Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 2) Bill 2026; Second Reading

Senate · Wednesday 19 August 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Senate debated the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 2) Bill 2026, which introduced loss carry-back provisions, made the $20,000 instant asset write-off permanent, provided tax exemptions for PNG Chiefs rugby league staff, and amended negative gearing rules to protect assets transferred due to death or relationship breakdown. The government argued these measures supported business resilience and investment while correcting unintended consequences of earlier tax reforms. Opposition members criticised the government for initially legislating changes that penalised widows and those undergoing divorce, describing the current bill as a forced capitulation after sustained pressure. Despite these criticisms, the coalition indicated support for the bill's business measures while noting the threshold for asset write-offs was too low.

Outcome

The bill was passed by the Senate.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Gallagher moved the second reading, outlining the bill as part of a broader tax reform package aimed at helping businesses and first home buyers. Gallagher detailed Schedule 1, proposing that firms with worldwide earnings below $1 billion could carry back losses for two years to boost cash flow and resilience, aiding up to 85,000 companies each year. Schedule 2 established the $20,000 instant asset write-off as a permanent measure for enterprises with turnover under $10 million, cutting compliance costs by an estimated $32 million annually. Schedule 3 granted income tax exemptions to PNG Chiefs Limited staff to align with Papua New Guinea tax laws and support regional partnership goals. Schedule 4 amended negative gearing rules to ensure properties owned on budget night retain concessions if transferred due to inheritance or relationship breakdown.

Opposition response

Cash characterised the bill as a capitulation by the government to opposition pressure regarding the so-called widows tax. Cash argued that the government had knowingly legislated a tax on widows, divorcees, and those fleeing violent relationships, only to reverse course after public outcry and coalition amendments. Cash claimed the government denied the problem existed for months and rushed the original legislation through parliament without adequate consultation. Cash welcomed the fix but stated it did not go far enough, pledging to axe all such taxes if elected. Cash also criticised the government's broader economic management and alleged misleading statements about housing market impacts.