Question Time AU

General Debate

Personal Information and Privacy; Order for the Production of Documents

Senate · Monday 17 August 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senator David Shoebridge moved a motion requiring the production of documents from the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner. The motion rejected government claims of public interest immunity and legal professional privilege, arguing these did not justify withholding the records. It demanded the release of specific correspondence and determinations by a set deadline, allowing only for redactions that could cause harm to individuals. The Senate passed the motion by a vote of 34 to 23.

Outcome

The motion was passed by a division of 34 to 23.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Shoebridge argued that the government had failed to comply with a previous Senate order for document production. Shoebridge rejected the Attorney-General's claims of public interest immunity and legal professional privilege, stating that the government had not demonstrated how disclosure would cause harm or prejudice legal proceedings. Shoebridge noted that the Senate has previously rejected assertions that privileged legal advice should remain undisclosed. Shoebridge moved that the Minister produce the full text of the determination and all relevant correspondence with American Express Australia Limited by 5 pm on 18 August 2026, subject only to necessary redactions.

Votes during this debate

Division 4: Personal Information and Privacy; Order for the Production of Documents Passed 34–23