fund has invested $400 million in businesses, while the Industry Growth Program supports companies in robotics and battery manufacturing. He highlighted the passage of production tax credits to ensure resources are processed locally, creating jobs in Western Australia. He also noted investments in the domestic steel industry, particularly in Whyalla, and mentioned that the government has delivered energy bill relief and tax cuts. He contrasted these actions with the opposition's record, claiming they opposed such relief measures.
Question from David Pocock
The senator asked why the government had not released the promised national housing plan or supported legislation for one, despite public support. He also questioned whether measuring unmet social housing need is essential for an effective plan.
Background: Research indicated high levels of housing stress, and the national housing and homelessness plan had not yet been released.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated the government is consulting stakeholders to ensure the plan is correct and has not been inactive. He highlighted the largest Commonwealth investment in social and affordable housing in over a decade, with 40,000 new homes to be delivered under the Housing Australia Future Fund and National Housing Accord. He noted that homelessness funding has doubled to $400 million annually under the national agreement. He dismissed the link between housing delays and political motivations, stating the minister is working with states and territories to achieve the best results.
Question from Varun Ghosh
The senator asked how the government was creating secure jobs in the resources industry through local processing. He followed up by asking how production tax credits would create jobs and who supported them. He also asked why the credits were important for Western Australia and what was preventing their implementation.
Background: The government plans to process critical minerals in Australia rather than exporting them for refinement.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister stated that production tax credits would ensure critical minerals are processed locally, maximising value and creating jobs, particularly in Western Australia. He noted that industry groups, including the Association of Mining and Exploration Companies and the Minerals Council of Australia, supported the credits. He claimed that the Liberal and National parties were standing in the way of implementation, turning their backs on the resources sector and Western Australia.
Other Parliamentary Activity
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Fuel Excise Relief) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Fuel Excise Relief) Bill 2026; First Reading
Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · First Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Strategic Reserve) Bill 2026; In Committee
Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · In Committee
Responded as minister
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Building a Stronger and Fairer Super System) Bill 2026, Superannuation (Building a Stronger and Fairer Super System) Imposition Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 10 March 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Building a Stronger and Fairer Super System) Bill 2026, Superannuation (Building a Stronger and Fairer Super System) Imposition Bill 2026; First Reading
Senate · Tuesday 10 March 2026 · First Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Middle East
Senate · Tuesday 10 March 2026 · General Debate
Responded as minister
-
Picton, Mr Tim
Senate · Wednesday 4 February 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Bolkus, Hon. Nick
Senate · Tuesday 3 February 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
His Holiness Pope Francis
Senate · Tuesday 22 July 2025 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Electoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Reform) Bill 2024; In Committee
Senate · Wednesday 12 February 2025 · In Committee
Opened this debate
-
Andrews, Hon. Kevin James, AM
Senate · Tuesday 11 February 2025 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
- Votes recorded
- 346
- Aye votes (35.0%)
- 121
- No votes (65.0%)
- 225
Showing the latest 50 votes.
-
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account)...
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 36 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account)...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 24, Noes 35 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account)...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 25 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Carbon Farming Initiative--Improved Forest Management in Multiple-use Public ...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 27, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; In Committee
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 24 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Strengthening Accountability for Tax Adviser Miscond...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 4 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Defence Properties; Order for the Production of Documents
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 36, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Rearrangement
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 36 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Housing; Order for the Production of Documents
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 37, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Selection of Bills Committee; Report
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 17, Noes 26 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Strengthening Accountability for Tax Adviser Miscond...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 36, Noes 4 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Strengthening Accountability for Tax Adviser Miscond...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 37, Noes 4 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee; Reference
8 Sep 2026 · Ayes 37, Noes 22 · Passed
VOTED NO -
International Relations: Australia and the United States of America
7 Sep 2026 · Ayes 14, Noes 28 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Animal Welfare; Order for the Production of Documents
7 Sep 2026 · Ayes 13, Noes 25 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Social Security (Administration) Legislation Amendment (Income Management and...
7 Sep 2026 · Ayes 13, Noes 24 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025; Li...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 15 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025; Li...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 11, Noes 26 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025; Li...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 11 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025; Li...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 36 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025; Li...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 15, Noes 27 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025; Li...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 3, Noes 37 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025; Li...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 28 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025; Li...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 11 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025; Li...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 15 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025; Li...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 27 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Australia's Foreign Relations (State and Territory Arrangements) Amendment Bi...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 30, Noes 9 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Australia's Foreign Relations (State and Territory Arrangements) Amendment Bi...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 30, Noes 9 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Combatting Illicit Tobacco Bill 2026; Limitation of Debate
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 27, Noes 36 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Customs Tariff Amendment (Incorporation of Proposals) Bill (No. 1) 2026; Limi...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 28, Noes 35 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026, Cash Distribution Framework (Consequen...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 26 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026; Limitation ...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 9 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026; Limitation ...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 10 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026; Limitation ...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 35 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026; Limitation ...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 10, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED NO -
News Journalism Payments Bill 2026, News Journalism Payments (Consequential A...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 10, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED NO -
News Journalism Payments Bill 2026, News Journalism Payments (Consequential A...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 10 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
News Journalism Payments Bill 2026, News Journalism Payments (Consequential A...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 10, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED NO -
News Journalism Payments Bill 2026, News Journalism Payments (Consequential A...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 35 · Failed
VOTED NO -
News Journalism Payments Bill 2026, News Journalism Payments (Consequential A...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 13, Noes 29 · Failed
VOTED NO -
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 30, Noes 12 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 29 · Failed
VOTED NO -
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 29, Noes 12 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 30 · Failed
VOTED NO -
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 30, Noes 12 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 37, Noes 3 · Passed
VOTED AYE
About this page
This page tracks Don Farrell's parliamentary activity: questions asked and answered in Question Time, debates spoken in, and votes in divisions. Summaries are in reported speech, not transcripts; each one links to the official record.