Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Defence Legislation Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 2) Bill 2026; Second Reading

Senate · Thursday 17 September 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Senate debated the second tranche of legislation implementing recommendations from the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide. The bill aims to improve information sharing, modernise defence health governance, support families, and enforce integrity standards. All parties supported the bill, though the Coalition emphasised the need for robust privacy safeguards and effective implementation. The Greens also called for a formal apology and financial redress for LGBTQIA+ personnel historically discriminated against by the ADF.

Outcome

The bill was read a second time.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Shoebridge indicated the Greens would support the bill, which implements approximately 20 royal commission recommendations. Shoebridge highlighted provisions extending support to former spouses and partners after separation to address mental health burdens on families. Shoebridge noted the explicit prohibition on individuals sentenced for sexual offences joining the ADF. Shoebridge argued the legislation addresses the lack of a safe culture for speaking up within Defence by protecting disclosures related to wellbeing and safety. Shoebridge credited veterans for their evidence and affirmed that the Greens do not view defence members as disposable.

Government response

McAllister stated the government had agreed to 104 of the 122 royal commission recommendations and was implementing them at pace. McAllister outlined that the bill amends the Defence Act and Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act to deliver direct benefits such as enhanced information sharing and earlier intervention for at-risk individuals. McAllister noted improvements in defence health services, stronger entry and separation protections, and better family support including safe separation options. McAllister also tabled an addendum to the explanatory memorandum addressing scrutiny committee concerns. McAllister acknowledged the companion bill establishing an extinguishment scheme for historical homosexual service offences and confirmed a formal apology would be issued.

Opposition response

Smith announced the Coalition's support for the bill, noting it was established by the former Coalition government. Smith emphasised that support was cautious and predicated on the reforms delivering tangible improvements rather than adding administrative complexity. Smith supported the new framework for sharing information between Defence and Veterans' Affairs but stressed the need for rigorous scrutiny of privacy safeguards. Smith endorsed the modernisation of defence health governance and the automatic separation of personnel imprisoned for serious violent or sexual offences. Smith concluded that the true measure of the legislation would be the lived experience of personnel and families.