Commission of Inquiry into Antisemitism at Australian Universities Bill 2024 (No. 2); Second Reading

Reynolds supported the bill, describing the rise in antisemitism as a result of government appeasement and weak leadership. Reynolds referenced testimony from Holocaust educators and community leaders to highlight the severity of the situation. Reynolds argued that university vice-chancellors had failed to protect students and that the government's response was insufficient to address the growing hatred.

Hughes supported the bill, criticising the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights for failing to unequivocally condemn antisemitic statements by university staff. Hughes cited specific examples of academics promoting hate speech and argued that universities were indoctrinating students rather than fostering critical thinking. Hughes called on Labor members to support the inquiry to demonstrate solidarity with the Jewish community.

Cadell moved that the question be now put, seeking to conclude the debate and proceed to a vote on the bill.

Ciccone opposed the bill, stating that the government was already addressing antisemitism through a parliamentary joint committee inquiry chaired by Josh Burns. Ciccone emphasised the government's commitment to community safety and social cohesion, arguing that the existing inquiry was thorough and appropriate. Ciccone condemned antisemitism while advocating for a balanced approach that respected free speech and multicultural harmony.

Green opposed the bill, arguing that a commission of inquiry would be too slow and that the parliamentary joint committee was a more agile mechanism. Green cited committee findings that university responses to antisemitism were inadequate but that the bill itself was not the right solution. Green highlighted government funding for social cohesion and safety measures, including support for the Executive Council of Australian Jewry.