Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025; Consideration in Detail

Haines moved further amendments to define equitable access in terms of affordability and device availability, and to empower the minister to mandate temporary disaster roaming during emergencies. The member argued that without clear definitions, commercial interests could override consumer needs, particularly for those unable to afford premium devices or plans. Haines highlighted concerns from the Australian Communications Consumer Action Network and the National Farmers' Federation regarding the risk of regional consumers being priced out. The member also emphasised the need for fault rectification standards and statutory disaster roaming powers, citing recent bushfires in the electorate.

Wells stated the government would not support the remaining amendments, arguing that prescriptive definitions of equitable access could limit regulatory flexibility and have unintended commercial consequences. The minister explained that existing standard-making powers in the bill allowed for targeted interventions regarding performance, reliability, and fault rectification without needing the proposed changes. Regarding temporary disaster roaming, Wells noted that an industry-led initiative was commencing in October and that the government retained existing powers to regulate if necessary. The minister concluded that the amendments were not required given the bill's existing provisions and ongoing industry progress.