Ted O'Brien
Liberal Party Member for Fairfax
Currently sitting
Photo: Commonwealth of Australia (Regional Development Australia, Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and th, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Seat and party history (1)
- Liberal Party - Fairfax (House) - 2 Jul 2016 to present
- Seat and party records: OpenAustralia member data.
Contact
Electorate office: (07) 5479 2800
17 Southern Drive, Maroochydore QLD 4558
Office details: Parliament of Australia, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Contact details on aph.gov.au Profile on OpenAustraliaNot sure if this is your member? Find your electorate (AEC)
These counts cover what is on this site only. They do not measure electorate work or committee work.
Compared with other members
Ted O'Brien compared with all 150 sitting House members.
Questions asked in Question Time
Higher than 98% of House members- This member
- 35
- Average
- 11.2
- Median
- 12
Debates spoken in
Lower than 61% of House members- This member
- 23
- Average
- 35.9
- Median
- 30.5
Votes cast
Lower than 93% of House members- This member
- 162
- Average
- 253.0
- Median
- 265
Share of divisions voted in
Lower than 94% of House members- This member
- 49%
- Average
- 79%
- Median
- 81%
Read these with care
- The median is the middle member: half did more, half did less. It is less affected by a few very active members than the average.
- Ministers answer questions rather than ask them, and the presiding officers rarely vote, so their patterns differ.
- Government backbenchers are often given arranged "Dorothy Dixer" questions, which raises their question counts.
- Votes only record ayes and noes, so a missed vote cannot be told apart from a pair (an agreed absence).
- Counts cover only what is on this site, and do not measure electorate or committee work. New members have less history.
Question Time
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked if the Prime Minister could assure the House that no official or private correspondence from Japan had been leaked by his office or department, and what steps had been taken to verify this.
Background: The Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs asked about alleged leaks of private correspondence from the Japanese government.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that the government takes its obligations and engagement with Japan seriously. He noted that the opposition had referred matters to the Australian Federal Police (AFP) in a political stunt. He affirmed that the AFP is independent and expressed confidence in their work.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked if the Prime Minister would follow the example of owning up to mistakes, referencing his previous refusals to apologise to the Japanese Prime Minister.
Background: The Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs asked again about the Prime Minister's refusal to apologise for podcast comments.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister reiterated that relations with Japan were stronger than ever and strategically aligned. He highlighted the procurement of Mogami-class frigates and enhanced defence cooperation. He mentioned the establishment of the Australia-Japan Leadership Dialogue to address key issues. He expressed confidence in the positive relationship with the Japanese Prime Minister and regional leaders.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked why the government appeared weak in protecting borders given recent security incidents.
Background: Recent incidents included gunfire at a Border Force vessel, a major cocaine seizure, and illegal arrivals in Queensland.
Answer from Tony Burke
The minister expressed pride in Border Force for successfully intercepting drugs and handling aggressive situations, noting that no people smuggling operation has succeeded in over a decade. He refuted the claim of weakness by stating that all recent illegal arrivals were removed. He criticized the opposition leader for supporting the release of surveillance information, arguing this provides people smugglers with the intelligence they seek.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member sought confirmation of the debt milestone.
Background: The member asked if the Treasurer would confirm that Australia's debt would soon hit $1 trillion for the first time.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated that the government had reduced debt by $176 billion compared to when it took office, saving $60 billion in interest costs. He noted debt as a share of GDP had fallen from nearly 45 per cent to 37 per cent. He argued that the previous government's budget had projected debt crossing the trillion-dollar threshold two years prior, and that current surpluses had delayed that milestone.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked why the Treasurer would not explain the $57 billion budget black hole, noting that neither the Treasury Secretary nor the Parliamentary Budget Office could explain it.
Background: The member cited reports of a $57 billion blowout in medium-term budget forecasts.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated that the issue had been addressed in estimates and that the main drivers were lower receipts and provisions for a hospitals deal. He noted that the Treasury figure was $54 billion, not $57 billion. The Treasurer argued that the opposition's medium-term forecast was $142 billion weaker than the government's, implying their policies would cause a larger deterioration. He challenged the opposition to specify how much they would cut from hospital funding.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member quoted the Reserve Bank Governor regarding persistent high inflation and asked when inflation would come down.
Background: The Reserve Bank Governor stated that inflation would remain above target for six years, prompting questions about when prices would stabilise.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated that Reserve Bank forecasts indicated inflation would peak around the middle of the year before trailing away. He highlighted government actions to lower inflation, including tax cuts and cost-of-living assistance, which he claimed the opposition opposed. He criticised the opposition's economic record, citing their support for wage stagnation and policies that would increase taxes and debt, specifically blaming the members for Fairfax and Hume for undermining economic credibility.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked if the Treasurer would concede that the commentator had a point regarding government spending and interest rates.
Background: A finance commentator criticised the Treasurer for not tightening government spending, attributing the interest rate rise to fiscal policy.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer rejected the premise, arguing that the opposition's logic was inconsistent because they did not attribute falling inflation and rate cuts to government policy last year. He stated that the Reserve Bank governor identified private demand, not public spending, as the driver of recent inflationary pressure. He criticised the opposition for being divided and dishonest on economic matters.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked whether the Treasurer would apologize for allegedly misrepresenting comments by economist Diana Mousina regarding the government's contribution to inflation.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer challenged the Treasurer's previous citation of an economist, claiming the economist had stated the government was contributing to inflation, and asked for an apology.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated he took responsibility for his role in fighting inflation but maintained that his citation of the economist was accurate. He argued that the economist's comments reflected the fact that private demand growth had contributed more to economic growth than public demand in 2025. He cited the Reserve Bank governor and monetary policy statements to support the view that private demand was stronger than expected, while the contribution of public demand to GDP growth had eased.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked whether the Prime Minister would rule out raising capital gains tax on housing, given previous commitments to protect negative gearing.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer asked the Prime Minister to rule out raising capital gains tax on housing, citing previous promises to protect negative gearing.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister pointed out that a Senate select committee, including Liberal and National senators, was already examining the capital gains tax discount. He highlighted government actions such as the Housing Australia Future Fund, which had helped 220,000 Australians into their first home, and partnerships with states to build 100,000 new homes. He also mentioned training more tradespeople through free TAFE and utilizing Defence land for housing supply.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked when the Treasurer would admit that controlling spending is necessary to prevent further interest rate rises, citing AMP economist Shane Oliver.
Background: Economists have suggested government spending contributes to inflation, prompting questions about fiscal responsibility.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer disputed the view that government spending is the primary driver of inflation, citing economists from AMP, Commonwealth Bank, and Westpac who noted that public sector demand growth is slowing or has peaked. He confirmed that savings would be included in the May budget, highlighting $114 billion in savings found so far and a $233 billion improvement in the budget. He criticized the opposition for running larger deficits during their term and for proposing higher deficits in the election.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked if the Treasurer expected Australians to believe that numerous economists were wrong about government spending driving inflation.
Background: Multiple economists have linked government spending to inflation, contradicting the Treasurer's stance.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer argued that the opposition's own policies of higher deficits would worsen inflation. He cited economists from AMP, Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, and Access Economics who noted that public sector demand growth is slowing or has peaked. He reiterated the Reserve Bank Governor's view that private demand was stronger than expected, driving the recent inflation uptick.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked if the Treasurer was suggesting the RBA Governor was wrong to cite public demand as a factor in the rate rise.
Background: The RBA Governor cited aggregate demand, including public demand, as a factor in the rate rise.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated that the Governor's primary point was that private demand recovered faster than anticipated. He quoted the Governor's response to a specific question about government spending, which emphasized the strength of private demand. He argued that the government is acting responsibly by rolling out cost-of-living help and improving the budget, contrasting this with the opposition's lack of support for such measures.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked the Treasurer to take responsibility for the current economic situation, citing high inflation, rising interest rates, and falling real wages, arguing the government was failing on the metrics it previously highlighted.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer referenced the Treasurer's past comments on taking responsibility for economic management during high inflation.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated he took responsibility for his role in fighting inflation and managing the budget, which he claimed was stronger than when inherited. He highlighted cost-of-living measures such as tax cuts, cheaper medicines, and free TAFE. He argued that the opposition had left the government with higher inflation and larger deficits, and had campaigned on policies for higher taxes and debt. He noted that real wages had grown for two years and inflation had decreased.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked the Treasurer to take responsibility for the 13th interest rate rise under Labor, citing economist claims that fiscal guardrails had been removed.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer cited economists blaming the government for inflation and asked for accountability.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer repeated that the Reserve Bank and other economists attributed inflation pressure to private demand, not public spending. He cited specific economists to support this view. He stated he took responsibility for his role in fighting inflation and cleaning up the previous government's economic mess, which included higher inflation and larger deficits. He argued the opposition was not credible on economic management.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked the Treasurer to rule out future interest rate rises this year, citing the Reserve Bank's statement on persistent inflation.
Background: The Reserve Bank stated inflation would remain above target for some time.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated that the Reserve Bank makes independent decisions and the government does not set interest rates. He reiterated that the Reserve Bank's statement attributed inflation pressure to private demand, not government spending. He emphasized the government's role in managing the budget and providing cost-of-living relief, while the Reserve Bank managed monetary policy. He argued the opposition's campaign blaming government spending was dishonest.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked the Prime Minister to address struggling mortgage holders who were paying significantly higher interest rates compared to the previous government's tenure, citing economic failure and high inflation.
Background: Inflation was reported to be above the Reserve Bank of Australia's target band, with markets suggesting potential interest rate hikes. The question highlighted the cost of living pressures on mortgage holders.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister rejected the characterization of economic failure, noting that interest rates had decreased three times that year and inflation was half of what it was when the government took office. He highlighted that 1.2 million additional Australians were in jobs and wages had risen for eight consecutive quarters. He listed cost-of-living measures including free TAFE, cheaper medicines, and student debt relief, stating these were opposed by the opposition.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked what the Prime Minister had to say to struggling mortgage holders facing no relief in interest rates, given that inflation was accelerating and government spending was continuing.
Background: ABS data showed accelerating inflation, leading to speculation that the Reserve Bank of Australia would keep mortgage rates on hold, affecting mortgage holders before Christmas.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister noted that three interest rate cuts had occurred in 2025, providing relief to borrowers. He criticized the Coalition's rhetoric regarding a 'culture of dependency,' arguing that it attacked pensioners, public sector workers, and those receiving support. He stated that the Coalition had previously proposed cutting public sector jobs and opposing work-from-home arrangements. He challenged the opposition to specify which spending they considered wasteful, asserting that the government's focus was on helping people earn and keep more of their income.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked the Treasurer to admit that his fiscal policies were preventing the Reserve Bank from offering further interest rate relief, given the disparity between government and household consumption growth.
Background: The Reserve Bank of Australia forecast that further rate relief might not return inflation to the 2 to 3 per cent target. National accounts showed government consumption growing faster than household consumption.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated that the Reserve Bank had explicitly clarified that government spending was not a factor in its recent decisions, having downgraded expectations for public spending in its forecasts. He emphasized that the private sector had resumed its role as the primary driver of economic growth, with public demand making no contribution to growth in the last two quarters. He noted that three interest rate cuts had occurred this year, including two after the March budget, and highlighted the delivery of two budget surpluses and a reduced deficit. He criticized the shadow Treasurer's proposal for nuclear power as economically irresponsible.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked the Prime Minister to take responsibility for high government spending, which he claimed was driving inflation and preventing interest rate cuts for mortgage holders.
Background: The Reserve Bank of Australia kept interest rates on hold, prompting questions about government spending impacts.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer denied that the Reserve Bank linked its decision to government spending, stating the Governor did not mention it in the statement. He contrasted the current government's two budget surpluses and 1.7 per cent real spending growth with the previous government's nine deficits and 4.1 per cent spending growth. He noted that national debt was $188 billion lower than the previous trajectory, saving tens of billions in interest.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked whether the Treasurer would take responsibility for economic mismanagement given the reported economic difficulties.
Background: The member listed various economic challenges, including high energy prices, falling living standards, and rising debt.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated that the government took responsibility for addressing economic challenges but highlighted that it had inherited high inflation and large deficits. He noted that inflation had been halved, two budget surpluses had been delivered, and debt had been reduced by $188 billion. He argued that the opposition had opposed tax cuts and cost-of-living relief measures.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked whether it was time to rein in government spending given the RBA's inflation forecasts and spending rates.
Background: The member cited RBA forecasts showing inflation peaking above the target band and not returning until 2027.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated that the Reserve Bank had revised down the contribution of public spending to inflation. He noted that the RBA expected a moderation in inflation in December and that the government's fiscal position was strong, with low debt-to-GDP ratios. He argued that the opposition's claim that government spending drove inflation was contradicted by recent rate cuts.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked whether the Prime Minister would rein in the Treasurer's spending to alleviate mortgage stress, citing high inflation and increased interest payments for households compared to when the coalition left office.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer accused the Prime Minister of forcing a backflip on super tax and claimed inflation had hit its highest level in 212 years, asking if the Prime Minister would stop the Treasurer's spending spree to help mortgage holders.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister dismissed the question by referencing the Shadow Treasurer's previous promotion and the opposition's $600 billion nuclear power plan. He argued that the opposition would cut cost-of-living measures if elected. He defended the government's superannuation reforms, stating they affect only 0.5 per cent of people and make the system more progressive, similar to stage 3 tax cuts. He listed measures including paid parental leave super, payday super, and lifting the low-income super tax offset to $810 with an eligibility threshold increase to $45,000, asserting that Labor strengthens superannuation while the opposition opposes these changes.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked for the Treasurer's explanation for high inflation and unemployment, attributing it to government spending.
Background: Inflation data showed rates exceeding the RBA's target band.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The minister withdrew the question before answering. The Treasurer then responded by stating that the average unemployment rate under the current government was 3.9 per cent, compared to 5.6 per cent under the previous government. He noted that inflation was 6.1 per cent and rising when the current government took office, and that the government had delivered two surpluses and one smaller deficit compared to nine consecutive deficits under the previous administration.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked whose rejection most influenced the Treasurer's decision to drop the super tax proposal, listing several potential influencers.
Background: The Treasurer had previously proposed super tax changes that were later modified or dropped.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The treasurer stated he did not take advice from the opposition, criticising their past policies on income tax and superannuation. He asserted the government worked through issues collegiately to deliver outcomes for working people, including real wage growth and tax cuts. He dismissed the question as political scuttlebutt and emphasised the government's focus on delivering better retirement outcomes for workers.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked the Treasurer to explain the economic impact of the government's alleged new carbon tax.
Background: The member claimed Treasury officials confirmed a planned carbon tax of around $300 a tonne.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer denied the premise, stating that Treasury modelling does not assume an economy-wide carbon price is in place, as it is not government policy. He argued that the government's orderly transition is the best way to grow the economy, contrasting it with the opposition's disorderly approach which he claimed would cost jobs and investment.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked whether the Treasurer would implement specific fiscal rules to limit government expenditure.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer asked if the Treasurer would introduce quantifiable fiscal rules to control spending.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer criticized the opposition's previous fiscal rules, claiming they led to higher taxes and deficits. He stated the government had improved the budget position, reduced debt as a share of the economy, and banked upward revenue revisions. He cited turning deficits into surpluses, finding $100 billion in savings, limiting real spending growth to 1.7 per cent, and reducing debt by $177 billion. He noted debt-to-GDP had fallen from 45 per cent to 37 per cent.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked the Prime Minister to insist the Treasurer introduce fiscal rules, alleging the government planned to spend all upward revenue revisions plus an additional $26 billion.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer challenged the Treasurer's claim of banking revenue revisions, citing a pre-election budget figure of $8 billion.
Answer from Anthony Albanese; Jim Chalmers
The Prime Minister defended the Treasurer's record, criticizing the opposition's past failures to deliver surpluses and their election promises of higher taxes. The Treasurer added that the government had banked about 70 per cent of upward revenue revisions, compared to 40 per cent under the opposition and 30 per cent under the Howard government. He reiterated that the government had turned deficits into surpluses and reduced debt, contrasting this with the opposition's record of deficits and increased debt.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked if the Treasurer agreed with Paul Keating's view that the government's superannuation tax changes were unfair, particularly regarding young workers hitting higher thresholds.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer asked the Treasurer about former Prime Minister Paul Keating's criticism of the government's superannuation tax changes as 'unconscionable'.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer contrasted the government's tax cuts for all workers with the opposition's focus on protecting those with over $3 million in super. He acknowledged his respect for Paul Keating but stated they had different views on this issue. He emphasized the government's commitment to increasing the superannuation guarantee to 12 per cent and ensuring the sustainability of super concessions. He criticized the opposition for historically undermining superannuation.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked what the Treasurer would say to Australians given the spike in unemployment and other economic challenges.
Background: The shadow treasurer cited high inflation, productivity collapse, and rising unemployment to challenge the government's economic record.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated that unemployment was lower on average than under any government in the last 50 years. He argued that inflation had decreased from the 6 per cent range to the 2 per cent range since the government took office. He claimed real wages had grown for 18 consecutive months and that living standards were recovering. He highlighted budget surpluses and reduced debt compared to the previous term.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked the Treasurer to identify the colleague who opposed taxing unrealised capital gains and to justify taxing money not yet received.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer asked the Treasurer about a report that a government colleague opposed taxing unrealised capital gains, citing concerns from the labour movement.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer did not identify the colleague but defended the superannuation system, noting the increase of the super guarantee to 12 per cent. He stated that concessional treatments for super would remain generous and that the changes were necessary to ensure the sustainability of the system and the budget.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked if the Assistant Treasurer could confirm that 1.2 million Australians would be affected by the super tax, based on a previous 10 per cent estimate.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer asked the Assistant Treasurer to confirm if the previously stated 10 per cent figure for taxpayers affected by the super tax meant at least 1.2 million Australians would be impacted.
Answer from Daniel Mulino
The Assistant Treasurer stated that the policy applies to around half a per cent of member funds, specifically those larger than $3 million. He argued that tax thresholds are not always indexed, citing the Coalition's previous failure to index the Division 293 threshold, and maintained that the measure is fair and modest.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked whether the government would rule out ever taxing unrealised capital gains on assets other than superannuation.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer asked the Prime Minister to rule out taxing unrealised capital gains on assets beyond superannuation.
Answer from Jim Chalmers
The Treasurer stated that the government's priority was cutting taxes for 14 million Australians, with cuts already delivered and more scheduled. He noted that the Shadow Treasurer had previously said not to rule anything out. He mentioned an upcoming economic reform roundtable where various ideas would be considered, but reaffirmed the government's commitment to tax cuts within a responsible budget.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked whether the government was considering taxing unrealised capital gains on family trusts or family homes.
Background: The Shadow Treasurer asked the Prime Minister if taxing unrealised gains on family trusts or homes was being considered.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister dismissed the question as a pre-election scare campaign. He reiterated that the government's policy was focused on tax cuts for 14 million Australians, contrasting this with the opposition's election platform of tax increases. He invited the Shadow Treasurer to contribute to the upcoming economic roundtable.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked if the Prime Minister could point to any Australian paying less for energy now than three years ago, citing a cost-of-living and energy crisis.
Background: The Shadow Minister claimed families were paying up to $1,000 more for energy than promised, despite the Prime Minister's pledge to cut bills by $275.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that inflation had fallen to 2.4 per cent and wages were rising, leading to growing pay packets. He highlighted cost-of-living measures, including a $300 energy rebate, cheaper medicines, and child care relief, all of which were opposed by the opposition. He criticized the opposition's policies, including a $600 billion nuclear plan and unspecified cuts, as harmful to Australians.
Question from Ted O'Brien
The member asked for a single example of an Australian family that had received a $275 cut to their power bill.
Background: The Shadow Minister asked for an example of a family receiving the promised $275 power bill cut.
Answer from Anthony Albanese
The Prime Minister stated that all Australian households, including the member's, had received $300 in relief as a direct result of the government's policy.
Other Parliamentary Activity
-
Australia's Foreign Relations (State and Territory Arrangements) Amendment Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
House of Representatives · Thursday 20 August 2026 · Consideration of Senate Message
Responded as shadow minister
-
Australia's Foreign Relations (State and Territory Arrangements) Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Australia's Foreign Relations (State and Territory Arrangements) Amendment Bill 2026; Consideration in Detail
House of Representatives · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Consideration in Detail
Opened this debate
-
Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 1 April 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as shadow minister
-
Migration Amendment (2026 Measures No. 1) Bill 2026; Consideration in Detail
House of Representatives · Wednesday 11 March 2026 · Consideration in Detail
Responded as shadow minister
-
Migration Amendment (2026 Measures No. 1); Second Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 10 March 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as shadow minister
-
Criminalising Re-entry Assistance for Terrorist Sympathisers The Criminal Code Amendment (Keeping Australia Safe) Bill 2026; First Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 3 March 2026 · First Reading
Responded as shadow minister
-
Appropriation Bill (No. 3) 2025-2026, Appropriation Bill (No. 4) 2025-2026, Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 2) 2025-2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 12 February 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Supporting Choice in Superannuation and Other Measures) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 11 February 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Government Spending
House of Representatives · Monday 9 February 2026 · General Debate
Opened this debate
-
Economy
House of Representatives · Tuesday 3 February 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as shadow minister
-
Bondi Beach Attack Victims
House of Representatives · Monday 19 January 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Dissent from Ruling
House of Representatives · Tuesday 25 November 2025 · General Debate
Responded as shadow minister
-
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 4 November 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Economy
House of Representatives · Thursday 30 October 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2025-2026; Consideration in Detail
House of Representatives · Wednesday 8 October 2025 · Consideration in Detail
Opened this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Strengthening Financial Systems and Other Measures) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 7 October 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2025-2026, Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2025-2026, Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 1) 2025-2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Monday 1 September 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Fiscal Policy
House of Representatives · Thursday 28 August 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Reconsiderations) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 25 March 2025 · Second Reading
Responded as shadow minister
-
Cost of Living
House of Representatives · Tuesday 25 March 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Opened this debate
-
Sunshine Coast: Infrastructure
House of Representatives · Tuesday 11 February 2025 · General Debate
Opened this debate
-
Electricity Infrastructure Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 11 February 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
- Votes recorded
- 162
- Aye votes (38.9%)
- 63
- No votes (61.1%)
- 99
Showing the latest 50 votes.
-
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare With...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 85, Noes 40 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Rearrangement
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 42, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 42, Noes 89 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 87, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 86, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 45, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 46, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 49, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Consideration of Legislation
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 43, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 95, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 95, Noes 42 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Albanese Government; Attempted Censure
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 46, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 84, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 84, Noes 34 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Economy
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 41, Noes 85 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment Bill 2026; Report from Federation Cha...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 39, Noes 90 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Australia's Foreign Relations (State and Territory Arrangements) Amendment Bi...
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 38, Noes 80 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Minister for Veterans' Affairs
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 83, Noes 44 · Passed
VOTED NO -
News Journalism Payments Bill 2026; Second Reading
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 40, Noes 83 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Third Reading
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 103, Noes 14 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Consideration in ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 102, Noes 14 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Consideration in ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 95 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Consideration in ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 96, Noes 9 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Minister for Veterans' Affairs and Defence Personnel; Attempted Censure
17 Aug 2026 · Ayes 86, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED NO -
International Relations: Australia and Japan
12 Aug 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 41 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Rearrangement
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 42 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Minister for Defence Industry; Attempted Censure
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 41 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Health Insurance Amendment (Incentive Payments and Other Measures) Bill 2026;...
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 39, Noes 92 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Joint Committee; Appointment
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 38, Noes 101 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Health Legislation Amendment (Prescribing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 20...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Health Legislation Amendment (Prescribing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 20...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 43, Noes 92 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
National Anti-Corruption Commission Joint Committee; Consideration of Senate ...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 93, Noes 45 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Member for Groom
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 102, Noes 33 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Reporting System Reform) Bill 2026; Consid...
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 98, Noes 40 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Reporting System Reform) Bill 2026; Consid...
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 91, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Albanese Government
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 91, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No...
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 97, Noes 42 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No...
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 91, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No...
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 93, Noes 44 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Aviation Consumer Protection Bill 2026, Aviation Consumer Protection (Consequ...
29 Jun 2026 · Ayes 47, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED AYE -
Prime Minister; Attempted Censure
25 Jun 2026 · Ayes 87, Noes 42 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate...
25 Jun 2026 · Ayes 98, Noes 39 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate...
25 Jun 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Budget
25 Jun 2026 · Ayes 89, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders
23 Jun 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 46 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Income Tax Rates Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026; Third Reading
4 Jun 2026 · Ayes 94, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Income Tax Rates Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026; Consideration in Det
4 Jun 2026 · Ayes 94, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED NO -
Income Tax Rates Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026; Second Reading
4 Jun 2026 · Ayes 94, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED NO
About this page
This page tracks Ted O'Brien's parliamentary activity: questions asked and answered in Question Time, debates spoken in, and votes in divisions. Summaries are in reported speech, not transcripts; each one links to the official record.