Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Treasury Laws Amendment (Strengthening Accountability for Tax Adviser Misconduct and Other Measures) Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Thursday 20 August 2026

Continued from Thursday 2 July 2026.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate focused on reforms to tax practitioner regulation, foreign resident capital gains tax, merger controls, and competition policy. Labor members supported the bill as necessary to close enforcement gaps exposed by the PwC scandal and ensure fair taxation of foreign investors. Independent members raised concerns about the impact of tax changes on clean energy investment, particularly regarding the initial short transition period for renewable energy concessions. The government agreed to amend the bill to extend the renewable energy capital gains tax discount until 2040. Liberal members opposed the bill, arguing it exacerbated inflation and public debt. The bill was passed after the amendments were accepted.

Outcome

The bill was read a second time and passed.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

French supported the bill, arguing it strengthened the Tax Practitioners Board's enforcement powers following the PwC leaks scandal. French noted that the legislation provided a broader range of proportionate sanctions for misconduct, including criminal penalties for unregistered preparers. French explained that the reforms clarified foreign resident capital gains tax rules to ensure investors pay tax on assets connected to Australian land and resources. French highlighted a specific 50 per cent capital gains tax discount for qualifying foreign institutional investors in renewable energy assets until 30 June 2030 to support the energy transition. French also welcomed amendments to the merger regime that made voiding transactions more targeted and reduced unnecessary reporting for low-risk investments.

Opposition response

Wilson opposed the bill, characterising the government as prioritising donors over the economic welfare of Australians. Wilson argued that the legislation was part of a broader pattern of increasing public debt and stoking inflation to fund government spending. Wilson claimed the tax reforms favoured specific industries while burdening ordinary taxpayers and self-managed superannuants. Wilson asserted that the government's fiscal policies were driving a decline in living standards and increasing unemployment. Wilson concluded that the bill would turbocharge the government's inflationary agenda rather than improve economic outcomes.