Tim Wilson
Liberal Party Member for Goldstein
Currently sitting
Photo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Mandineo, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Seat and party history (2)
- Liberal Party - Goldstein (House) - 3 May 2025 to present
- Liberal Party - Goldstein (House) - 2 Jul 2016 to 21 May 2022
- Seat and party records: OpenAustralia member data.
Contact
Electorate office: (03) 9557 4644
677 Nepean Highway, Brighton East VIC 3187
Office details: Parliament of Australia, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Contact details on aph.gov.au Profile on OpenAustraliaNot sure if this is your member? Find your electorate (AEC)
These counts cover what is on this site only. They do not measure electorate work or committee work.
Compared with other members
Tim Wilson compared with all 150 sitting House members.
Questions asked in Question Time
Higher than 99% of House members- This member
- 44
- Average
- 11.2
- Median
- 12
Debates spoken in
Higher than 97% of House members- This member
- 96
- Average
- 35.9
- Median
- 30.5
Votes cast
Lower than 87% of House members- This member
- 194
- Average
- 253.0
- Median
- 265
Share of divisions voted in
Lower than 78% of House members- This member
- 67%
- Average
- 79%
- Median
- 81%
Read these with care
- The median is the middle member: half did more, half did less. It is less affected by a few very active members than the average.
- Ministers answer questions rather than ask them, and the presiding officers rarely vote, so their patterns differ.
- Government backbenchers are often given arranged "Dorothy Dixer" questions, which raises their question counts.
- Votes only record ayes and noes, so a missed vote cannot be told apart from a pair (an agreed absence).
- Counts cover only what is on this site, and do not measure electorate or committee work. New members have less history.
Question Time
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked how many more chances the Prime Minister would give the Treasurer, alleging that productivity assumptions were changed to inflate budget numbers.
Background: The Liberal member accused the Treasurer of manipulating productivity figures and questioned the Prime Minister's support for the Treasurer.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer defended the productivity assumption of 1.2 per cent, stating it was based on Treasury advice and consistent with international forecasts from the UK, US, and New Zealand. He argued that the previous government had kept assumptions artificially high at 1.5 per cent despite weak growth. He highlighted the budget's broad productivity agenda, including faster approvals and foreign investment reform, as measures to address long-term structural challenges.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked the Treasurer to respond to reports that Labor MPs were mocking his inflation explanations and expressing doubts about cabinet's appreciation of how markets functioned.
Background: Media reports suggested Labor backbenchers were mocking the Treasurer's inflation excuses and doubting cabinet's understanding of markets.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated that he took his colleagues and economic challenges seriously, noting that the specific matters raised had not come up in a recent briefing on the Intergenerational report. He highlighted the government's focus on inflation, productivity, and global volatility, citing the impact of the war in Iran on borrowing costs. He pointed to the government's productivity package, tax reform, and responsible budget management as evidence of serious engagement with economic risks.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked the Prime Minister to admit that Bill Kelty was correct in asserting that housing affordability was worsening and real wages were declining under the current government.
Background: Former Labor figure Bill Kelty had criticised the Prime Minister's economic claims, stating that housing unaffordability was increasing and real wages were falling.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister acknowledged that Australians faced cost-of-living pressures due to global events including the pandemic, conflicts in Europe and the Middle East, and oil shocks. He stated the government was taking action to provide relief and strengthen the economy against future shocks. He highlighted that all workers received tax cuts, one of five forms of tax relief implemented during the government's term, contrasting this with the opposition's previous stance on reversing such measures.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked the Treasurer to concede whether the government's strategy of higher debt and spending was driving up interest rates, given that the interest bill was becoming the fastest-growing budget line.
Background: Government debt costs had risen from a budget assumption of 4.8 per cent to approximately 5.2 per cent for 10-year bonds, with predictions of further interest rate hikes.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer argued that the current debt trajectory was $200 billion lower than inherited levels, with over 60 per cent of existing debt accumulated during the previous nine years of Coalition government. He attributed the rise in global bond yields to the escalation of conflict in Iran and broader global economic uncertainty, noting that markets in all major advanced economies were pricing in rate increases. He stated that the government's fiscal management had resulted in surpluses and revenue upward revisions, contrasting this with the opposition's unfunded commitments.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked whether the government acknowledged that its policies had failed to deliver sufficient housing supply, resulting in higher rents and a projected deficit of at least 330,000 homes against its targets.
Background: The member challenged the government on its housing performance, citing high rents and a predicted shortfall in construction targets.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The minister stated that the government had implemented the largest housing agenda since the postwar period, focusing on building more homes, assisting renters, and promoting homeownership. She claimed supply measures would result in an additional 400,000 homes, including 55,000 social and affordable homes, contrasting this with the previous government's record of building only 373 homes in nine years. The minister highlighted that Commonwealth rent assistance had been raised twice above legislated increases and noted that 270,000 first-home buyers had accessed the five per cent deposit scheme. She argued that recent tax changes would reverse the decline in homeownership rates.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked whether the Minister still supported Treasury's prediction that property prices would fall by only two per cent, given reports of a significant market crash.
Background: The member claimed Sydney house prices were plummeting and questioned the transparency of government modelling.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister confirmed that house prices were softening, noting this was the fourth such occurrence in a decade. She cited the federal budget fact sheet, which stated Treasury modelling predicted a small, temporary slowing in price growth, estimated at around two per cent less over a couple of years compared to no policy change. She argued this would lead to 75,000 more people owning their homes in the coming ten years. She contextualised current trends by noting house prices had grown by 400 per cent over the previous 25 years and almost doubled in Sydney during the previous nine years of Coalition government.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked why the government would not support a future generations fund to pay down debt using resource revenue windfalls, citing high interest costs.
Background: The member claimed the government had spent over $400 billion in windfall revenue since 2022 and cited high interest costs on national debt.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated that Australia's debt ratios were low compared to peer nations, citing reaffirmations of the AAA credit rating by Moody's and S&P Global. He argued that most of the current gross debt was accumulated between 2013 and 2022 by the previous government. He noted that gross debt was $200 billion lower than the inherited trajectory, resulting in $7 billion less interest paid this year compared to the previous budget. The Treasurer claimed the opposition's policies would have led to higher debt and deficits.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked if the Minister would guarantee rents would not go up by 30 per cent due to Labor's tax changes, citing the rise in median rents.
Background: Median capital city rents had risen from $470 to $690 per week, and the opposition claimed tax changes would cause a 30 per cent increase.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister referred to the Prime Minister's clarification regarding the National Australia Bank's statement. She stated that Treasury advice indicated a negligible impact on rents because existing landlords were grandfathered. She highlighted that the government had lifted Commonwealth Rent Assistance by 50 per cent, negotiated improved rental standards, and aimed to help 75,000 renters enter homeownership. She quoted an advocacy group stating that investor tax breaks had fueled the housing crisis.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked the Minister for Housing why the number of first home buyers had decreased by more than six per cent this year.
Background: The member cited a reported drop of more than six per cent in the number of first home buyers during the current calendar year.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The minister stated that there had been more first home buyers each year under the current government than under any previous administration. She highlighted that the five per cent deposit program had assisted 260,000 Australians and that recent tax reforms would help 75,000 rental households purchase their first home. She argued that first home buyers were now on a level playing field at auctions, citing recent sales in Footscray and Wills as evidence of increased activity.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked why the government was making Australians poorer.
Background: A shadow minister cited data suggesting the average worker was more than $1,200 poorer than the previous year.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister listed government measures including tax cuts, increased bulk-billing to 84 per cent, 800,000 free TAFE enrolments, wage justice for educators, and gig worker protections. He mentioned cheaper medicines and the new Fair Work Court. He contrasted this with the opposition's past policies, citing a report by the current Leader of the Opposition that suggested offshoring aluminium production to China.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked whether the Minister had received or reviewed advice from Treasury or APRA regarding the number of first home buyers who would be pushed into negative equity due to the government's housing policy changes.
Background: The member claimed that Labor's housing policies could cause home values to collapse by 10 to 20 per cent, pushing first home buyers into negative equity.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister directed the member to the budget documents, specifically page 5 of the factsheet on capital gains tax and negative gearing. She quoted Treasury modelling indicating that reforms would increase the owner-occupier share of the market by around 75,000 over the next decade, reversing ten years of decline in home ownership rates. The Minister stated that the reduction in investor demand was expected to cause a small, temporary slowing in house price growth, estimated at around two per cent less over a couple of years compared to no policy change.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked how many Australians would suffer financial loss from a predicted 20 per cent drop in house values resulting from the government's tax changes.
Background: The member for Goldstein asked the Minister for Housing how many Australians would become poorer due to alleged house price collapses caused by the government's budget.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister rejected the premise of the question as a misrepresentation of her previous statements. She reiterated that the housing market had favored investors for 25 years, causing a 400 per cent price increase and falling homeownership rates for young people. She argued that the government aimed to create a fairer market for first-home buyers and noted inconsistencies in the opposition's position, citing their shadow spokesperson's desire for price declines.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked if the Treasurer's previous statement that inflation had turned the corner was a broken promise, given that core inflation had risen and mortgage costs had increased significantly.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer questioned the Treasurer on rising core inflation and interest rates.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated that inflation had fallen for the second consecutive month. He noted that the Shadow Treasurer had acknowledged on social media that the war in the Middle East was worsening inflationary pressures. He argued that the Shadow Treasurer inadvertently credited the budget settings for the substantial drop in inflation. He warned that the opposition's $110 billion in unfunded commitments would lead to higher inflation and interest rates. He criticized the Opposition Leader for trying to outdo One Nation on policy.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked how the public could trust the Treasurer's statements given the change in position regarding restrictions on self-managed superannuation funds investing in property.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer questioned the Treasurer's credibility, citing a previous statement that the government had no intention of restricting self-managed superannuation fund property investments.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer explained that the amendment reduces risk to retirement savings and secures passage of fairer tax reforms. He cited the Murray inquiry, which found direct borrowing by super funds inconsistent with retirement savings objectives. He clarified that the change extends the ban on borrowing but grandfathers existing arrangements with a 45-day transition period. Regarding trust, he pointed to falling petrol prices across major cities since March, contradicting the Shadow Treasurer's claims that prices were not falling.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked the Prime Minister to confirm whether enterprises of every scale would forfeit the current 50 per cent capital gains tax rebate for all holdings.
Background: The member asked if businesses would lose the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer clarified that a discount for capital gains would remain, reflecting real gains rather than an arbitrary figure. He stated that 98 per cent of all active businesses would access concessions and carve-outs, with 100 per cent of active small businesses accessing the higher turnover threshold. He criticized the shadow treasurer for running a scare campaign against changes he had previously called for. The Treasurer asserted that the opposition voted against measures to help first home buyers and workers.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked the Prime Minister to admit that the government's votes against the Coalition's tax-back guarantee would result in hundreds of billions of dollars in extra taxes for workers.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer accused the government of locking in higher taxes by rejecting Coalition proposals.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that legislation to lower taxes had just passed the House, which the Opposition had voted against. He noted that the member for Goldstein was absent during the vote but that other Opposition members rejected the tax cuts effective from 1 July of the current and following year, as well as the Working Australians Tax Offset and the $1,000 automatic deduction. He criticized the Shadow Treasurer for arguing for higher taxes and deficits during the last election.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked why the government was introducing tax reforms described as a productivity tax during a period of declining productivity.
Background: National accounts showed a sharp fall in productivity, and economist Richard Holden criticized capital gains tax changes.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer disputed the opposition's productivity figures, noting they included data from before the government took office. He argued that the previous government's policies locked young people out of housing and that the current budget focused on productivity challenges. He stated that leaving the tax system unchanged was not a solution to long-standing productivity issues.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked whether the Treasurer would confirm that the working Australians tax offset would be eroded by bracket creep within a year.
Background: The opposition claimed the government had taken $410 from the average worker through bracket creep over the last 12 months.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer criticized the opposition for voting against tax cuts for 13 million workers. He stated that the government would vote to return bracket creep through tax cuts, while the opposition would vote to keep it. He noted that the government has returned bracket creep five times using three mechanisms, with another tax cut effective from 1 July. He asserted that the government supports tax cuts while the opposition supports higher taxes.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked if the government would reinstate the pre-1999 capital gains tax averaging provisions for small-business owners to avoid higher tax rates.
Background: A Liberal member asked the Prime Minister to confirm whether capital gains for small-business owners would be averaged over five years, similar to the pre-1999 system, to prevent pushing them into higher tax brackets.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister cited the 1999 Ralph Review, commissioned by the Coalition government, which stated that averaging provisions allowed asset holders to reduce capital gains tax to near zero while others paid full marginal rates. He noted that the Howard government had removed these provisions due to inequity and criticized the current opposition for moving further to the right than the previous Coalition government.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked whether the government's policy included averaging capital gains over five years to prevent small-business owners from being pushed into the top tax bracket, referencing the Prime Minister's previous comments.
Background: The shadow treasurer asked the Prime Minister if the government's policy included averaging capital gains over five years, as was possible in 1999.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister did not directly answer the question but cited comments from the Institute of Public Accountants stating that over 90 per cent of small-business owners would qualify for CGT concessions. He also quoted Nash Advisory, which said the preservation of small business CGT concessions was the most important detail for business owners considering a sale. He began to quote Daniel Petre, co-founder of Airtree Ventures, but was interrupted by opposition interjections.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked again whether the government's policy included averaging capital gains over five years for small-business owners.
Background: The shadow treasurer repeated his question about whether the government's policy included averaging capital gains over five years.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister resumed his previous answer, quoting Daniel Petre of Airtree Ventures, who dismissed claims that founders would move overseas due to tax changes. He also quoted Jevon Le Roux of Keeyu, who highlighted that the government currently returns 43 per cent of R&D dollars spent to founders immediately, rather than waiting for an exit.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked whether the Prime Minister was imposing a new 30 per cent death tax on Australians with disability, citing a specific case of an adult with Down syndrome.
Background: The member for Goldstein asked the Prime Minister about a claim that Janet's daughter, an adult with Down syndrome, was not exempt from a new 30 per cent death tax.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister denied the claim, stating that no such tax was being imposed.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked the Treasurer whether he endorsed the Cabinet Secretary's position regarding concerns that new capital gains tax rules negatively impact small businesses and startups, citing an example of a founder who sold a business for $35.8 million.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer cited a specific case of a startup founder concerned about capital gains tax changes.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer questioned the validity of the example, suggesting the individual might be exempt or eligible for concessions. He quoted the Shadow Treasurer's past writings and parliamentary statements arguing that the current tax system favors asset holders over workers and disadvantages young Australians. He stated that the government's reforms addressed these inequities and that the Shadow Treasurer was now opposing changes he had previously advocated for.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked the Prime Minister how much more families caring for people with disabilities would pay in tax due to new measures affecting testamentary discretionary trusts, citing a constituent with a child with Down syndrome.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer raised concerns about tax impacts on families with disabled members.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that exemptions for vulnerable people were included in the budget announcement. He criticized the opposition for using scare tactics regarding vulnerable people to gain political advantage.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked whether the Prime Minister would exclude the possibility of reversing his decision on implementing an estate duty, claiming that Labor had misled the public.
Background: The member for Goldstein questioned the Prime Minister about allegations that Labor had misled Australians regarding tax plans, specifically asking about a potential death tax.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that Labor is the party of homeownership and wants more Australians to own their first home. He criticized the Coalition for campaigning on higher taxes and opposing tax cuts and housing reforms. He quoted the Shadow Treasurer acknowledging that the current tax system favors established interests over young Australians. He asserted that Labor protects the family home for future generations, contrasting this with the Coalition's shrinking caucus.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked where new migrants would live, given the arrival of 1.4 million people since the government took office and a housing target shortfall of 77,000 homes.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer asked where new migrants would live, citing 1.4 million arrivals since Labor took office and a shortfall of 77,000 homes against the housing target.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated that net overseas migration had decreased by 45 per cent from its peak, which was inherited from the previous government. He noted that in the last full year, migration was 30,000 fewer than the Treasury forecast. The Treasurer highlighted that dwelling commencements were up 26 per cent, building approvals up 13 per cent, and dwelling investment up 5.5 per cent, contrasting these with declines under the previous government. He mentioned an extra $2 billion investment in the budget to support 65,000 homes by funding local infrastructure such as drains, power, and roads.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked why the government was imposing additional tax on a hypothetical low-income earner with a capital gain, arguing it undermined the tax-free threshold.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer presented a hypothetical scenario of a low-income earner facing higher taxes on capital gains and asked why the government was taxing lower income earners.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated that the tax reforms aimed to align the tax treatment of workers with those earning income from other legitimate sources, addressing distortions that made it harder for young people to buy homes. He noted that the tax package provided cuts to 13.3 million workers. The Treasurer quoted the Shadow Treasurer's past writings and speeches, which criticized the preferential treatment of capital gains and argued that the tax system favored established interests over young Australians, suggesting the Shadow Treasurer's current position was inconsistent with his previous views.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked if the Treasurer would guarantee that the budget would not add pressure to inflation and interest rates.
Background: The opposition member claimed government spending increased mortgage interest costs and asked for a guarantee on inflation.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer criticized the opposition's fiscal record, noting their promises of higher taxes and deficits. He highlighted that the government had found $114 billion in savings across seven budgets, including $20 billion in the December update. He stated that the May budget would be responsible, focusing on savings, tax reform, and productivity. The Treasurer emphasized the government's achievement of turning deficits into surpluses and banking revenue revisions. He argued that the opposition's policies would have worsened inflation and economic challenges, citing their proposed $11 billion larger deficit.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked the Treasurer to confirm whether the government's fuel excise cut included inflationary offsets, contrasting it with the coalition's plan.
Background: The government announced a fuel excise cut shortly after the opposition had proposed a similar measure.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer highlighted that the government's plan included relief for heavy vehicle users, which the opposition had allegedly ignored in their costing. He stated that the government was providing more relief in a responsible manner due to a stronger underlying cash position compared to the previous election. He noted that $114 billion in offsets had been found in less than four years and that further budget decisions would be made methodically before the May budget. He emphasized that the measures were temporary cost-of-living relief.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked the Treasurer to apologize to mortgage holders for the financial pressure caused by interest rate hikes, citing predictions of further rises and increased annual interest costs.
Background: The shadow treasurer highlighted increased mortgage costs for Australians following multiple interest rate rises and predicted further increases.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer criticized the shadow treasurer's recent call to end the Reserve Bank's dual mandate, arguing it would lead to higher rates and unemployment. He stated that responsible treasurers do not comment on future rate movements and noted that three rate cuts had occurred in the previous year. He emphasized the importance of the dual mandate for balancing inflation and employment, acknowledging that while inflation was lower than under the previous government, the Middle East conflict complicated the challenge.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked the Prime Minister to confirm that population growth from immigration had increased by 1.9 million since 2022 and that the government had failed to meet housing construction targets by tens of thousands.
Background: Recent data indicated population growth driven by immigration, while housing targets were reportedly missed.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that the previous government had no housing minister and set a target of zero homes. He noted that net migration had been cut by over 40 per cent in a year, with current arrival numbers lower than under the Coalition. He cited projections that population growth would decrease to 1.3 per cent this financial year and 1.2 per cent starting in 2026-27. He highlighted that 1.2 million jobs had been created and that the budget bottom line was $233 billion better over seven years.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked the Treasurer to deny any link between government spending and the resurgence of inflation, given that public demand had outpaced private demand.
Background: Recent data showed public demand growing faster than private demand in the final quarter of 2025, alongside rising inflation.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer attributed the rise in public demand to defense spending, which the opposition had supported. He argued that over the full year, private demand had grown faster and contributed more than three times as much to growth as public demand. He highlighted that the government had delivered budget surpluses and reduced debt by $176 billion. He criticized the opposition for talking down the economy and noted the Shadow Treasurer's personal investments in betting against Australia.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked the Prime Minister to accept responsibility for the decline in living standards and real wages under the Labor government.
Background: The member stated that real wages had fallen by 2.1 per cent over the previous four years and that the Reserve Bank predicted additional drops.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister countered that the opposition had missed the creation of 1.2 million jobs and the upcoming extension of paid parental leave to six months. He listed several government measures opposed by the opposition, including a 20 per cent cut to student debt for over three million Australians, protection of penalty rates, increases to social services payments, expansion of the five per cent deposit plan for first home buyers, tripling of bulk-billing incentives, opening of urgent care clinics, and reducing medicine costs from $42.50 to $25.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked the Prime Minister to accept responsibility for high inflation and declining living standards.
Background: The member claimed Australia's inflation rate was higher than many other countries and that Labor policies were fuelling it.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated that living standards had risen in the latest national accounts and that per capita income growth was more than twice the OECD average. He highlighted that real wages had grown in eight of the last nine quarters. He criticized the shadow Treasurer for talking down the economy and noted reports that the shadow Treasurer held investments that profited when the Australian market underperformed.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked the Treasurer to rule out spending any taxpayer money on extremist Islamic groups or places of worship that had mourned the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer asked if taxpayer funds were being used to support groups mourning the death of Iran's leader, Ayatollah Khamenei.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated that the government ensures public money is spent appropriately and takes steps if funding is deemed unsuitable. He criticized the opposition for focusing on this issue rather than economic challenges like inflation and productivity. He invited the opposition to ask questions about central economic concerns instead.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked what steps the Prime Minister had taken to ensure no taxpayer dollars were misused.
Background: The member referenced the Prime Minister's refusal to write to the National Anti-Corruption Commission regarding the Watson report.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that the National Anti-Corruption Commission is independent and established to operate without political interference. He affirmed that the commission can conduct inquiries and refer matters as it sees fit.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked if the minister's office had sought a copy of the CFMEU report before 9 February and which version was received.
Background: The member questioned whether the government had received a redacted version of the CFMEU report before the official date cited by the minister.
Answer from Amanda Rishworth
The minister reiterated that her office had never requested changes, omissions, or different versions of the report. She emphasized that the report was provided to the administrator, not the government, and that the administrator handled its distribution. She maintained that the government had no involvement in the content or redaction of the report.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked if the Prime Minister supported the Minister for Small Business's characterisation of insolvent business owners as 'dodgy'.
Background: Treasury reported low uptake of a small-business incentive, and insolvencies reached a record high.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer clarified that insolvency rates as a proportion of companies were the lowest on record, lower than under previous governments. He noted that 26,000 new companies were being created monthly, a 20 per cent increase over the previous government. He stated that the government was providing over $2 billion in targeted support for small businesses.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member cited an Australian Energy Council report predicting bill increases for the next decade and asked why the minister prioritized global negotiations over domestic bills.
Background: A Liberal member questioned the Prime Minister about warnings of long-term bill increases and the energy minister's focus on COP negotiations.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer argued that the opposition was misrepresenting the Australian Energy Council report, which supported a transition to renewables. He cited multiple energy CEOs and experts stating that abandoning net zero would increase costs and reduce investor confidence. He claimed the opposition's policy uncertainty was harming the economy and that their focus was on internal party politics rather than energy prices.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked if Zach Smith, head of the Victorian CFMEU, still sat on the National Construction Industry Forum and would advise the minister, given his meetings with John Setka.
Background: Whistleblowers alleged organized crime figures had a stronger position in the CFMEU.
Answer from Amanda Rishworth
The minister stated that the government was dedicated to addressing criminal activity and corrupt practices within the building sector. She pointed to cases of people excluded from the industry under the present administration who had earlier been treated leniently by the ABCC. She verified that Zach Smith remained on the forum.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked why the government had not acted against crime and corruption in the CFMEU, suggesting inaction was due to political donations.
Background: CFMEU officials were alleged to have met with underworld figures and accepted bribes, while the government had received nearly $7 million in union donations.
Answer from Amanda Rishworth
The minister rejected the allegations and detailed actions taken over 16 months, including the removal of 60 staff and the establishment of an integrity unit. She noted the administration had received over 500 whistleblowing complaints and referred matters to police and regulators. She mentioned specific investigations by the Fair Work Ombudsman and Operation Rye led by the AFP. She asserted the government was doing more than the previous administration to combat corruption.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked what specific actions the government had taken to protect journalists exposing CFMEU corruption.
Background: Journalist Nick McKenzie, who reported on CFMEU corruption, had experienced home intrusions and intimidation.
Answer from Amanda Rishworth
The minister stated there was no tolerance for intimidation of journalists or anyone else. She focused on whistleblower protections within the CFMEU administration, noting specific provisions in the Fair Work Act and the administration's code of conduct. She emphasised that the administrator prioritised the safety of staff and all Australians, asserting the government was seriously addressing violence and corruption in the building industry.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked whether the CFMEU's plan to unionise the New South Wales residential housing sector would increase or decrease prices.
Background: An opposition member asked about the impact of CFMEU unionisation plans on housing prices.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that the government had taken action against CFMEU construction bans during the previous term. He highlighted his role in removing John Setka from the Labor Party in 2019. He emphasized the government's efforts to reduce the power of union leaders who had controlled branches. The answer did not directly address the impact on housing prices.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked whether the Treasurer stood by the figure that 80,000 people would be impacted by the super tax on unrealised gains.
Background: A Liberal member asked the Treasurer if he stood by a previous estimate that 80,000 people would be affected by the super tax on unrealised gains.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated that the policy would impact approximately half a per cent of the superannuation system, which aligns with the previous estimate. He noted that the impact varies by fund, citing Hostplus as an example where only 57 members out of 1.86 million would be affected. He emphasised that concessional tax treatment remains for all balances, with slightly reduced concessions for those over $3 million.
Other Parliamentary Activity
-
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance Rebate) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 15 September 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 10 September 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as shadow minister
-
Tobacco Control
House of Representatives · Tuesday 8 September 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Acknowledgements
House of Representatives · Tuesday 8 September 2026 · General Debate
Opened this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Strengthening Accountability for Tax Adviser Misconduct and Other Measures) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 20 August 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as shadow minister
-
Economy
House of Representatives · Thursday 20 August 2026 · General Debate
Opened this debate
-
Economy
House of Representatives · Thursday 20 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion
House of Representatives · Tuesday 18 August 2026 · General Debate
Responded as shadow minister
-
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026, National Self-exclusion Register (Cost Recovery Levy) Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 12 August 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
-
Cost of Living
House of Representatives · Wednesday 12 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Labor Government
House of Representatives · Wednesday 1 July 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Health Insurance Amendment (Incentive Payments and Other Measures) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Monday 29 June 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Refugees
House of Representatives · Monday 29 June 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Fuel Excise Relief No. 2) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 23 June 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Budget
House of Representatives · Tuesday 23 June 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Combatting Illicit Tobacco Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Monday 22 June 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2026-2027; Consideration in Detail
House of Representatives · Wednesday 3 June 2026 · Consideration in Detail
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Taxation
House of Representatives · Wednesday 3 June 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026, Income Tax Rates Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 2 June 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 27 May 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Budget
House of Representatives · Tuesday 26 May 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Appropriation Bill (No. 5) 2025-2026, Appropriation Bill (No. 6) 2025-2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Monday 25 May 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Budget
House of Representatives · Wednesday 13 May 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering an Efficient and Trusted Tax System) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 1 April 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as shadow minister
-
Customs Legislation Amendment (False Trade Marks Infringement Notices) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 1 April 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Fuel Excise Relief) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as shadow minister
-
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Integrity and Safeguarding) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
-
Superannuation
House of Representatives · Monday 30 March 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026, Fair Work Amendment (Fairer Fuel) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 26 March 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Labor Government
House of Representatives · Thursday 26 March 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Fuel
House of Representatives · Tuesday 24 March 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Monday 23 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Parliamentary Frameworks Legislation Amendment (Reviews) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 10 March 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Coal Mining Industry (Long Service Leave) Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 10 March 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Cost of Living
House of Representatives · Thursday 5 March 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Reporting System Reform) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 4 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Building a Stronger and Fairer Super System) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 3 March 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Monday 2 March 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
-
Government Spending
House of Representatives · Monday 2 March 2026 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Fraud
House of Representatives · Monday 2 March 2026 · General Debate
Opened this debate
-
Cost of Living
House of Representatives · Monday 2 March 2026 · General Debate
Responded as shadow minister
-
Appropriation Bill (No. 3) 2025-2026, Appropriation Bill (No. 4) 2025-2026, Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 2) 2025-2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 12 February 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Supporting Choice in Superannuation and Other Measures) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 11 February 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner Bill 2025, Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 11 February 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
House of Representatives · Wednesday 11 February 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 11 February 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
National Commission for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children and Young People Bill 2026, National Commission for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children and Young People (Transitional Provisions) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 10 February 2026 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: oppose
-
Jonceski, Mr Ljupco (Luch)
House of Representatives · Tuesday 10 February 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) Bill 2025, Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Monday 9 February 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Small Business
House of Representatives · Monday 9 February 2026 · General Debate
Opened this debate
- Votes recorded
- 194
- Aye votes (38.1%)
- 74
- No votes (61.9%)
- 120
Showing the latest 50 votes.
-
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare With...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 85, Noes 40 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Rearrangement
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 42, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 42, Noes 89 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 85, Noes 44 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 87, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 86, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 45, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 46, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 49, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Consideration of Legislation
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 43, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Albanese Government; Attempted Censure
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 46, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 84, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation...
9 Sep 2026 · Ayes 52, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Gun Control
9 Sep 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Economy
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 41, Noes 85 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026; Considerati...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 36 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Minister for Veterans' Affairs
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 83, Noes 44 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Third Reading
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 103, Noes 14 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Consideration in ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 102, Noes 14 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 87, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026; Reference to Federation Chamber
12 Aug 2026 · Ayes 40, Noes 83 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
International Relations: Australia and Japan
12 Aug 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 41 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Aged Care Amendment (Restoring Human Override for Aged Care Needs Assessments...
11 Aug 2026 · Ayes 42, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
11 Aug 2026 · Ayes 86, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Rearrangement
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 42 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Minister for Defence Industry; Attempted Censure
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 41 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Health Insurance Amendment (Incentive Payments and Other Measures) Bill 2026;...
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 39, Noes 92 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Joint Committee; Appointment
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 38, Noes 101 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future ...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 33 · Passed
VOTED NO -
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future ...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 100, Noes 9 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future ...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 101, Noes 7 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Report from Federation Chamber
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 9, Noes 68 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Health Legislation Amendment (Prescribing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 20...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Health Legislation Amendment (Prescribing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 20...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 43, Noes 92 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
National Anti-Corruption Commission Joint Committee; Consideration of Senate ...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 93, Noes 45 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Member for Groom
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 102, Noes 33 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Reporting System Reform) Bill 2026; Consid...
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 98, Noes 40 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Reporting System Reform) Bill 2026; Consid...
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 91, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Albanese Government
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 91, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No...
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 97, Noes 42 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No...
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 91, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No...
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 93, Noes 44 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Aviation Consumer Protection Bill 2026, Aviation Consumer Protection (Consequ...
29 Jun 2026 · Ayes 47, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Prime Minister; Attempted Censure
25 Jun 2026 · Ayes 87, Noes 42 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate...
25 Jun 2026 · Ayes 98, Noes 39 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate...
25 Jun 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Budget
25 Jun 2026 · Ayes 89, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No...
24 Jun 2026 · Ayes 87, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED NO
About this page
This page tracks Tim Wilson's parliamentary activity: questions asked and answered in Question Time, debates spoken in, and votes in divisions. Summaries are in reported speech, not transcripts; each one links to the official record.