Economy

Birrell argued that government spending is unsustainable and creates inflationary pressures that harm private enterprises and taxpayers. Birrell cited examples of farmers and business owners struggling with rising energy costs and input prices, attributing these issues to the government's economic management. Birrell advocated for a competitive private sector and warned that excessive reliance on government distribution undermines economic prosperity.

Gregg attributed high electricity prices to the previous government's policy paralysis and failure to ensure adequate energy supply. Gregg defended the current government's energy strategy, which includes renewables, batteries, pumped hydro, and gas, as providing policy certainty and lower costs compared to fossil fuels. Gregg highlighted the creation of 1.5 million jobs and a low unemployment rate, contrasting this with the opposition's record of overspending and failed promises.

Kennedy challenged the government's explanation for rising energy prices, citing specific businesses in his electorate that have seen costs increase by over 70 per cent. Kennedy argued that the government's previous promises of bill reductions were false and that high energy costs are threatening manufacturing and industry, with some facilities facing bankruptcy. Kennedy claimed that Australia's energy costs are significantly higher than in comparable economies, hindering competitiveness.

Holzberger reframed government spending as necessary investment in health, housing, and skills, rather than a frivolous spree. Holzberger highlighted the immediate impact of Medicare reforms, which increased bulk-billing clinics, and noted significant progress in housing construction. Holzberger argued that investing in people and infrastructure yields long-term returns and prevents greater costs associated with inaction.

McCormack criticised the government for neglecting regional Australia, citing poor road conditions and lack of funding for regional hubs. McCormack disputed the government's debt figures and argued that electricity bills have risen by 40 per cent since the government took office. McCormack claimed that the economy is deteriorating, with struggles in transport, construction, and housing sectors, and accused the government of failing to deliver on promises.

Berry defended the government's record on cost-of-living pressures, highlighting tax cuts for lower-income earners, energy bill rebates, and investments in bulk-billing and urgent care clinics. Berry noted that the unemployment rate is at historically low levels and that over 1.1 million jobs have been created. Berry argued that these measures, combined with structural energy reforms, are designed to provide both immediate relief and long-term economic stability.

Venning argued that the government's spending and borrowing are burdening everyday Australians, particularly in regional areas, with high interest payments on national debt. Venning cited rising costs for rent, food, mortgages, and power, and claimed that regional communities are being overlooked in favour of inner-city projects. Venning called for fiscal discipline and an end to what he described as wasteful spending and tax increases.

Teesdale argued that the government's strategy is delivering tangible benefits, including tax cuts, job creation, and lower long-term energy costs through renewable energy investment. Teesdale cited research indicating that renewables are cheaper than fossil fuels and that wholesale electricity prices have been falling. Teesdale highlighted the lowest average unemployment rate in 50 years and the creation of over 1.1 million jobs, framing these as evidence of effective economic management.