Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Consideration in Detail

News Journalism Payments Bill 2026; Consideration in Detail

House of Representatives · Wednesday 19 August 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The House of Representatives debated the News Journalism Payments Bill 2026 at the consideration in detail stage. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese supported the legislation, arguing it closes loopholes in the news media bargaining code to ensure digital platforms contribute to the sustainability of Australian journalism. Independent member Kate Chaney moved a series of amendments designed to guarantee that small and independent publishers receive a share of the funds by imposing specific expenditure requirements on large platforms. Minister Anika Wells opposed the amendments, stating the existing bill already includes targeted support for small, regional, and diverse news organisations through grant programs and uplifts. The amendments were defeated in divisions, with the bill proceeding without the proposed changes.

Outcome

The amendments moved by Kate Chaney were defeated in divisions, with the result recorded as not passed 11-69.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Albanese argued that the legislation addresses the urgent need to support the news sector, which faces revenue loss to tech platforms. Albanese stated that the bill strengthens the original news media bargaining code by closing a loophole that allowed large digital platforms to avoid obligations. Albanese explained that if platforms fail to negotiate deals with Australian news creators, they will incur a charge, with all collected funds returned directly to the sector to employ journalists. Albanese highlighted that the bill narrows the charge base while increasing the incentive rate, raises the required number of deals from six to eight, and broadens the definition of journalists to include freelancers. Albanese noted that five per cent of incentive funds would be directed to the Australian Associated Press to support public interest journalism.

Government response

Wells stated that the government does not support the amendments moved by the member for Curtin. Wells argued that the bill already achieves the correct equilibrium to aid the viability of news publishers, including small and regional entities. Wells pointed out that five per cent of revenue raised by the News Bargaining Incentive is allocated to a separate grant program focused on small publishers and startups. Wells added that an additional uplift of 20 per cent applies to journalists working in regional and remote areas or in organisations serving diverse communities. Wells concluded that news businesses with low revenue can obtain finance to turn unpaid reporters into salaried staff, making the amendments unnecessary.

Votes during this debate

Division 2: News Journalism Payments Bill 2026; Consideration in Detail Not passed 11–69