Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Consideration in Detail

Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Triple Zero Custodian and Emergency Calling Powers) Bill 2025; Consideration in Detail

House of Representatives · Wednesday 8 October 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate focused on amendments to the bill aimed at enhancing the protection and transparency of the triple 0 emergency call network. The opposition moved amendments to classify the network as critical infrastructure, increase penalties for breaches, mandate public registers of outages, and require more frequent reporting. Another set of amendments sought to ensure the Triple Zero Custodian specifically addresses connectivity deficiencies in rural, regional, and remote areas. The government opposed all amendments, citing ongoing discussions and the existing mandate of the Custodian. Both sets of amendments were defeated in divisions.

Outcome

Both sets of amendments were defeated in divisions, with the first set failing 44-86 and the second failing 44-84.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

McIntosh moved five amendments to strengthen the bill's provisions regarding the triple 0 network. The proposals included listing the network as critical infrastructure under the Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018, doubling penalties for contraventions to $20 million, establishing a public register of outage events, reducing the reporting period for the regulator from six months to three months, and requiring the publication of reports. McIntosh argued that these measures were necessary to restore public confidence, ensure transparency, and protect national security following recent catastrophic failures and fatalities.

Government response

Wells opposed the amendments moved by McIntosh, stating that good faith discussions regarding the changes were still underway. The minister argued that the opposition's decision to expedite the amendments prevented the finalisation of these discussions before the vote. Consequently, the government voted against the proposals to allow for further negotiation and refinement of the legislative details.

Opposition response

Webster moved two amendments to ensure the Triple Zero Custodian specifically investigates and reports on connectivity deficiencies in rural, regional, and remote Australia. Webster argued that regional Australians face unique risks due to poor connectivity and lack of alternative services, which the current bill did not adequately address. The amendments sought to mandate reporting on personal safety risks and specific challenges faced by these communities, asserting that the government had neglected regional needs.

Votes during this debate

Division 2: Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Triple Zero Custodian and Emergency Calling Powers) Bill 2025; Consideration in Detail Not passed 44–86 Division 3: Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Triple Zero Custodian and Emergency Calling Powers) Bill 2025; Consideration in Detail Not passed 44–84