Sussan Ley
Liberal Party Member for Farrer
No longer sitting
Seat and party history (1)
- Liberal Party - Farrer (House) - 10 Nov 2001 to 27 Feb 2026
- Seat and party records: OpenAustralia member data.
Contact
Contact details on aph.gov.au Profile on OpenAustraliaNot sure if this is your member? Find your electorate (AEC)
These counts cover what is on this site only. They do not measure electorate work or committee work.
Question Time
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked whether the Prime Minister would write to the National Anti-Corruption Commission to request an urgent investigation into the misuse of Commonwealth funds and potential involvement of officials.
Background: The Watson report into CFMEU corruption found that taxpayer funds were compromised through widespread bribery.
Answer from Amanda Rishworth
The minister stated that the Watson report was commissioned by the administrator to assist in cleaning up the union. She noted that the administrator, Mr Irving, had released a statement referring the report to the Australian Federal Police, Victoria Police, the Fair Work Commission, and other relevant agencies for enforcement action.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked whether any individual in the government had involvement in the removal of specific sections from the CFMEU corruption report, noting that the chief investigator stated he was directed to make changes.
Background: Reports indicated that sections of a corruption probe into the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union were removed by the government-appointed administrator, including chapters on government inaction and taxpayer costs.
Answer from Amanda Rishworth
The minister stated that the report was commissioned by the independent administrator for his own use, not for the government, and that handling and publication were matters for the administrator. She confirmed her office received the report on 9 February and had never requested changes or amendments to its contents. The minister explained that the administrator removed sections because he was not satisfied they were well-founded or properly tested. She expressed full confidence in the administrator, noting that all bad actors identified in the report had been removed from the union, with significant reductions in organiser numbers across Victoria, New South Wales, and Queensland.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked why homebuyers were paying the price for the government's failure to stand up to union corruption, citing Treasury advice that the 1.2 million homes target was unmet.
Background: The member linked the government's failure to meet housing targets to alleged suppression of union corruption evidence.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that the previous government had done nothing to address union influence, whereas his government had expelled key figures and appointed administrators. He noted that construction cost inflation had fallen from 17 per cent to 1.8 per cent. The Prime Minister highlighted that new dwelling commencements were up 11.6 per cent and that over 220,000 Australians had been helped into home ownership sooner. He cited Master Builders Australia as confirming the 1.2 million homes target was achievable due to federal leadership.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member expressed devastation regarding the low fines imposed on those responsible for the deaths of two Australian girls in Laos. She noted that government officials had apologised for the failure to inform the families directly. She asked what actions the Prime Minister would take to seek justice for the victims.
Background: Fathers of deceased Australian tourists Bianca Jones and Holly Morton-Bowles revealed that perpetrators received fines of only $185, information the families learned from a British victim's family rather than Australian officials.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister expressed condolences to the families and acknowledged the tragedy. He stated that the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade had apologised for failing to inform the families, which was appropriate. He confirmed that the Foreign Minister had demanded full accountability from Laos authorities, noting that charges should reflect the seriousness of the incident involving six deaths. He pledged continued engagement with Laos authorities and support for the families.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked why Australians were skipping meals during a cost-of-living crisis driven by government spending.
Background: A small business owner reported that people were skipping meals due to financial pressure, attributed to government spending.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister listed government measures to alleviate cost-of-living pressures, including cutting student debt by 20 per cent, protecting penalty rates, increasing social services payments, and expanding the first home buyer deposit plan. He highlighted the opening of 122 urgent care clinics, tripling the bulk-billing incentive, and installing home batteries. He accused the opposition of opposing these measures and lacking positive plans, while focusing on internal divisions.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked the Prime Minister to confirm whether the Reserve Bank governor was correct and the Treasurer was incorrect regarding the causes of the interest rate increase.
Background: The Treasurer previously claimed government spending was not a factor in the recent interest rate rise, while the Reserve Bank governor stated that public demand's contribution had declined and private demand had increased.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that the Reserve Bank governor identified private demand as stronger than forecasted and public demand as having declined, describing these as facts. He outlined government measures to ease cost-of-living pressures, including cheaper medicines, bulk-billing investments, urgent care clinics, student debt relief, and income tax cuts. He asserted that the government remains focused on improving lives regardless of opposition rhetoric.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked the Prime Minister to confirm that interest rates had risen 13 times and that mortgage holders were paying $23,000 more annually.
Background: Interest rates had increased multiple times since the government took office.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that inflation had decreased from the six per cent range to the three per cent range while keeping unemployment low and real wages increasing. He noted that the Reserve Bank governor attributed recent inflationary pressure to stronger-than-expected private demand. He emphasised the government's cost-of-living support measures opposed by the opposition.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked whether the Prime Minister maintained his position that inflation was under control, given the recent interest rate hike and the financial pressure on mortgage holders.
Background: The Leader of the Opposition challenged the Prime Minister's previous claims that inflation was under control, citing the 13th interest rate increase and increased mortgage costs for Australians.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister acknowledged cost-of-living pressures but stated that inflation had decreased from nearly 8 per cent to the low single digits. He cited an OECD report indicating that Australia avoided recession and that real incomes had risen since 2022, unlike in many other OECD economies. He criticized the opposition for failing to outline their budget plans and for proposing tax increases and nuclear energy funding.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked whether the Prime Minister believed all reputable economists were wrong in stating that government spending was having a significant impact on inflation.
Background: The Leader of the Opposition cited a KPMG economist's view that government spending was clearly impacting inflation and asked if the Prime Minister believed all reputable economists were wrong.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister cited the Reserve Bank governor's statement that private demand had been stronger than forecast. He referenced OECD and IMF reports praising Australia's fiscal strategy and soft landing. He noted that the government had identified $114 billion in savings and provided an additional $20 billion in the Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook. He challenged the opposition to specify what cuts they would make, given their lack of action when in government.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked whether the Prime Minister would accept responsibility for the recent rate rise, citing economist Stephen Smith's view that government spending was a driver of inflation.
Background: The Reserve Bank of Australia recently increased interest rates, with opposition figures attributing inflation to government spending.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that the Reserve Bank Governor attributed the rate rise to stronger-than-expected private demand, not government spending. He highlighted government measures to ease cost-of-living pressures, including cheaper medicines, bulk-billing incentives, student debt reductions, apprenticeship incentives, and free TAFE. He also noted upcoming tax cuts and criticized the opposition for failing to agree on cost-of-living measures.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked if the Prime Minister would accept responsibility for rate hikes and end reckless spending, citing HSBC economist Paul Bloxham.
Background: Families are facing increased mortgage repayments and cost-of-living pressures following multiple rate hikes.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister highlighted the government's record of back-to-back budget surpluses and returning 70 per cent of tax receipt upgrades to the bottom line. He noted that debt was $188 billion lower than forecast under the previous government, saving $60 billion in interest costs. He cited AAA credit ratings from S&P and Fitch and criticized the opposition's platform for proposing higher deficits, debt, and tax increases.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked the Prime Minister when the Treasurer's spending would end, citing predictions that interest rates would rise further and that government spending was fueling mortgage pain despite claims that inflation was under control.
Background: The Reserve Bank of Australia was set to announce an interest rate decision, with economists predicting a rise. The opposition leader highlighted increased mortgage costs for Australians.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that inflation had decreased from six per cent to three per cent since the government took office, while unemployment remained low and wages increased. He noted that the budget had moved from deficits to surpluses, allowing for debt reduction. He emphasized that the Reserve Bank had indicated government spending was not the primary driver of inflation. The government continued to implement cost-of-living measures, including cheaper medicines, free TAFE, and home batteries, which he claimed were opposed by the opposition.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member reminded the Minister of her previous commitment to fund 500 frontline domestic violence workers and asked for an update on this specific pledge.
Background: The Leader of the Opposition sought to follow up on the previous answer regarding domestic violence commitments.
Answer from Tanya Plibersek (Minister for Social Services)
The Minister did not provide a direct answer to the specific question regarding the 500 workers, as the exchange was cut short or not fully recorded in the provided transcript segment. The transcript shows the question was asked but the answer is not included in the provided text for this specific exchange.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked the Prime Minister to take responsibility for the rate rise, contrasting it with his previous claims that inflation was under control and his credit for previous rate cuts.
Background: The Reserve Bank confirmed a 0.25 per cent interest rate rise.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated the government had engaged in responsible economic management, turning deficits into surpluses and reducing debt by $176 billion. He highlighted tax cuts, wage increases for aged care and childcare workers, student debt relief, and free TAFE as measures to help Australians. He argued that the opposition had opposed these measures and campaigned on higher taxes and deficits.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked what it said about Labor's economic incompetence that the Prime Minister's appointed Treasury Secretary voted to lift rates.
Background: The Treasury Secretary voted with the Reserve Bank board to raise interest rates.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer defended the Treasury Secretary, stating she attends Reserve Bank meetings as a representative of Treasury, not the government. He criticized the opposition for attacking a public servant. He highlighted that the government had appointed women to lead major economic institutions, including the Treasury, ASIC, Productivity Commission, and Reserve Bank, for the first time in history.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked the Prime Minister to apologise for delaying the establishment of a royal commission into antisemitism, arguing that he had forced grieving families to advocate for it while citing various excuses.
Background: Following the Bondi Beach terrorist attack, families of victims had requested a Commonwealth royal commission into antisemitism, which the Prime Minister initially delayed.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister expressed sorrow for the grief experienced by the Jewish community and the nation, stating he felt the weight of responsibility for the attack occurring on his watch. He explained that the immediate priority was ensuring national security and preventing further attacks, which involved daily meetings of the National Security Committee and upgrading security measures. He noted that legislation addressing antisemitism was passed in the House of Representatives, although some recommendations from the antisemitism envoy's report were not supported in the Senate. The royal commission was established once a commissioner was appointed and terms of reference were agreed upon with the Jewish community.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked the Prime Minister to apologise to Jewish Australians for not listening to their concerns prior to the attack.
Background: Families of Bondi attack victims had written to the Prime Minister stating they felt unsafe and that the government had ignored warnings.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister acknowledged the pain felt by Jewish Australians but rejected the claim that antisemitism began with the election of his government in 2022, citing statistics and statements from previous years showing a rise in incidents under the former government. He listed actions taken by his government, including appointing a special envoy, establishing joint operations between the AFP and ASIO, introducing hate speech laws, banning Nazi symbols, criminalising doxxing, appointing a National Student Ombudsman, creating a hate crimes database, imposing sanctions on Terrorgram, expelling the Iranian ambassador, and directing the eSafety Commissioner to tackle online hate. He concluded by noting the establishment of the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked the Prime Minister to apologise, citing Sheina Gutnick's statement that the government had failed to act on warnings.
Background: Sheina Gutnick, whose father was killed in the Bondi attack, had publicly criticised the government for failing to act on warnings.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister described his meetings with Sheina Gutnick and other community leaders as warm and generous, contrasting this with the rhetoric of the opposition. He stated that he had engaged extensively with the Jewish community and that no one who asked to speak to him had been denied a meeting. He listed actions taken, including appointing the Special Envoy, introducing legislation, appointing the National Student Ombudsman, and engaging with the envoy's report. He criticised the opposition for opposing vilification laws and failing to present their own legislative package despite calling for parliament to resume.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked if the Prime Minister had defied national security advice or made up his previous statements by establishing the royal commission.
Background: The Prime Minister had previously stated that national security experts recommended against a Commonwealth royal commission.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister criticised the opposition for calling for parliament to resume and then voting against national security measures, including gun laws and vilification legislation. He stated that the government's process involved seeking advice and working collaboratively with the Jewish community. He argued that the opposition's approach had been to weaken legislation rather than strengthen it. He noted that the government had managed to pass measures despite lacking Senate numbers, highlighting the gap between the opposition's rhetoric and their actions.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked the Prime Minister to acknowledge that he had misled the public regarding his promise to reduce electricity bills by $275 by 2025, noting that the four-year anniversary of that pledge was approaching.
Background: The Prime Minister had previously promised a $275 reduction in power prices by 2025, a commitment made numerous times. The question was posed on the final sitting day of the year.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister criticized the opposition's internal divisions and their historical stance on climate policy, citing comments from Phil Coorey about the dysfunction caused by past climate wars. He highlighted the defection of a National Party member and the lack of unity within the coalition regarding net zero commitments. He stated that the government was focused on delivery rather than political tactics.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked the Prime Minister to take responsibility for alleged economic failures, including lower productivity, higher debt, and inflation, on the final sitting day of the year.
Background: The opposition claimed the government had delivered the largest decline in living standards. The question demanded accountability.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister rejected the claims, stating that the government had turned deficits into surpluses and reduced debt. He highlighted zero quarters of negative growth, inflation halved, and wages rising for eight quarters. He listed achievements including 1.2 million new jobs, tax cuts, and cost-of-living relief, criticizing the opposition for fighting amongst themselves.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked why Australians were bearing the cost of the government's economic management, given that inflation had risen despite promises that it was under control and that the corner had been turned.
Background: Recent ABS data indicated a rise in inflation, prompting concerns about potential interest rate increases and the government's previous assurances regarding economic stability.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister acknowledged ongoing cost-of-living pressures and attributed the recent inflation tick-up to the withdrawal of state energy subsidies. He contrasted the current situation with the higher inflation rates experienced under the previous government, noting that the Coalition had delivered profligate budgets and increased debt. He highlighted that the government had achieved budget surpluses and reduced deficits, while implementing tax cuts for all taxpayers and securing eight consecutive quarters of high wage growth. He stated the government would continue to deliver cost-of-living relief to assist households.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked if phasing out gas imports, exports, and usage was government policy, and whether the Minister's actions as COP president contradicted his role as energy minister.
Background: Reports indicated the Minister for Climate Change and Energy, in his role as COP president, had signed a statement phasing out fossil fuels, including gas.
Answer from Chris Bowen
The Minister confirmed that the transition away from fossil fuels was government policy, agreed to at the Pacific Island Forum in November 2023. He rejected the characterization of the COP presidency as a full-time role, citing precedents where cabinet ministers held the position while serving in their national governments. He argued that the transition to renewable energy was orderly and equitable, and criticized the opposition for opposing international engagement and scientific guidance.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked how many days of parliament the minister would miss in 2026 due to his full-time presidential duties and what the cost to taxpayers would be.
Background: The Leader of the Opposition questioned the Minister for Climate Change and Energy regarding his dual role as President of COP31 negotiations and part-time energy minister.
Answer from Chris Bowen
The minister stated that the COP presidency is not a full-time position and is commonly held concurrently with cabinet duties, citing previous examples from Azerbaijan and Egypt. He noted that other officials, including the assistant minister and a special envoy, would represent him at international meetings. He criticized the opposition for opposing international climate leadership while claiming to support national interests.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member stated that 74 women had lost their lives to violence in the past year and emphasized the need to pause and reflect on each loss.
Background: The Leader of the Opposition associated the coalition with the Minister's remarks and acknowledged the funding for 1800RESPECT.
Answer from Tanya Plibersek (Minister for Social Services)
The minister acknowledged the statement and the coalition's association with the remarks on the importance of addressing violence against women.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked why the minister was not using their international influence to reduce household electricity bills and requested a specific date by which average power costs would fall below current levels.
Background: The Leader of the Opposition questioned the Prime Minister regarding the Minister for Climate Change and Energy's role as COP31 president and its impact on domestic energy costs.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that Pacific leaders welcomed Australia's role in climate negotiations and noted global support for the Paris Agreement at the G20. He highlighted recent treaty negotiations with Indonesia and meetings with the OECD secretary-general as evidence of building Australia's international standing. He argued that the opposition's lack of a coherent plan would lead to higher prices and reduced investment, citing criticism from business groups regarding their policy uncertainty.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked how many days the minister would spend overseas in their new role as COP president, suggesting this prioritized global summits over domestic power prices.
Background: The Leader of the Opposition questioned the Prime Minister about the Minister for Climate Change and Energy's absence from parliament due to international commitments.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister explained that critical climate negotiations occur during the conference period and highlighted upcoming meetings in the Pacific to address urgent climate threats to nations like Kiribati and Tuvalu. He criticized the opposition for previously mocking Pacific island nations and opposing Australia's international bids. He cited business leaders, including the Australian Industry Group and ACCI, who warned that abandoning net zero targets would create investor uncertainty and higher costs.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked the Prime Minister why more Australians were going hungry under the Labor government, citing the Foodbank report's findings on household food insecurity and the perceived ineffectiveness of government assistance measures.
Background: The Foodbank Hunger Report 2025 indicated that 20 per cent of Australian households faced severe food insecurity, with parents skipping meals to feed their children. The report criticized Labor's cost-of-living measures for failing to translate into food on tables.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister criticized the opposition for opposing every cost-of-living measure, including tax cuts, cheaper medicines, and free TAFE. He highlighted the creation of over one million jobs and the lowest unemployment rate in 50 years, dismissing opposition claims that these were government jobs. He noted that the previous government had cut $20 million from Foodbank annually and accused the opposition of contempt for public servants who cleared waiting lists in Veterans' Affairs.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked the Prime Minister to accept responsibility for rising inflation, business closures, and the lack of interest rate relief, citing data that millions of Australians could not afford food.
Background: A Foodbank report indicated high levels of food insecurity among renting and single-parent households.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that the economy was growing, inflation had halved from inherited levels, and real wages were rising. He highlighted government actions including income tax cuts, job creation, pay increases for aged and childcare workers, minimum wage rises, energy bill relief, cheaper medicines, and free TAFE places. He argued that these measures provided cost-of-living relief that the opposition had dismissed or opposed.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked to give a shout-out to the pilots and crew of Rex Airlines and other regional airlines.
Background: The member sought to acknowledge Rex Airlines staff.
Answer from Sussan Ley (Leader of the Opposition)
The member praised the pilots and crew of Rex Airlines and other smaller regional airlines for their outstanding work in connecting communities.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked whether the Prime Minister's promise of cheaper living was accurate given the denial of a rate cut and ongoing cost-of-living pressures.
Background: The member claimed that government spending had prevented a Christmas rate cut and cited high levels of household financial stress.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister highlighted the government's fiscal record, including two budget surpluses and a reduction in debt by $188 billion. He noted that the government had intervened to cap coal and gas prices and implemented measures such as tax cuts and cheaper medicines, which the opposition had opposed.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked when prices would decrease for Australian families, citing rising inflation and unemployment under the current government and the financial strain on households.
Background: The Leader of the Opposition challenged the Prime Minister regarding recent inflation data showing a rise, contradicting earlier claims that the economy had 'turned the corner', and noted economists' predictions that a rate cut before Christmas was unlikely.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that inflation had decreased from six per cent to three per cent since the government took office, noting that the recent rise followed several falls. He highlighted that interest rates had begun to fall under his administration, whereas they had risen under the previous government. He pointed out that the unemployment rate was in the four per cent range and that over one million jobs had been created, resulting in the lowest average unemployment in five decades. He also mentioned that the Treasurer had delivered two consecutive budget surpluses and lower deficits than projected at the election, which the public endorsed by rejecting the opposition's platform of higher taxes and deficits.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked why Australians were paying the price for the government's housing failures, citing the investigation and the resignation.
Background: The Auditor-General launched an investigation into the Housing Australia Future Fund, and the chair of Housing Australia resigned.
Answer from Richard Marles
The minister stated that the opposition should have supported the Housing Australia Future Fund earlier. He noted that 54 homes in Thurgoona, 135 in Penrith, and 213 in Moncrieff were part of the first tranche of projects. He claimed half a million houses had been built since the government took office, including 5,000 social and affordable homes, compared to 313 built by the previous government in nine years.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked whether the minister retained full confidence in Mark Irving given the allegations of criminal conduct and associations with organised crime figures within the union.
Background: Journalist Nick McKenzie reported that CFMEU officials under government-appointed administrator Mark Irving had met with underworld figures Mick Gatto and John Setka and accepted bribes.
Answer from Amanda Rishworth
The minister stated the government had zero tolerance for criminal conduct, which justified placing the union into administration. She reported that the administrator had removed or accepted the resignation of over 60 staff, mostly in leadership roles, and implemented a national code of conduct. The administration had received more than 500 complaints via a whistleblowing website and was collaborating with the AFP, Fair Work Commission, and police forces. She asserted the administrator was performing his duties effectively.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked whether the minister would deregister the CFMEU as the Coalition had proposed, citing ongoing corruption and criminal links under the current administration.
Background: Allegations persisted regarding CFMEU officials accepting bribes and associating with criminal figures despite the union being in administration.
Answer from Amanda Rishworth
The minister argued that administration was the strongest available action for ensuring accountability and transparency, contrasting it with the previous government's ABCC. She detailed the administration's transparency measures, including biannual parliamentary reporting and public financial records. She dismissed the opposition's claims as baseless and political, asserting the government was seriously committed to eliminating corruption in the construction industry.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked why the Prime Minister instructed the government to vote against the coalition's proposal to strengthen protections for children, given the high volume of abuse cases and the perceived betrayal of justice when offenders are released early.
Background: The opposition introduced legislation to crack down on child sex offenders, which the government voted to delay. The questioner cited statistics regarding daily cases of child sexual exploitation.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that child sexual abuse is unacceptable and should not be subject to partisan politics. He explained that private member's business is procedurally scheduled for Monday after introduction, a practice in place since 1996. He highlighted the government's commitment to child safety, noting the establishment of the Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation in 2018 and the retention of mandatory minimum sentences for serious offences introduced by the previous government. He affirmed that the government is implementing the National Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Child Sexual Abuse and working on reforming Working with Children Checks, while remaining open to sensible proposals from the opposition.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked why the Prime Minister claimed no assistance was provided to returning ISIS brides when evidence indicated the government facilitated various legal and administrative processes for this cohort.
Background: Evidence presented at Senate estimates suggested the government assisted with medical interviews, DNA tests, citizenship claims, and passports for returning ISIS associates, contradicting previous statements by the Prime Minister.
Answer from Tony Burke
The Minister stated that the actions described as assistance were legal obligations under the Citizenship Act and passport laws, not discretionary support. He clarified that the government followed the law by processing applications for citizenship and passports where eligible, providing no more or less than required. He contrasted this with the previous government's handling of returns, noting that no support was given to individuals who returned under their tenure, regardless of their involvement with extremist groups.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked how Australians can have confidence in the government when the Prime Minister and Home Affairs Minister appeared to contradict each other on assistance to returning ISIS brides.
Background: The member claimed contradictions between the Prime Minister and the Home Affairs Minister regarding assistance to returning ISIS associates.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister listed facts: a non-government organization lost a court case demanding repatriation; the government did not repatriate these people; and the AFP remains prepared for self-managed returns. He quoted the AFP Commissioner on preparedness for self-managed returns and emphasized that Australian citizens have rights, but the government is not actively repatriating individuals. He accused the opposition of misleading the public.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked why the minister claimed her office was not notified of the crisis until late afternoon on 19 September, when secret emails indicated notification occurred 24 hours earlier. She questioned whether Australians could trust the triple 0 system if they could not trust the minister's truthfulness in parliament.
Background: The Leader of the Opposition challenged the Minister for Communications regarding discrepancies between her public statements and internal emails concerning the timing of notification about the Optus triple 0 outage.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister stated that the information was already public and referenced a press conference held on 22 September. She explained that Optus provided incorrect and misleading advice to her office and the ACMA regulator on 18 September. She noted that new ACMA determinations taking effect on 1 November would require telcos to immediately share outage information with emergency services and the regulator, a process telcos had agreed to start early.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked why the government voted down an amendment to increase penalties for telcos to $20 million per offence, given the minister's previous assertion that Optus was solely to blame for the triple 0 crisis.
Background: The Leader of the Opposition questioned the government's vote against an amendment to double the maximum penalty for telecommunications outages.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister stated that the proposed amendments to the Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 were poor and potentially redundant. She argued that the current definition of critical telecommunications assets already covered the relevant infrastructure. She warned that the amendment could extend the definition too broadly, capturing any system connected to emergency calls, which would make the legislation confusing without achieving clear objectives.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked when the minister would act, accept accountability, and rebuild confidence in the triple 0 network, citing her previous statements on empathy and penalties.
Background: The Leader of the Opposition asked the minister to take responsibility for the triple 0 crisis and restore trust in the network.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister pointed out that the shadow minister had previously supported penalty increases in the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025. She stated that the government would hold telcos accountable and that several investigations were underway. She emphasized that telcos must deliver resilient triple 0 services and that there would be serious consequences for failures.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked whether the minister regretted prioritising her international travel over addressing the urgent domestic crisis regarding the triple zero emergency call system, noting that people had died due to the government's inaction.
Background: The Minister for Communications had recently returned from a trip to New York following a major telecommunications outage that resulted in fatalities.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister stated that the Optus outage was unacceptable and solely the fault of the telecommunications provider, which is under investigation. She announced six key reforms to strengthen the triple zero system, including legislating for a Triple Zero Custodian, mandating real-time outage reporting, requiring telcos to test systems during maintenance, ensuring call fallback to other networks, enforcing improvement plans after outages, and issuing new performance requirements within six months. Regarding her travel, she defended her attendance at the United Nations to discuss social media age verification laws, citing lobbying by bereaved families, and stated she did not regret standing with them.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked how many deaths the minister was aware of resulting from the outage and whether she had personally apologised to each affected family for the government's inaction.
Background: The Minister for Communications had previously acknowledged deaths linked to the Optus outage before travelling to New York.
Answer from Anika Wells
The minister noted that the Optus CEO had announced three deaths, while the Western Australian Premier identified a fourth potential death connected to the outage. She stated that she had spoken with Optus, whose CEO and its parent company Singtel had apologised to the families. She argued that the companies, not the government, were responsible for the failures and should bear the accountability, criticising the opposition for politicising the tragedy and letting the private company off the hook.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked whether the Prime Minister would join the coalition in condemning the former premier's attendance at the event with dictators and war criminals.
Background: The opposition leader condemned former Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews for attending a Chinese Communist Party military parade alongside authoritarian leaders.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister contrasted the current government's approach, where embassy officials formally represented Australia, with the former government's decision to send a minister. He highlighted his recent meeting with Yulia Navalnaya to discuss democracy and human rights in Russia, and his upcoming participation in a coalition of the willing convened by President Macron. He affirmed the government's unequivocal support for Ukraine and its opposition to Vladimir Putin, noting new sanctions against Russia and North Korea. He stated he would never meet Putin or the North Korean leader and emphasized the government's commitment to supporting democracy globally.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member expressed respect for Commissioner Kershaw's service and wished him well.
Background: Following the previous exchange, the opposition leader wished the retiring AFP Commissioner well.
Answer from Sussan Ley (Farrer) (Liberal Party)
The member joined the Prime Minister and government members in wishing Commissioner Kershaw well, acknowledging his legacy of service and influence.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked what message was sent by the Prime Minister not condemning former premier Daniel Andrews for posing with the Iranian president, whose regime had orchestrated attacks on Australian soil.
Background: The Prime Minister had recently expelled the Iranian ambassador, an action supported by the coalition.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that the government had taken decisive action and that he was not responsible for the actions of individual citizens. He noted that the former government had sent a minister to a similar event previously. He affirmed the government's unequivocal condemnation of the Iranian regime and its decision not to send any official representatives to the parade. He criticized the opposition for seeking political difference on an issue that had bipartisan support for the ambassador's expulsion, arguing that such division undermined Australia's international position.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked the Prime Minister to explain the contradiction between his previous rejection of reports about ISIS brides coming to Australia and recent statements by NSW police deputy commissioner Dave Hudson.
Background: Reports suggested NSW police were working with the Commonwealth on the return of ISIS brides.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated there was no contradiction with his previous answer, which he maintained was absolutely correct.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked whether the minister was aware that the Prime Minister had deliberately excluded him from negotiations regarding aged care reforms. She queried why elderly Australians should trust the government if the relevant minister was not present for significant decisions.
Background: The coalition had secured an agreement in the Senate for the delivery of 83,000 home-care package places, including 40,000 in the current year. The opposition leader questioned why the Prime Minister excluded the Minister for Aged Care from these negotiations.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister stated that the government had agreed to pass the aged care bill, ensuring certainty for older Australians, providers, and workers. He explained that the new Support at Home program would allow more seniors to remain at home with higher levels of care. To meet increased demand, the government would fast-track the release of an extra 20,000 home care packages in the eight weeks leading up to 1 November. The remaining 63,000 packages would be allocated by 30 June 2026, maintaining fiscal prudence while delivering care faster.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked when the minister or his office became aware of the increased waitlist figure of nearly 109,000 people. She questioned why this updated number had not been provided to the House.
Background: The government had previously cited a waitlist of around 87,000 people as of 31 March. Recent Senate statements indicated the waitlist had grown to nearly 109,000 by 31 July.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister explained that there is an established process for verifying data regarding the national priority system waitlist. He confirmed that around 87,000 people were on the waitlist at the end of March and that the government releases more than 2,000 home-care packages weekly. He stated that the verification process is longstanding and consistent with previous government practices to ensure incorrect information is not released.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked what actions the government had taken to guarantee the safety of Australians if ISIS-terrorist brides were allowed to return to the country.
Background: Reports in The Australian suggested government officials were helping ISIS-terrorist brides return to Australia.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that the reports were not accurate.
Other Parliamentary Activity
-
Economy
House of Representatives · Tuesday 3 February 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Bondi Beach Attack Victims
House of Representatives · Monday 19 January 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Energy
House of Representatives · Thursday 27 November 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Energy
House of Representatives · Tuesday 25 November 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate
-
Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; Consideration of Senate Message
House of Representatives · Thursday 4 September 2025 · Consideration of Senate Message
Responded as shadow minister
-
De Waart, Senior Constable Vadim, Thompson, Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal
House of Representatives · Thursday 28 August 2025 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Labor Government
House of Representatives · Wednesday 23 July 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Women's Budget Statement
House of Representatives · Thursday 27 March 2025 · Ministerial Statement
Responded as shadow minister
- Votes recorded
- 34
- Aye votes (50.0%)
- 17
- No votes (50.0%)
- 17
-
Australian Parliament
4 Feb 2026 · Ayes 32, Noes 98 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism (Criminal and Migration Laws) Bil...
20 Jan 2026 · Ayes 116, Noes 7 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism (Criminal and Migration Laws) Bil...
20 Jan 2026 · Ayes 45, Noes 94 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism (Firearms and Customs Laws) Bill ...
20 Jan 2026 · Ayes 96, Noes 45 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism (Firearms and Customs Laws) Bill ...
20 Jan 2026 · Ayes 96, Noes 44 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Energy
25 Nov 2025 · Ayes 91, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Dissent from Ruling
25 Nov 2025 · Ayes 41, Noes 96 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
6 Nov 2025 · Ayes 84, Noes 46 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Consideration of Legislation
9 Oct 2025 · Ayes 83, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Days and Hours of Meeting
23 Jul 2025 · Ayes 54, Noes 92 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Nuclear Energy Select Committee; Report
26 Mar 2025 · Ayes 60, Noes 75 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Treasury Laws Amendment (More Cost of Living Relief) Bill 2025; Second Readin
26 Mar 2025 · Ayes 91, Noes 52 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Treasury Laws Amendment (More Cost of Living Relief) Bill 2025; Second Readin
26 Mar 2025 · Ayes 77, Noes 65 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Rearrangement
26 Mar 2025 · Ayes 80, Noes 61 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Consideration of Legislation
25 Mar 2025 · Ayes 87, Noes 13 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Consideration of Legislation
25 Mar 2025 · Ayes 87, Noes 13 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders
25 Mar 2025 · Ayes 86, Noes 12 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Early Childhood Education and Care (Three Day Guarantee) Bill 2025; Second Re...
13 Feb 2025 · Ayes 91, Noes 53 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Early Childhood Education and Care (Three Day Guarantee) Bill 2025; Second Re...
13 Feb 2025 · Ayes 88, Noes 53 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Early Childhood Education and Care (Three Day Guarantee) Bill 2025; Second Re...
13 Feb 2025 · Ayes 78, Noes 59 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Electricity Infrastructure Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; Consideration in ...
12 Feb 2025 · Ayes 86, Noes 50 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Electricity Infrastructure Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; Consideration in ...
12 Feb 2025 · Ayes 86, Noes 50 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Rearrangement
12 Feb 2025 · Ayes 58, Noes 74 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
11 Feb 2025 · Ayes 57, Noes 81 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Attorney-General
10 Feb 2025 · Ayes 52, Noes 91 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives and Integrity) Bill 2024; Considerati...
10 Feb 2025 · Ayes 59, Noes 75 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives and Integrity) Bill 2024; Report from...
10 Feb 2025 · Ayes 50, Noes 81 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Competition and Consumer Amendment (Australian Energy Regulator Separation) B...
6 Feb 2025 · Ayes 85, Noes 54 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Scams Prevention Framework Bill 2024; Second Reading
6 Feb 2025 · Ayes 58, Noes 76 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024; Third Reading
6 Feb 2025 · Ayes 117, Noes 13 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024; Report from Federation Chamb
6 Feb 2025 · Ayes 116, Noes 11 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Free TAFE Bill 2024; Second Reading
5 Feb 2025 · Ayes 83, Noes 53 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Rearrangement
4 Feb 2025 · Ayes 86, Noes 53 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Rearrangement
4 Feb 2025 · Ayes 86, Noes 53 · Passed
VOTED NO
About this page
This page tracks Sussan Ley's parliamentary activity: questions asked and answered in Question Time, debates spoken in, and votes in divisions. Summaries are in reported speech, not transcripts; each one links to the official record.