Anika Wells
Australian Labor Party Member for Lilley
Currently sitting
Photo: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT)/Sarah Hodges, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Seat and party history (1)
- Australian Labor Party - Lilley (House) - 18 May 2019 to present
- Seat and party records: OpenAustralia member data.
Contact
Electorate office: (07) 3266 8244
Ground floor, 1176 Sandgate Road, Nundah QLD 4012
Office details: Parliament of Australia, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Contact details on aph.gov.au Profile on OpenAustraliaNot sure if this is your member? Find your electorate (AEC)
These counts cover what is on this site only. They do not measure electorate work or committee work.
Compared with other members
Anika Wells compared with all 150 sitting House members.
Questions asked in Question Time
Lower than 81% of House members- This member
- 0
- Average
- 11.2
- Median
- 12
Debates spoken in
Higher than 65% of House members- This member
- 39
- Average
- 35.9
- Median
- 30.5
Votes cast
Lower than 55% of House members- This member
- 245
- Average
- 253.0
- Median
- 265
Share of divisions voted in
Lower than 56% of House members- This member
- 74%
- Average
- 79%
- Median
- 81%
Read these with care
- The median is the middle member: half did more, half did less. It is less affected by a few very active members than the average.
- Ministers answer questions rather than ask them, and the presiding officers rarely vote, so their patterns differ.
- Government backbenchers are often given arranged "Dorothy Dixer" questions, which raises their question counts.
- Votes only record ayes and noes, so a missed vote cannot be told apart from a pair (an agreed absence).
- Counts cover only what is on this site, and do not measure electorate or committee work. New members have less history.
Question Time
No questions recorded for this member.
Question from Kara Cook
The member asked what actions the government was taking to protect children from online harm and the role of the digital duty of care.
Background: A government member asked the Communications Minister about protecting children from online harm.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister highlighted $6 million in funding for the eSmart program to teach online safety. She introduced the draft Digital Duty of Care, which requires platforms to satisfy the eSafety Commissioner that their tools are safe. The duty of care aims to protect children, remove illegal content, and give users more choice. She noted that more than half of Australian children had experienced cyberbullying.
Question from Libby Coker
The member asked how the proposed digital duty of care would protect Australians from apps designed to create fake nude images. She also asked about the government's response to these threats and why action was necessary.
Background: The government proposed a digital duty of care to address online harms, including predatory apps creating fake nude images.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister affirmed the government's commitment to online safety, particularly for young people, stating that tech companies must obey Australian laws. She highlighted that current laws prohibit non-consensual deepfake material but relied too heavily on victim reporting. The draft digital duty of care will impose basic safety standards on big tech, ban nudify apps, and empower the eSafety Commissioner to issue take-down notices. She cited statistics showing a 550 per cent increase in such conduct since 2019 and noted that one in four reported cases involved young girls.
Question from Julie-Ann Campbell
The member asked how the proposed digital duty of care would protect Australians from illegal and dangerous material online.
Background: The government is proposing a digital duty of care to protect Australians from online harm.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister stated that the digital duty of care would place the onus on big tech companies to identify, detect, and prevent risks of online terrorism and extremism. She highlighted that the average age of minors investigated by ASIO had dropped to 15 years old. She noted support for the legislation from community organizations and the Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism, who warned against algorithms spreading hate and conspiracy theories.
Question from Alicia Payne
The member asked how the government was responding to calls for a safer online environment for children and what obstacles remained.
Background: The government was introducing reforms to protect children online.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister stated the government was leading global efforts with the social media minimum-age law, which had influenced over 20 countries. She highlighted the proposed laws on digital duty of care, designed to protect children from online risks such as extortion, grooming, and harmful content. She criticised the opposition for rejecting the draft laws and failing to engage in constructive discussion, accusing them of prioritising politics over child safety.
Question from Gabriel Ng
The member asked the Minister for Communications to outline how the government is leading global efforts to protect young people online and whether there are obstacles to implementing these safety standards.
Background: The government released an exposure draft for a digital duty of care framework to regulate social media platforms.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister explained that the digital duty of care would establish basic safety standards for digital services, similar to regulations for physical products. She noted that various community organizations and experts supported the measure, while the opposition had voted against recent social media minimum age laws. The Minister stated the government intended to introduce the bill to parliament the following month after consultation on the exposure draft. She emphasized that the legislation aimed to protect children from harmful content and give adults control over their feeds.
Question from Zaneta Mascarenhas
The member asked how the government was enhancing the social media minimum-age law and what was preventing progress on this critical work.
Background: The member asked about strengthening the law setting a minimum age for social media use to shield young Australians from online harm.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister stated that an urgent online safety bill had been introduced 72 days prior to empower the eSafety Commissioner to hold social media companies accountable. She criticised the Coalition and Greens for delaying the bill's passage, arguing this allowed harm to continue. She defended the proposal to examine big tech executives under oath, noting the Coalition had previously granted this power. She highlighted that the Coalition had voted with One Nation to block the bill in the Senate and urged parliament to pass the legislation to protect children.
Question from Ash Ambihaipahar
The member asked how the proposed digital duty of care would protect children from harmful content and provide parents with safety tools, as well as how it would give adults more choice over online content.
Background: The member asked about the proposed digital duty of care and its role in protecting children and giving adults choice online.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister stated that the digital duty of care would set basic safety standards for online tools, similar to standards for cars or food, to address harms from platforms like online games and AI chatbots. She emphasized that the legislation was not about controlling adults but giving them choice, such as opting into algorithmic feeds or chronological ones. She cited support from parents who had lost children to suicide due to online harm, noting that the reforms aimed to hold tech companies accountable for the consequences of their features.
Question from Basem Abdo
The member asked how the government was protecting youth from social media harms and what was preventing big tech from complying with Australian law.
Background: The member asked about protecting young Australians from social media harms and holding tech giants accountable.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister reported that over five million underage accounts had been deactivated or restricted. She cited a YouGov survey indicating improvements in sleep, sports participation, and reductions in bullying and exposure to violent content among young Australians. She criticised platforms for using tactics to evade age verification and noted the introduction of a bill on 1 July to strengthen eSafety's powers and double penalties for non-compliance. She urged the opposition and Greens to pass the bill, which had been recommended by a Senate inquiry.
Question from Gabriel Ng
The member asked how the government was delivering change and protecting vulnerable Australians from gambling harm.
Background: The member asked about government measures to protect Australians from gambling harm.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister stated that the government had passed significant gambling reforms, including strengthening BetStop, the national self-exclusion register, which had over 67,000 registrations. She noted that costs for strengthening BetStop would be recovered from gambling companies. The reforms included new restrictions on inducements, requirements for companies to monitor vulnerable people, and bans on gambling advertising on jerseys, in stadiums, and during live sporting coverage between 5 am and 8:30 pm. The Minister also mentioned bans on online keno pocket pokies and foreign match lotteries.
Question from Helen Haines
The member asked why the government was delaying the passage of the UOMO bill despite its importance for disaster roaming and connectivity.
Background: The member noted the bill had been on the Notice Paper for over a year and asked why progress was slow, referencing recent outages and proposed amendments.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister explained that the UOMO would provide baseline outdoor mobile connectivity for the first time, aiding safety in remote areas. She stated that the bill had not yet passed the House due to other legislative priorities but expected it to return for consideration in detail soon. She noted that the default start date was 1 December 2027, contingent on the development of the direct-to-device market and industry readiness.
Question from Julie-Ann Campbell
The member asked how the government was delivering sustainable change in gambling reform and the media sector.
Background: The member asked about the government's delivery of real change regarding gambling and media landscape reforms.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister highlighted a $153 million investment in the News Media Assistance Program and the progression of News Bargaining Incentive legislation to ensure digital platforms contribute to journalism. She noted that gambling advertising reforms had passed, including amendments to protect children from ads on streaming services. She emphasized that these reforms were part of a broader agenda to deliver real change for Australians.
Question from Louise Miller-Frost
The member asked how the government was tackling gambling harms and why a balanced package of reforms was important.
Background: The government was finalizing reforms to tackle gambling harms.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister announced additional amendments agreed with the coalition, including banning inducements for 14 days after signing up, for red flag customers, and for three months after deregistering from BetStop. She noted that commissions based on customer activity would be banned. Advertising protections would be enshrined in law, extended to online streaming services, and include a 15-minute blackout before live sport. A wagering advertising opt-out register would also be introduced.
Question from Rebekha Sharkie
The member asked whether the government would contemplate laws requiring gambling firms to fund a community benefit round for delivering regional sporting infrastructure.
Background: Regional sporting infrastructure was described as outdated, and the gambling industry was generating significant profits from sports betting.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister noted that the federal sports ministry delivered over $500 million in funding and worked with state governments on infrastructure projects. She highlighted the $200 million Play Our Way program as a significant investment in regional sports infrastructure. She stated that while demand for funding was high, the government would continue to advocate for more funding through usual budget processes and that the proposal would remain under consideration.
Question from Gabriel Ng
The member asked how the government is working to strengthen social media laws to protect young people from online harm and what obstacles remain.
Background: The government introduced legislation to strengthen social media laws protecting young Australians.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister explained that the government introduced a four-page bill to enable the eSafety Commissioner to require documents from tech firms and increase penalties for failing to comply, raising the maximum from $49.5 million to $99 million. She criticised the opposition for supporting a two-month Senate inquiry, stating this pause lets tech firms destroy evidence and persist in not complying. The minister cited the personal tragedy of Wayne Holdsworth, whose son died by suicide because of online sexual extortion, to stress the need to hold platforms accountable.
Question from Jess Teesdale
The member asked for details on the government's leadership in protecting children from social media harms.
Background: The member asked how the government was leading the world in keeping children safe from social media harms.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister stated that since the social media minimum age laws commenced on 10 December, over five million accounts belonging to under-16s had been removed or restricted. She noted that tech companies like Roblox and Apple had introduced improved safety features inspired by Australia's approach. The Minister announced plans to introduce a digital duty of care to prevent harm from AI chatbots, algorithmic recommendations, and other online risks. She urged support for amendments to allow the eSafety Commissioner to hold platforms accountable.
Question from Mike Freelander
The member asked how the government was reinforcing social media laws to ensure big tech companies were held to account.
Background: A government member asked the Minister for Communications about strengthening social media laws to hold big tech companies accountable.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister reported that over five million underage accounts had been deactivated since the law began six months prior. She cited survey data showing improvements in sleep, sports participation, and reductions in online bullying and exposure to violent content among young Australians. She announced that new legislation would double the maximum penalty for non-compliance from $49.5 million to $99 million and strengthen the eSafety Commissioner's information-gathering powers. She noted that the commissioner was actively investigating five major platforms for non-compliance.
Question from Kate Chaney
The member asked whether the government would commit to a digital duty of care that included an overarching duty to address emerging harms, rather than limiting accountability to currently identified harms.
Background: The Independent member for Curtin asked the Minister for Communications about committing to a digital duty of care that was future-proofed against emerging harms like AI-related issues.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister explained that the digital duty of care aimed to prevent psychosocial harm and enforce safety by design, shifting the onus to tech companies. She stated that defining harm as psychosocial captured emerging issues as research developed. She compared the current regulatory approach to the introduction of seatbelts, noting that cultural change takes time. She affirmed that the government was working towards holding tech companies accountable and looked forward to continuing work on the digital duty of care later in the year.
Question from Andrew Wilkie
The member asked the Minister to halt changes to Australia Post licensing that were harming communities and licensees.
Background: The member for Clark asked the Minister for Communications to stop Australia Post from running licensees out of business and reactivating licence buybacks.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister acknowledged the importance of post offices but stated that closures sometimes occurred when licensees handed back licenses. She noted that Australia Post must remain financially sustainable while meeting community standards, including maintaining at least 4,000 offices. She explained that the licensing model was being modernized to reflect changes in letter business and retail foot traffic, and offered to arrange a meeting regarding specific concerns.
Question from Alison Byrnes
The member asked how the government is finishing the rollout of a reliable broadband network and what other approaches have been considered.
Background: A government member asked the Minister for Communications about the rollout of the national broadband network.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister reported that 90 per cent of the fixed-line network now accesses gigabit speeds, following the upgrade of 1.5 million premises from copper to fibre. She noted that the Fixed Wireless and Satellite Upgrade Program, funded by $480 million, is complete, providing faster speeds. She highlighted an investment of up to $3 billion to upgrade the final 622,000 premises. She emphasized that the government opposes privatization of the NBN, unlike the opposition.
Question from Kate Chaney
The member asked if the digital duty of care would cover AI chatbots that simulate emotional intimacy, or if the government would extend the under-16 social media ban to these apps.
Background: An independent member raised concerns about the psychological harm of AI chatbots to children.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister stated that all digital platforms, including AI chatbots, must protect young Australians from harm or face fines of up to $49.5 million. She noted that AI nudify apps were being restricted. She explained that the social media ban applied to specific harms associated with social media platforms, whereas chatbots were not social media. She confirmed that under the digital duty of care, AI chatbots would be required to adopt safety-by-design principles to protect young Australians.
Question from Jodie Belyea
The member asked how the government was protecting children from online harm.
Background: Online safety for children was a priority, with new laws in place.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister stated that five million under-16 accounts had been removed or restricted under the social media minimum age law. She highlighted eSafety investigations into major platforms and the introduction of a digital duty of care to compel tech companies to manage harms proactively. She noted quadrupled funding for the eSafety Commissioner.
Question from Allegra Spender
The member asked whether the government would act to outlaw gambling inducements that drive problem gambling.
Background: The Murphy review recommended banning gambling inducements, but these were not included in the exposure draft bill.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister stated that the government's reforms aim to minimize children's exposure to wagering advertising and break the link between sport and gambling. She noted that the exposure draft bill was released for consultation and would start from 1 January next year. She listed other measures including strengthening BetStop, banning online keno, and cracking down on illegal offshore providers, but did not explicitly confirm the banning of inducements.
Question from Mary Aldred
The member asked in which room at The Jade venue the minister held a sideline meeting during a birthday party.
Background: The member for Monash questioned the Minister for Communications about the location of a meeting held during a birthday party at a live music venue.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister stated that she had provided a full account to the Integrity Commissioner and that a report was available online. She asserted that the trip was considered completely within the rules.
Question from Mary Aldred
The member asked whether the Minister maintained her claim that an official meeting occurred at a private birthday party.
Background: The member asked if the Minister for Communications stood by her declaration that she held an official ministerial meeting at a private birthday party.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister confirmed she stood by everything she had told the Independent Parliamentary Expenses Authority (IPEA). She noted that IPEA had reviewed all documents and that Minister Picton had confirmed the events in media outlets.
Question from Mary Aldred
The member asked whether ministerial staff or officials were present at the meeting and if notes were recorded.
Background: The member followed up on the previous question, asking if ministerial staff were present at the meeting and if notes were taken.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister stated that the trip had been audited by IPEA, which reviewed nearly 2,000 line items and 243 trips. IPEA deemed the trip's dominant purpose to be parliamentary, encompassing four matters across two days, including a Sporting Schools funding announcement. The Minister referred the member to the publicly available 256-page IPEA report.
Question from David Moncrieff
The member asked how the government was holding social media companies accountable and how other countries were responding to Australian actions.
Background: A government member asked about holding social media companies accountable and international responses to Australian laws.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister thanked the member and noted that five million under-16 social media accounts had been removed or restricted due to Australia's social media law. She criticized some platforms for doing the bare minimum and highlighted issues with age assurance systems and reporting pathways. The eSafety Commissioner was investigating potential noncompliance by Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, TikTok, and YouTube. The Minister stated that Australia's leadership had inspired over a dozen countries to follow suit, with Canada's minister recently meeting to discuss expertise sharing. She emphasized the government's commitment to introducing a digital duty of care this year.
Question from Zali Steggall
The member asked if the government would introduce truth-in-political-advertising laws and ban generative AI and deepfakes in political advertising, citing misinformation spread by a specific activist group.
Background: A far-right activist group had platformed controversial claims, with links to political figures.
Answer from Anthony Albanese; Anika Wells
The Prime Minister acknowledged the divisive nature of some political advocacy and suggested the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters consider the issues, while emphasizing freedom of expression. The Minister for Communications stated that the government was implementing a digital duty of care to address online harms, including deepfakes and hate speech. She noted that consultation had closed and legislation was intended to pass by year-end, placing responsibility on big tech to prevent harm proactively.
Question from Andrew Wilkie
The member asked when the government would table its response to the Murphy report and legislate a ban on gambling advertising, suggesting the Prime Minister was blocking reform.
Background: The Murphy report had recommended phasing out gambling advertising.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister highlighted existing harm reduction measures, including BetStop, a ban on credit card wagering, and mandatory activity statements. She noted that a recent review of BetStop found it successful and suggested improvements to its reach. She stated she would continue working with advocates, broadcasters, and sporting codes to minimize gambling harms, without committing to a specific date for a full advertising ban.
Question from Tim Watts
The member asked what steps the government was implementing to safeguard Australian children from harm on the Roblox gaming platform.
Background: Concerns were raised about the safety of children on the gaming platform Roblox, including exposure to harmful content and predatory behaviour.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister stated she had placed Roblox on notice and demanded an urgent meeting to discuss child safety measures. She reported writing to the eSafety Commissioner for advice on preventing harm and requested the Classification Board review Roblox's PG rating, last updated in 2018. She highlighted the government's commitment to legislating a digital duty of care to hold platforms accountable for preventing harms such as predatory behaviour and exposure to harmful algorithms.
Question from Carol Berry
The member asked how the social media age restriction is helping to protect young people and what the response has been.
Background: The government implemented social media age restrictions to protect young people.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister stated that 4.7 million accounts were deactivated or restricted in the first week of the laws. She noted that leaders from Spain, France, the UK, New Zealand, Denmark, and Norway were inspired by Australia's approach and implementing similar measures. She cited praise from social psychologist Professor Jonathan Haidt for the legislation's significance.
Question from Emma Comer
The member asked about the impact of the social media age restrictions and how the policy was protecting young Australians from harm.
Background: The social media age restriction law had recently been implemented.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister reported that 4.7 million accounts had been deactivated, removed, or restricted in the first week of the law's implementation. She stated this allowed young Australians to disconnect from algorithms and engage in real-life activities. She acknowledged that implementation was not perfect but emphasized the cultural change and progress being made. She cited positive feedback from parents and educators.
Question from Ali France
The member asked what threats the social media minimum age law faced and how the government was protecting parents and children.
Background: The social media minimum age law had been passed. The question sought to outline threats to the law and government actions.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister stated that the government was tabling rules and working with platforms to ensure compliance. She identified threats from opposition parliamentarians who were attempting to repeal the law and undermining trust in it. She criticized the shadow minister for suggesting she would not have supported the law in hindsight.
Question from David Smith
The member asked how the government was helping Australians prepare for the implementation of the new social media law.
Background: Australia's social media law, raising the minimum age for accounts to 16, was set to commence in two weeks.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister stated that the government had invested over $10 million in a national advertising campaign to build awareness and trust in the law. She reported that online visits to eSafety's website rose by 1,441 per cent, with nearly 600,000 Australians accessing resources. She shared positive feedback from young people who believed the law would reduce cyberbullying and protect mental health. She affirmed the government's commitment to standing with parents against platform threats and legal challenges.
Question from Matt Burnell
The member requested details on how the world-leading social media minimum age law would protect young Australians.
Background: A government member asked the Minister for Communications about the social media minimum age law.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister explained that delaying social media access until age 16 protects developing brains from dopamine-driven reward systems. She cited a meeting with a 12-year-old student and a neuroscientist who highlighted the risks of social media to young people's mental health and development. She stated the law would give young people three more years to build resilience in the real world before accessing platforms.
Question from Elizabeth Watson-Brown
The member asked if the government had responded to the Murphy report's recommendation to ban gambling advertising and why Sportsbet's interests were prioritized.
Background: A Greens member questioned the Minister for Communications about the government's response to the Murphy report on gambling advertising.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister highlighted the delivery of BetStop and the ban on credit cards for online wagering as significant harm-reduction initiatives. She reported that BetStop had reached 51,079 registrations, with 38 per cent choosing a lifetime ban. She stated she had met with harm-reduction advocates but not with gambling companies.
Question from Lisa Chesters
The member asked how the government's social media laws were helping parents keep children safe online.
Background: The member asked about the impact of new social media laws on child safety.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister confirmed that nine major platforms must remove underage accounts from 10 December, implementing a minimum age of 16 for social media. She cited international support from leaders in Europe and New Zealand. She stated that the law aims to allow young people an additional three years to develop strength in everyday life, protecting them from predatory algorithms and harmful content.
Question from Zali Steggall
The member asked if the Prime Minister would implement Australian local content quotas for streaming services without delay to protect screen industry jobs.
Background: The member referenced previous government promises to implement local content quotas for streaming services.
Answer from Anika Wells
The Minister stated that she and the Minister for the Arts are working on local content quotas, acknowledging their importance to the Australian industry. She promised to provide an update as soon as possible.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked why the minister claimed her office was not notified of the crisis until late afternoon on 19 September, when secret emails indicated notification occurred 24 hours earlier. She questioned whether Australians could trust the triple 0 system if they could not trust the minister's truthfulness in parliament.
Background: The Leader of the Opposition challenged the Minister for Communications regarding discrepancies between her public statements and internal emails concerning the timing of notification about the Optus triple 0 outage.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister stated that the information was already public and referenced a press conference held on 22 September. She explained that Optus provided incorrect and misleading advice to her office and the ACMA regulator on 18 September. She noted that new ACMA determinations taking effect on 1 November would require telcos to immediately share outage information with emergency services and the regulator, a process telcos had agreed to start early.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked why the government voted down an amendment to increase penalties for telcos to $20 million per offence, given the minister's previous assertion that Optus was solely to blame for the triple 0 crisis.
Background: The Leader of the Opposition questioned the government's vote against an amendment to double the maximum penalty for telecommunications outages.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister stated that the proposed amendments to the Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 were poor and potentially redundant. She argued that the current definition of critical telecommunications assets already covered the relevant infrastructure. She warned that the amendment could extend the definition too broadly, capturing any system connected to emergency calls, which would make the legislation confusing without achieving clear objectives.
Question from Melissa McIntosh
The member asked why the minister's office did not immediately inform the department about the outage, suggesting it was due to the minister's planned trip to New York.
Background: The Shadow Minister for Communications questioned why the minister did not immediately raise the triple 0 outage with her department upon being advised.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister said she learned of the significant service failure on 19 September around 4:30 pm when Optus reached out to her office. She noted that she postponed her journey to collect details and update premiers and the community, instead holding a press conference on Saturday. She stressed that the fatalities strengthened her determination and that her office would handle the issue with strictness to guarantee system safety.
Question from Anne Webster
The member asked if the minister took steps to verify that welfare and wellbeing checks were being conducted for affected individuals, such as apologizing to families.
Background: The Shadow Minister for Regional Communications asked if the minister took action to ensure welfare checks were conducted for those impacted by the triple 0 outage.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister stated that Optus advised her office on 18 September that the outage was minor, affected only 10 calls, and had no adverse impacts. She confirmed that her office sought assurance that the regulator, ACMA, was informed and investigating. She noted that ACMA had publicly confirmed they were aware of the incident.
Question from Melissa McIntosh
The member asked why the minister expressed confusion about the opposition's amendment to double penalties and whether she would now act to implement the higher penalty.
Background: The Shadow Minister for Communications asked if the minister would review her decision regarding the penalty amendment for triple 0 failures.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister reminded the shadow minister that the government had already introduced legislation enhancing consumer safeguards, increasing penalties for telcos by 40 times to up to $10 million. She offered to continue working on penalties within the existing bill before the House, noting that the shadow minister had previously supported these increases. She stated she was done with the matter.
Question from Melissa McIntosh
The member asked why the minister had not apologized to victims and their families, noting that her office was aware of the crisis 24 hours before she claimed to find out.
Background: The Shadow Minister for Communications pressed the minister to apologize to victims of the triple 0 outage, citing alleged lack of compassion.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister repeated that Optus had advised her office on 18 September that the outage was minor and resolved with no adverse impacts. Regarding the larger outage, she stated she inquired about the correct process for contacting families and was advised that emergency services were the appropriate agency. She said she would meet with affected families if they wished but was respecting their space and avoiding politicizing their grief.
Question from Anne Webster
The member asked why the minister would not apologize, citing evidence that she chose not to accept responsibility for the deaths and misinformation.
Background: The Shadow Minister for Regional Communications asked the minister to apologize for misleading the public about the triple 0 outage.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister stated that all matters were public record and had been declared at a press conference. She emphasized that the issue centred on Optus's inability to manage its network and meet legal obligations, rather than emails. She stated her job was to improve the system and deliver maximum safety and public confidence.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked when the minister would act, accept accountability, and rebuild confidence in the triple 0 network, citing her previous statements on empathy and penalties.
Background: The Leader of the Opposition asked the minister to take responsibility for the triple 0 crisis and restore trust in the network.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister pointed out that the shadow minister had previously supported penalty increases in the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025. She stated that the government would hold telcos accountable and that several investigations were underway. She emphasized that telcos must deliver resilient triple 0 services and that there would be serious consequences for failures.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked whether the minister regretted prioritising her international travel over addressing the urgent domestic crisis regarding the triple zero emergency call system, noting that people had died due to the government's inaction.
Background: The Minister for Communications had recently returned from a trip to New York following a major telecommunications outage that resulted in fatalities.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister stated that the Optus outage was unacceptable and solely the fault of the telecommunications provider, which is under investigation. She announced six key reforms to strengthen the triple zero system, including legislating for a Triple Zero Custodian, mandating real-time outage reporting, requiring telcos to test systems during maintenance, ensuring call fallback to other networks, enforcing improvement plans after outages, and issuing new performance requirements within six months. Regarding her travel, she defended her attendance at the United Nations to discuss social media age verification laws, citing lobbying by bereaved families, and stated she did not regret standing with them.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked how many deaths the minister was aware of resulting from the outage and whether she had personally apologised to each affected family for the government's inaction.
Background: The Minister for Communications had previously acknowledged deaths linked to the Optus outage before travelling to New York.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister noted that the Optus CEO had announced three deaths, while the Western Australian Premier identified a fourth potential death connected to the outage. She stated that she had spoken with Optus, whose CEO and its parent company Singtel had apologised to the families. She argued that the companies, not the government, were responsible for the failures and should bear the accountability, criticising the opposition for politicising the tragedy and letting the private company off the hook.
Question from Melissa McIntosh
The member asked why the government had not implemented all recommendations from the Bean review and whether the minister would apologise for the delay.
Background: The Bean review had made 18 recommendations to fix the triple zero network 565 days prior.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister stated that 13 of the 18 recommendations were complete, with the remaining five dependent on industry action. She noted that she had urged telecommunications CEOs to accelerate implementation of the outstanding items, and they had agreed to do so. She criticised the shadow minister for equivocating on support for the new triple zero custodian legislation, arguing that the government had acted swiftly and that the opposition should support the bill rather than politicise the crisis.
Question from Melissa McIntosh
The member asked why people had to die before the minister instructed her department to accelerate the implementation of triple zero guardian legislation recommended 18 months ago.
Background: The minister had urged Optus to accelerate reforms three weeks after the outage.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister rejected the premise that the government had sat on the issue, stating that the triple zero custodian would not exist without the government's action. She outlined the timeline: the Bean review recommended a custodian in March 2024, a steering committee reported in November 2024, and the department recommended the custodian operate within the department in March 2025. She asserted that the government had worked continuously to protect Australians and hold failing providers accountable.
Question from Alison Penfold
The member asked how many triple zero outages had occurred since the minister became responsible for communications.
Background: The Minister for Communications had recently taken on the portfolio.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister did not provide a specific number of outages but highlighted that telecommunications companies were not previously legally required to report outages. She stated that new ACMA determinations taking effect on 1 November would require telcos to immediately share outage information with emergency services.
Other Parliamentary Activity
-
Sport Legislation Amendment (World Anti-Doping Code Implementation) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 17 September 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Private Health Insurance (National Joint Replacement Register Levy) Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 17 September 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
House of Representatives · Thursday 10 September 2026 · Consideration of Senate Message
Responded as minister
-
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025; Consideration in Detail
House of Representatives · Wednesday 9 September 2026 · Consideration in Detail
Responded as minister · Position: oppose
-
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 9 September 2026 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (News Media Bargaining) (Consequential) Bill 2026; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
News Media Bargaining Charge Bill 2026; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
News Media Bargaining Charge Bill 2026; Consideration in Detail
House of Representatives · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Consideration in Detail
Contributed to this debate
-
News Media Bargaining (Administration) Bill 2026; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
News Media Bargaining (Administration) Bill 2026; Consideration in Detail
House of Representatives · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Consideration in Detail
Responded as minister
-
News Journalism Payments Bill 2026; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
News Journalism Payments Bill 2026; Consideration in Detail
House of Representatives · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Consideration in Detail
Responded as minister
-
News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2026; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Consideration in Detail
House of Representatives · Tuesday 18 August 2026 · Consideration in Detail
Opened this debate
-
Interactive Gambling (Cost Recovery Levy) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Monday 17 August 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
News Journalism Payments Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 13 August 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 13 August 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026, National Self-exclusion Register (Cost Recovery Levy) Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 13 August 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as minister
-
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026, National Self-exclusion Register (Cost Recovery Levy) Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 12 August 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as minister
-
National Self-exclusion Register (Cost Recovery Levy) Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 2 July 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 2 July 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2026; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 1 July 2026 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 1 July 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as minister
-
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Monday 29 June 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Major Sporting Events (Indicia and Images) Protection Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 25 June 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 14 May 2026 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 14 May 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as minister
-
Bondi Beach Attack Victims
House of Representatives · Monday 19 January 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 27 November 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Communications Legislation Amendment (Australian Content Requirement for Subscription Video On Demand (Streaming) Services) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Monday 24 November 2025 · Second Reading
Responded as minister
-
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Triple Zero Custodian and Emergency Calling Powers) Bill 2025; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 8 October 2025 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Triple Zero Custodian and Emergency Calling Powers) Bill 2025; Consideration in Detail
House of Representatives · Wednesday 8 October 2025 · Consideration in Detail
Responded as minister
-
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Triple Zero Custodian and Emergency Calling Powers) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 7 October 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 28 August 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Supply Bill (No. 2) 2025-2026; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 25 March 2025 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Supply Bill (No. 1) 2025-2026, Supply Bill (No. 2) 2025-2026, Supply (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 1) 2025-2026; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 25 March 2025 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Supply (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 1) 2025-2026; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 25 March 2025 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Parliamentary Business Resources Legislation Amendment (Machinery of Government Change) Bill 2025; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 25 March 2025 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Early Childhood Education and Care (Three Day Guarantee) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 12 February 2025 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate
- Votes recorded
- 245
- Aye votes (58.4%)
- 143
- No votes (41.6%)
- 102
Showing the latest 50 votes.
-
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare With...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 85, Noes 40 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 42, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 42, Noes 89 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 85, Noes 44 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 87, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 9, Noes 85 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 86, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 45, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 46, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Rearrangement
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 84, Noes 13 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 49, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Consideration of Legislation
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 43, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 95, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 95, Noes 42 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Albanese Government; Attempted Censure
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 46, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 84, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 95, Noes 37 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 96, Noes 36 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative-Improved Forest Management in Multi...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 38, Noes 92 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation...
9 Sep 2026 · Ayes 52, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Gun Control
9 Sep 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Veterans
7 Sep 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 49 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 84, Noes 34 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Economy
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 41, Noes 85 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026; Considerati...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 36 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment Bill 2026; Report from Federation Cha...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 39, Noes 90 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Combatting Illicit Tobacco Bill 2026; Report from Federation Chamber
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 41, Noes 84 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Minister for Veterans' Affairs
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 83, Noes 44 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
News Media Bargaining (Administration) Bill 2026; Consideration in Detail
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 65 · Failed
VOTED NO -
News Journalism Payments Bill 2026; Consideration in Detail
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 11, Noes 69 · Failed
VOTED NO -
News Journalism Payments Bill 2026; Second Reading
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 40, Noes 83 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Third Reading
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 103, Noes 14 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Consideration in ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 102, Noes 14 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Consideration in ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 11, Noes 62 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Consideration in ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 58 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Consideration in ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 61 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Consideration in ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 58 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Consideration in ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 95 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Consideration in ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 96, Noes 9 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Second Reading
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Second Reading
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 85 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 87, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Minister for Veterans' Affairs and Defence Personnel; Attempted Censure
17 Aug 2026 · Ayes 86, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
International Relations: Australia and Japan
12 Aug 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 41 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Aged Care Amendment (Restoring Human Override for Aged Care Needs Assessments...
11 Aug 2026 · Ayes 42, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Rearrangement
11 Aug 2026 · Ayes 86, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 42 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Minister for Defence Industry; Attempted Censure
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 41 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Health Insurance Amendment (Incentive Payments and Other Measures) Bill 2026;...
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 39, Noes 92 · Failed
VOTED NO
About this page
This page tracks Anika Wells's parliamentary activity: questions asked and answered in Question Time, debates spoken in, and votes in divisions. Summaries are in reported speech, not transcripts; each one links to the official record.