Question Time AU

Matter of Public Importance

Fuel

House of Representatives · Tuesday 24 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on fuel shortages, rising prices, and their impact on the cost of living, triggered by global conflicts and domestic supply chain issues. Opposition members argued that the government had failed to secure adequate supplies, leading to rationing effects and severe hardship for farmers and families, while attributing inflation to excessive government spending. Government members countered that the crisis was driven by external geopolitical events and a spike in demand, highlighting measures such as releasing fuel reserves, amending fuel standards, and increasing penalties for price gouging. The discussion also touched on broader economic management, with the opposition criticising the government's fiscal record and the government defending its cost-of-living relief packages.

Outcome

The motion was debated as a matter of public importance; no vote was taken.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Wilson argued that the government was failing to manage the economy, citing record inflation, high interest rates, and fuel shortages affecting 166 petrol stations. Wilson claimed that government spending was driving inflation and that the administration was linked to corruption through the CFMEU, comparing the situation to international scandals. Wilson asserted that the government was borrowing from the future and would eventually impose new taxes on Australians to cover deficits. Wilson contended that the opposition offered a better alternative for economic stability and growth.

Government response

Leigh argued that the opposition offered slogans rather than solutions, noting that the previous government had overseen the closure of refineries and held fuel reserves overseas. Leigh outlined three government strategies: coordinating supply through a dedicated coordinator, releasing 20 per cent of national fuel reserves, and cracking down on anticompetitive conduct with increased ACCC penalties. Leigh stated that Australia had sufficient fuel stocks, including over 1.6 billion litres of petrol, and that the government was working to end the Middle East conflict. Leigh criticised the shadow treasurer for previously advocating for higher interest rates and opposing wage increases.

Opposition response

Kennedy argued that inflation was running at record levels compared to other advanced economies, exacerbated by high government spending. Kennedy claimed the energy minister lacked control over the situation, citing an inability to answer questions about fuel shortages in specific states during question time. Kennedy highlighted the impact on businesses and individuals, including a business owner fearing self-harm and a woman losing her home. Kennedy asserted that the government had failed to protect Australians from external shocks and that fuel shortages were affecting essential sectors like agriculture and construction.