Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Commonwealth Workplace Protection Orders Bill 2025; Second Reading

Senate · Wednesday 29 October 2025

Continued from Monday 1 September 2025.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Senate debated the Commonwealth Workplace Protection Orders Bill 2025, which establishes a framework for courts to issue protection orders against individuals who threaten or use violence against Commonwealth workers. The legislation implements recommendation 17 of the Ashton review, following the stabbing of Services Australia employee Joeanne Cassar in 2023. All speakers supported the bill, citing the need to protect frontline staff, including contractors and volunteers, from the nearly 1,700 serious incidents recorded at Services Australia in a single year. The bill allows agencies to apply for orders on behalf of workers, ensuring alternative service access remains available for those subject to restrictions. The legislation passed its second reading with bipartisan support.

Outcome

The bill was read a second time.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

Bragg argued that the bill addresses security risks identified in the Ashton review, particularly following the attack on a Services Australia employee. Bragg noted that the broad definition of Commonwealth worker ensures protection extends to contractors, security guards, and electorate office staff. Bragg explained that courts must be satisfied of a real risk of further violence before issuing orders, which can prohibit attendance at workplaces or contact with specific workers. Bragg stated that the Coalition supported the bill after a bipartisan committee inquiry recommended minor changes. Bragg confirmed the Coalition would facilitate the bill's swift passage through the Senate.

Government response

Walsh stated the bill strengthens protections for workers facing increasing risks of violence and aggression. Walsh highlighted that the legislation implements recommendation 17 of the Ashton review, complementing previous criminal code amendments. Walsh explained that courts can impose conditions such as restricted contact or alternative service arrangements to ensure continued access to government benefits. Walsh noted that breaching an order is a criminal offence punishable by up to two years imprisonment. Walsh tabled a replacement explanatory memorandum and affirmed the government's commitment to worker safety.

Opposition response

Bragg argued that the bill addresses security risks identified in the Ashton review, particularly following the attack on a Services Australia employee. Bragg noted that the broad definition of Commonwealth worker ensures protection extends to contractors, security guards, and electorate office staff. Bragg explained that courts must be satisfied of a real risk of further violence before issuing orders, which can prohibit attendance at workplaces or contact with specific workers. Bragg stated that the Coalition supported the bill after a bipartisan committee inquiry recommended minor changes. Bragg confirmed the Coalition would facilitate the bill's swift passage through the Senate.