Question Time AU

Question Time

Senate

Wednesday 13 May 2026 · 10 questions

Summarised by AI in reported speech, not a transcript. Read the official Hansard · OpenAustralia

At a glance

Main topics

Federal Budget and National Debt, Federal Budget and Cost of Living, Taxation and Negative Gearing, National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), Housing Supply and Affordability, Indigenous Child Placement in Northern Territory, Tax Policy Changes, Data Centre Regulation and Energy, Fuel Security and Resilience, Housing Supply and Tax Impact

Topics (select to filter)

Questions and answers

Q1 Claire Chandler Liberal TAS 2:00 pm

Budget

Background

The question addressed the impact of the newly released federal budget on young Australians, specifically regarding inflation, interest rates, and national debt levels.

Question

The member asked whether the budget demonstrated that young Australians faced worsening economic conditions due to government spending. She further inquired if the budget projected national debt reaching $1.25 trillion, creating a financial burden for future generations, and whether interest costs would exceed $42 billion annually.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Katy Gallagher

The minister denied the premise, stating the budget ensured fairness for future generations through responsible fiscal management. She argued that the previous government had doubled the debt before the pandemic and left a $1 trillion debt burden. The minister highlighted that the current budget reduced debt by $173 billion compared to inherited levels and saved approximately $70 billion in interest payments. She emphasized that net debt growth remained lower than when the government took office.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Budget

Background

The question sought to highlight the government's responsible budget approach amidst global oil shocks and inflationary pressures.

Question

The member asked how the government's budget supported Australians facing cost-of-living pressures and delivered for all citizens. She further inquired about the budget's contribution to fiscal repair and why this task was important.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Katy Gallagher

The minister outlined the budget's five-part economic strategy, including fuel security, assistance with living expenses, productivity, tax reform, and responsible management. She noted a new $250 Working Australians Tax Offset for 13.3 million workers from late 2027, bringing total tax cuts to up to $2,816 for the average worker by 2028. The minister stated the budget was $44.9 billion stronger than the mid-year economic and fiscal outlook and included $63.8 billion in savings, contributing to almost $180 billion in total savings since the government took office.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q3 Jane Hume Liberal VIC 2:10 pm

Budget

Background

The question cited budget documents regarding a hypothetical low-income earner paying additional tax on capital gains due to minimum tax rules.

Question

The member asked why the government was forcing low-income Australians to pay extra tax through changes to capital gains tax and negative gearing. She further questioned why the Prime Minister was denying opportunities to young Australians that he had previously used to build wealth.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister stated the policy change aimed to address intergenerational inequity and help young Australians achieve homeownership. She clarified that negative gearing remained available for investments in new builds. The minister argued that the combination of capital gains tax discounts and negative gearing privileged investors over owner-occupiers. She highlighted that the budget included tax cuts averaging $2,800 for workers, contrasting this with the opposition's past promises of higher taxes.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Budget

Background

The question addressed significant budget cuts to the NDIS and concerns about support for disabled people.

Question

The member asked if the minister was proud of cutting $185 billion from the NDIS over the decade. She further inquired if the government could guarantee that no disabled person would lose support or be left worse off, and what alternative supports were funded for autistic adults and teenagers.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Katy Gallagher

The minister stated the reforms were necessary to ensure the long-term sustainability of the NDIS, which had grown beyond initial projections of $13 billion annually to over $50 billion. She explained that the budget aimed to manage scheme growth and return the NDIS to its original focus. The minister highlighted investments in rebuilding support systems outside the NDIS for those who do not qualify, ensuring that people without private funds could still access necessary care.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q5 Carol Brown ALP TAS 2:24 pm

Housing

Background

The question sought to highlight the government's achievements in building homes and making housing fairer.

Question

The member asked how budget measures would help Australians buy homes and impact housing supply. She further inquired about progress in delivering social and affordable homes and the benefits of increased supply for renters and buyers.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Tim Ayres

The minister stated that changes to capital gains tax and negative gearing leveled the playing field for young Australians. He noted that over 660,000 homes had been built since the government took office, with housing starts up 26 per cent. The minister highlighted the delivery of 55,000 affordable new homes, with more than 6,000 already completed, and a further $2 billion investment in infrastructure to unlock tens of thousands of additional homes.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Indigenous Australians

Background

The question addressed new Northern Territory legislation weakening the Aboriginal child placement principle amid concerns from commissioners.

Question

The member asked if the minister agreed that the Northern Territory legislation should be paused until an inquiry was complete. She further questioned whether the inquiry should be led by Aboriginal experts or a former police officer, and if the Commonwealth should intervene against the Northern Territory government.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Malarndirri McCarthy

The minister stated she had expressed concerns to the Northern Territory government and urged them to consult with Aboriginal organizations and commissioners. She noted that coronial and police investigations were underway and that comments should not jeopardize these legal processes. Regarding intervention, the minister acknowledged the Commonwealth's constitutional power but emphasized the need for responsible use of that power, citing past negative impacts of interventions on Northern Territory families.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 1 point of order raised

Taxation

Background

The question focused on the Prime Minister's previous election promises regarding negative gearing, capital gains tax, and family trusts.

Question

The member asked how many times the Prime Minister had promised not to change negative gearing, capital gains tax, or family trust taxes before the last election.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister acknowledged the policy change, stating it was necessary to address intergenerational inequity and help young Australians enter the housing market. She argued that the status quo was failing young people and that the budget papers demonstrated worsening inequity. Regarding trusts, she noted that 82 per cent had no underlying business operations, justifying the need for equitable tax arrangements while excluding farming and testamentary trusts.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 3 points of order raised

Q8 David Pocock Ind ACT 2:44 pm

Data Centres

Background

The question addressed reports that the government might require data centres to offset their power usage, questioning the sufficiency of voluntary expectations.

Question

The member asked if mandatory offsetting rules confirmed that voluntary expectations were insufficient. He further inquired about the trade-offs between data centre development and housing construction, and the lack of clear guardrails.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Tim Ayres

The minister denied that voluntary expectations were insufficient, stating they were being operationalized through state planning approvals. He emphasized the need for data centre developers to invest in additional electricity generation and transmission to lower prices. The minister highlighted the government's commitment to securing tech investment in Australia's national interest while ensuring cooperation with states to manage energy impacts.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Fuel Security

Background

The question sought to highlight the government's fuel security package announced in the budget.

Question

The member asked why acting now to strengthen fuel resilience was important. He further inquired about regional cooperation for fuel security and how the government's approach compared to alternatives.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister outlined a $14.8 billion package including a Fuel and Fertiliser Security Facility and a permanent government-owned fuel reserve of around one billion litres. She noted new agreements with Singapore, Brunei, Korea, Japan, and Malaysia to ensure fuel flows. The minister contrasted the government's actions with the previous administration's record, citing the closure of refineries and the decision to store reserves in Texas.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH)

Q10 Andrew Bragg Liberal NSW 2:56 pm

Housing

Background

The question claimed the government's tax changes would reduce housing supply by 35,000 dwellings.

Question

The member asked how building fewer houses would help younger people. He further questioned why the Prime Minister was cutting off negative gearing opportunities and requested a guarantee that tax changes would result in more homes.

Includes 2 supplementary questions.

Answer from Penny Wong

The minister denied the claim, stating the policies would result in 35,000 more houses than otherwise. She highlighted that the Local Infrastructure Fund would support up to 65,000 homes and tax changes would enable 75,000 additional owner-occupiers over the decade. The minister emphasized that negative gearing remained available for new builds and that the changes aimed to address the divergence between housing prices and incomes.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the source.

Read on OpenAustralia · Official Hansard (APH) · 1 point of order raised

Other debates this day (13)

Answers to Questions Take Note Debate Budget Matter of Public Importance Budget Take Note Debate Competition and Consumer Amendment (Responding to Exceptional Circumstances) Bill 2026; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Competition and Consumer Amendment (Responding to Exceptional Circumstances) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Customs Legislation Amendment (False Trade Marks Infringement Notices) Bill 2026; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Customs Legislation Amendment (False Trade Marks Infringement Notices) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Data Centres Take Note Debate Extended Producer Responsibility Scheme for Packaging (No Time to Waste) Bill 2026; First Reading Bill Debate · listed Extended Producer Responsibility Scheme for Packaging (No Time to Waste) Bill 2026; Second Reading Bill Debate Indigenous Australians Take Note Debate Regional Budget Statement Ministerial Statement · listed Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Tackling the Gender Super Gap) Bill 2025; Second Reading Bill Debate

Divisions on this day (7)

1. Consideration of Legislation Passed 34–25 2. Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee; Reference Not passed 27–35 3. Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee; Reference Not passed 5–41 4. Housing; Order for the Production of Documents Passed 37–22 5. Northern Territory Remote Aboriginal Investment Agreement; Order for the Production of Documents Passed 37–22 6. Budget Not passed 13–24 7. Economics References Committee; Reference Not passed 26–31