Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Treasury Laws Amendment (Supporting Choice in Superannuation and Other Measures) Bill 2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Wednesday 11 February 2026

Continued from Wednesday 26 November 2025.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on the Treasury Laws Amendment (Supporting Choice in Superannuation and Other Measures) Bill 2025, with Coalition members opposing the bundling of superannuation reforms with unrelated tax and trade measures as wedge politics. Government members defended the legislation as necessary protections against duplicate fees and aggressive marketing, while also supporting wine industry rebates and international tax agreements. Independent member Allegra Spender raised concerns about reduced competition and moved an amendment for a review, whereas One Nation and National Party members highlighted issues regarding collapsed super funds. The discussion concluded without a recorded vote in the provided transcript segment.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

O'Brien moved an amendment to note the coalition's support for specific schedules while opposing the superannuation measures. O'Brien argued that the government had cynically bundled unrelated policies to force a false choice on parliament. O'Brien contended that the superannuation reforms restricted competition and benefited union-backed industry funds at the expense of retail funds and individual choice. O'Brien highlighted concerns about the timing of advertising bans during employee onboarding and the lack of regulatory detail for implementation. O'Brien also linked the bill to broader government spending pressures and previous failed tax proposals.