Question Time AU

Matter of Public Importance

Housing

Senate · Tuesday 4 November 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on the efficacy of the Albanese Government's $60 billion housing plan, with the opposition arguing it has failed to increase supply and wasted taxpayer funds through bureaucratic inefficiency. Government senators defended the plan as the most ambitious in generations, citing rising building approvals and investments in social housing, while accusing the opposition of blocking progress. Crossbench members highlighted systemic issues, including rent controls and structural reforms, and criticised specific policy impacts on regional affordability.

Outcome

The motion was debated as a Matter of Public Importance; no vote was taken.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Bragg argued that the government's housing initiatives were failing to deliver homes, with completions dropping despite significant funding. Briskey contended that the Housing Australia Future Fund was overpaying for dwellings, citing costs of $1.2 million to $1.3 million compared to an average build cost of $500,000. The senator raised concerns about probity and transparency, noting that major superannuation funds had received substantial allocations while the Auditor-General investigated spending. Bragg suggested the government was undermining public financial integrity by keeping certain schemes off-budget and withholding documents from the Senate.