Budget

Smith argued that the government had consistently introduced housing supply measures while the opposition and One Nation blocked them. Smith highlighted the intergenerational inequity caused by the housing crisis and accused One Nation of ignoring facts regarding migrant contributions. Smith urged voters to check One Nation's voting record on serious housing legislation, claiming they had not engaged with meaningful policy reforms.

Walker criticised One Nation for blaming migrants for housing issues, noting that foreign buyers constituted only 0.8 per cent of the market. Walker argued that structural problems like underbuilding and construction costs required serious policy work rather than scapegoating. Walker accused One Nation of using culture war politics to distract from their lack of solutions for younger Australians.

Tyrrell disputed Hanson's claims about foreign ownership, stating that less than two per cent of houses were owned by foreigners and that such purchases of existing homes were already banned. Tyrrell argued that domestic investors owning multiple properties had a greater impact on housing availability than foreign buyers. Tyrrell characterised the motion as based on misinformation rather than factual analysis of the housing market.

Shoebridge accused One Nation of prioritising billionaire interests over public housing and affordable solutions. Shoebridge cited Hanson's attendance at events with Donald Trump and Gina Rinehart as evidence of alignment with wealthy elites. Shoebridge argued that One Nation's opposition to taxing fossil fuel profits and resources hindered funding for public housing and infrastructure.