David Shoebridge
Australian Greens Senator for NSW
Currently sitting
Photo: Australian Greens, CC BY-SA 2.5 au, via Wikimedia Commons
Seat and party history (1)
- Australian Greens - NSW (Senate) - 21 May 2022 to present
- Seat and party records: OpenAustralia member data.
Contact
Office: (02) 8073 7400
Suite 201, Level 2, 1A Lawson Square, Redfern NSW 2016
Office details: Parliament of Australia, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Contact details on aph.gov.au Profile on OpenAustraliaThese counts cover what is on this site only. They do not measure electorate work or committee work.
Compared with other members
David Shoebridge compared with all 76 sitting senators.
Questions asked in Question Time
Higher than 71% of senators- This member
- 15
- Average
- 10.4
- Median
- 10
Debates spoken in
Higher than 99% of senators- This member
- 137
- Average
- 44.8
- Median
- 40
Votes cast
Higher than 92% of senators- This member
- 1098
- Average
- 743.0
- Median
- 730
Share of divisions voted in
Higher than 91% of senators- This member
- 98%
- Average
- 69%
- Median
- 69%
Read these with care
- The median is the middle member: half did more, half did less. It is less affected by a few very active members than the average.
- Ministers answer questions rather than ask them, and the presiding officers rarely vote, so their patterns differ.
- Government backbenchers are often given arranged "Dorothy Dixer" questions, which raises their question counts.
- Votes only record ayes and noes, so a missed vote cannot be told apart from a pair (an agreed absence).
- Counts cover only what is on this site, and do not measure electorate or committee work. New members have less history.
Question Time
Question from David Shoebridge
The senator asked why the government chose to align with right-wing parties on migration rather than supporting multicultural Australia. In supplementary questions, he asked if the government intended to treat migrants as economic levers given the rise in temporary visas and slowdown in permanent family visas, and whether the government would take responsibility for failing to address material needs that allowed scapegoating of migrants.
Background: The government is preparing migration changes amid criticism of offshore processing and visa delays.
Answer from Murray Watt
The minister rejected the comparison to One Nation, arguing the previous migration system was broken and unsustainable with net overseas migration exceeding half a million annually. He stated the government is implementing calm, considered reforms to balance workforce needs with family reunion at sustainable levels. He accused the Greens of blocking public housing construction in the past and lacking self-awareness regarding the housing crisis.
Question from David Shoebridge
The senator asked why the government had allowed the US to use Australian bases in a way that could draw Australia into US conflicts. He cited fears from residents near bases and asked for an example of the government denying US access to bases.
Background: Reports indicated the US had access to over 100 Australian military bases for surveillance, troop deployment, and munitions storage, raising concerns about Australia becoming a forward operating base.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister affirmed that the US alliance contributed to Australian sovereignty and provided access to capabilities Australia would not otherwise have. She stated that all facilities remained under Australian command and that US access occurred in rotation, by mutual agreement, and at Australia's request. The minister rejected the view that the alliance compromised sovereignty, emphasizing that the government's actions were aimed at deterring conflict in the region.
Question from David Shoebridge
The member asked if the government was treating the Royal Commission with seriousness and providing necessary support. He specifically asked if the government would intervene to grant a visa to a former ASIO source denied entry, to ensure his evidence could be heard by the commission.
Background: The Royal Commission was established to investigate antisemitism and social cohesion, including the role of security services.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister affirmed the government's support for the Royal Commission's independence and its wide powers. Regarding the visa denial, she stated that the government acts on advice from security agencies and respects the statutory framework, implying that national interest considerations guided the decision. On the gun buyback, she expressed pleasure that New South Wales was cooperating with the Commonwealth and urged all other states to engage with the reform in a similar manner to ensure national consistency.
Question from David Shoebridge
The member asked what it would take for the government to say no to Palantir. He further asked if the minister would commit to a moratorium on new contracts and a public audit of existing ones, and confirmed whether any ethics or risk assessments had been conducted on the company.
Background: The senator raised concerns about a multimillion-dollar Defence contract awarded to Palantir without tender, citing the company's links to ICE deportations and targeting in Gaza.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that she did not have detailed information on the specific contract but would provide information on notice if she could obtain it. She clarified that she represented the Minister for Defence but was not the minister herself, and noted that questions had been raised at Senate estimates. She referred the senator to the government's procurement framework and repeated her offer to provide further information on notice.
Question from David Shoebridge
The member asked if the government still supported the war in the Middle East, citing consequences for Australians. He later asked if the minister would oppose an Israeli invasion of Lebanon and why Australia was not joining middle powers to end the conflict.
Background: The member questioned the government's support for military actions in the Middle East involving the US and Israel.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister defended the government's position by citing the Iranian regime's actions, including sponsoring terrorism and attacking Australians, stating that Australia supported actions to prevent Iran from being a threat. She clarified that Australia was not proposing strikes on Iran and was engaged in defensive action. Regarding Lebanon, she expressed grave concern about the expansion of conflict and the displacement of over a million citizens, including 200,000 children. She announced a further $5 million in humanitarian assistance and stated that a major Israeli ground offensive would exacerbate the humanitarian situation.
Question from David Shoebridge
The member asked whether any Australian personnel were on the US submarine that sank the Iranian frigate. He questioned if the government could confirm the presence of Australian Defence Force personnel on the vessel.
Background: A US nuclear submarine sank an Iranian frigate off Sri Lanka, raising questions about Australian personnel embedded on US vessels.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that US submarine operations were a matter for the United States. She explained that for operational and security reasons, the government did not disclose specific information regarding Australian personnel. She reiterated that Australia was not involved in the attacks on Iran.
Question from David Shoebridge
The member asked why the government would not stop intelligence collected at Pine Gap being used to bomb Iran and why it would not be truthful about the situation's reality.
Background: Concerns were raised about the use of intelligence from Pine Gap in US and Israeli attacks on Iran.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that she had previously answered questions about facilities and referred the member to those responses. She highlighted Iranian attacks on Dubai airport and a UK base in Cyprus as part of the broader context. In response to supplementary questions about the 'red line' for opposing the war and the legality of the strikes, she reiterated that Australia did not participate in the strikes and that the issue of compliance with international law is for the US and Israel to outline. She emphasised support for action to prevent Iran from possessing nuclear capability and standing with the Iranian people against oppression.
Question from David Shoebridge
The member enquired whether Commissioner Brereton had stepped down from his role as assistant IGADF, and if that was the case, what the timing and circumstances were. He then questioned whether the government retained confidence in Brereton, citing his failure to disclose moonlighting activities, and urged the minister to dismiss him because of eroding public trust.
Background: Senator Shoebridge highlighted conflicting statements regarding whether Commissioner Brereton had resigned as Assistant Inspector-General of the ADF before taking up his NACC role, citing letters and committee answers.
Answer from Don Farrell
The minister initially stated he could not answer directly as he was not the responsible minister and would consult with the Attorney-General. In response to the supplementary question regarding confidence, the minister answered affirmatively. He rejected the proposition that Brereton should be removed, stating that the government had appointed him and he continued to do his work, having clarified he was not involved in other activities.
Question from David Shoebridge
The senator asked why the government signed a secret deal with Nauru despite awareness of corruption allegations involving senior officials.
Background: Reports alleged corrupt payments to Nauruan officials and questioned the transparency of a $212 billion memorandum of understanding.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated she would not comment on classified AUSTRAC reporting. She clarified that the memorandum of understanding was negotiated by the Department of Home Affairs, not her portfolio. Regarding allegations of funding criminal groups through contractors, she reiterated that government expectations for the use of funds were clear and applied across all departments.
Question from David Shoebridge
The member asked why it took two years to send emails stopping direct exports to Israel. He also asked if similar emails would be sent to F-35 supply chain companies and if the government monitored end-users of weapons washed through the US.
Background: Reports indicated the government sent emails to defence companies to stop direct exports to Israel. The member questioned the delay and the role of the US in washing weapons.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that Australia had not supplied weapons to Israel since the conflict began. She referred the senator to Defence estimates for details on export conditions. Regarding the F-35, she noted Australia was one of 20 operators and that arrangements had been detailed in estimates. She rejected the premise that weapons were being washed through the US and referred to previous statements supporting international law.
Question from David Shoebridge
The member asked whether the government had ever refused requests from the United States or Donald Trump regarding defence spending and critical minerals. He questioned if there were limits to the government's support for US interests.
Background: Concerns were raised about the extent of Australian financial commitments to the United States under AUKUS and the prioritization of US interests over Australian sovereignty.
Answer from Jenny McAllister
The minister affirmed the importance of the US alliance for national security. She stated that the government considers the national interest in all international engagements. She defended the acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines and critical minerals agreements as beneficial for Australia.
Question from David Shoebridge
The member asked why the government labels refugees as criminals and whether this rhetoric fuels far-right rallies. She cited concerns from human rights organizations about the impact of the laws.
Background: The member criticized legislation excluding procedural fairness for third-country reception arrangements, linking it to far-right rallies.
Answer from Murray Watt
The minister condemned the rallies and rejected the implication that the government was responsible for them. He stated the legislation excludes procedural fairness for those without a right to a visa, asserting that such individuals should leave Australia. He defended the principle that people without visa rights must depart, contrasting it with the Greens' position.
Question from David Shoebridge
The senator asked whether the government would condemn the attack on Nasser hospital as a war crime and commit to applying sanctions against Israel similar to those applied to Russia.
Background: Israel carried out a second strike on the Nasser hospital in Gaza, hitting the site once more when rescue personnel had arrived.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister condemned the attack, stating that targeting hospitals breaches international law and that civilians and health workers must be protected. She reiterated calls for Prime Minister Netanyahu to agree to a ceasefire. Regarding sanctions, she noted that sanctions had already been applied to two Israeli ministers and that the government continues to work with the international community to apply pressure. She declined to stop sending F-35 parts, referring to previous answers and emphasising the government's goal of achieving peace.
Question from David Shoebridge
The senator asked when the government would take material action to enforce international law in Gaza, such as joining South Africa's genocide case, imposing Magnitsky sanctions on the Netanyahu cabinet, and ending military cooperation with Israel.
Background: The Prime Minister had stated that stopping food deliveries to Gaza breached international law. The senator asked for material actions to enforce this law.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister condemned the situation in Gaza and affirmed that stopping food deliveries breaches international law and decency. She stated Australia joins international calls for a ceasefire and adherence to humanitarian law, and has sanctioned extremist settler entities and individuals. She clarified that Australia has not supplied weapons to Israel for five years. In response to questions about Pine Gap and F-35 parts, she denied supplying weapons, stating Australia contributes non-lethal components to the global F-35 supply chain, and dismissed the senator's claims as misinformation.
Question from David Shoebridge
The senator asked for justification for providing $1.6 billion to the United States for nuclear submarines that might be cancelled, with no clawback provisions.
Background: The government gave an extra $800 million to the US armed forces under AUKUS, raising total contributions to $1.6 billion while the submarine agreement was reviewed.
Answer from Penny Wong
The minister stated that AUKUS contributes to strategic balance and stability in the region through hard deterrence. She affirmed that decisions are made in Australia's national interest. Regarding beef imports, she explained that a rigorous, science-based risk assessment allowed expanded access for beef from cattle born in Canada or Mexico, consistent with biosecurity standards. The minister rejected the premise that the government was appeasing the United States.
Other Parliamentary Activity
-
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare Without Caps) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 17 September 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Migration
Senate · Thursday 17 September 2026 · Take Note Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Defence Legislation Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 2) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 17 September 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Defence Force Discipline Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 1) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 17 September 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Wednesday 16 September 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Migration
Senate · Wednesday 16 September 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
Migration
Senate · Wednesday 16 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Superannuation
Senate · Tuesday 15 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Water
Senate · Monday 14 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Artificial Intelligence
Senate · Monday 14 September 2026 · General Debate
Opened this debate
-
Statute Update Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 10 September 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Protecting Australians from Foreign Terrorist Fighters Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 10 September 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide
Senate · Wednesday 9 September 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Veterans: Health Care
Senate · Tuesday 8 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 8 September 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
-
Defence Properties
Senate · Tuesday 8 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 7 September 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Climate Change, Defence
Senate · Monday 7 September 2026 · Take Note Debate
Opened this debate
-
International Relations: Australia and the United States of America
Senate · Thursday 20 August 2026 · General Debate
Opened this debate
-
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 20 August 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Veterans: Women's Health
Senate · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Privatisation
Senate · Tuesday 18 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Personal Information and Privacy; Order for the Production of Documents
Senate · Monday 17 August 2026 · General Debate
Opened this debate
-
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 17 August 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Human Rights
Senate · Monday 17 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026; In Committee
Senate · Monday 17 August 2026 · In Committee
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Extended Producer Responsibility Scheme for Packaging (No Time to Waste) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 13 August 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026; In Committee
Senate · Thursday 13 August 2026 · In Committee
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Gas Industry: Taxation
Senate · Wednesday 12 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026; In Committee
Senate · Wednesday 12 August 2026 · In Committee
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment (Omnibus No. 1) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 11 August 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
National Security
Senate · Tuesday 11 August 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Universal Periodic Review
Senate · Wednesday 1 July 2026 · General Debate
Opened this debate
-
Defence Procurement
Senate · Tuesday 30 June 2026 · Take Note Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Data Centres
Senate · Tuesday 30 June 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Secrecy Provisions Amendment (Sunsetting Provision) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Monday 29 June 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Online Safety and Other Legislation Amendment (My Face, My Rights) Bill 2025; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 25 June 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Palestine
Senate · Wednesday 24 June 2026 · Take Note Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
National Disability Insurance Scheme
Senate · Wednesday 24 June 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Gas Industry: Taxation
Senate · Tuesday 23 June 2026 · Take Note Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Forestry Industry
Senate · Tuesday 23 June 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Gas Industry: Taxation
Senate · Monday 22 June 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (The Survivors Law) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 14 May 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Customs Legislation Amendment (False Trade Marks Infringement Notices) Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Thursday 14 May 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
-
Kumanjayi Little Baby
Senate · Tuesday 12 May 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Budget
Senate · Tuesday 12 May 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Defence Procurement
Senate · Wednesday 1 April 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate
-
Copyright Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading
Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Australian Defence Force
Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · General Debate
Opened this debate
-
Public Transport
Senate · Monday 30 March 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
- Votes recorded
- 1098
- Aye votes (57.7%)
- 634
- No votes (42.3%)
- 464
Showing the latest 50 votes.
-
Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026; Second Read
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026; Second Read
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 13, Noes 23 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026; Second Read
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 13, Noes 23 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Defence Force Discipline Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 30, Noes 24 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Corruption in the Construction Industry Select Committee; Appointment
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee; Reference
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 21 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Environment and Communications References Committee; Reference
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Selection of Bills Committee; Report
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 28 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare With...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare With...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Migration
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 19, Noes 30 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Manufacturing Industry
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 20, Noes 27 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Personal Information and Privacy; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 30, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Maritime Industry; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 16, Noes 23 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Climate Change; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 16, Noes 23 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Census; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 30 · Failed
VOTED NO -
ASECA Judicial Seminar; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 28 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Middle East; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 13, Noes 27 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
North to East Australia Pipeline; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 18, Noes 25 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Artificial Intelligence Joint Select Committee; Appointment
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 17, Noes 25 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Artificial Intelligence Joint Select Committee; Appointment
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 17, Noes 26 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Improved Native Forest Management; Order for the Production of Documents
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 26, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 27, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Middle East
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Amendment (No Jab No Pay Repeal) Bill 20...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 6, Noes 34 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Economy
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Australian Federal Police; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Trade Unions; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Consideration of Legislation
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Cybersafety Legislation; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Executive Remuneration; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 17, Noes 26 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Waste Management and Recycling; Order for the Production of Documents
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 34, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Environment and Communications References Committee; Reference
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Red Lines Package Omnibus Bill 2026; First Reading
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 39, Noes 14 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Artificial Intelligence
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 20 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account)...
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 36 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 25, Noes 31 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Water
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 16, Noes 24 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Cost of Living
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 22, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Digital Seller Underperformance Policy; Order for the Production of Documents
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 18 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Health Care; Order for the Production of Documents
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 23, Noes 28 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Intergenerational Trust Fund for the People of the Republic of Nauru; Order f...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee; Reference
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 35, Noes 19 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account)...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 24, Noes 35 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Wage Justice for Early Childhood Education and Care Workers (Special Account)...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 25 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Major Sporting Events (Indicia and Images) Protection Amendment Bill 2026; Th...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 18 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Major Sporting Events (Indicia and Images) Protection Amendment Bill 2026; Se...
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 18 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; In Committee
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 21, Noes 32 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; In Committee
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 31, Noes 22 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Consideration of Legislation
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 19, Noes 33 · Failed
VOTED NO
About this page
This page tracks David Shoebridge's parliamentary activity: questions asked and answered in Question Time, debates spoken in, and votes in divisions. Summaries are in reported speech, not transcripts; each one links to the official record.