Question Time AU

Take Note Debate

Answers to Questions

Senate · Wednesday 13 May 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senators debated the government's budget responses, focusing on capital gains tax reforms and housing affordability. Opposition senators argued that tax increases would penalise young savers and that the government had broken previous election promises regarding superannuation and healthcare costs. Government senators contended that the budget addressed long-standing housing supply issues and provided immediate relief through fuel excise reductions and new tax deductions for workers. The debate concluded with the motion being agreed to.

Outcome

Question agreed to.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Liddle argued that the government's tax changes constituted an intergenerational fraud that disadvantaged younger Australians trying to build wealth. Liddle claimed that removing the capital gains tax discount would create one of the highest capital gains taxes globally, acting as a barrier to aspiration and saving. Liddle asserted that high government spending had led to increased inflation, interest rates, and a projected debt of $1.2 trillion. Liddle maintained that these policies would result in fewer houses and higher rents, contradicting the government's stated goals.