Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion

Opened the debate

Leeser argued that the Royal Commission was established under severe time constraints imposed by the government, which initially opposed the inquiry. Leeser contended that the commission had failed to hold key figures accountable, including leaders from arts institutions, universities, protest organisers, and government ministers. Leeser called for an immediate extension of the reporting date to allow for the examination of evidence from these groups and for ministers to appear before the commission. Leeser asserted that without this accountability, the commission would fail to address the root causes of the rise in antisemitism.

Government response

Burke sought an indulgence to move a procedural motion to adjourn the debate. Burke stated that the purpose was to ensure a vote on the procedural matter was not viewed as a division within parliament regarding the rejection of antisemitism. Burke affirmed that all members unanimously rejected the horrific nature of antisemitism and the terrorist attack at Bondi. Burke moved that the debate be adjourned to maintain unity on the core issue while acknowledging differences on the commission's timeline.

Opposition response

Wilson seconded the motion, emphasising the need to address the escalation of antisemitism following the events of 7 October 2023. Wilson argued that the commission must investigate the root causes of the violence and harassment experienced by Jewish Australians, particularly in universities and through protest activities. Wilson highlighted the resignation of commissioner Dennis Richardson as a reason to ensure thoroughness in the inquiry. Wilson called for accountability from university leaders, unions, and government ministers who had failed to provide adequate leadership during the crisis.