Question Time AU

Take Note Debate

KPMG Australia

Senate · Monday 29 June 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senator Pocock moved a motion to take note of answers regarding the government's engagement with KPMG. She criticised the decision to award a $1.3 million contract to KPMG for ethics training while the firm faced allegations of lying to parliament and cheating on exams. Pocock argued that the government had failed to act on years of evidence regarding corrupt behaviour in the big four accounting firms. She called for stronger regulatory measures, including breaking up the firms and ensuring they meet standard tax obligations. The debate highlighted public cynicism towards major parties due to perceived inaction on corporate accountability.

Outcome

The motion was moved by Senator Pocock to take note of the answers given by the Minister for Finance.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Barbara Pocock (SA) (Australian Greens) Greens

Pocock argued that the government's decision to contract KPMG for ethics training was contradictory given the firm's history of misconduct. Pocock cited specific allegations including lying to parliament, cheating on exams, and misusing confidential information. Pocock stated that the $1.3 million contract for training senior public servants undermined trust in the institution. Pocock criticised the government for relying on a code of conduct rather than implementing stronger remedies. Pocock called for the breakup of the big four partnerships and insisted they should face the same tax and whistleblower obligations as other corporations.